November 13, 2009 NIH PROPOSAL SUBMISSIONS: 2010 REVISONS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 REVIEWER ORIENTATION TO ENHANCED PEER REVIEW April
Advertisements

Office of Sponsored Programs VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY The Office of Sponsored Programs has upgraded COEUS to accommodate the new Grants.gov C-Forms About.
How Your Application Is Reviewed Robert Elliott, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
NIH Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) R15 AASCU November 5, 2009 Mary Ann Guadagno, PhD Office of Extramural Research National Institutes of Health.
Review Suggested Citations Review Match to PubMed Citation.
Environment - Facilities/Equipment Randall Duncan Biological Sciences COBRE Grant Writing Workshop January 21, 2015.
FEBRUARY 7, 2012 SERIES 2, SESSION 3 OF AAPLS – PART 2: POLICY & APPLICATION COMPONENTS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module E:
How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
Fundamentals of NLM Grants National Library of Medicine Extramural Programs Updated 2015.
PRESENTER: DR. ROBERT KLESGES PROFESSOR OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AND MEMBER, DEPARTMENT OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND.
Decoding RFAs and PAs Charlotte FlippDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health (EpiCH) Anne EverettDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health (EpiCH)
Funding Research Programs instead of Individual Projects Increase the stability of funding to enhance investigators’ willingness to take on ambitious scientific.
NIH’s schedule for MANDATORY electronic submission of applications:  December 15, Support for Conferences & Scientific Meetings (R13 & U13)  June.
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW Changes to Application Forms and Instructions December 2009
1 Major changes Get ready! Changes coming to Review Meetings Considering Potential FY2010 funding and beyond: New 1-9 Scoring System Scoring of Individual.
4/17/2017 Maximizing Investigators’ Research Award for New and Early Stage Investigators (R35) Jon Lorsch, Director, NIGMS Peter Preusch, Program Director,
11 1 Enhancing Peer Review Frequently Asked Questions on Application Changes.
The Life Cycle of an NIH Grant Application Alicia Dombroski, Ph.D. Deputy Director Division of Extramural Activities NIDCR.
How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.
Enhancing Peer Review at NIH University of Central Florida Grant Day Workshop October 26, 2009 Anne K. Krey Division of Scientific Review.
THE NIH REVIEW PROCESS David Armstrong, Ph.D.
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Presentation for University of Detroit Mercy (Drs Pacini & Kleinke, hosts) 1 May 2013 James C. Anthony (calling name: Jim Anthony)
1 NIH Regional Seminar Baltimore, MD June 28, 2013 Finding and Understanding NIH’s Funding Opportunities Christopher L. Hatch, Ph.D. Chief Program Coordination.
Policy WG NIH policy proposal. Goal: Incorporating global access licensing as one of the additional review criteria Question 1: Should we propose this.
Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions EFFECTIVE JANUARY 25, 2010.
A Review of Recent Changes to NIH Forms & Instructions Jane Tolbert ORPA December 15, 2009.
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW Changes to Application Forms and Instructions October 6, 2009.
1 Sex/Gender and Minority Inclusion in NIH Clinical Research What Investigators Need to Know! Presenter: Miriam F. Kelty, PhD, National Institute on Aging,
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) What is RCR? New Requirements for RCR Who Does it Affect? When? Data Management What is the Institutional Plan? What.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
