Teaming for Success: Going from ALL to EACH. Option #2: Oregon Reading First’s PD series Training series is optional, if interested submit application.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R T I Progress Monitoring Module 6 RI RTI Initiative 2007.
Advertisements

Closing the Achievement Gap in Park City School District Nicole Todd, Ph.D. Special Education Coordinator.
November 2009 Oregon RTI Project Cadre 5.  Participants will understand both general IDEA evaluation requirements and evaluation requirements for Specific.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Monitoring Student Progress: Administrative Issues Part I – History of Using Progress Monitoring in Minneapolis Schools Doug Marston John Hintze July 8,
Robyn Seifert February 6,  smarterbalanced.org  K-12 EDUCATION  Administrators 2.
Executive Summary  Did not meet API/AYP goals in language arts for the school or significant subgroups.  Did not meet API/AYP goals in math for the school.
What We’re Learning Building & Improving an RTI System Seven Key Foundations RISS 2009.
*This is a small school district of fewer than 1000 students located in northern Illinois. *The district consists of: an Elementary School (Pre-K--4 th.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention
Eugene, OR Brown Bag Presentation: November 19, 2007
RTI RDS E-I-E-I-O. How Does it All Fit Together? ToolPurposeUser RDS RTIHouses student Tier 2 plans; Plans will follow student across schools RTI team.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
October, 2006 Leadership Session: A Proposal for Further Professional Development for Cohort A Reading First Schools Hank Fien Center for Teaching and.
Oregon Department of Education Sustaining K-3 Literacy Momentum Forum Salem, Oregon September 28, 2007.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
One More Piece of the RTI Puzzle: Zones of Growth for Students Receiving Tier 2 Instructional Supports Hank Fien, Ph.D. Center for Teaching and Learning.
1. 2 Dimensions of A Healthy System Districts Schools Grades Classrooms Groups.
1 Oregon Reading First: Cohort B Leadership Session Portland, Oregon May 27, 2009.
EOY Reading 3D NC Comparison Templates The following slides contain a combination of state-level EOY mCLASS reports paired with blank templates.
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
RTI 2 Murfreesboro City Schools Lessons Learned Linda Gilbert, Director of SchoolsLinda Gilbert, Director of Schools Caresa Brooks, Coordinator, Reading/InterventionCaresa.
Schoolwide Reading Improvement Model - RTI Name:___________________________ Grade:___________________________ School:__________________________ CONSULTING.
RTI Grade Level Team Meetings Presented by April Kelley.
Please have a seat and review the budget.  BEST Mission and Vision: Believe Engage Succeed Together  Norms For everyone at BES: 1. Take it to the.
© 2011 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency Progress Monitoring Campus RTI Implementation: The RTI – Data Management Tool (RTI-DMT) Pamela.
March 4,  ALL third grade students, including those classified as students with disabilities and/or ELL (ESOL) MUST take the Florida Standards.
RtI July 29, RtI Is… A General Education Data-Driven Process or System that Provides Instructional Intervention in Reading, Mathematics,
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Oregon RTI The Who, What & How of Participation in
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Evaluation Is a process, not an event; Is individual to the student; Is comprehensive in design; Is used to inform eligibility; Is the same process whether.
Elementary RtI Liaison Meeting Shirley Jirik, Ed.D. RtI Coordinator October 30, 2013.
B-ELL Leadership Session May 26, 2009 Jorge Preciado University of Oregon © 2009 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Teacher Education Division Conference Charlotte, NC George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI.
Foundations and Critical Features of Successful R.T.I. Implementation Erin Lolich, OrRTI project Dean Richards, OrRTI project Tigard-Tualatin School District.
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
Decision Rules: Models, Ideas & Resources Presented by April Kelley.
Training for Problem Solving Teams Susan Clay Jefferson County Board of Education Fall 2014.
Evaluation Planning & Eligibility Identifying Learning Disabilities Under a RTI Model October 17, 2008.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
Section 1: Why RTI Is So Important. How do we know RTI really works? YEARS OF RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND USE IN THE CLASSROOM.
Student Growth Percentiles Basics Fall Outcomes Share information on the role of Category 1 assessments in evaluations Outline steps for districts.
Evaluation and Eligibility Using RTI Crook County School District February 26, 2010.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Successes and Challenges of Implementing a Systems Change Model Cheri Page, Roseburg SD Christina Cox, Lowell SD Cherie Ward, Baker City SD Erin Lolich,
Martha Buenrostro, PhD SPDG Project Director
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA PRINCIPAL’S CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.
STAR 3 Parent Advisory Council UPDATE Questions to Parents Fact: More than 28% of children enter kindergarten more than 1 year below age level in.
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA LAW CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
RTI 2 Please write down three things you want to know before this session is done today.
1 Average Range Fall. 2 Average Range Winter 3 Average Range Spring.
Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Dayton MS/HS Literacy /28/2015. Literacy Goals for the Year: Three Literacy Goals: Standard-based Learning Targets (e.g. ‘I Can’) that integrate.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
MTSS Multi-Tiered System of Supports
Ahoskie Elementary School
ESL Data-Driven Instruction
Systems Problem Solving
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support
Learning and growing together
Response to Intervention in Educational Transformation Schools
February 2, February 2,
RTI Readiness Conference: Intensive Levels of Assistance
Ahoskie Elementary School
Response to Intervention
Presentation transcript:

