FISHING FOR PROFIT, NOT FISH: AN ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF MARINE RESERVE EFFECTS ON FISHERIES Crow White, Bruce Kendall, Dave Siegel, and Chris Costello.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KELP-SEA URCHIN-FISHERMEN DYNAMICS: IMPLICATIONS FOR SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT Nicolas Gutierrez SAFS - UW R Hilborn, AE Punt, LW Botsford, D Armstrong,
Advertisements

WHERE IS F3 IN MODELING LARVAL DISPERSAL? Satoshi Mitarai, David Siegel University of California, Santa Barbara, CA Kraig Winters Scripps Institution of.
Population Genetics Kellet’s whelk Kelletia kelletii mtDNA COI & 11 microsatellite markers 28 sampling sites across entire range larvae in each capsule.
UNIT 5: Fish biology.
Simulating Larval Dispersal in the Santa Barbara Channel James R. Watson 1, David A. Siegel 1, Satoshi Mitarai 1, Lie-Yauw Oey 2, Changming Dong 3 1 Institute.
ROMS Modeling for Marine Protected Area (MPA) Connectivity Satoshi Mitarai, Dave Siegel, James Watson (UCSB) Charles Dong & Jim McWilliams (UCLA) A biocomplexity.
Caring for The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park & World Heritage Area Dr Laurence McCook, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Pew Fellow in Marine.
Population Connectivity and Management of an Emerging Commercial Fishery Crow White ESM 242 ProjectMay 31, 2007.
Marine reserves and fishery profit: practical designs offer optimal solutions. Crow White, Bruce Kendall, Dave Siegel, and Chris Costello University of.
FISHING FOR PROFIT, NOT FISH: AN ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF MARINE RESERVE EFFECTS ON FISHERIES Crow White, Bruce Kendall, Dave Siegel, and Chris Costello.
Lagrangian Descriptions of Marine Larval Dispersion David A. Siegel Brian P. Kinlan Brian Gaylord Steven D. Gaines Institute for Computational Earth System.
A SCALING TOOL TO ACCOUNT FOR INHERENT STOCHASTICITY IN LARVAL DISPERSAL Mitarai S., Siegel D. A., Warner R.R., Kendall B.E., Gaines S.D., Costello C.J.
Brian Kinlan UC Santa Barbara Integral-difference model simulations of marine population genetics.
Citations 1.Poulain, P. M. and P. P. Niiler Statistical-Analysis of the Surface Circulation in the California Current System Using Satellite-Tracked.
Flow, Fish and Fishing 2007 All-Hands Meeting. F3’s Bottom Line… Larval transport is a stochastic process driven by coastal stirring Fish stocks, yields.
Mary L. Frost Introduction The diversity-promoting effects of nonlinear dynamics in variable environments (1, 2) may be an important component of the maintenance.
Can Marine Reserves bolster fishery yields?. NO RESERVES RESERVES (E = 0% outside) Larvae-on- larvae density dependence equal.
Marine reserves and fishery profit: practical designs offer optimal solutions. Crow White, Bruce Kendall, Dave Siegel, and Chris Costello University of.
Flow, Fish and Fishing 2006 All-Hands Meeting July UCSB.
Stochastic Transport Generates Coexistence in a Nearshore Multi-Species Fishery Heather Berkley, Satoshi Mitarai, Bruce Kendall, David Siegel, Robert Warner.
Population Dynamics in a Stirred, not Mixed, Ocean Bruce Kendall, David Siegel, Christopher Costello, Stephen Gaines, Ray Hilborn, Robert Warner, Kraig.
Examining the interaction of density dependence and stochastic dispersal over several life history scenarios Heather Berkley Bruce Kendall David Siegel.
Optimal Spatial Fishery Management for the Southern California Bight Dave Siegel, Chris Costello, Satoshi Mitarai (UCSB), Jim McWilliams & Charles Dong.
Marine reserve spacing and fishery yield: practical designs offer optimal solutions. Crow White, Bruce Kendall, Dave Siegel, and Chris Costello University.
Harvesting stochastic, spatially connected fisheries Christopher Costello (UCSB) Stephen Polasky (UMN) F3 All-Hands-On July 12, 2006 Santa Barbara, CA.
Scaling of Larval Transport in the Coastal Ocean Satoshi Mitarai, Dave Siegel, Kraig Winters Postdoctoral Researcher University of California, Santa Barbara.
Flow, Fish and Fishing: Building Spatial Fishing Scenarios Dave Siegel, James Watson, Chris Costello, Crow White, Satoshi Mitarai, Dan Kaffine, Will White,
SIMULATION SETUP Modeled after conditions found in the central coast of California (CalCOFI line 70) during a typical July Domain is unstructured in alongshore.
Using Climate Information in Fisheries Stock Assessments (with a focus on Pacific Whiting) Ian Taylor SMA 550: Climate Impacts on the Pacific Northwest.
Inherent Uncertainties in Nearshore Fisheries: The Biocomplexity of Flow, Fish and Fishing Dave Siegel 1, Satoshi Mitarai 1, Crow White 1, Heather Berkley.
“Fishing” Actually, coupled Flow, Fish and Fishing.
