Homology Modeling comparative modeling vs. ab initio folding alignment (check gaps) threading loop building re-packing side-chains in core, DEE, SCWRL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Functional Site Prediction Selects Correct Protein Models Vijayalakshmi Chelliah Division of Mathematical Biology National Institute.
Advertisements

PROTEOMICS 3D Structure Prediction. Contents Protein 3D structure. –Basics –PDB –Prediction approaches Protein classification.
Rosetta Energy Function Glenn Butterfoss. Rosetta Energy Function Major Classes: 1. Low resolution: Reduced atom representation Simple energy function.
Andrzej Kolinski LABORATORY OF THEORY OF BIOPOLYMERS WARSAW UNIVERSITY Structure and Function of Biomolecules, Bedlewo,
Protein Threading Zhanggroup Overview Background protein structure protein folding and designability Protein threading Current limitations.
Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction
Structural bioinformatics
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ANALYSISTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK DTU Homology Modeling Anne Mølgaard, CBS, BioCentrum, DTU.
Two Examples of Docking Algorithms With thanks to Maria Teresa Gil Lucientes.
Chapter 9 Structure Prediction. Motivation Given a protein, can you predict molecular structure Want to avoid repeated x-ray crystallography, but want.
CISC667, F05, Lec21, Liao1 CISC 467/667 Intro to Bioinformatics (Fall 2005) Protein Structure Prediction 3-Dimensional Structure.
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ANALYSISTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK DTU Can protein model accuracy be identified? Morten Nielsen, CBS, BioCentrum, DTU.
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ANALYSISTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK DTU Protein Homology Modelling Thomas Blicher Center for Biological Sequence Analysis.
Thomas Blicher Center for Biological Sequence Analysis
The Protein Data Bank (PDB)
. Protein Structure Prediction [Based on Structural Bioinformatics, section VII]
1 Protein Structure Prediction Reporter: Chia-Chang Wang Date: April 1, 2005.
Protein Tertiary Structure. Primary: amino acid linear sequence. Secondary:  -helices, β-sheets and loops. Tertiary: the 3D shape of the fully folded.
Molecular modelling / structure prediction (A computational approach to protein structure) Today: Why bother about proteins/prediction Concepts of molecular.
IV. Protein Structure Prediction and Determination Methods of protein structure determination Critical assessment of structure prediction Homology modelling.
Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction Structural Bioinformatics.
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ANALYSISTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK DTU Homology Modelling Thomas Blicher Center for Biological Sequence Analysis.
Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction Structural Bioinformatics.
Protein Structures.
An introduction and homology modeling
Bioinformatics Ayesha M. Khan Spring 2013.
Protein modelling ● Protein structure is the key to understanding protein function ● Protein structure ● Topics in modelling and computational methods.
Homology Modeling David Shiuan Department of Life Science and Institute of Biotechnology National Dong Hwa University.
Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction
Construyendo modelos 3D de proteinas ‘fold recognition / threading’
Tertiary Structure Prediction Methods Any given protein sequence Structure selection Compare sequence with proteins have solved structure Homology Modeling.
Comparative Protein Modeling Jason Wiscarson ( Lloyd Spaine ( Comparative or homology modeling, is a computational.
Practical session 2b Introduction to 3D Modelling and threading 9:30am-10:00am 3D modeling and threading 10:00am-10:30am Analysis of mutations in MYH6.
COMPARATIVE or HOMOLOGY MODELING
Protein Sequence Alignment and Database Searching.
CRB Journal Club February 13, 2006 Jenny Gu. Selected for a Reason Residues selected by evolution for a reason, but conservation is not distinguished.
Representations of Molecular Structure: Bonds Only.
Lecture 12 CS5661 Structural Bioinformatics Motivation Concepts Structure Prediction Summary.
Rotamer Packing Problem: The algorithms Hugo Willy 26 May 2010.
Protein Folding Programs By Asım OKUR CSE 549 November 14, 2002.
Multiple Mapping Method with Multiple Templates (M4T): optimizing sequence-to-structure alignments and combining unique information from multiple templates.
Protein secondary structure Prediction Why 2 nd Structure prediction? The problem Seq: RPLQGLVLDTQLYGFPGAFDDWERFMRE Pred:CCCCCHHHHHCCCCEEEECCHHHHHHCC.
Applied Bioinformatics Week 12. Bioinformatics & Functional Proteomics How to classify proteins into functional classes? How to compare one proteome with.
Structure prediction: Homology modeling
Protein Modeling Protein Structure Prediction. 3D Protein Structure ALA CαCα LEU CαCαCαCαCαCαCαCα PRO VALVAL ARG …… ??? backbone sidechain.
JM - 1 Introduction to Bioinformatics: Lecture XI Computational Protein Structure Prediction Jarek Meller Jarek Meller Division.
Protein Structure Prediction ● Why ? ● Type of protein structure predictions – Sec Str. Pred – Homology Modelling – Fold Recognition – Ab Initio ● Secondary.
Predicting Protein Structure: Comparative Modeling (homology modeling)
Protein Structure Prediction: Homology Modeling & Threading/Fold Recognition D. Mohanty NII, New Delhi.
Modelling protein tertiary structure Ram Samudrala University of Washington.
Protein Folding & Biospectroscopy Lecture 6 F14PFB David Robinson.
Homology Modeling 原理、流程,還有如何用該工具去預測三級結構 Lu Chih-Hao 1 1.
CS-ROSETTA Yang Shen et al. Presented by Jonathan Jou.
Modelling genome structure and function Ram Samudrala University of Washington.
Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction Structural Bioinformatics.
Protein Structure Prediction: Threading and Rosetta BMI/CS 576 Colin Dewey Fall 2008.
We propose an accurate potential which combines useful features HP, HH and PP interactions among the amino acids Sequence based accessibility obtained.
Protein Structure Prediction. Protein Sequence Analysis Molecular properties (pH, mol. wt. isoelectric point, hydrophobicity) Secondary Structure Super-secondary.
Lab Lab 10.2: Homology Modeling Lab Boris Steipe Departments of Biochemistry and.
Protein Structure Visualisation
Computational Structure Prediction
Protein Structure Prediction and Protein Homology modeling
Protein dynamics Folding/unfolding dynamics
Protein dynamics Folding/unfolding dynamics
Protein Structures.
Yang Zhang, Andrzej Kolinski, Jeffrey Skolnick  Biophysical Journal 
Protein structure prediction.
Protein Homology Modelling
Protein structure prediction
Presentation transcript:

Homology Modeling comparative modeling vs. ab initio folding alignment (check gaps) threading loop building re-packing side-chains in core, DEE, SCWRL fold evaluation/scoring statistical potentials (pot. of mean force) - DFIRE minimization servers: Swiss-model

ab initio folding –Rosetta (Baker) –MONSSTER (Skolnick) –I-TASSER (Zhang)

Sequence Alignment critical step gaps should be in loops (check in final model) dynamic programming (Smith-Waterman) –LALIGN: –adjust gap parameters: gap-open penalty>x? gap-extension penalty<x? x=average match score –could also adjust substitution matrix (PAM250, BLOSUM62) use PSI-Blast to include info from homologs –iterative: retrieves homologs, refines search... use HMM to align to family

Threading use info about 3D structure to improve alignment local secondary structure, solvent-accessibility 3D profiles (Eisenberg) 3D-PSSM/Phyre (Sternberg, Lawrence Kelley) THREADER RAPTOR

MODELLER (Sali) references –A. Šali and T. L. Blundell. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234, , –A. Fiser, R. K. G. Do and A. Š ali. Modeling of loops in protein structures. Protein Science 9, , –Fiser A, Sali A. (2003). Modeller: generation and refinement of homology-based protein structure models. Methods Enz. 374: loop-modeling via dynamics evaluation: –>30% identity? –stereochemistry: Procheck –contacts/exposure: ProSA (Sippl, 1993) – distance-based pair potentials

Side-chain re-packing mutations cause steric conflicts (and voids) –changing rotamers can relieve conflicts –adjacent side-chains are coupled –multiple changes might be required –combinatorial search: exhaustive versus Monte Carlo (Holm & Sander, 1992) DEE (Dead-End Elimination) –pruning method –pre-processing, singles, pairs –Desmet, Mayo –reduction in branching factor? interesting application: use DEE to determine rotamer populations for tryptophans; use to predict fluorescence quenching times (Hellings 2003, BiophysJ) rigid backbone assumption –how important is backbone flexibility? –also sample alternative backbone conformations at each site –(Georgiev and Donald, 2007)

SCWRL 3.0 Canutescu et al. (2003) –Dunbrack BBdep rotamer library –de-couple interaction graph into bi-connected components representing local dependencies TreePack (Xu and Berger, JACM 2006) –geometric neighborhood graph decomposition; up to 90x faster side-chain interactions: energy of configuration:

Loop Modeling two approaches: 1. MD/conformational sampling 2. templates from loop library accuracy depends on length: 2-4 (turns), 4-8, >8 (ab initio) importance in immunoglobulins (hyper-variable loops in antigen-binding region)

modeling loops via molecular dynamics –Monte Carlo conformational search using a FF/energy function, high temp MD: 800K (Bruccoleri & Karplus, 1990) –“Does Conformational Free Energy Distinguish Loop Conformations in Proteins?” templates from loop library (examples from existing structures) –amino acid similarities –fit to stems: C  distance, vectors (i-1:i,j,j+1), carbonyls?,  angles

Scoring statistical potentials –knowledge-based poten (Sippl, 1990) –potential of mean force –residue-based potentials (e.g. C  -C  contact distance, or centers-of-mass) atomic pairwise potentials –(Lu & Skolnick, 2001) –capture side-chain interactions better –discriminate correct folds better –z-score of true fold vs. decoys (gapless threading)

DFIRE (Yaoqi Zhou) Distance-scaled Finite Ideal-gas REference state –Zhou and Zhou (Prot. Sci, 2002) –all-atom potential –Nexp(i,j,r) will not increase in r 2 as in an infinite system –  =1.57 gives best correlation with density in radial shells –improves ability to recognize correct fold versus decoys –see also: RAPDF (Samudrala and Moult, 1998) DOPE (Shen and Sali, 2006) fair??? instead, assume:

Minimization a logical step, however... one of the conclusions from CASP4 (Baker): –minimization generally made models worse (took predicted structures farther from native) –threshold: minimization works if rmsd<2Å, but ab initio models are often 4-6Å rmsd –backbone adjustments required?