Current Research Topics -Sigcomm Sessions -QoS -Network analysis & security -Multicast -giga/tera bit routers /fast classification -web performance -TCP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spring 2003CS 4611 Quality of Service Outline Realtime Applications Integrated Services Differentiated Services.
Advertisements

Traffic and routing. Network Queueing Model Packets are buffered in egress queues waiting for serialization on line Link capacity is C bps Average packet.
Internet Protocols Steven Low CS/EE netlab.CALTECH.edu October 2004 with J. Doyle, L. Li, A. Tang, J. Wang.
Spring 2000CS 4611 Quality of Service Outline Realtime Applications Integrated Services Differentiated Services.
CSIT560 Internet Infrastructure: Switches and Routers Active Queue Management Presented By: Gary Po, Henry Hui and Kenny Chong.
CS640: Introduction to Computer Networks Aditya Akella Lecture 20 – QoS.
Quality of Service Requirements
Engineering Internet QoS
Courtesy: Nick McKeown, Stanford 1 Intro to Quality of Service Tahir Azim.
TCP Stability and Resource Allocation: Part II. Issues with TCP Round-trip bias Instability under large bandwidth-delay product Transient performance.
CPSC Topics in Multimedia Networking A Mechanism for Equitable Bandwidth Allocation under QoS and Budget Constraints D. Sivakumar IBM Almaden Research.
Copyright: RSVP The ReSerVation Protocol by Sujay koduri.
Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 1 Informal Quiz 6 T F  Video is different from data only because it requires larger bandwidth.
15-441: Computer Networking Lecture 18: QoS Thanks to David Anderson and Srini Seshan.
Comparing flow-oblivious and flow-aware adaptive routing Sara Oueslati and Jim Roberts France Telecom R&D CISS 2006 Princeton March 2006.
QoS Protocols & Architectures by Harizakis Costas.
Computer Networks Multimedia and Multicast. Outline F Multimedia Overview F Receiver-Driven Layered Multicast F UDP Sockets (coming soon) F IP Multicast.
LYU9802 Quality of Service in Wired/Wireless Communication Networks: Techniques and Evaluation Supervisor: Dr. Michael R. Lyu Marker: Dr. W.K. Kan Wan.
Traffic Sensitive Active Queue Management - Mark Claypool, Robert Kinicki, Abhishek Kumar Dept. of Computer Science Worcester Polytechnic Institute Presenter.
Real-time traffic Dr. Abdulaziz Almulhem. Almulhem©20012 Agenda RT traffic characteristic RT traffic profiles RT traffic requirements RT Architecture.
Endpoint Admission Control WebTP Presentation 9/26/00 Presented by Ye Xia Reference: L. Breslau, E. W. Knightly, S. Shenkar, I. Stoica, H. Zhang, “Endpoint.
Fundamental Design Issues for the Internet Shenker95a Slides from Christos Papadopoulos at USC.
Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 1 Informal Quiz 6: IPv6, QoS T F  Given a constant set of resources, the bandwidth and delay.
1 Quality of Service Outline Realtime Applications Integrated Services Differentiated Services.
A novel switching paradigm for buffer-less WDM networks Myungsik Yoo and Chunming Qiao EE and CSE Departments University at Buffalo (SUNY)
Multimedia Applications r Multimedia requirements r Streaming r Phone over IP r Recovering from Jitter and Loss r RTP r Diff-serv, Int-serv, RSVP.
Multicast Communication
School of Information Technologies IP Quality of Service NETS3303/3603 Weeks
CSc 461/561 CSc 461/561 Multimedia Systems Part C: 3. QoS.
Spring 2002CS 4611 Quality of Service Outline Realtime Applications Integrated Services Differentiated Services.
A Simulation Approach for Internet QoS Market Analysis Bruno Pereira Miguel Martins.
Internet Traffic Management Prafull Suryawanshi Roll No - 04IT6008.
Computer Networking Intserv, Diffserv, RSVP.
Bell Labs Advanced Technologies EMEAAT Proprietary Information © 2004 Lucent Technologies1 Overview contributions for D27 Lucent Netherlands Richa Malhotra.
Quality of Service. Overview Why QoS? When QoS? One model: Integrated services Contrast to Differentiated Services (more modern; more practical; not covered)
DaVinci: Dynamically Adaptive Virtual Networks for a Customized Internet Jennifer Rexford Princeton University With Jiayue He, Rui Zhang-Shen, Ying Li,
Internet Traffic Management. Basic Concept of Traffic Need of Traffic Management Measuring Traffic Traffic Control and Management Quality and Pricing.
CS Spring 2011 CS 414 – Multimedia Systems Design Lecture 23 - Multimedia Network Protocols (Layer 3) Klara Nahrstedt Spring 2011.
CSE QoS in IP. CSE Improving QOS in IP Networks Thus far: “making the best of best effort”
Computer Networking Intserv, Diffserv, RSVP.
QOS مظفر بگ محمدی دانشگاه ایلام. 2 Why a New Service Model? Best effort clearly insufficient –Some applications need more assurances from the network.
Changbin Liu, Lei Shi, Bin Liu Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Universal.
Quality of Service in the Internet The slides of part 1-3 are adapted from the slides of chapter 7 published at the companion website of the book: Computer.
Higashino Lab. Maximizing User Gain in Multi-flow Multicast Streaming on Overlay Networks Y.Nakamura, H.Yamaguchi and T.Higashino Graduate School of Information.
2000/3/9QoS Introduction1 References: 1.Paul Ferguson and Geoff Huston, Quality of Service, John Wiley & Sons, Xipeng Xiao and Lionel M. Ni, “Internet.
Mazumdar Ne X tworking’03 June 23-25,2003, Chania, Crete, Greece The First COST-IST(EU)-NSF(USA) Workshop on EXCHANGES & TRENDS IN N ETWORKING 1 Non-convex.
1 Quality of Service Outline Realtime Applications Integrated Services Differentiated Services MPLS.
1 [3] Jorge Martinez-Bauset, David Garcia-Roger, M a Jose Domenech- Benlloch and Vicent Pla, “ Maximizing the capacity of mobile cellular networks with.
ACN: RED paper1 Random Early Detection Gateways for Congestion Avoidance Sally Floyd and Van Jacobson, IEEE Transactions on Networking, Vol.1, No. 4, (Aug.
Wolfgang EffelsbergUniversity of Mannheim1 Differentiated Services for the Internet Wolfgang Effelsberg University of Mannheim September 2001.
Beyond Best-Effort Service Advanced Multimedia University of Palestine University of Palestine Eng. Wisam Zaqoot Eng. Wisam Zaqoot November 2010 November.
Congestion Control in CSMA-Based Networks with Inconsistent Channel State V. Gambiroza and E. Knightly Rice Networks Group
Covilhã, 30 June Atílio Gameiro Page 1 The information in this document is provided as is and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Optimizing Converged Cisco Networks (ONT) Module 3: Introduction to IP QoS.
A Practical Approach for Providing QoS: MPLS and DiffServ
DaVinci: Dynamically Adaptive Virtual Networks for a Customized Internet Jiayue He, Rui Zhang-Shen, Ying Li, Cheng-Yen Lee, Jennifer Rexford, and Mung.
UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ 2005 Multicast Admission Control in DiffServ Networks Department of Mathematical Information Technology University of Jyväskylä.
EE 122: Lecture 15 (Quality of Service) Ion Stoica October 25, 2001.
Jennifer Rexford Fall 2014 (TTh 3:00-4:20 in CS 105) COS 561: Advanced Computer Networks TCP.
Chapter 6 outline r 6.1 Multimedia Networking Applications r 6.2 Streaming stored audio and video m RTSP r 6.3 Real-time, Interactive Multimedia: Internet.
Univ. of TehranIntroduction to Computer Network1 An Introduction Computer Networks An Introduction to Computer Networks University of Tehran Dept. of EE.
Providing QoS in IP Networks
Integrated Services & RSVP Types of pplications Basic approach in IntServ Key components Service models.
TCP Congestion Control
TCP Congestion Control
Taxonomy of network applications
Advanced Computer Networks
TCP Congestion Control
University of Houston Quality of Service Datacom II Lecture 3
Presentation transcript:

Current Research Topics -Sigcomm Sessions -QoS -Network analysis & security -Multicast -giga/tera bit routers /fast classification -web performance -TCP -Diff Serv. -Routing -Network Topology

BEST-EFFORT VERSUS RESERVATIONS A simple comparative Analysis Lee Breslau & Scott Shenker PROCEEDINGS OF ACM SIGCOMM’ 98

MOTIVATION -Current Internet -single class of best-effort service -no guarantees about if/when packets are delivered -Best-effort service not suitable for real-time applications -audio, video, soft real-time … -Solution: Integrated Services -Applications reserve bandwidth -Network admits flows, enforces reservations...

KEY QUESTIONS - Are reservations really necessary? -Are we better off with an over-provisioned BE network? *Arguments for reservations -Applications needing higher quality benefit *Arguments against reservations -Network must operate at low utilization levels for low blocking probability -Low util =>over-provisioned BE network is ok -Soft real-time applications are adaptive

GOAL OF NETWORK DESIGN A network should be designed to meet user needs Each user gets a utility u based on network bandwidth, delay, jitter Design the network to maximize total utility (  ui) =>provide maximum satisfaction to users 1 delay 0 u video delay u ftp delay uelastic

FIXED LOAD MODEL Assume -Single link of capacity C -K identical flows, b/w b=C/k -Utility fn  (0)=0,  (  )=1 -Maximize v(k)= Elastic applications -v(k) increases as k->  =>admit  flows to maximize v =>use B/E network Rigid applications -v(k) drops to 0 beyond a certain k -admit no more than k max flows =>use reservation elastic  b/w Rigid 

VARIABLE LOAD MODEL -Number of flows is taken from a probability distribution -V= -Reservations=> v= -Question: How much extra b/w do you need for BE network to match the performance of resv? -trade b/w for complexity -P(k): -exponential -Poisson -Algebraic (heavy tailed)

Results -BE v/s rigid v/s adaptive application -Fixed model : substantial difference between BE & resv- capable network -adaptive applications change the picture -less compelling case for reservations -Poisson: equal costs except at highest prices -Exponential: small difference -Algebraic: Resv is better IF complexity is small -B/W is expensive -? -B/W is cheap -? 1