From multiculturalism to super-diversity Prof. Steven Vertovec ESRC Centre on Migration, Policy and Society University of Oxford
Some core features of multiculturalism To ensure equality, respect, tolerance To enable continuity of traditions and identities Representation (‘community leaders’) in local forums Public support for community associations, activities Culturally sensitive service provision (in schools, healthcare, policing, social work, etc.) -- mostly based on ‘corporatist’ model of ethnic groups -- particularly Caribbean & South Asian oriented
In addition to recent setbacks, Multiculturalism faces a further serious set of challenges…
Immigration to/from the UK, Source: ippr, based on International Passenger Survey and ONS
total international migration by country of birth, United Kingdom Source: Home Office
UK 2001: Inflow by region (total 106,820) Source: Home Office
Non-EU Immigration, change source: IPPR
London, home to 42% of UK’s immigrants Migrants (born outside UK) = 2 million (29%) of 7 million 23% came before % came after 1990 Compared to UK-born Londoners: –More migrants with higher qualifications, more with none –More migrants with dependent children 33 groups > 10,000, 12 more > 5, languages
Newham (pop. 243,898) by country of birth source: 2001 Census
Towards ‘Super-Diversity’ In UK, increasingly more people -- from non-’traditional’ source countries (non-colonial link) -- with greater linguistic diversity (300 languages in London) -- in smaller groups (pockets of Columbians, Romanians, Ghanaians, Kurds, Japanese, Afghans, Fujianese, etc.) alongside large, longstanding migrant origin communities -- with differing gender & age profiles per group -- with differing migration status (student – spouse – work permit – EU national – sector based schemes – au pairs – highly skilled – asylum-seekers – refugees – undocumented – citizens) -- with more mobility (spatially and temporally) -- with more sustained transnational links (social, religious, political)
Super-diversity: some implications New patterns of inequality and prejudice New patterns/experiences of space and ‘contact’ –may reduce prejudice / increase respect –cross-cutting ties / networks –may sensitize to spectrum of possible differences –‘hybridity’, ‘interculturalism’, ‘cosmopolitanism’ ‘Corporatist’ models of multiculturalism likely inadequate Prompt shift in public service provision: from ‘community knowledge’-based to ‘generic skills to respond flexibly to all encounters’ with individuals & their cultural variations (Kai 2003)
ESRC Centre on Migration, Policy and Society University of Oxford 58 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 6QS United Kingdom T +44/ F +44/