Multiple-Agent Dialogue Thomas K Harris, Satanjeev (Bano) Banerjee Alex Rudnicky Boeing Kick-off Meeting June 8, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key architectural details RavenClaw: Dialog Management Using Hierarchical Task Decomposition and an Expectation Agenda Dan BohusAlex Rudnicky School of.
Advertisements

Developing Spoken Dialogue Systems in the Communicator / RavenClaw Framework Sphinx Lunch Talk Carnegie Mellon University, October 2004 Presented by:Dan.
Manuela Veloso, Anthony Stentz, Alexander Rudnicky Brett Browning, M. Bernardine Dias Faculty Thomas Harris, Brenna Argall, Gil Jones Satanjeev Banerjee.
WP 2 Usability Attributes Affected by Software Architecture Deliverable D2 – Usability Patterns Presenter: Robert Chatley - ICSTM.
1 Team Talk – A Report. 2 Introduction Project done as part of , Spring ’03. Design and implementation of a spoken dialog system. Thrust of project:
Nick Dupuy Gabe McKinney. Overview  The project was to program the BoE Bot to solve a maze with a ramp at the end  Several trials preceded the final.
(Spoken) Dialogue and Information Retrieval Antoine Raux Dialogs on Dialogs Group 10/24/2003.
Robot Navigation based on the Mapping of Coarse Qualitative Route Descriptions to Route Graphs Motivation Outline Global World Knowledge Local Path Planning.
CPSC 481 Foundations and Principles of Human Computer Interaction
ECHO: NASA’s E os C learing HO use Integrating Access to Data Services Michael Burnett Blueprint Technologies, 7799 Leesburg.
Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Dialogues for Search Tasks Thomas K Harris, Satanjeev (Bano) Banerjee Alexander Rudnicky AAAI Spring Symposium 2005: Dialogical.
CLAReT PERSONAS AND SCENARIOS. When? Personas were used in the CLAReT workshops as a role play activity. Participants were required to assume a persona.
1 Voice Command Generation for Teleoperated Robot Systems Authors : M. Ferre, J. Macias-Guarasa, R. Aracil, A. Barrientos Presented by M. Ferre. Universidad.
Learning in the Wild Satanjeev “Bano” Banerjee Dialogs on Dialog March 18 th, 2005 In the Meeting Room Scenario.
Case study - usability evaluation Howell Istance.
Effective Agent Participation in Rescue Operations Brent Dutson CS7100 Fall 2009.
Madeleine, a RavenClaw Exercise in the Medical Diagnosis Domain Dan Bohus, Alex Rudnicky MITRE Workshop on Dialog Management, Boston, October 2003.
© Lethbridge/Laganière 2001 Chapter 7: Focusing on Users and Their Tasks1 7.1 User Centred Design (UCD) Software development should focus on the needs.
Project title All Your Names (Underline name of presenter) Plan on no more than 10 minutes (no more than 7 slides)
James Tam CPSC 481 Foundations and Principles of Human Computer Interaction James Tam.
Recall The Team Skills 1. Analyzing the Problem (with 5 steps) 2. Understanding User and Stakeholder Needs 1. Interviews 2. Workshops 3. Brainstorming.
Behavior-Based Artificial Intelligence Pattie Maes MIT Media-Laboratory Presentation by: Derak Berreyesa UNR, CS Department.
WP1 UGOT demos 2nd year review Saarbrucken Mar 2006.
Supporting Adaptive Interfaces in a Knowledge-Based User Interface Environment Piyawadee Noi Sukaviriya James Foley.
MDE In A Sales Management System: A Case Study © 2008 INRIA, TUD & SAP MDE In A Sales Management System: A Case Study Mathias Fritzsche, Hugo Bruneliere,
Use of Multimedia in Engineering. Mechatronics engineering is based on the combination from three basic engineering field that is mechaninal, electronics.
GTRInewFormat.ppt-1 Electronic Systems Laboratory TMC Operator Requirements and Position Descriptions, Phase 2, Kickoff Meeting Presented by Dennis J.
Joint International Master Project Dennis Böck & Dirk C. Aumueller 1.
ORCA Robot Simulator HY-475 Autonomous Robot Navigation.
By: Bryan Sanchez and Alex Lindenmayer. A command-line interface (CLI) is a mechanism for interacting with a computer operating system or software by.
OHTO -99 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING LECTURE 5 Today: - An overview to OO Analysis and OO Design - Introduction of Assignment 2.
Computer Science CPSC 322 Lecture 3 AI Applications 1.
Storyboarding 1. Purpose of Storyboarding  To gain an early reaction from users on the concepts proposed for the application.  They are an effective.
Interfacing the Public and Technology: A Web Controlled Mobile Robot Erin J. Harris R. Andrew Lamonica Jerry B. Weinberg.
