Seismic Performance in Urban Regions (SPUR) and Prototype NEESgrid Implementation Roger L. King, Gregory L. Fenves, Jacobo Bielak, Tomasz Haupt Bozidar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seismic Simulation: Advances with OpenSees
Advertisements

Using the Collaborative Tools in NEESgrid Charles Severance University of Michigan.
Performance-based Evaluation of the Seismic Response of Bridges with Foundations Designed to Uplift Marios Panagiotou Assistant Professor, University of.
Numerical methods in the Earth Sciences: seismic wave propagation Heiner Igel, LMU Munich III The latest developments, outlook Grenoble Valley Benchmark.
Nirmal Jayaram Nilesh Shome Helmut Krawinkler 2010 SCEC Annual Meeting A statistical analysis of the responses of tall buildings to recorded and simulated.
Faults in Focus: Earthquake Science Accomplishments Thomas H. Jordan Director, Southern California Earthquake Cente r 28 February 2014.
Prague, March 18, 2005Antonio Emolo1 Seismic Hazard Assessment for a Characteristic Earthquake Scenario: Integrating Probabilistic and Deterministic Approaches.
2o Ciclo de Palestras em Engenharia Civil de Novembro de 2003 Universidade Nova de Lisboa-Centro de Investigaçao em Estruturas e Construção-UNIC.
1 Software & Grid Middleware for Tier 2 Centers Rob Gardner Indiana University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven National.
S1000D Transformation Toolkit Mr. Wayne Gafford Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) Mr. Tyler Shumaker Concurrent Technologies Corporation (CTC)
The GEON LiDAR Workflow: An Internet-Based Tool for the Distribution and Processing of LiDAR Point Cloud Data Christopher J. Crosby, J Ramón Arrowsmith,
ARCS Data Analysis Software An overview of the ARCS software management plan Michael Aivazis California Institute of Technology ARCS Baseline Review March.
PEER Jonathan P. Stewart University of California, Los Angeles May 22, 2002 Geotechnical Uncertainties for PBEE.
Simulation and Information Technologies Gregory L. Fenves, UC Berkeley PEER Summative Meeting – June 13, 2007.
GMSM Methodology and Terminology Christine Goulet, UCLA GMSM Core Members.
Instrumented Moment Frame Steel Buildings Models Erol Kalkan, PhD California Geological Survey PEER-GMSM First Work Shop, Berkeley Oct
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Grids and Portals at NERSC Presented by Steve Chan.
Ground Motion Intensity Measures for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Hemangi Pandit Joel Conte Jon Stewart John Wallace.
Modeling Decision Variables: Dollars, Deaths, and Downtime Judith Mitrani-Reiser (JHU) James L. Beck (Caltech) PEER Annual Meeting San Francisco, CA January.
Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.
Overview of GMSM Methods Nicolas Luco 1 st Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification (GMSM) for Nonlinear Analysis – 27 October 2006.
Nonlinear response- history analysis in design practice RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE November 2007 Joe Maffei.
Assessing Effectiveness of Building Code Provisions Greg Deierlein & Abbie Liel Stanford University Curt Haselton Chico State University … other contributors.
A Genetic Algorithm Solution for the Problem of Selection and Scaling of Ground Motion Records Arzhang Alimoradi and Farzad Naeim John A. Martin & Associates.
11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop1 NUMERICAL GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS: ASSUMPTIONS, VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION Earthquake Source Velocity Structure.
Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering
Time-dependent vulnerability assessment of RC buildings considering
Preliminary Investigations on Post-earthquake Assessment of Damaged RC Structures Based on Residual Drift Jianze Wang Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Kaoshan.
NEESR: Near-Collapse Performance of Existing Reinforced Concrete Structures Presented by Justin Murray Graduate Student Department of Civil and Environmental.
Static Pushover Analysis
CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE FOR THE GEOSCIENCES High Performance Computing applications in GEON: From Design to Production Dogan Seber.
