1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright URBAN ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY MODELLING AT THE METEOROLOGICAL OFFICE Dick Derwent Climate Research Urban Air Quality Modelling.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEMS Kick- off MPI -Hamburg CTM - IFS interfaces GEMS- GRG Review of meeting in January and more recent thoughts Johannes Flemming.
Advertisements

Urban Modelling 1 03/2003 © Crown copyright Urban Scale NWP with the Met Office's Unified Model Peter Clark Mesoscale Modelling Group Met Office Joint.
Some recent studies using Models-3 Ian Rodgers Presentation to APRIL meeting London 4 th March 2003.
Detailed chemical modelling based on the Master Chemical Mechanism (MCM) Mike Jenkin EMMA Group Department of Environmental Science and Technology
A numerical simulation of urban and regional meteorology and assessment of its impact on pollution transport A. Starchenko Tomsk State University.
1 AirWare : AirWare : C OMPREHENSIVE A IR QUALITY M ODEL WITH E X TENSIONS VERSION 4.30, PBM DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352.
PREV ’AIR : An operational system for large scale air quality monitoring and forecasting over Europe
Discussion Space Research Centre. Urbanization and Industrialization: in 2008, more than half of humans live in cities UN Population Report 2007.
THE PUMA PROJECT AND SUBSEQUENT AIR QUALITY MODELLING AT THE UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM ROY M. HARRISON AND XIAOMING CAI SCHOOL OF GEOGRAPHY, EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL.
Atmospheric modelling activities inside the Danish AMAP program Jesper H. Christensen NERI-ATMI, Frederiksborgvej Roskilde.
CLARIS WP4.3 : Continental-scale air Pollution in South America.
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Workshop USEPA/OAQPS.
CHAPTER 3: SIMPLE MODELS
X ONE-BOX MODEL Atmospheric “box”;
Integration of CMAQ into the Western Macedonia environmental management system A. Sfetsos 1,2, J. Bartzis 2 1 Environmental Research Laboratory, NCSR Demokritos.
1. Emissions of chemical into the atmosphere 2. Atmospheric transport, diffusion and deposition 3. Chemical reactions 4. Air quality management 5. The.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
Session 9, Unit 17 UAM and CAMx. UAM and CAMx UAM - Urban Airshed Model Currently available versions:  UAM-V 1.24  UAM-V 1.30  Available from Systems.
Atmospheric chemistry Day 4 Air pollution Regional ozone formation.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
1 1 Model studies of some atmospheric aerosols and comparisons with measurements K. G e o r g i e v I P P – B A S, S o f i a, B u l g a r i a.
Simulation of European emissions impacts on particulate matter concentrations in 2010 using Models-3 Rob Lennard, Steve Griffiths and Paul Sutton (RWE.
Beta Testing of the SCICHEM-2012 Reactive Plume Model James T. Kelly and Kirk R. Baker Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards US Environmental Protection.
Modelling of Acid deposition in South Asia Magnuz Engardt Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI) Introduction to Acid deposition.
REACTIVITY SCALES AS COMPARATIVE TOOLS FOR CHEMICAL MECHANISMS: SAPRC-07 vs MCM Dick Derwent rdscientific, Newbury, United Kingdom Presentation to Reactivity.
Importance of Lightning NO for Regional Air Quality Modeling Thomas E. Pierce/NOAA Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory.
Research and Development to Meet Urban Weather and Climate Needs Dr. Richard D. Rosen NOAA Research September 23, 2004 Presentation at “Challenges in Urban.
08/20031 Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office Helen Champion, Sarah Watkin Derrick Ryall Responsibilities Tools Etna 2002 Future.
1 Neil Wheeler, Kenneth Craig, and Clinton MacDonald Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, California Presented at the Sixth Annual Community Modeling and.
CONTRIBUTION FROM DIFFERENT VOC EMISSION SOURCES TO PHOTOCHEMICAL OZONE FORMATION IN EUROPE Dick Derwent rdscientific This work was supported by the UK.
1Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology OFCM OFCM Special Session: Challenges of Urban Test Beds Charge to the Joint Action Group for Joint.
Preliminary Study: Direct and Emission-Induced Effects of Global Climate Change on Regional Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter K. Manomaiphiboon 1 *, A.
4. Atmospheric chemical transport models 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Box model 4.3 Three dimensional atmospheric chemical transport model.
GEM/AQ Simulations on Intercontinental Transports Science and Technology Branch Environment Canada.
The effect of pyro-convective fires on the global troposphere: comparison of TOMCAT modelled fields with observations from ICARTT Sarah Monks Outline:
Dispersion conditions in complex terrain - a case study of the January 2010 air pollution episode in Norway Viel Ødegaard Norwegian Meteorological.
Wildland Fire Impacts on Surface Ozone Concentrations Literature Review of the Science State-of-Art Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. Rocky Mountain Center USDA FS Rocky.
Application of Models-3/CMAQ to Phoenix Airshed Sang-Mi Lee and Harindra J. S. Fernando Environmental Fluid Dynamics Program Arizona State University.
Chemistry-climate working group Co-chairs: Hong Liao, Shiliang Wu The 7th International GEOS-Chem Meeting (IGC7)
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT OF OZONE AND ITS SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN EUROPE Dick Derwent rdscientific 2 nd ICAP Workshop Chapel Hill, North Carolina October.
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
10-11 October 2006HYMN kick-off TM3/4/5 Modeling at KNMI HYMN Hydrogen, Methane and Nitrous oxide: Trend variability, budgets and interactions with the.
Sustainable Air Quality ME 449 Jan 14, 16; The Earth System Atmosphere –Conveyer of mass, moves mass source to receptor –Small storage capacity.
Standard images are available on the intranet For more specific images please contact Matthew Hart For PowerPoint help please contact Elizabeth Leishman.
___________________________________________________________________________CMAQ Basics ___________________________________________________Community Modeling.
David Stevenson 1, Colin Johnson 2, Ellie Highwood 3, Bill Collins 2, & Dick Derwent 2 1 School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh 2 The Met Office.
Intro to Modeling – Terms & concepts Marti Blad, Ph.D., P.E. ITEP
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
Wildfire activity as been increasing over the past decades Cites such as Salt Lake City are surrounded by regions at a high risk for increased wildfire.
Breakout Session 1 Air Quality Jack Fishman, Randy Kawa August 18.
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
Summary of the Report, “Federal Research and Development Needs and Priorities for Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion Modeling” 22 September 2004 Walter.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service
Andrea Fraser DIAC PhD student Supervised by Prof. H ApSimon
The science of urban air quality
Lupu, Semeniuk, Kaminski, Mamun, McConnell
Atmospheric modelling of the Laki eruption
Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office
A 1-year simulation of atmospheric concentrations and deposition over Europe and UK Alan Cocks, Vicky Lucas, Ian Rodgers, and Ian Teasdale RWEInnogy Environment.
Impact on Recent North American Air Quality Forecasts of Replacing a Retrospective U.S. Emissions Inventory with a Projected Inventory Michael Moran1,
Models of atmospheric chemistry
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
Influence of future climate change on air quality – global model results David Stevenson Institute of Atmospheric and Environmental Science School of GeoSciences.
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
Alison Redington* and Derrick Ryall* Dick Derwent**
UNCERTAINTIES IN ATMOSPHERIC MODELLING
UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS IN OZONE MODELS
Presentation transcript:

1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright URBAN ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY MODELLING AT THE METEOROLOGICAL OFFICE Dick Derwent Climate Research Urban Air Quality Modelling APRIL Imperial College London Tuesday March 4th 2003

2 00/XXXX © Crown copyright ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work has been sponsored by the Air and Environmental Quality Division DEFRA and by the Government Meteorological Research Programme of the Met Office. Thanks are to Derrick Ryall, Alison Redington and Alistair Manning.

3 00/XXXX © Crown copyright LONG TERM STRATEGY FOR URBAN ATMSOPHERIC CHEMISTRY MODELLING To develop improved tools for predicting ozone and particles on all time and spatial scales from global to urban spatial scales from episodic to climate timescales for forecasting and research purposes Using as building blocks Master Chemical Mechanism Met Office Lagrangian Dispersion NAME model

4 00/XXXX © Crown copyright ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY MODELLING APPROACHES Tropospheric chemistry models have generally either been EULERIAN or LAGRANGIAN Eulerian models use a fixed co-ordinate framework through which the atmospheric flow moves. Lagrangian models describe the flow as a stream of air parcels which move in three-dimensions.

5 00/XXXX © Crown copyright ON-LINE OR OFF-LINE Another important aspect of model formulation is whether the atmospheric chemistry is handled off-line or on-line. In an off-line model, the meteorology is calculated separately from the chemistry and there is no feedback between the chemistry and the meteorology. In an on-line or coupled model, the chemistry and meteorology are solved simultaneously allowing the possibility of chemical data assimilation.

