Page 1 CRAD F&A Waiver Process Change November 15, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Types of Cost Sharing Mandatory: When the sponsor stipulates that cost sharing or matching funds are required as a condition of receiving an award. Specifically.
Advertisements

Sponsored Project Effort on Summer and Part-Time Appointments Pamela A. Webb Proposal.
JULY12, 2011 SESSION 7 OF AAPLS – BUDGETING FOR PROPOSALS WITH SUBCONTRACTS: ESTABLISHING RELATIONSHIPS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES.
Subrecipient Monitoring OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION 2010.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
Indirect Cost & Waiver Update Senior Contract & Grant Officers Chris Rigney and Lauren Ryan.
The Revised Infrastructure Policy Effective 9/01/05 and Sponsored Projects Office of Research Administration Jesse Charlton May 13, 2009.
Presented by: OSP January MRAM 2012 Policy publication: January 16, 2012.
External Funding Fiscal Issues CEHD CPI January 2014.
Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200 Nicole Pilman, Uniform Guidance Implementation Coordinator Sue Paulson, Assistant Controller Pamela A. Webb, Associate VP for.
ADVANCE SPENDING REQUESTS – DEVELOPING REVISED PROGRAM Lynelle A. Gehrke, Associate Director Office of Contract & Grant Administration Campus Cost Transfer.
CREATING AND UNDERSTANDING BUDGETS Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Jack Gelfand, Director Maria Nakamura, Associate Director
Supporting Research in Colleges of Education: Some Preliminary Data Ralph E. Reynolds
Financial Policies Training: Effort Reporting on Sponsored Projects (2.1.21) Effective Date: July 1, 2009.
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session Three: The 1,2,3’s of.
New F&A Waiver Strategy. Current F&A Challenges Large amounts of foregone F&A restrict institutional capabilities Institutional risk exists due to inconsistent.
Board of Regents Strategic Planning Study Session A Brief Discussion of UCB Peer Financial Comparative Data April 10, 2006.
Facilities & Administrative Costs and Sponsored Programs at Chico State March 27, 2012.
Instructions for VCU’s Internal Approval Form Form is required to obtain Authorized Official’s signature on proposals and awards OSP – 8/2006.
Building Partnerships with U.S. Universities William Lacy Vice Provost—University Outreach & International Programs.
UW Definition: “Cost sharing is the portion of total costs of a sponsored project that is borne by the UW, rather than the sponsor.” Office of Extramural.
1 COST SHARING CReATE ver. 04/13 © 2013 Florida State University. All rights reserved Objective: To understand the requirements related to cost sharing.
Washington University Washington University School of Medicine Research Administrator’s Forum February 2002.
HOW TO WRITE A BUDGET…. The Importance of Your Budget Preparation of the budget is an important part of the proposal preparation process. Pre-Award and.
MANAGING THE SUBMISSION AND AWARD PROCESS Office of Sponsored Projects Main Campus and Branches.
Financial Management How Can I Spend Award Dollars.
EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF GRANTS AND CONTRACTS Effort Reporting System Departmental Coordinator Training Updated 01/11/2012.
CSBS Fourth Friday Faculty Workshop 1: Grant Management CSBS: Frances Solano ORSP: Stefanie Friesen TUC: Stacey Lord / Maryann Camarillo 1/23/
Managing Your Grant Roberta Teliska Vice President for Sponsored Programs Operations The Research Foundation of SUNY October 6, 2008.
Role of the Sponsored Programs Office Michelle D. Christy March 23, 2010.
MANAGING SPONSORED PROJECTS FINANCIAL COMPLIANCE May 1, 2008 Office of Grants &Contracts Accounting.
