Welcome and thanks for coming. Before we get started Please be sure to sign in!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome and thanks for coming. Before we get started Please be sure to sign in!
Advertisements

Panel Briefing CAREER Panel. CISE Organization and Core Research Programs CISE Cross-Cutting Programs Cross-Foundation Programs 30% 70% CISE Core Programs.
National Science Foundation
CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 9, 2014 Putting a Face on the CAREER Peer Review Process Ross Ellington Associate Vice President for Research FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY.
1 UMass Dartmouth Conflicts of Interest Policies UMass Dartmouth Liz Rodriguez February 17, 2011.
{ Navigating James Hammar Interim Assistant Director of Financial Aid and Admissions University of St. Thomas Financial Aid.
Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney Division of Environmental Biology
NSF Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney, Ph.D Adjunct, Department of Biology New Mexico State University 24 September 2008.
How to Write Grants Version 2009.
Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation FY’06 Institute Partnerships  Focus on:  Development of school-based intellectual leaders and.
Etiquette for Professors. Why is Etiquette Important? Audiences interact with the printed word as though it has a personality and that personality.
Welcome  To access audio for this webinar: Use a touchtone phone to dial Wait for the prompt to enter a code, and then enter #.
1 “Broader Impacts”: NSF Changes & SE Researcher Strategies Margaret Burnett, Lori Clarke, Sebastian Elbaum, Bill Pugh Oregon State Univ., Univ. Mass Amherst,
Edwin H. Abbott Senior Associate, CDI RESEARCH CENTERS DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOPS NORTH DAKOTA, APRIL 14 and 15, 2005 An EPSCoR Foundation Initiative Funded.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
1 Welcome to an NSF Unsolicited Panel Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport (CBET) Division.
Overview of the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) Program Office of Integrative Activities National Science.
ALMA Development Workshop FY2016 Call for Study Proposals - Mechanics Mike Shannon, Program Manager 25 March 2015.
Ensuring an Equitable Review AmeriCorps External Review Training.
National Science Foundation FastLane: An eGovernment Success Story BS
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.
oTools of Governance oBoard Responsibilities oPractical Tips/ Board Meetings oFinancial Issues oRisk Management oProfessional Standards TOPICS.
Reviewing the 2015 AmeriCorps Applications & Conducting the Review AmeriCorps External Review.
Research Conflicts of Interest: Identifying and Minimizing COI from the Perspectives of Sponsors, Faculty and the IRB Research Conflicts of Interest: Identifying.
Submitting a Proposal: Best Practices By: Anu Singh Science Assistant
NSF MRI: Decreasing the Probability of Rejection Jeanine Cook Klipsch School of Electrical and Computer Engineering New Mexico State University.
A Roadmap to Success Writing an Effective Research Grant Proposal Bob Miller, PhD Regents Professor Oklahoma State University 2011 Bob Miller, PhD Regents.
Math Department Proposal Guidance Fiscal Year 2016.
On Preparing Proposals: Comments from Both Inside and Outside NSF Xiaodong Zhang The Ohio State University.
Writing More Effective NSF Proposals Jeanne R. Small Oklahoma City, Oklahoma March 2, 2006 Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) National Science Foundation.
Community Response Fund Community Response Fund Overview of Application Process.
PAB/ICAJ Seminar1 The Public Accountancy Board & The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Jamaica Sustaining the Knowledge of Public Accountants - Seminar.
A 40 Year Perspective Dr. Frank Scioli NSF-Retired.
NSF GRFP Workshop Sept 16, 2016 Dr. Julia Fulghum
19/9/2005 Promotion and Tenure: Suggestions for Success Kimberly W. Anderson Professor Chemical and Materials Engineering.
March 2, 2008 – GEC #2 Newcomerswww.geni.net1 The GPO Solicitation Process Feedback encouraged Chip Elliott GENI Project Director Clearing.
This Thursday (November 30, 2006) You will individually select an agency where you actually would like to send your proposal. Read their instructions and.
Ethical Dilemmas and Research Misconduct
Partners Conflict of Interest Policy and Reporting October 11, 2012.
Family-Work-Life Balance: Is it always going to be like this??? A presentation geared toward PhD students who will be going on to academic, tenure-track.
Health Resources and Services Administration Division of Independent Review Objective Review Orientation Scholarships for Disadvantaged Students 1.
TeraGrid Allocations Discussion John Towns Director, Persistent Infrastructure National Center for Supercomputing Applications University of Illinois.
The Review Process o What happens to your proposal o Two Review Criteria.
You Can Get Into And Afford College! GOUCHER COLLEGE EXPLORE GOUCHER DAY
We will begin on the hour. In the meantime, feel free to chat with your classmates. "When there is a start to be made, don't step over! Start where you.
Basic Grant Writing John Hulvey Director – Sponsored Programs Office of Sponsored Programs Administration and Accounting.
Return all calls within 24 hours Return within 24 hours Grade work within 48 hours Keep in touch with our students! Help YOU finish HOPE.
WELCOME VOLUNTEERS AND MENTORS! September 30, 2015.
NSF Core Documents and Online Resources for Proposal Preparation and Post-Award Activities Jeffrey G. Ryan School of Geosciences Former NSF Program Director.
Common Sense Ethics. Everyone who enters into public service for the United States has a duty to the American people to maintain the highest standards.
Internal Audit Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.), authorizes the Inspector General to review.
LivePlan Best Practices in Deployment & Promotion Arlene Soto
Beaver Hangouts Edition. Why go to college? Financial Aid Types of Degrees Exploring Interests Preparing for College
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Academic Magnet High School 2010
Ethics in the Workplace
Considering whether to volunteer to be an NSF AISL reviewer?
Considerations in Engineering
FISH 521 Further proceedings Peer review
Rick McGee, PhD and Bill Lowe, MD Faculty Affairs and NUCATS
Welcome and thanks for coming.
Welcome and thanks for coming.
Developing and using questionnaires
North American ALMA Development Program
Writing More Effective NSF Proposals
Congratulations on your new Award!
Exec Training 2018 Covering:
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Presentation transcript:

Welcome and thanks for coming

Before we get started Please be sure to sign in!