A Novel Approach to Architectural Recovery in Evolving Object- Oriented Systems PhD thesis Koen De Hondt December 11, 1998.
Faculty: Manuela Veloso, Anthony Stentz, Alex Rudnicky Brett Browning, M. Bernardine Dias Students: Thomas Harris, Brenna Argall, Gil Jones Satanjeev Banerjee.
T Project Review Vihannekset PI Phase
Spoken Dialog Systems and Voice XML Lecturer: Prof. Esther Levin.
3-Tier Client/Server Internet Example. TIER 1 - User interface and navigation Labeled Tier 1 in the following graphic, this layer comprises the entire.
Tangible Bots: Interaction with Active Tangibles in Tabletop Interfaces Esben Warming Pedersen & Kasper Hornbæk Department of Computer Science, University.
Johnson Lab Database Senior Design Project Management II Spring 06 Mark Nelson.
Model of the Human  Name Stan  Emotion Happy  Command Watch me  Face Location (x,y,z) = (122, 34, 205)  Hand Locations (x,y,z) = (85, -10, 175) (x,y,z)
 Motivated by desire for natural human-robot interaction  Encapsulates what the robot knows about the human  Identity  Location  Intentions Human.
1 Natural Language Processing Lecture Notes 14 Chapter 19.
Intelligent Robot Architecture (1-3)  Background of research  Research objectives  By recognizing and analyzing user’s utterances and actions, an intelligent.
Evaluation in the FEEL Project - A Pilot Study Peter Lönnqvist and Hillevi Sundholm The Future Ubiquitous Service Environments Research Group, Stockholm.
Reference WPx/Tx.y/YY-MM-DD/PP UsiXML project # Generating User Interface for Information Applications from Task, Domain and User models.
Project Title All your names 1. Problem Space Importance of problem space How do people deal with this problem today? Who will care about a solution?
1  [company] Inc. [year] Girl Scouts of the USA Secure Site Project Kickoff [date]
Assignment Help From Requirements Elicitation to Elicitation.
Stanford University 1 CADUI' June FUNDP Namur The Mecano Project Angel R. Puerta Knowledge Systems Laboratory Stanford University Stanford.
Conceptual Design Dr. Dania Bilal IS588 Spring 2008.
1 Galatea: Open-Source Software for Developing Anthropomorphic Spoken Dialog Agents S. Kawamoto, et al. October 27, 2004.
Introduction to Evaluation without Users. Where are you at with readings? Should have read –TCUID, Chapter 4 For Next Week –Two Papers on Heuristics from.
Companion Cognitive Systems: A Step toward Human-Level AI
Korea Workshop May GAE CMS Analysis (Example) Michael Thomas (on behalf of the GAE group)
1 Thinking Have you ever interacted with a robot? If so, what do you remember about the interaction? If not, what would you like to do with a.
CompNet A project for the - IST-program A presentation.
The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation Interactive Edition By Michelle Walsh.
Group Y Presenters: (indicate roles)
Recall The Team Skills Analyzing the Problem (with 5 steps)
Sphinx Lunch Talk Carnegie Mellon University, October 2004
Thrust II: Task C Visualization and Interface for Situation Awareness
MBI 630: Week 11 Interface Design
Invisible Computing Angie, Collin, Nick, Will.
Joys and Pains of building a Dialog System
BBC micro:bit Robot Buggy
Combine Like Terms and Distribute Part II
Project title All Your Names
Requirements “Content Guide”
Presentation transcript:

Multiple-Agent Dialogue Thomas K Harris, Satanjeev (Bano) Banerjee Alex Rudnicky Boeing Kick-off Meeting June 8, 2004

Multiple Agent Dialogue2 What do we have today? A platform that supports multiple (robot) participants –Sphinx II ASR; Festival TTS –RavenClaw dialogue manager –Galaxy-II message-passing architecture –Carmen “back-end” interface A basic corridor movement domain –Commands to move robots along in vectors and towards named locations –Mechanisms for describing robot status and location to human

Multiple Agent Dialogue3 System architecture

Multiple Agent Dialogue4 Does it work? Tested on 6 users in a maze navigation scenario –Around half of the tasks were successful –Timing issues with moving robots trying to describe their locations –Robot feedback to commands was insufficient –People actually preferred dealing with multiple robots System and experiments described in a paperpaper It’s a little buggy yet 

Multiple Agent Dialogue5 TeamTalk: The movie

Multiple Agent Dialogue6 Tasks Direction understanding Dialogue structure Location and task description generation More bots (we’ve never had more than 2) Interaction speed