Large-scale 3-D Simulations of Spontaneous Rupture and Wave Propagation in Complex, Nonlinear Media Roten, D. 1, Olsen, K.B. 2, Day, S.M. 2, Dalguer, L.A.
Ohio State University Department of Computer Science and Engineering 1 Cyberinfrastructure for Coastal Forecasting and Change Analysis Gagan Agrawal Hakan.
Seismic Performance in Urban Regions (SPUR): A Simulation Example Roger L. King Tomasz Haupt Mississippi State University Gregory L. Fenves University.
GROUND MOTION INTENSITY MEASURES THAT CORRELATE TO ENGINEERING DEMAND PARAMETERS Jonathan Bray and Thaleia Travasarou University of California, Berkeley.
1 SCEC Broadband Platform Development Using USC HPCC Philip Maechling 12 Nov 2012.
Efrat Frank, Ashraf Memon, Vishu Nandigam, Chaitan Baru
Team UCDSESM Yihai Bao, YeongAe Heo, Zhiyu Zong University of California, Davis April 4 th, 2008 Prediction for Progressive Collapse Resistance of a 2D.
EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models Role of SCEC Ground Motion Simulation Validation Technical Activity Group (GMSV TAG) in SEISM Project.
July 21, 2005AESE Fast Hybrid Simulation with Geographically Distributed Substructures Gilberto Mosqueda Boza Stojadinovic Jason P. Hanley (Presenter)
Session 1A – Ground Motions and Intensity Measures Paul Somerville Andrew Whittaker Greg Deierlein.
Review of Urban Modeling Program at LLNL CRTI RD Project Review Meeting Canadian Meteorological Centre August 22-23, 2006.
SCEC Workshop on Earthquake Ground Motion Simulation and Validation Development of an Integrated Ground Motion Simulation Validation Program.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UCSD: Engineering Core 2 Portal and Grid Infrastructure.
State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System China Integration of Grid Service and Web Processing Service Gao Ang State Key Laboratory.
Seismic of Older Concentrically Braced Frames Charles Roeder (PI) Dawn Lehman, Jeffery Berman (co-PI) Stephen Mahin (co-PI Po-Chien Hsiao.
NEEDS FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
GEON2 and OpenEarth Framework (OEF) Bradley Wallet School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma
Validation of physics-based ground motion earthquake simulations using a velocity model improved by tomographic inversion results 1 Ricardo Taborda, 1.
NEES Cyberinfrastructure Center at the San Diego Supercomputer Center, UCSD George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation NEES TeraGrid.
WebFlow High-Level Programming Environment and Visual Authoring Toolkit for HPDC (desktop access to remote resources) Tomasz Haupt Northeast Parallel Architectures.
CABER Project Update February 22, 2008
Southern California Earthquake Center SCEC Collaboratory for Interseismic Simulation and Modeling (CISM) Infrastructure Philip J. Maechling (SCEC) September.
Progress towards Structural Design for Unforeseen Catastrophic Events ASME Congress Puneet Bajpai and Ben Schafer The Johns Hopkins University.
Experiments in Utility Computing: Hadoop and Condor Sameer Paranjpye Y! Web Search.
Southern California Earthquake Center SI2-SSI: Community Software for Extreme-Scale Computing in Earthquake System Science (SEISM2) Wrap-up Session Thomas.
A Use Case for GEON 1 A user request of the form: “For a given region (i.e. lat/long extent, plus depth), return a 3D structural model with accompanying.
Southern California Earthquake Center CyberShake Progress Update November 3, 2014 – 4 May 2015 UGMS May 2015 Meeting Philip Maechling SCEC IT Architect.
Interacting Data Services for Distributed Earthquake Modeling Marlon Pierce, Choonhan Youn, and Geoffrey Fox Community Grids Lab Indiana University.
Site effect characterization of the Ulaanbaatar basin
ShakeAlert CISN Testing Center (CTC) Development
Yelena Kropivnitskaya, Kristy F. Tiampo,
(PERFORMANCE-BASED PLASTIC DESIGN)
Kinematic Modeling of the Denali Earthquake
PreOpenSeesPost: a Generic Interface for OpenSees
High-F Project Southern California Earthquake Center
Philip J. Maechling (SCEC) September 13, 2015
LA Basin Story Tectonics Geology Faults Velocity Structure Seismicity
Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra
Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra
Presentation transcript:

Seismic Performance in Urban Regions (SPUR) and Prototype NEESgrid Implementation Roger L. King, Gregory L. Fenves, Jacobo Bielak, Tomasz Haupt Bozidar Stojadinovic, Joerg Meyer Antonio Fernandez, Jaesung Park, Prashant Chopra, Koel Das, Aysegul Askan, George Petropoulos, A. Kalayanasundaram, M. Khotournenko, A. Chilkuri, N. Ammari NSF NEES Awardees Meeting September 11-12, 2003

Outline of Presentation What is SPUR? Value of simulation and integration Structural performance Earthquake ground motion modeling Site response and soil-structure interaction Visualization SPURport – web portal and demo

An NSF ERC Problem-Centered Research Flow Process

SPUR, a Distributed Simulation Framework for Seismic Performance for Urban Regions Advance the state-of-the-art in simulating the effects of a major earthquake on an urban region. Integration of earthquake ground motion modeling with modeling of structural and infrastructure systems using advanced computational and visualization methods. The goal is to develop tools that will ultimately permit damage estimates based on best available information. Generalize discipline specific approach towards system-level research.

PBEE SSFI Basin Effects Large Scale Viz Fundamental Research Computational seismology SSI with DRM PBEE Performance measures Spatial distribution of performance Large scale viz. Enabling Technologies Archimides OpenSees NEESgrid System integration Middleware NEES HPC Resource Viz Systems-level Applications Loss estimation Tools for decision makers Scenarios for planning MicrozonationPlanning Emerg. Resp. Education Loss Estimate SPUR Strategic Vision

Leveraging Existing NSF Research for System-Level Problems ground motion data (CMU) precomputed simulations ground motion data (CMU) precomputed simulations rendering + portal (UCI) (MSU) immersive rendering & web-based portal rendering + portal (UCI) (MSU) immersive rendering & web-based portal structural performance (PEER - Berkeley) precomputed or online simulations structural performance (PEER - Berkeley) precomputed or online simulations

SPURport: The Grid-Based Portal for SPUR Provide earthquake community with collaborative environment for research on Seismic Performance of Urban Regions and training of future earthquake engineers Develop NEESgrid application of databases, computation, visualization, using distributed Grid-accessible resources; demonstrate ability to use NEESgrid resources at any location Opportunity to apply NEESgrid software releases to a substantial application and provide NEESgrid developers feedback Add to simulation capability of NEES

Strike-Slip Fault Simulation Model Peak Ground Displacement Peak Ground Velocity

Thrust Fault Simulation Model Peak Ground Displacement Peak Ground Velocity

Structural Models for Regional Simulation Objective Evaluate regional distribution of Engineering Demand Parameters (EPD) SDF Model u u u u u u u u Grid point - “Hydra” model - Multiple parameters and multiple orientations - Constant strength analysis - Constant ductility analysis Simulation Tool – OpenSees (PEER software framework for simulation) Building Models Shear Beam Model Generalized Frame Model Building Models

Constant Ductility Analysis for Strike Slip Fault

SAC 9-story OpenSees Model Column Fiber Section Beam Fiber Section Leaning columns for P-  effects Distributed Plasticity Beam-Column LA 10%/50 year

Regional Distribution of SAC 9-story EDP Roof drift ratioMax Plastic RotationMax Story Drift Ratio PGV

Regional Distribution of SAC 20-story EDP Max Plastic Rotation Roof drift ratioMax Story Drift Ratio Story 22Story 15PGV

Calibration of Shear Beam Model Pushover Analysis of Frame ModelShear Beam Model Story Force-Deform.

Comparison of Floor Displacement Generic Frame Model Floor 1Floor 2Floor 3 Floor 1Floor 2Floor 3 Shear Beam Model

Regional Distribution of EDP, 3-Story Roof Displacement SAC Frame ModelShear Beam ModelGeneric Frame Model SAC Frame ModelShear Beam ModelGeneric Frame Model Max Story Drift

Computational Challenge SAC 9-Story Simulation –306 DOFS, 1800 time steps. –Approx 4 min. per grid point. –25,281 grid points. –70 days in single processors. Constant Ductility Analysis – 28 parameter combinations. – Considering 8 orientations. – 25,281 grid points. – 5 iterations in average. – One million non-linear analysis of SDF system per parameter.

OpenSees Applications for Parallel Computing Parallel simulation applications built with OpenSees API and MPI API can be implemented using NEESgrid resources. Model Domain Element Material Pattern Analysis Solution Procedures OpenSees Framework wake PackagingSend output wait Un- packaging ReceiveGround Motion Structure parameter Slave Node Job Queue Wait Queue Ground Motion Data Recording output Receive outputUn-packaging Send Ground Motion Structure parameter packaging Process Manage Master Node Producer-Consumer Approach

Northridge Earthquake Mainshock (USGS)

Rupture Model Depth (km) Wald et al. (1996) Strike=122 (S58E), Dip=40 (S32W), Rake=101 USGS

Snapshots of Surface Velocity Peak ground velocity ( USGS)

Wavelength-Adaptive Tetrahedral Mesh (~ 100 million elements; 3 hrs)

Site Response - SSI Cross Section Reduced Domain Cascading (3 models) Domain Reduction Method Run on different platforms

Free-Field Response Peak values of displacement and velocity Analysis Region Observation Point (1280, 3000)

Observation Point Velocity (m/s) |FT|

Peak Ground Velocity in Region of Interest Vmax 800 m/s 100 m/s 200 m/s 40 m Spatial variability of ground motion 3D vs 1D

Random City Model Alternatively, populate with sets of uniform buildings

Structural Models and Distributions

Influence of Different Structural Distributions On Maximum Ground Velocity (EW) Free-field Hz Buildings R-City Low period structures

Random City Simulation

High-end Visualization New Algorithms for Rendering: Efficient 3-D mesh decimation More efficient than edge- collapse Various levels of detail  TetFusion  QTetFusion

SPURport Architecture Tele-presence NEESpop (middleware) MSU extensions (Enterprise Computational System) Apache Tomcat JetSpeed Chef NEESgrid services DBMS (postgress) EJB container (JBoss) OGSI (globus 3.0) ECS application streaming device driver Data Controller Data streaming and channel management Authentication and authorization SPUR applet Request Data NSDS Data and Metadata Collaboration ERC at Mississippi State PSCNCSA OpenSees Ground Motion Data Struct. Resp. Data Ground Motion Data Front End Back End

SPURport Functionality Earthquake Model Inventory of Structures view data extract data Structure Model select or define a structure (set parameters) select location run simulation select or define an inventory run simulation (future) view data

Earthquake Model

Structural Model

Inventory Model

Spatial Response Data

Individual Structure Response