About NSF NSF is not a “mission agency” NSF is not a “mission agency” Our goal is to promote and enable high quality in education, particularly in the higher education system, and particularly in the sciences and engineering Our goal is to promote and enable high quality in education, particularly in the higher education system, and particularly in the sciences and engineering In the research divisions, our mechanism is the research grant In the research divisions, our mechanism is the research grant

Proposal Review NSF received 44,593 proposals in FY2007 (40,075 in ’03; 31,942 in ’01) with 11,484 awards NSF received 44,593 proposals in FY2007 (40,075 in ’03; 31,942 in ’01) with 11,484 awards 96 percent of these proposals are subject to external merit review 96 percent of these proposals are subject to external merit review Your assistance in this review process is crucial to the success of NSF, and we recognize that it is a lot of work Your assistance in this review process is crucial to the success of NSF, and we recognize that it is a lot of work

NSF is a Government Agency NSF spends taxpayer’s money NSF spends taxpayer’s money We seek fair and unbiased reviews We seek fair and unbiased reviews We are required to avoid both actual conflicts of interest and the appearance of conflicts We are required to avoid both actual conflicts of interest and the appearance of conflicts

Typical Conflicts Close friend or relative Close friend or relative Same institution Same institution Student/advisor relationship Student/advisor relationship Collaboration in the past 48 months (research, proposal, paper) Collaboration in the past 48 months (research, proposal, paper) Co-edit book, journal in the past 24 months Co-edit book, journal in the past 24 months Financial interest at stake Financial interest at stake PI ran over spouse’s cat PI ran over spouse’s cat

Typical Conflicts Close friend or relative Close friend or relative Same institution Same institution Student/advisor relationship Student/advisor relationship Collaboration in the past 48 months (research, proposal, paper) Collaboration in the past 48 months (research, proposal, paper) Co-edit book, journal in the past 24 months Co-edit book, journal in the past 24 months Financial interest at stake Financial interest at stake PI ran over spouse’s cat PI ran over spouse’s cat

Appearance of a Conflict We must avoid even the appearance of a conflict We must avoid even the appearance of a conflict Persons with conflicts must recuse themselves from all discussions relating to proposals with which they have a conflict Persons with conflicts must recuse themselves from all discussions relating to proposals with which they have a conflict It is necessary that you declare all conflicts at the beginning of each panel meeting It is necessary that you declare all conflicts at the beginning of each panel meeting

Before you begin your panel session, we must have a signed Conflict of interest form Please note what you are signing— You must be aware of conflicts You may not use “insider” information for personal gain You must maintain confidentiality of the panel and its recommendations

Reviewer Duties By the end of the meeting, we must have for every proposal By the end of the meeting, we must have for every proposal –At least three reviews entered into FastLane –A summary of the panel discussion for every proposal discussed by the panel –Proposals place into one of three categories  Primary consideration (PC)  Secondary consideration (SC)  Do not consider (DNC) –All proposals in the PC and SC categories must be ranked

Written Reviews Sent verbatim to PIs Sent verbatim to PIs Comprise the major form of feedback to PIs Comprise the major form of feedback to PIs Please make sure your comments are constructive, informative and non- inflammatory Please make sure your comments are constructive, informative and non- inflammatory Please be sure to substantively address both review criteria - Intellectual Merit and Broader Impact Please be sure to substantively address both review criteria - Intellectual Merit and Broader Impact

Ethics Remember your obligations to maintain the confidentiality of the proposals and the panel recommendations Remember your obligations to maintain the confidentiality of the proposals and the panel recommendations Do not save the proposals Do not save the proposals Do not plagiarize from proposals (or any other source) Do not plagiarize from proposals (or any other source) Plagiarizing from a declined proposal constitutes breach of confidentiality Plagiarizing from a declined proposal constitutes breach of confidentiality

Anonymity and Propriety Reviewers are anonymous; we won’t tell, you must not tell Reviewers are anonymous; we won’t tell, you must not tell Your recommendations are advisory and confidential; do not inform PIs of their status Your recommendations are advisory and confidential; do not inform PIs of their status Awarded proposals go into the public domain Awarded proposals go into the public domain Declined proposals are not in the public domain; don’t distribute, use or quote them Declined proposals are not in the public domain; don’t distribute, use or quote them

This is Your Meeting We hope that you will feel free to express your opinions and make the best technical judgments that you can We hope that you will feel free to express your opinions and make the best technical judgments that you can You may wish to choose a chair for your panel to expedite the process—who has the earliest flight out? You may wish to choose a chair for your panel to expedite the process—who has the earliest flight out?

Good News/Bad News The good news—you will get reimbursed for your attendance and participation on the panel The good news—you will get reimbursed for your attendance and participation on the panel The bad news—we can’t use money; Federal law requires the use of electronic funds transfer (we need your bank account number) The bad news—we can’t use money; Federal law requires the use of electronic funds transfer (we need your bank account number) If you don’t see your reimbursement within four weeks, please let me know If you don’t see your reimbursement within four weeks, please let me know

We’re from the government, and we’re here to help And thanks for coming!

We wish you a pleasant flight home!