Teaming for Success: Going from ALL to EACH

Option #2: Oregon Reading First’s PD series Training series is optional, if interested submit application –Application due by November 22nd Content: –Systems-level problem solving –Systems level and individual growth and goal setting –RTI in a Three-tiered model (Tigard-Tualatin Series) –District and School Literacy planning (Sustainability) PD mechanism –Statewide, Regional, school-based Funding: –February, 2007 ODE will fund – school year either RF funding or alternative ODE funds

Objectives Part 1 New section 3 reports Developing school goals K-3 Student goals and zones of growth Part 2 Systems level problem solving Part 3 Sustainability Literacy planning

Healthy Systems (Tiers) Matter School A Student weekly growth:.5 cwpm Instructional Group Average weekly growth:.5 cwpm School B Student weekly growth:.5 cwpm Instructional Group Average weekly growth: 1.75 cwpm

Dual Discrepancy: Severely discrepant in initial skill level and growth

Section 3 Reports and School Level Goals

Oregon Reading First Section 3 Report

Oregon Reading First Section 3 Report - Charts

Oregon Reading First Section 3 Report - Text

Kindergarten Students across 12 states in Western Region *High performing = 85 th percentile % Intensive K Students Entering Fall High Performing* % of Students Benchmark at EOY Average % of Students Benchmark at EOY 60% or more95.9%83.4% 50 – 59%93.8%74.5% 40 – 49%95.7%79.7% 30 – 39%93.9%78.8% 20 – 29%93.8%77.4% 0 – 19%100%84.2%

Grade 1 Students across 12 states in Western Region *High performing = 85 th percentile % Intensive K Students Entering Fall High Performing % of Students Benchmark at EOY Average % of Students Benchmark at EOY 60% or more71.4%57.9% 50 – 59%77.8%53.6% 40 – 49%73.7%59.2% 30 – 39%80.3%63.2% 20 – 29%81%64.1% 0 – 19%89.7%70.7%

Grade 2 Students across 12 states in Western Region *High performing = 85 th percentile % Intensive K Students Entering Fall High Performing % of Students Benchmark at EOY Average % of Students Benchmark at EOY 60% or more63.2%48% 50 – 59%63.8%45% 40 – 49%71.1%52.8% 30 – 39%66.2%51.3% 20 – 29%68.6%54.8% 0 – 19%87.7%65.1%

Grade 3 Students across 12 states in Western Region *High performing = 85 th percentile % Intensive K Students Entering Fall High Performing % of Students Benchmark at EOY Average % of Students Benchmark at EOY 60% or more63.3%47.6% 50 – 59%64.1%45.9% 40 – 49%63.9%50% 30 – 39%62.5%44.9% 20 – 29%71%51.8% 0 – 19%75%58.3%