Modeling MPAs in regulated fisheries: assessing the role of larval dispersal distance Carey McGilliard and Ray Hilborn July 12, 2006.
Poaching and the Success of Marine Reserves Suresh A. Sethi School of Aquatic and Fisheries Sciences 7/06.
Economics, Density Dependence and the Efficacy of Marine Reserves Crow White Ph.D. Chapter.
Scaling of larval dispersal in the coastal ocean Satoshi Mitarai Postdoctoral Researcher University of California, Santa Barbara.
Inherent Uncertainties in Nearshore Fisheries: The Biocomplexity of Flow, Fish and Fishing Dave Siegel 1, Satoshi Mitarai 1, Crow White 1, Heather Berkley.
Spatial Bioeconomics under Uncertainty (with Application) Christopher Costello* September, 2007 American Fisheries Society Annual Meeting San Francisco,
Fishing in a stirred ocean: sustainable harvest can increase spatial variation in fish populations Heather Berkley Bruce Kendall, David Siegel, Christopher.
Spatial and Temporal Patterns in Modeling Marine Fisheries Heather Berkley.
Fishing in a stirred ocean: sustainable harvest can increase spatial variation in fish populations Heather Berkley Bruce Kendall David Siegel.
Examining the interaction of density dependence and stochastic dispersal over several life history scenarios Heather Berkley Bruce Kendall David Siegel.
Reserve design There’s a lot of crap out there We are in a position to inform how to do this intelligently.
Andrew Rassweiler 1, Chris Costello 1, Dave Siegel 1, Giulio De Leo 2, Fiorenza Micheli 3, Andrew Rosenberg University of California Santa Barbara.
“IDEALIZED” WEST COAST SIMULATIONS Numerical domain Boundary conditions Forcings Wind stress: modeled as a Gaussian random process - Statistics (i.e.,
Spatial fisheries management for conservation and profitability Christopher Costello* University of California and National Bureau of Economic Research.
Partnership for Interdisciplinary Studies of Coastal Oceans PISCO.
Spatial management of renewable resources under uncertainty Preliminary results on the economics of coupled Flow, Fish and Fishing Christopher Costello*
A REVIEW OF BIOLOGICAL REFERENCE POINTS AND MANAGEMENT OF THE CHILEAN JACK MACKEREL Aquiles Sepúlveda Instituto de Investigación Pesquera, Av. Colón 2780,
Fisheries in the Seas Fish life cycles: Egg/sperm pelagic larvaejuvenile (first non-feeding – critical period – then feeding) (first non-feeding – critical.
Economic impacts of changes in fish population dynamics: the role of the fishermen’s behavior Dipl.-Geogr. Peter Michael Link, BA Research Unit Sustainability.
Flow, Fish and Fishing Dave Siegel, Chris Costello, Steve Gaines, Bruce Kendall, Satoshi Mitarai & Bob Warner [UCSB] Ray Hilborn [UW] Steve Polasky [UMn]
Marine Conservation Marine protected areas and reserves.
Santa Barbara Coastal LTER & California’s Marine Protected Areas Dave Siegel University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara Coastal LTER.
Fisheries 101: Modeling and assessments to achieve sustainability Training Module July 2013.
Issues of Scale Both time & space – Time: waves, tides, day, year, ENSO – Space: local, regional, global Set how processes interact Scale invariance.
Steve Gaines Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Sustainable Fisheries Group UC Santa Barbara12 May 2011.
Hydrodynamic Connectivity in Marine Population Dynamics Satoshi Mitarai 1, David A. Siegel 1, Bruce E. Kendall 1, Robert R. Warner 1, Steven D. Gaines.
Current Oversights in Marine Reserve Design. MARINE RESERVE DATA BASE 81 studies, 102 measurements Halpern, in press.
The influence of climate on cod, capelin and herring in the Barents Sea Dag Ø. Hjermann (CEES, Oslo) Nils Chr. Stenseth (CEES, Oslo & IMR, Bergen) Geir.
Spatial models (meta-population models). Readings Hilborn R et al. (2004) When can marine reserves improve fisheries management? Ocean and Coastal Management.
PRINCIPLES OF STOCK ASSESSMENT. Aims of stock assessment The overall aim of fisheries science is to provide information to managers on the state and life.
US Army Engineer Research and Development Center
Science-based “rules of thumb” for the design of marine protected area networks Mark H. Carr Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of.
Estimating the minimum size for inshore no-take marine protected areas in the iSimangaliso Wetland Park based on movement patterns of surf-zone fish.
Retrospective bioeconomic analysis of Fraser River sockeye salmon fisheries management Dale Marsden, Steve Martell and Rashid Sumaila Fisheries Economics.
Special Session: Landing Obligation
How maintain marine fish population in a context of high anthropic pressure: role of shallow coastal zones Pr. Philippe LENFANT1,2; Dr. Jérémy PASTOR1,2;
A Fishery Management Index:
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Presentation transcript:

FISHING FOR PROFIT, NOT FISH: AN ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF MARINE RESERVE EFFECTS ON FISHERIES Crow White, Bruce Kendall, Dave Siegel, and Chris Costello University of California – Santa Barbara

Compared to traditional (open access) management… …reserves maintain yields: ▪ Hastings and Botsford 1999 …reserves enhance yield: ▪ Gerber et al (a review) ▪ Neubert 2003 ▪ Gaylord et al. 2005

θ = 5 θ = 0 Cost of catching one fish = Density of fish at that location θ

θ = 5 θ = 0 Bottom line for fishermen: Profit = Revenue - cost Cost of catching one fish = Density of fish at that location θ

θ = 20 θ = 0 Bottom line for fishermen: Profit = Revenue - cost Cost of catching one fish = Density of fish at that location θ

No Fishing

For coastal fish species: Myers & Cadigan 1993 Botsford & Hobbs 1995 Carr et al Caley et al Fokvord 1997 Hixon & Webster 2002 Webster 2003 Skajaa et al. In Prep.

An integro-difference model describing coastal fish population dynamics: Adult abundance at location x during time-step t+1 Number of adults harvested Natural mortality of adults that escaped being harvested Fecundity Larval survival Larval dispersal (Gaussian) (Siegel et al. 2003) Larval recruitment at x Number of larvae that successfully recruit to location x

Incorporating Density Dependence Post-dispersal: Larva settlement and/or recruitment success increases with decreasing adult population density at that location.

To maximize maximize profits, should reserves be… …few and large, What is the optimal reserve design? …or many and small? SLOSS debate

PROFIT = Revenue - Cost Initial fish density Final fish density This year’s harvest at location x

integrate PROFIT = Revenue - Cost Final fish density Initial fish density This year’s harvest at location x

FEW LARGE RESERVES SEVERAL SMALL RESERVES

Scale bar = 100 km

Max yield without reserves

Max profit without reserves

Spectrum of high-profit scenarios

Max profit without reserves Spectrum of high-profit scenarios Cost = θ/density (Stop fishing when cost = $1)

Max profit without reserves Spectrum of high-profit scenarios Cost = θ/density (Stop fishing when cost = $1) Escapement = % of virgin K (K = 100)

Max profit without reserves Spectrum of high-profit scenarios Cost = θ/density (Stop fishing when cost = $1) Escapement = % of virgin K (K = 100) Zero-profit escapement level = θ/K = 20%

Max profit without reserves Spectrum of high-profit scenarios Cost = θ/density (Stop fishing when cost = $1) Escapement = % of virgin K (K = 100) Zero-profit escapement level = θ/K = 20%

Max profit without reserves Spectrum of high-profit scenarios θ/K = 15/100 = 15%

Max profit without reserves Spectrum of high-profit scenarios θ/K = 15/100 = 15%

Max profit without reserves Spectrum of high-profit scenarios θ/K = 10/100 = 10% 10%

Max profit without reserves Spectrum of high-profit scenarios θ/K = 5/100 = 5% 10%

Summary 1.Profit is bottom line for fishermen and fisheries. 2.Fishery yield and profit maximized via…  Less than ~15% coastline in reserves …Any reserve spacing option.  More than ~15% coastline in reserves …Several small or few medium-sized reserves.

Summary 4.Reserves effects on fishery profit: ▪ Cost of fishing low/moderate: Increase profit ▪ Cost of fishing exorbitant: At best maintain profit

Summary 4.Reserves effects on fishery profit: ▪ Cost of fishing low/moderate: Increase profit ▪ Cost of fishing exorbitant: At best maintain profit 5.Near-maximum profits are maintained across a spectrum of reserve and harvest scenarios: ReservesNone Many EscapementHighLow

Summary 4.Reserves effects on fishery profit: ▪ Cost of fishing low/moderate: Increase profit ▪ Cost of fishing exorbitant: At best maintain profit 5.Near-maximum profits are maintained across a spectrum of reserve and harvest scenarios: ReservesNone Many EscapementHighLow 6. A single management strategy, based on fishermen’s self-regulated escapement levels, promotes high profits for multiple independent fisheries.

University of California – Santa Barbara National Science Foundation Coastal Environmental Quality Initiative The Canon National Parks Science Scholars Program THANK YOU!!

Older, bigger fish produce many more young