6 00/XXXX © Crown copyright EULERIAN VS LAGRANGIAN APPROACHES Met Office global 3-D chemistry transport model STOCHEM and regional scale UK PTM photochemical trajectory model have adopted a Lagrangian approach and so have more chemistry than most Eulerian models. Met Office NAME dispersion model has adopted a Lagrangian approach to atmospheric dispersion and chemistry. The new Unified Model is semi-Lagrangian and this will provide a very challenging framework for atmospheric chemistry modelling.

7 00/XXXX © Crown copyright URBAN ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY MODELLING Almost entirely Eulerian approaches have been adopted historically. The main approach in the USA is the Models-3 Eulerian modelling system which runs at 36 km, 12 km and 4 km and implements the Carbon Bond Mechanism version 4.0. A special version has been operated at sub 1-km to study air quality within the urban canopy. The main difficulties lie in the meteorological and emissions drivers and the limited nature of the chemical mechanisms employed.

8 00/XXXX © Crown copyright COMPARISON OF MCMv3.0 AND CBMv4.0 CBMv4.0 is based on outdoor smog chamber studies which focus largely on ozone formation rather than free radical budgets CBMv4.0 is a compact mechanism involving up to 10 VOCs and 25 species latest version is CBM Morpho 2002 MCMv3.0 involves 123 VOCs, over 4300 species and reactions

9 00/XXXX © Crown copyright Met Office NAME model Atmospheric Dispersion model –predicts the transport of a wide range of airborne pollutants –1-1000’s km, hours - days –driven by 3-D meteorology from Unified Model Emergency response –national & international operational responsibilities –nuclear, volcanoes, fires Air pollution –episode studies, air quality forecasts, policy support Source attribution –where, when, how much ?

10 00/XXXX © Crown copyright THE MET OFFICE NAME MODEL Next generation acid deposition model 15-minute and 15 km resolution treatment of particulates and acid deposition from SO 2, NO x and NH 3 developed through funding from Environment Agency and DEFRA AEQ Division 3-hourly back attribution atlas developed through funding from Met Office GMR programme

11 00/XXXX © Crown copyright PROGRESS REPORT COUPLING NAME AND THE MCM secondary particle sulphate and nitrate chemistry running in NAME secondary organic aerosol chemistry working but not yet in NAME urban ozone formation running in NAME for NERC URGENT/PUMA next step with NAME is to describe regional and global baseline fields for O 3, NO y, CO, VOCs and particles

12 00/XXXX © Crown copyright EPISODE STUDIES East Midlands - High SO 2

13 00/XXXX © Crown copyright IMPACT OF SO 2 EMISSIONS Nottingham episode Annual emissionsHourly emissions

14 00/XXXX © Crown copyright

15 00/XXXX © Crown copyright BACK ATTRIBUTION - NAME Identify possible source regions Run NAME ‘backwards’ from receptor Example - PM 10 >100mgm -3 on 12/09/2002 Forecasts or episode analyses

16 00/XXXX © Crown copyright LONDON ROUTINE COLUMN TRAJECTORY MODEL vertical column of air parcels from surface to 1300 metres vertical exchange using eddy diffusion coefficient, wind speed profile and dry deposition to surface hourly meteorological data taken from Heathrow Airport for 1995 NO - NO 2 - O 3 photochemistry LAEI NO x inventory for 1999, 2005 and 2010 with direct emissions of NO 2 together with NAEI inventory for south-east region hourly ozone data from Harwell, Sibton and Lullington Heath

17 00/XXXX © Crown copyright The LRCTM model identifies and describes in some detail the following major sources of NO 2 in London: direct emission of NO 2 from NO x sources, assumed to be 5% by volume in the base case model oxidation of NO by ozone advected into the model from the global baseline or from regional-scale photochemical pollution events oxidation of NO in the NO + NO + O 2 reaction in local-scale wintertime stagnation events LRCTM MODEL

18 00/XXXX © Crown copyright

19 00/XXXX © Crown copyright

20 00/XXXX © Crown copyright LRCTM MODEL RESULTS FOR 1999

21 00/XXXX © Crown copyright LRCTM MODEL RESULTS FOR 2005

22 00/XXXX © Crown copyright LRCTM MODEL RESULTS FOR 2010