1 ALICE rf project meeting Kai Hock, Cockcroft / Liverpool 19 May 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cockcroft Institute P. Goudket Cockcroft All Hands Meeting - March 2007 ILC Crab Cavity Collaboration Amplitude and Phase Control Development Cockcroft.
Advertisements

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility CWL/Kovar/March 1, 2007 Page 1 Determining Loaded-Q for SRF Cavities Used In ERLs (What do you mean it is.
Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Lorentz force detuning measurements on the CEA cavity
Stephen Molloy RF Group ESS Accelerator Division
Fundamentals of Circuits: Direct Current (DC)
Does the short pulse mode need energy recovery? Rep. rateBeam 5GeV 100MHz 500MWAbsolutely 10MHz 50MW Maybe 1MHz 5MW 100kHz.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
SLHC-PP – WP7 Critical Components for Injector Upgrade Plasma Generator – CERN, DESY, STFC-RAL Linac4 2MHz RF source Thermal Modeling Gas Measurement and.
Accelerator Physics Particle Acceleration
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
E. KAKO (KEK) 2009' Sept. 30 Albuquerque Global Design Effort 1 Cavity Test Items in S1-G Cryomodule Eiji Kako (KEK, Japan)
Vibrations and Waves AP Physics Lecture Notes m Vibrations and Waves.
RF Cavity Simulation for SPL Simulink Model for HP-SPL Extension to LINAC4 at CERN from RF Point of View Acknowledgement: CEA team, in particular O. Piquet.
LLRF Cavity Simulation for SPL
LLRF ILC GDE Meeting Feb.6,2007 Shin Michizono LLRF - Stability requirements and proposed llrf system - Typical rf perturbations - Achieved stability at.
LLRF-05 Oct.10,20051 Digital LLRF feedback control system for the J-PARC linac Shin MICHIZONO KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (JAPAN)
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 LLRF for the ERL Matthias Liepe.
Tom Powers LLRF Systems for Next Generation Light Sources LLRF Workshop October 2011 Authored by Jefferson Science Associates, LLC under U.S. DOE.
704MHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL July 8, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  July 8, 2015.
RF Development for ESS Roger Ruber and Volker Ziemann Uppsala Universitet 4 Dec Dec-20091RR+VZ: ESS RF Development.
W. 3rd SPL collaboration Meeting November 12, 20091/23 Wolfgang Hofle SPL LLRF simulations Feasibility and constraints for operation with more.
RF system issues due to pulsed beam in ILC DR October 20, Belomestnykh, RF for pulsed beam ILC DR, IWLC2010 S. Belomestnykh Cornell University.
RF Cavity Simulation for SPL
Marc Ross Nick Walker Akira Yamamoto ‘Overhead and Margin’ – an attempt to set standard terminology 10 Sept 2010 Overhead and Margin 1.
ECE 662 – Microwave Electronics
W. 5th SPL collaboration Meeting CERN, November 25, 20101/18 reported by Wolfgang Hofle CERN BE/RF Update on RF Layout and LLRF activities for.
LLRF Preliminary Design Review Vojtech Pacak/Ron Akre1 BEAM PHASE DETECTOR – PILLBOX CAVITY Basic Requirements and Parameters – Operating frequency:
SRF Requirements and Challenges for ERL-Based Light Sources Ali Nassiri Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory 2 nd Argonne – Fermilab Collaboration.
1 Simulation for power overhead and cavity field estimation Shin Michizono (KEK) Performance (rf power and max. cavity MV/m 24 cav. operation.
RF Tutorial G Burt. TM 010 Monopole Mode E H Beam Z 0 =377 Ohms.
Cornell digital LLRF system S. Belomestnykh LLRF05 workshopCERN, October 10, 2005.
ESS RF System Design Stephen Molloy RF Group ESS Accelerator Division SLHiPP2 4-May-2012.
Frequency-domain study of acceleration & beam loading based on a circuit model by raquel fandos.
Aaron Farricker 107/07/2014Aaron Farricker Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs.
R.SREEDHARAN  SOLEIL main parameters  Booster and storage ring low level RF system  New digital Booster LLRF system under development  Digital LLRF.
POWER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE LHC HARMONIC CAVITIES WITH THE FULL-DETUNING SCHEME P. Baudrenghien, T. Mastoridis, CERN BE-RF 2nd LHC Harmonic Cavity meeting,
GDE 4/Mar/20081 Lorentz Detuning Calculation for the transient response of the resonant cavity Introduction “Two modes” model Method of the.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
Performance of the cERL LLRF System Takako Miura (KEK) LLRF'15, Shanghai, Nov 4, 2015 (T. Miura) 1 Compact ERL (Energy Recovery LINAC)
Experience with Novosibirsk FEL Getmanov Yaroslav Budker INP, Russia Dec. 2012, Berlin, Germany Unwanted Beam Workshop.
LLRF Control Simulations for SPL Cavities Simulink Model for SPL Extension to LINAC4 at CERN from RF Point of View Acknowledgements: CEA team, in particular.
Overview of long pulse experiments at NML Nikolay Solyak PXIE Program Review January 16-17, PXIE Review, N.Solyak E.Harms, S. Nagaitsev, B. Chase,
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 6 March.
Matthias Liepe. Matthias Liepe – High loaded Q cavity operation at CU – TTC Topical Meeting on CW-SRF
1 Tuner performance with LLRF control at KEK Shin MICHIZONO (KEK) Dec.07 TTC Beijing (Michizono) S1G (RDR configuration) - Detuning monitor - Tuner control.
Aaron Farricker 107/07/2014Aaron Farricker Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs.
High-efficiency L-band klystron development for the CLIC Drive Beam High-efficiency L-band klystron development for the CLIC Drive Beam CLIC workshop,
Longitudinal dynamic analysis for the 3-8 GeV pulsed LINAC G. Cancelo, B. Chase, Nikolay Solyak, Yury Eidelman, Sergei Nagaitsev, Julien Branlard.
Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs
Test of the dressed spoke cavity
Coupler RF kick simulations.
Accelerator Physics Particle Acceleration
TTC Topical Workshop - CW SRF, Cornell 12th – 14th June 2013
SCRF 21-25/Apr/2008 Measurement & Calculation of the Lorentz Detuning for the transient response of the resonant cavity Introduction “Two.
Cavity Theory Feng QIU.
Cavity resonance control
Accelerator Physics Particle Acceleration
LCLS Injector/Diagnostics David H. Dowell, SLAC April 24, 2002
Accelerator Physics Particle Acceleration
Accelerator Physics Particle Acceleration
Accelerator Physics Particle Acceleration
Accelerator Physics Particle Acceleration
USPAS Course on Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linear Accelerators
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
RF Issues in Energy Recovery Linacs
Strategic Communications at TRIUMF
Robinson Instability Criteria for MEIC e Ring
Presentation transcript:

1 ALICE rf project meeting Kai Hock, Cockcroft / Liverpool 19 May 2008

2 Status Aug - Dec 07: 4GLS beam loading (Hywel, Yuri) –Worked through Wiedemann’s chapter, Perry Wilson’s report on rf system –Reproduced simulation on 4GLS beam loading (Sakanaka ERL07) –Report on beam loading – basics, 4GLS Feb 08: ALICE rf control – new phase Mar 08: ALICE – intro to rf system (Andy) Apr 08: –Contacted, received paper, suggestions from Tom Powers –Looking up references: rf feedback, energy recovery theory, … –Started learning rf control hardware, set up by Andy –Idea: connect cavity / stretched wire to simulate beam loading May 08 –Simulation on klystron power – with energy recovery ? –Set up stretched wire experiments ?

3 RF system theory Feedback control  experiments –Stefan Simrock’s LLRF lectures –Papers on ELBE rf system Beam loading –Wiedemann’s textbook, Wilson’s SLAC report (beam loading) –Sakanaka’s ERL07 paper (4GLS simulation) Energy recovery linac –Thomas Schilcher’s PhD thesis (microphonics, Lorentz detuning) –Lia Merminga’s 2001 USPAS lectures (beam loading in ERL) –Tom Power’s paper

4 Deciphering Tom’s paper Why / how does energy recovery happen? What are r/Q,  Q L, Q 0, ,  f S,  B, …? How does the klystron power equation come about? What are microphonics, Lorentz detuning, ponderomotive effects, vector sum, … ? Why are we interested in detuning? What are mechanical tuners? Why is detuning measured by the Klystron-cavity phase difference? When Q L is optimized, what exactly is minimised or maximised? The klystron power? Why is incomplete energy recovery needed? How does this compress the energy spread? What are page 2, page 3, page 4 and page 5 about? Questions from a complete beginner

5 Finding Answers Why Energy Recovery “ … the beam-induced voltage in a cavity is the same whether or not a generator voltage component is present.” (Wilson 1991, sect. 6.1 The Fundamental Theorem of Beam Loading ) The beam induced voltage is always negative. Therefore, if a bunch enters at the opposite phase of the cavity field, it will increase the amplitude of the field. This gives energy to the cavity. (Sakanaka ERL07)

6 Finding Answers Shunt Impedance (Wiedemann 2003) A full calculation from Maxwell’s equations for pillbox cavity:

7 Finding Answers Many equations come from this ! (Wiedemann 2003)

8 Finding Answers r/Q,  Q L, Q 0, ,  B, … (Wiedemann 2003) This models the behaviour of the cavity voltages. Mostly using equations from simple harmonic oscillator.

9 Finding Answers How the beam affects the cavity voltage All voltages defined along the axis of cavity (beam path): generator (klystron) voltage V g beam induced voltage V b and resultant cavity voltage V c Assuming all sinusoidal, they can be related by a phasor diagram. (Wilson 1991)

10 Finding Answers The klystron power equation r/Q,  Q L, Q 0, , … are measured by fitting to the equivalent circuit model The klystron power can be calculated from these parameters using the model. Merminga (2001) explains how to get this: Steps are easy once we have worked from Wiedemann and Wilson. The main equation in Tom’s paper

11 Finding Answers Energy recovery calculations  ERL Injector and Linac:  f m =25 Hz, Q 0 =1x10 10, f 0 =1300 MHz, I 0 =100 mA, V c =20 MV/m, L=1.04 m, R a /Q 0 =1036 ohms per cavity  ERL linac: Resultant beam current, I tot = 0 mA (energy recovery) and  opt =385  Q L =2.6x10 7  P g = 4 kW per cavity.  ERL Injector: I 0 =100 mA and  opt = 5x10 4 !  Q L = 2x10 5  P g = 2.08 MW per cavity! Note: I 0 V a = 2.08 MW  optimization is entirely dominated by beam loading. Nice examples from Merminga (2001)

12 Finding Answers Microphonics, Lorentz Force, Vector Sum (Schilcher 1998) Revelation !

13 Finding Answers What exactly is being optimized? (Liepe PAC05) The klystron power, of course !

14 Finding Answers Ponderomotive force

15 Finding Answers Page 2 of Tom’s paper One bunch at a time? 10 o 165 o 1 st pass 2 nd pass IBIB ? Shall try to do this next

16 Experiments References on Feedback control –Stefan Simrock’s LLRF lectures –Papers on ELBE rf system Andy’s Rossendorf control unit –Connect control system to standalone cavity –Stretched wire measurements with short pulses Ideas for experiments –For learning about rf control –For modelling of beam loading / energy recovery