Could CKOV1 become RICH? 1. Simulations 2. Sensitive area of the detection plane 3. Example of a workable solution 4. Geometrical efficiency of the photon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USE OF GEANT4 FOR LHCB RICH SIMULATION S. Easo, RAL, LHCB AND ITS RICH DETECTORS. TESTBEAM DATA FOR LHCB-RICH. OVERVIEW OF GEANT4 SIMULATION.
Advertisements

TOF0 TOF1 Ckov1 Iron Shield TOF2 Ckov 2Cal Diffuser Proton Absorber Iron Shield ISIS Bea m LN2 Option RICH Option LH Option PARTICLE ID - CKOV1 STATUS.
PID activities 1. Summary of work/activities since last CM in Berkeley 2. PID parallel session in Frascati 3. Topics specific to each subdetector CKOV1.
Peter Križan, Ljubljana Peter Križan University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute The HERA-B RICH counter.
CLAS12 – RICH PARAMETERDESIGN VALUE Momentum range3-8 GeV/c  /K rejection factor Not less than 500  /p rejection factor Not less than 100 Angular coverage5.
CKOV1 folded geometry 1. Optimization 2. Pion-muon separation 3. Instrumented area 4. Possible developments November 16, 2005 Gh. Grégoire Contents.
Could CKOV1 become RICH? 1. Characteristics of Cherenkov light at low momenta (180 < p < 280 MeV/c) 2. Layout and characterization of the neutron beam.
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.
Review of PID simulation & reconstruction in G4MICE Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university “St. Kliment Ohridski” Content : 1 TOF 2 Cerenkov.
February 8 th, 2001 Status Report: SciFi for MICE Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
Downstream e-  identification 1. Questions raised by the Committee 2. Particle tracking in stray magnetic field 3. Cerenkov and calorimeter sizes 4. Preliminary.
28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn1 Update to the Upstream Cherenkov  -  Separation Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab May 2, 2005 Detector Tele-Meeting.
Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.
Stephen KahnParticle ID Software Mice Collaboration Meeting Page 1 Particle ID Software Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 27 March 2003.
27 Jun 2005S. Kahn -- Tof/Ckov Status1 Status of TOF and Ckov Sub- packages in G4Mice Steve Kahn 27 June 2005.
E-  identification 1. Reminder from previous presentations, questions, remarks 2. Čerenkov option 3. Study of several optical configurations 4. Conclusions.
Marco Musy INFN and University of Milano-Bicocca Pylos, June 2002 Aerogel as Cherenkov radiator for RICH detectors for RICH detectors.
The HERMES Dual-Radiator Ring Imaging Cerenkov Detector N.Akopov et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A479 (2002) 511 Shibata Lab 11R50047 Jennifer Newsham YSEP.
Leroy Nicolas, HESS Calibration results, 28 th ICRC Tsukuba Japan, August Calibration results of the first two H·E·S·S· telescopes Nicolas Leroy.
Peter Križan, Ljubljana March 17, 2006 Super B Workshop, Frascati Peter Križan University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute Aerogel RICH and TOP: summary.
Position Sensitive SiPMs for Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counters C.Woody BNL January 17, 2012.
A Reconstruction Algorithm for a RICH detector for CLAS12 Ahmed El Alaoui RICH Workchop, Jefferson Lab, newport News, VA November th 2011.
RICH Development Serguei Sadovsky IHEP, Protvino CBM meeting GSI, 9 March 2005.
May 31, 2008 SuperB PID sessionMarko Starič, Ljubljana Marko Starič J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana Report on hardware tests and MC studies in Ljubljana.
Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Particle Accelerator Conference, May 2009, Vancouver, Canada Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Jean-Sebastien.
3/4/ PHYS 1442 – Section 004 Lecture #18 Monday March 31, 2014 Dr. Andrew Brandt Chapter 23 Optics The Ray Model of Light Reflection; Image Formed.
Experimental set-up Abstract Modeling of processes in the MCP PMT Timing and Cross-Talk Properties of BURLE Multi-Channel MCP PMTs S.Korpar a,b, R.Dolenec.
Optical performances of CKOV2 Gh. Grégoire 1. Optical elements in relation with beam properties 2. Comparison of optical geometries 4. Electron detection.
Status of the Genova activity on a direction-sensitive optical module toward the KM3 detector M.Taiuti WP3 PYLOS 16/4/2007.
Cherenkov Counters for SoLID Z.-E. Meziani on behalf of Simona Malace & Haiyan Gao (Duke University) Eric Fuchey (Temple University) SoLID Dry Run Review,
The calibration and alignment of the LHCb RICH system Antonis Papanestis STFC - RAL for the LHCb Collaboration.
Luminosity Monitor UKNF Meeting 7 June 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
TOP counter overview and issues K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2008/7/3-4 2 nd open meeting for proto-collaboration - Overview - Design - Performance - Prototype.
1 MPPC update S.Gomi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, M.Taguchi, (Kyoto University) T.Nakadaira (KEK) Nov KEK.
work for PID in Novosibirsk E.A.Kravchenko Budker INP, Novosibirsk.
Development of TOP counter for Super B factory K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2007/10/ th International Workshop on Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counters.
PID for super Belle (design consideration) K. Inami (Nagoya-u) - Barrel (TOP counter) - Possible configuration - Geometry - Endcap (Aerogel RICH) - Photo.
Status Report particle identification with the RICH detector Claudia Höhne - GSI Darmstadt, Germany general overview focus on ring radius/ Cherenkov angle.
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
MAMUD Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, March 29, 2005 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Geant4 Simulation of the Pierre Auger Fluorescence Detector
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
An experiment to measure   with the CNGS beam off axis and a deep underwater Cherenkov detector in the Gulf of Taranto CNGS.
RICH MEETING - CERN - April 21 st 2004 Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca Variation of Refractive Index inside an Aerogel Block Davide Perego.
Tests of a proximity focusing RICH with aerogel as radiator and flat panel PMT (Hamamatsu H8500) as photon detector Rok Pestotnik Jožef Stefan Institute,
Downstream Cherenkov Gh. Grégoire University of Louvain MICE collaboration meeting RAL, October 28, 2004 Design study for the Technical Reference Document.
Rotated by ≈ 45 degrees Beam Diaphragm Many PMT’s Light condensor Mirror geometry:
TORCH – a Cherenkov based Time-of- Flight Detector Euan N. Cowie on behalf of the TORCH collaboration E N Cowie - TORCH - TIPP June 2014.
RICH studies for CLAS12 L. Pappalardo1 Contalbrigo Marco Luciano Pappalardo INFN Ferrara CLAS12 RICH Meeting – JLab 21/6/2011.
CKOV1 design status 1. Generation of muon and pion beam files 2. PID performances with water radiator 3. Does it help with fluorocarbon FC72 ? 4. Conclusion.
Limitations on the Design of the CEDAR Light-guide Calculations of the light-collection efficiency indicate a severe limitation in the possible collection.
A Simple Method of Uniformity Measurement and RICH R&D 14. Oct C.W. Son* J. KIM, J.G. YI, H.Y. LEE, K.E. Choi, H.D. Son, K.H. Kim In-Kwon Yoo Department.
The Ring Imaging Cherenkov Detectors for LHCb Antonis Papanestis CCLRC – RAL On behalf of the LHCb RICH group.
New idea for the target detector: SuperFGD
FDIRC MC Studies: PMT Coupling Options
PCID – Projectile Charge Identification Detector
E.A.Kravchenko Budker INP, Novosibirsk, Russia
Simulation results for the upgraded RICH detector in the HADES experiment. Semen Lebedev1,3, Jürgen Friese2, Claudia Höhne1, Tobias Kunz2, Jochen Markert4.
Particle Identification in LHCb
RICH simulation for CLAS12
Multianode Photo Multipliers for Ring Imaging Cherenkov Detectors
Progress on the Focusing DIRC R&D
Monte Carlo simulation of the DIRC prototype
LHCb Particle Identification and Performance
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
Performance test of a RICH with time-of-flight information
Presentation transcript:

Could CKOV1 become RICH? 1. Simulations 2. Sensitive area of the detection plane 3. Example of a workable solution 4. Geometrical efficiency of the photon detecting plane 5. Conclusion October 19, 2005 Gh. Grégoire Contents

Focusing geometries Non exhaustive ! Very preliminary ! Not optimized Plane mirror Spherical mirror R=-1100 mm Parabolic mirror R curv =-1500 mm  = -1  = 0 Spheroidal mirror R curv = -600 mm along X R curv =-1100 mm along Y More x-focusing obviously needed ! Goal: Č light produced at the focus to get a parallel beam after reflection and placing the detecting plane perpendicularly (for easy simulation/reconstruction)  400 mm mm

Simulations Momenta190 to 280 MeV/c ( in steps of 10 MeV/c ) Gaussian beams  x-y = 50 mm  x’-y’ = 25 mrad From S. Kahn’s presentation, Phone conf. March 31, 2005 Water radiator20-mm thickn=1.33 Index not too high to decrease size of rings Index not too low to get enough photoelectrons (Spheroidal) biconic mirror at 45° (curvatures not optimized) ParticlesMuons, pions and electrons (10 kevts each) Diameter = 250 mm 3

Full beam 700 mm Muons only 700 mm Pixel size 1 mm x 1 mm Losses < Biconic mirror ( not optimized ) 280 MeV/c190 MeV/c The detecting plane does not have to be sensitive over the full area Faint ring due to aberrations … For all muon momenta covered by MICE, For all impact positions and directions at the radiator 135 < Radius of Č rings < 275 mm 4

Detection element Hamamatsu assembly H8711 based on R7600 multianode PMT Imagine the detection plane is equiped with multianode PMTs like Hamamatsu H pixels 4 x 4 mm each Square PM 26 x 26 mm Just an example ! Not a proposal ! Gain stages bialkali 300 < < 600 nm 5

Detection plane Annular coverage 270 mm < D < 550 mm 6

Detected photons Nr of photons reaching the detection plane = 89 (for muons of 280 MeV/c) assuming 100% light collection efficiency Average nr of anodes hits = 79 For Cherenkov rings, originating from muons hitting any position on the radiator Geometrical efficiency =89 % 7

Conclusion 1. One still gets enough photons to determine the radii of the rings 2. Next task: - a lot of optimization - detailed studies of aberrations with particles off axis 8 - to ease the simulation and analysis - but aberrations will not destroy the separation possibilities check that  -  separation at analysis level is still acceptable With a rough granularity of the photon detecting plane define a simple algorithm to identify pions from muons - the choice of a photon detection technique This is still a feasibility study confirming that CKOV1 could be made RICH To become a serious design work it needs