QARTOD 2: Remote Currents Working Group Definitions: Level 1 – refers to radials Level 2 – refers to total vectors Level 3 – refers to higher level data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intra-Car Wireless Sensor Networks Using RFID :
Advertisements

Rosetta Magnetic Field PDS Review B. J. Anderson.
Rachel Klima (on behalf of the MASCS team) JHU/APL MASCS/VIRS Data Users’ Workshop LPSC 2014, The Woodlands, TX March 17,2014 MASCS/VIRS Data Record Structure.
Basic Vibration Analysis
Interferometric Spectral Line Imaging Martin Zwaan (Chapters of synthesis imaging book)
IOOS, NOAA and HF Radar QA/QC and Standards Jack Harlan National Ocean Service Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services QARTOD
SWE Introduction to Software Engineering
QARTOD III Scripps Institution of Oceanography La Jolla, CA Quality Control, Quality Assurance, and Quality Flags Mark Bushnell, NOAA/NOS/CO-OPS November.
QARTOD II Currents and Waves Charge to the Breakout Groups QARTOD II February 28 – March 2, 2005.
Operational Quality Control in Helsinki Testbed Mesoscale Atmospheric Network Workshop University of Helsinki, 13 February 2007 Hannu Lahtela & Heikki.
DATA INTEGRATION DEMONSTRATION QA/QC Focus Quality Assurance of Real Time Ocean Data QARTOD II Feb 28-March 2, 2005 National Federation Of Regional Associations.
OPeNDAP CODAR Combining Server Provide CODAR surface current vectors in response to request for data within a user-specified region and time range. Will.
QARTOD II Currents and Waves IN-SITU WAVE GROUP Kent Hathaway, Moderator QARTOD II February 28 – March 2, 2005.
QARTOD II Currents and Waves In-Situ Currents: Breakout Group Report Out QARTOD II February 28 – March 2, 2005.
Direction Finding Positioning for
SeaSonde Overview.
MWR Algorithms (Wentz): Provide and validate wind, rain and sea ice [TBD] retrieval algorithms for MWR data Between now and launch (April 2011) 1. In-orbit.
Remote Currents: HF Radar QA/QC and Standards Jack Harlan National Ocean Service Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services QARTOD
Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.
Advanced Phasor Measurement Units for the Real-Time Monitoring
August 13-19, 2010Data Management Workshop Foz do Iguassu- Brazil Seismic Quality Assurance Rick Benson IRIS DMC Rick Benson IRIS DMC.
Radio Interference Calculations
The Remote Sensing of Winds Student: Paul Behrens Placement and monitoring of wind turbines Supervisor: Stuart Bradley.
Why We Care or Why We Go to Sea.
Tower SystemsJanuary AMS Short Course on Instrumentation 1 Installation and Use of Meteorological Tower Systems Melanie A. Wetzel Desert Research.
Traffic Enforcement And Management System Malam-Team is Israel's largest systems integration organization, One of the most exciting solutions offered by.
Software Engineering Term Paper
System Requirements Performance Upgrade Path Size and Weight Limits Operating Environment Power and Signal Calibration Remote/Autonomous Operation.
Sebastian Böser Acoustic sensor and transmitter development Amanda/IceCube Collaboration Meeting Berkeley March 2005.
SMOS Science Workshop, Arles, th Sept, 2011 IMPROVING SMOS SALINITY RETRIEVAL: SYSTEMATIC ERROR DIAGNOSTIC J. Gourrion, R. Sabia, M. Portabella,
Remote Sensing Microwave Remote Sensing. 1. Passive Microwave Sensors ► Microwave emission is related to temperature and emissivity ► Microwave radiometers.
Slide 1 25-Jan-10Huib Intema Recent low-frequency developments at NRAO Charlottesville and some other USA institutes.
MARCOOS Real-time Monitoring Daily Network Status sHourly Radial Site Status Updates CORDC Nation-wide CompilationContinuous In-House Diagnostic Processing.
OV Copyright © 2015 Logical Operations, Inc. All rights reserved. Unbounded Network Media  Wireless Networking  Wireless Network Devices and Components.
GPS derived TEC Measurements for Plasmaspheric Studies: A Tutorial and Recent Results Mark Moldwin LD Zhang, G. Hajj, I. Harris, T. Mannucci, X. PI.
CODAR Ben Kravitz September 29, Outline What is CODAR? Doppler shift Bragg scatter How CODAR works What CODAR can tell us.
April nd IBTrACS Workshop 1 Operational Procedures How can we build consistent, homogeneous, well- documented climate quality data?
Surface Current Mapping with High Frequency RADAR.
GISMO Simulation Study Objective Key instrument and geometry parameters Surface and base DEMs Ice mass reflection and refraction modeling Algorithms used.
An Approach to Stabilizing Large Telescopes for Stellar Interferometry It shakes like a…. [G. Vasisht, 31 March 2006] N. Di Lieto J. Sahlmann, G. Vasisht,
Operational Issues from NCDC Perspective Steve Del Greco, Brian Nelson, Dongsoo Kim NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC Dongjun Seo – NOAA/NWS/OHD 1 st Q2 Workshop Archive,
Environmental Management Plan (EMP) Required for: Full EIA based on Palestinian EIA Policy Category A projects based on World Bank Policy.
Application of Radial and Elliptical Surface Current Measurements to Better Resolve Coastal Features  Robert K. Forney, Hugh Roarty, Scott Glenn 
JERICO KICK OFF MEETING WP 3PARIS – Maison de la recherche - 24 & 25 May 2011 WP3: Harmonizing technological aspects Wilhelm Petersen Helmholtz-Zentrum.
Power Quality: A Nonlinear Adaptive Filter for Improved Power System Operation and Protection Research Overview: Focuses on the application of a new algorithm.
Validation Defination Establishing documentary evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that specification process will consistently produce.
Constellation of Airbus SAR satellites and PHOTOMOD Radar software: quality assessment of geometric and radiometric parameters of TerraSAR-X imagery Matthieu.
1 1 Lab. 9 Signal Analyzer  Signal/spectrum analyzer (SA): an equipment analyzing spectrum properties of signals.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
Turning a Mobile Device into a Mouse in the Air
Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future Broadband Delay Tutorial Bill Petrachenko, NRCan, FRFF workshop, Wettzell, Germany, March 18, 2009.
Summary of QARTOD and Recent Workshops on QA/QC March 9-10, 2006.
Doc.: IEEE /0091r1 Submission January 2004 Stephen Berger, TEM ConsultingSlide 1 IEEE Wireless Performance Prediction (WPP) - Background.
Informations and comments on ECE-TRANS-WP.29-GRB e 1 Louis-Ferdinand PARDO (France) Transmitted by the expert from France Informal document GRB
1700+ Active sites 200+ Contributors CORS Network continued growth RTN AND NGS “FOUNDATION CORS” WILL BE THE PRIMARY ACCESS TO THE NSRS.
The Global Positioning System
Thurs Nov 12, 12:45 Nov 8-17, 2009Data Management Workshop Cairo, Egypt.
A Moment Radar Data Emulator: The Current Progress and Future Direction Ryan M. May.
DUAL POLARIZATION AND ZDR CALIBRATION IMPROVEMENTS 5.2(6)
Lecture Continuous Wave Radar
Classical blocking test (e.g. EN )
A Closer Look at CODAR HF Radar Spectra
Radio Coverage Prediction in Picocell Indoor Networks
Jorge M.Trabal - M.S. Student José G. Colom - Ph.D.
Robert K. Forney, Hugh Roarty, Scott Glenn March 5th, 2015
Quality Assurance Measures for High Frequency Radar Systems
Manual Measuring Modes of ELA 10
Chap II. Radar Hardware (PART 1)
Defining the Products: ‘GSICS Correction’
Presentation transcript:

QARTOD 2: Remote Currents Working Group Definitions: Level 1 – refers to radials Level 2 – refers to total vectors Level 3 – refers to higher level data products

Question 1: What real-time quality control tests should be applied? Data evaluation parameters: Level 1 - signal to noise (s/n) - criteria to define 1st order peak (direction finding systems) - single or dual angle solution - sector-to-sector change in radial speed - standard deviation and number of vectors within each sector - eigenvalues for each vector (MUSIC specific) - % coverage for given time window - establish parameters for other equipment (e.g. radars) and processing methods Level 2 - radial misfit error (rms difference from back-calculating the radials) - GDOP - Geometric Dilution of Precision - thresholds - number of radials and which sites contribute radials to total vector - % coverage at grid points over given time interval

Question 2: What categories of real-time quality descriptor flags should be required? - flag interpolated data (radial or total) - categories from QARTOD 1 are appropriate with potential additions (e.g. interpolated)

Question 3: What real time metadata descriptors should be required? Level 1 - site location - hardware parameters (e.g. transmit frequency, range resolution, etc.) - software parameters (e.g. version no., averaging time, etc.) - antenna patterns and time of measurement - operating institution - equipment environmental parameters - data units Level 2 - number/identification of possible sites contributing radials to total vectors - parameters used for combining (e.g. averaging time, averaging area) - institution that conducted combining - grid parameters (e.g. spacing, domain) - data units

Question 4: What real-time calibration flags should be required? - baseline consistency checks (2 sites) - total/radial consistency checks (3+ sites) - antenna amplitude and phase measured between sites - forward and reflected power - diagnostics (e.g. transmitter temperature sensor) - sea echo for phase determination and amplitude Question 5: What common data formats should be required? - NetCDF - ASCII (lat, lon, u, v) Question 6: Additional requirements associated with DMAC? - cross-walk between metadata provided in NetCDF and FGDC-compliant metadata

Question 7: Next Steps and roadblocks to implementation of QA/QC? Need to: - establish consistency of QA/QC throughout national network; - develop data dictionary and establish timeline - define data parameters for manufacturers to deliver (developed from QARTOD2 and ROWG) - develop “best practices” procedures for new operators - discussion to be continued…