NIH Challenge Grants in Health and Science Research RFA OD
The NIH Grant Review Process Hiram Gilbert, Ph.D. Dept. of Biochemistry, Baylor College of Medicine Xander Wehrens, M.D. Ph.D. Dept. of Molecular Physiology.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 5 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Office of Sponsored Projects & Industry Partnerships 1 New Scientific and Grants Management Policies Cynthia Ernest Office of Sponsored Projects & Industry.
Summary of NIH Enhancing Peer Review Implementation Changes to NIH Proposals due on or after January 25, 2010 Slide Content Provided by Dr. Michael Sesma,
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH CHALLENGE GRANT APPLICATIONS Dan Hoyt Survey, Statistics, and Psychometrics(SSP) Core Facility March 11, 2009.
1 RA Forum July American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)
FEDERAL UPDATE Jeff Warner Senior Contract and Grant Officer Alisia Ford Contract and Grant Officer Spring QRAM - Tuesday, March 12, 2013.
1 Preparing an NIH Institutional Training Grant Application Rod Ulane, Ph.D. NIH Research Training Officer Office of Extramural Research, NIH.
NIH Peer Review Process – Grant Renewal Angela Y Ng, MBA, PhD Scientific Review and Referral Officer Center for Scientific Review NCI DCB New Grantee Workshop.
Research Administration Forum Changes to NSF & NIH Proposal Submission and Award Documents December 8, 2015.
Changes is NIH Review Process and Grant Application Forms Shirley M. Moore Professor of Nursing and Associate Dean for Research Frances Payne Bolton School.
Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.
How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University
Restructured NIH Applications One Year Later:
An Insider’s Look at a Study Section Meeting: Perspectives from CSR Monica Basco, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer Coordinator, Early Career Reviewer Program.
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW: GUIDE FOR REVIEW OF RESTRUCTURED GRANT APPLICATIONS.
Upcoming NIH Proposal Preparation Changes NOT-OD (Summary of All Changes) NOT-OD
Pilot Grant Program EGAD Study OCCUPATIONAL & ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH.
Funding Opportunities for Investigator-initiated Grants with Foreign Components at the NIH Somdat Mahabir, PhD, MPH Program Director Epidemiology and Genetics.
NRSA: An Introductory Presentation Michael J. Zvolensky and Rex Forehand.
SCORE Program Informational Town Hall Meeting WELCOME FACULTY! Friday March 11, 2016 BSE Conference Room 9:00 am – 10:00 am.
Roundtable November 12, 2015 Auditorium C, DHMC.  The continuing Resolution is good until December 11, 2015….stay tuned.  Non-competing awards are issued.
1 Lifespan Office of Research Administration, Grants & Contracts NIH PEER REVIEW CRITERIA AND RESTRUCTURED PHS 398 & SF 424 APPLICATION FORMS Presenters:
Office of Sponsored Projects Federal Updates/Reminders ROUNDTABLE FEBRUARY 9, 2016 CAMPUS.
Sponsored Programs Administration (SPA).  Coeus is now updated with the SF424 D-Forms for all NIH submissions due May 25, 2016 and after.  For proposals.
NIH R03 Program Review Ning Jackie Zhang, MD, PhD, MPH College of Health and Public Affairs 04/17/2013.
NIH F31 Application Process
F32 Postdoctoral Fellowship Panel
Presenter: dr. Robert Klesges Professor of Preventive Medicine
Grants & Contracts Officer, III College of Arts and Sciences
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Grant Writing Information Session
How to Write a Successful NIH Career Development Award (K Award)
Information Session January 18, :00-1:45 pm
K R Investigator Research Question
K Awards: Writing the Career Award Development Plan
Biosketches and Other Attachments
Presentation transcript:

November 13, 2009 NIH PROPOSAL SUBMISSIONS: 2010 REVISONS

Goals for Today Provide relevant changes required for NIH submissions. Share resources for updates.

NOT-OD : Restructured forms and Instructions- FY2011 funding submissions Affects PHS 398 and SF424 applications New application packages target January 25, 2010 due dates and beyond Competing applications affected: – All electronic submissions using packages that combine the SF 424 (R&R) with PHS 398 components – NRSA fellowship applications (SF 424 with PHS Fellowship Supplemental form) – Paper PHS 398 application package

NOT-OD : Restructured forms and Instructions- FY2011 funding submissions All new or resubmission applications due on or after January 25, 2010 must use new forms and instructions Submissions using incorrect application forms will be delayed and may not be reviewed NOTE: AIDS applications intended for May 2010 review and submitted by those eligible for continuous submission will use existing forms and instructions.

NOT-OD : Restructured forms and Instructions- FY2011 funding submissions December 2009, new FOA’s with accompanying application packages will be published EXCEPTIONS: Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR [R43/R44])/Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR [R41/R42]) applications Conference (R13/U13) grant applications Individual Kirschstein National Research Service Award (NRSA) Fellowship applications (F30, F31, F32, and F33).

NOT-OD : Restructured forms and Instructions- FY2011 funding submissions For Exceptions: NIH will issue a Guide Notice when the new forms and instructions are available New parent announcements will be issued at the same time and all active FOA’s will be updated

NOT-OD : New Structure and Length – Research Strategy Section Current limit <25; New limit =6 Current limit 25; New limit=12 Current limit >25; New limit=follow FOA instructions One additional page will be allowed for Specific Aims

NOT-OD : New Structure and Length - Research Strategy Section K applications, Research Strategy includes Candidate Information; Limit = 12 pages T (Training) Awards including K12; Kirschstein NRSA; International Training Program Planning (D43); Grants in Epidemiology (D71); Education Projects (R25): Limit remains 25 pages

NOT-OD : New Structure and Length - Research Strategy Section SCORE FOA’s: (PAR’s , , ) SCORE SC1 new limit = 12 pages SCORE SC2 and SC3 new limit = 6 pages

NOT-OD : New Structure and Length - SCORE applications Institutional data to be given under “Other Project Information”-item 11 Other attachments’: A. The total student enrollment at the institution and the number and percent of underrepresented minorities (e.g., Native American, African American, Hispanic American, natives of the U.S. Pacific Islands) in the total student population; B. Number and percent of underrepresented minority students (undergraduate and graduate) enrolled in the sciences relevant to biomedical and behavioral research; C. Number and percent of total and underrepresented minority faculty in the sciences relevant to biomedical and behavioral research and the total number of faculty and of underrepresented minority faculty from these departments participating in funded research.

NOT-OD : Peer Review Criteria Alignment Sections impacted are 1) Research Plan, 2) Resources, 3) Biographical Sketch Research Plan: Consolidate Background / Significance, Preliminary Studies/Progress Report and Research Design/Methods into one single section titled Research Strategy

NOT-OD : Peer Review Criteria Alignment - Research Strategy Single PDF upload Subdivided into Significance, Innovation, Approach Approach subsection includes Preliminary Studies for New applications and Progress Report for Renewal/Revision Applications

NOT-OD : Peer Review Criteria Alignment - Facilities/Other Resources Describe how the scientific environment will contribute to the probability of success of the project; unique features of the environment; institutional investment in investigator’s success (for Early Stage Investigator’s) Location: SF424 R&R Other Project Information; PHS398 Resources format Page

NOT-OD : Peer Review Criteria Alignment - Biographical Sketch New Personal Statement incorporated as part A Former parts A, B and C change to parts B, C and D Peer-reviewed publication list limited to no more than 15 Choose 15 pubs based on recency, importance to the field and relevance to proposed research

NOT-OD – New Scoring Procedures Became effective for all FY 2010 submissions (1/25/09) New 9 point rating scale: (1=exceptional; 9=poor) Not recommended for further consideration (NRFC)

NOT-OD – New Scoring Procedures NRFC: – Lacks significant and substantial merit – Presents serious ethical problems in human subjects protections – Presents serious ethical problems in use of animals, biohazards, and/or select agents

NOT-OD – New Scoring Procedures Each reviewer and discussant will give a separate score for 5 core review criteria Reported individually on summary statement – Significance – Investigator (s) – Innovation – Approach – Environment

NOT-OD – New Scoring Procedures Each reviewer and discussant will give a preliminary impact score Impact score determines which applications will be discussed in committee After discussion by committee, each member will give final impact score

NOT-OD – New Scoring Procedures Overall impact score (OIS) = mean score from all members’ impact score, then multiplying the average by 10 OIS will be reported on summary statement 81 possible OIS’s will range from Funding decisions based on scores, and other factors (mission relevance, portfolio balance, etc.)

RESOURCES NOT-OD , 9/16/09 NOT-GM , 9/28/09 NOT-OD /8/09 NOT-OD , 10/26/09 NOT-OD , 12/2/08 (Scoring) NOT-OD-O9-025, 12/2/08 (Enhanced Review Criteria) Weekly NIH Guide:

Questions?