1 Sponsored Programs AdditionalReviewSteps. 2 Sponsored Program Section Content How to Identify a Sponsored Program Types of Costs Review Budget to Actual.
WORKING WITH SPO AND IAO Lynne HollyerNoam Pines Associate Director Research Administrator Industry Alliances OfficeSponsored Projects Office
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs April 4, 2011 Topic: Cost Share.
Washington University Washington University Hilltop Campus Research Administrator’s Forum March 2002 Presented by The Research Office and Sponsored Projects.
ORIENTATION Grants Development Office. ″The Grants Development Office assists faculty, staff, and external collaborators, when relevant, with conceptualizing,
PRESENTATION TO FACILITIES INFORMATION SYSTEM USERS OCTOBER 2013 CORPORATE CONTROLLER’S OFFICE JODY MURAWSKI COST ANALYSIS BEVERLY LIPSKI, BILL RIDGWAY.
Cost Sharing for Sponsored Programs College of Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources March 19, 2010.
Virginia Department for the Aging Area Plan Financial Section Training FY2006.
Cost Sharing James Trotter Quality Standards Manager Sponsored Projects Administration.
Current Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Distribution Faculty Senate January 19, 2011 Jim Rankin.
Faculty coming aboard: Best Practices for PI Transfers.
DGA Community Meeting February 14, DGA Community Meeting: Agenda February 14, 2012 Agenda ItemDiscussion Leader Welcome and IntroductionsMoira.
COST SHARE Neta Fernandez Director, Grants and Contracts.
Cost Sharing The Double Edge Sword 1 Dennis J. Paffrath – University of Maryland, Baltimore Executive Director, Sponsored Programs Administration
Submitting Subaward Proposals ORA Third Tuesday January 15, 2007.
Reduced Responsibility Policy, Process and Status on Implementation Presented by: Carol Rhodes Associate Director Office of Sponsored Programs Michael.
Carilion Clinic, Office of Sponsored Projects Frequently Asked Questions Pre-Award Procedures For Principal Investigators.
Daily Management of Awards Jennifer Crockett Jennifer Crockett, Director, Sponsored Projects Finance, Columbia University Tamara Hill Tamara Hill, Manager,
UCLA Department of Medicine Office of Research Administration.
Seminar Series Charge the Stuff that’s Easy to Defend Tim Reuter, Director Post Award Office of Sponsored Research December 5, 2013 Nuts & Bolts of Research.
Limited Submissions NCURA Region III Spring Meeting.
1 Service Center FY2006 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation.
UCB Accounting System Review Prepared by: T. Dobson 6/28/01.
1 February 23, 2015 Teresa A. Costantinidis Budget and Resource Management UCSF Facilities & Administration Presentation.
Research Activity Administered in support of San Diego State University Fiscal Year
Quarterly SPAAS Meeting Sponsored Programs Administration & Accounting Services.
Indirect Cost Calculations: Beyond the Basics Jim Carter Huron Consulting Tuesday March 12, :45 – 3:30 PM 1.
Cost Analysis Guidance for Information Requested from Financial Officer.
SUBMITTING PROPOSALS AFTER LEGAL CLOSE If you plan to collaborate with VUMC investigators, you will need to include a VUMC proposal for an outgoing billing.
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session VI: Cost Share Part One.
How to Discuss Indirect Costs with Upper Administration Anne Feuerborn – MAXIMUS Steve Cofield – OHSU Leading Excellence in Research Costing Practices.
HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER
Grant and Contract Accounting Brown Bag January 24, 2017
Collaborative Research Initiative for Sponsored Programs
PROCESSING SPONSORED PROPOSALS AT THE JOHN F
Calculation of Research F&A Rate
Faculty Grant Writing FLC (Faculty Learning Community)
Updates COM Faculty Council
Office of Sponsored Programs
Presentation transcript:

Page 1 CRAD F&A Waiver Process Change November 15, 2007

Page 2 Issues  Large amounts of foregone F&A limit institutional capabilities  Institutional risk exists due to inconsistent treatment  F&A Waiver process needs to be streamlined UMN is more generous with F&A waivers than other top research universities UMN is more generous with F&A waivers than other top research universities

Page 3 Minnesota Waiver Volume  July 2007 – October 2007 (4 month)  Total amount waived: $1,875,382  Total # of waiver requests: 76 Dollar value (direct costs)# of waivers$ waived <50K 40$ 346,899 50K - $100K 12$ 166,222 >$100K 16$1,362,262 Federal Projects 26$ 808,190 Non-Federal 19$ 393,680 State 6$ 305,183 Business & Industry 18$ 194,443 Foreign 2$ 26,527 Other 2 $ 148,079

Page 4 Peer Positions  F&A Waivers not granted to for-profits (UC all campuses, Stanford, Michigan, Washington, MIT, Michigan State, Purdue)  F&A Waivers not granted to foreign entities (UC all campuses, Stanford, Penn State, MIT, Michigan State, Purdue)

Page 5 Minnesota F&A Rates are Competitive  U of Washington56.0%  UC San Diego54.5%  UC San Francisco54.0%  UC Los Angeles54.0%  UC Berkeley53.5%  U of Illinois53.0% (UIC at 57%)  U of Michigan52.0%  U of Minnesota51.0%  Ohio State50.0%  Wisconsin47.0% (FY08 under negotiation)  North Carolina46.0% (FY08 under negotiation)

Page 6 SPA PI Transfers Non-profits with published policy Special governmental programs Projects which move from off-campus to on-campus. New Strategy (Part 1) F&A Waiver Requests Administrative Waivers Strategic Waivers Regular Waivers Deans Small Project Waiver (<$50K year) Other Reductions above minimums VPR Waivers or reductions below minimums Tracked

Page 7 Proposed F&A Rate Minimums (awards over $50K direct costs/year)  Federal ……………………………… Federally negotiated rate*  Foreign government ………………... Federally negotiated rate*  For-profit …………………………… 34%  State of Minnesota ………………….. 0% (for now)  Non-profit/foundations ……...…….. Lower of 10% TDC or published policy  Corporate affiliate programs ……….. 10% TDC  Industry-funded clinical trials** …… 26% TDC * or as approved by SPA ** sponsor-initiated protocols only

Page 8 New Strategy (Part 2) Waivers No Longer Available for:  Projects that did not receive institutional endorsement prior to submission to Sponsor  F&A waivers or reductions of rates negotiated by PIs with Sponsors If reduced F&A is needed in these instances, the Unit must set up a cost-sharing account to pay the difference between the Sponsor-approved rate and the federally negotiated rate or approved minimum for this type of project.

Page 9 Potential Reasons to Approve Waivers  Seed grants which may attract larger awards  Hardship for new PI  Awards which include equipment or building funds  Community relations or library projects  Student services projects (or increase funding to pay for students)  Capped awards  Department committed to undertake the research regardless of external funding (e.g, any dollar gained is better than nothing)  Small cost  Junior faculty or incoming faculty member  Enhance cultural/artistic activities (small projects only)  Only available source of funds in an area  Strategic partnerships

Page 10 Potential Reasons to Disapprove Waivers  Precedent setting  Grounds on which the waiver might be justified to other faculty whose projects carry full overhead  Consistency with similar sponsors or programs  Large total cost to the University  Any IP rights granted to the sponsor  Past history of PI requesting waivers  Profit-making entities  Foreign entities

Page 11 New Strategy: Part 3 F&A Waiver Process Improvements 1.Administrative waivers and waivers for small projects (less than $50K) will no longer require use of the formal waiver process 2.SPA has created a list of agencies with pre-approved rates (based on policy); proof of agency policy is no longer required to accompany PRFs when submitting to these entities 3.SPA has new “Foregone F&A calculator” to help Deans and SPA better understand and track foregone amountsForegone F&A calculator 4.Waiver requests must be submitted in advance (4 business days for regular waivers, 7 business days for strategic waivers) 5.CRAD will be updated twice yearly on the amount of F&A waived for regular and strategic waivers  Waived amounts will not be tracked for small & administrative waivers

Page 12 Proposal for New Waiver Strategy Rollout Proposed for January 1, 2008  Streamlined waiver approval process implemented  Dean’s approval for small waivers implemented  SPA endorsement for administrative waivers implemented  No waivers granted for proposals submitted without endorsement  Reductions for for-profits and foreign governments beyond pre-set minimum level requires VPR approval  Other F&A minimums considered “targets”  PIs informed that they may not negotiate F&A rates Proposed for January 1, 2009  F&A minimum levels for all categories implemented

Page 13 Questions?