Portsmouth 2008 of gravity Luca Amendola INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma The dark side.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Benasque 2012 Luca Amendola University of Heidelberg in collaboration with Martin Kunz, Mariele Motta, Ippocratis Saltas, Ignacy Sawicki Horndeski Lagrangian:
Advertisements

L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page.
Light Bending as a probe of Geometric Dark Energy modelsEDEN, Paris December 8,2005 Light Bending as a probe for Geometric Dark Energy Alessandro Gruppuso.
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page S. Fay, S. Nesseris, L.P. gr-qc/
P ROBING SIGNATURES OF MODIFIED GRAVITY MODELS OF DARK ENERGY Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
CMB but also Dark Energy Carlo Baccigalupi, Francesca Perrotta.
Dark Energy and Extended Gravity theories Francesca Perrotta (SISSA, Trieste)
Venice 2013 Luca Amendola University of Heidelberg The next ten years of dark energy research Raphael, The School of Athens, Rome.
University of Texas at San Antonio Arthur Lue Dark Energy or Modified Gravity?
Non-linear matter power spectrum to 1% accuracy between dynamical dark energy models Matt Francis University of Sydney Geraint Lewis (University of Sydney)
Cosmological Expansion from Nonlocal Gravity Correction Tomi Koivisto, ITP Heidelberg 1. Outline Introduction 2. Nonlocalities in physics 3. The gravity.
SAIT 2008 Luca Amendola INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma The dark side of gravity.
Modified Gravity Takeshi Chiba Nihon University. Why?
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Dark energy II : Models of dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Physical Constraints on Gauss-Bonnet Dark Energy Cosmologies Ishwaree Neupane University of Canterbury, NZ University of Canterbury, NZ DARK 2007, Sydney.
Cosmology Zhaoming Ma July 25, The standard model - not the one you’re thinking  Smooth, expanding universe (big bang).  General relativity controls.
CMB as a physics laboratory
1 L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page.
Near-Horizon Solution to DGP Perturbations Ignacy Sawicki, Yong-Seon Song, Wayne Hu University of Chicago astro-ph/ astro-ph/
Statistics of the Weak-lensing Convergence Field Sheng Wang Brookhaven National Laboratory Columbia University Collaborators: Zoltán Haiman, Morgan May,
Weak Gravitational Lensing by Large-Scale Structure Alexandre Refregier (Cambridge) Collaborators: Richard Ellis (Caltech) David Bacon (Cambridge) Richard.
Gravity and Extra Dimensions José Santiago Theory Group (Fermilab) APS April meeting, Session Y4 (Gravity and Cosmology) Jacksonville (FL) April 14-17,
1 f(R) Gravity and its relation to the interaction between DE and DM Bin Wang Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Weak Lensing 3 Tom Kitching. Introduction Scope of the lecture Power Spectra of weak lensing Statistics.
Effective field theory approach to modified gravity with applications to inflation and dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa Hot Topics in General Relativity And.
Structure formation in dark energy cosmology La Magia, April 2005.
Large distance modification of gravity and dark energy
Munich 2008 Luca Amendola INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma The dark side of gravity.
Dark Energy and Modified Gravity IGC Penn State May 2008 Roy Maartens ICG Portsmouth R Caldwell.
Cosmology: recent developments Luca Amendola INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma INFN/Spazio.
Bologna 2007 of gravity Luca Amendola INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma The dark side.
Modified (dark) gravity Roy Maartens, Portsmouth or Dark Gravity?
BRANEWORLD COSMOLOGICAL PERTURBATIONS
Jochen Weller Benasque August, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, , 2006.
1 Edmund Bertschinger MIT Department of Physics and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research Testing Gravity on Large Scales Dekel 1994 Ann.
Cascading gravity and de gravitation Claudia de Rham Perimeter Institute/McMaster Miami 2008 Dec, 18 th 2008.
Dark Energy The first Surprise in the era of precision cosmology?
ISAPP 2011 Observations are converging… …to an unexpected universe.
Cosmological studies with Weak Lensing Peak statistics Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
Dark Energy and Modified Gravity Shinji Tsujikawa (Gunma National College of Technology ) Collaborations with L. Amendola, S. Capozziello, R. Gannouji,
Observational test of modified gravity models with future imaging surveys Kazuhiro Yamamoto (Hiroshima U.) Edinburgh Oct K.Y. , Bassett, Nichol,
Cosmological structure formation and dark energy Carlo Baccigalupi Heidelberg, May 31, 2005.
Clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Bob Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth) Many SDSS Colleagues.
From Dark Energy to Dark Force Luca Amendola INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma.
Michael Doran Institute for Theoretical Physics Universität Heidelberg Time Evolution of Dark Energy (if any …)
 Acceleration of Universe  Background level  Evolution of expansion: H(a), w(a)  degeneracy: DE & MG  Perturbation level  Evolution of inhomogeneity:
Cosmological structure formation and dark energy Carlo Baccigalupi Madrid, November 15, 2005.
(cosmological) tests of acceleration: why and what Martin Kunz University of Geneva.
Phenomenology of beyond Horndeski theories Kazuya Koyama University of Portsmouth.
Theoretical Aspects of Dark Energy Models Rong-Gen Cai Institute of Theoretical Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences CCAST, July 4, 2005.
Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, ,
Dark Energy and baryon oscillations Domenico Sapone Université de Genève, Département de Physique théorique In collaboration with: Luca Amendola (INAF,
Gravitational Lensing
1 1 Dark Energy with SNAP and other Next Generation Probes Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
Investigating dark energy with CMB lensing Viviana Acquaviva, SISSA, Trieste Lensing collaborators in SISSA: C. Baccigalupi, S. Leach, F. Perrotta, F.
@ 2012 Miniworkshop for String theory and Cosmology Dec. 01st Seokcheon Lee (KIAS)
Cosmology in a brane-induced gravity model with trace-anomaly terms
J. Tang, J. Weller, A. Zablocki
Recent status of dark energy and beyond
Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA
a viable candidate for dark energy?
Cosmo 2007, Brighton, Sussex, August 21-25, 2007
Stealth Acceleration and Modified Gravity
Shintaro Nakamura (Tokyo University of Science)
Probing the Dark Sector
Ignacy Sawicki CEICO, Institute of Physics, Prague
Presentation transcript:

Portsmouth 2008 of gravity Luca Amendola INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma The dark side

Portsmouth 2008 Observations are converging… …to an unexpected universe

Portsmouth 2008 Can we detect traces of modified gravity at background linear level ? non-linear { } Modified gravity

Portsmouth 2008 What is gravity ? A universal force in 4D mediated by a massless tensor field What is modified gravity ? What is modified gravity ? A non-universal force in nD mediated by (possibly massive) tensor, vector and scalar fields

Portsmouth 2008 Cosmology and modified gravity in laboratory in the solar system at astrophysical scales at cosmological scales } very limited time/space/energy scales; only baryons complicated by non-linear/non- gravitational effects unlimited scales; mostly linear processes; baryons, dark matter, dark energy !

Portsmouth 2008 L = crossover scale: 5D gravity dominates at low energy/late times/large scales 4D gravity recovered at high energy/early times/small scales 5D Minkowski bulk: infinite volume extra dimension gravity leakage brane Simplest MG (I): DGP (Dvali, Gabadadze, Porrati 2000)

Portsmouth 2008 f(R) models are simple and self-contained (no need of potentials) easy to produce acceleration (first inflationary model) high-energy corrections to gravity likely to introduce higher- order terms particular case of scalar-tensor and extra-dimensional theory eg higher order corrections Let’s start with one of the simplest MG model: f(R) Simplest MG (II): f(R)

Portsmouth 2008 Is this already ruled out by local gravity? is a scalar-tensor theory with Brans-Dicke parameter ω=0 or a coupled dark energy model with coupling β=1/2 (on a local minimum) α λ

Portsmouth 2008 The simplest case In Einstein Frame Turner, Carroll, Capozziello etc. 2003

Portsmouth 2008 R-1/R model : the φ MDE R-1/R model : the φ MDE rad mat field rad mat field  MDE today Caution: Plots in the Einstein frame! instead of !! In Jordan frame:

Portsmouth 2008 Sound horizon in R+R n model L.A., D. Polarski, S. Tsujikawa, PRL 98, , astro-ph/

Portsmouth 2008 A recipe to modify gravity Can we find f(R) models that work?

Portsmouth 2008 MG in the background (JF) An autonomous dynamical system characteristic function

Portsmouth 2008 Classification of f(R) solutions deSitter acceleration, w = -1 General acceleration, any w For all f(R) theories, define the characteristic curve: The problem is: can we go from matter to acceleration? wrong matter era (t 1/2 ) good matter era (t 2/3 ) for m≥0

Portsmouth 2008 The m,r plane The dynamics becomes 1-dimensional ! The qualitative behavior of any f(R) model can be understood by looking at the geometrical properties of the m,r plot m(r) curve crit. line acceleration matter era deSitter L.A., D. Polarski, S. Tsujikawa, PRD, astro-ph/

Portsmouth 2008 The power of the m(r) method REJECTED

Portsmouth 2008 The triangle of viable trajectories There exist only two kinds of cosmologically viable trajectories Notice that in the triangle m>0

Portsmouth 2008 A theorem on viable models Theorem: for all viable f(R) models  there is a phantom crossing of  there is a singularity of  both occur typically at low z when phantom DE standard DE L.A., S. Tsujikawa, 2007

Portsmouth 2008 Local Gravity Constraints are very tight Depending on the local field configuration depending on the experiment: laboratory, solar system, galaxy see eg. Nojiri & Odintsov 2003; Brookfield et al Navarro & Van Acoyelen 2006; Faraoni 2006; Bean et al. 2006; Chiba et al. 2006; Hu, Sawicky 2007;....

Portsmouth 2008 LGC+Cosmology Take for instance the ΛCDM clone Applying the criteria of LGC and Cosmology i.e. ΛCDM to an incredible precision

Portsmouth 2008 However... perturbations

Portsmouth 2008 Two free functions At the linear perturbation level and sub-horizon scales, a modified gravity model will  modify Poisson’s equation  induce an anisotropic stress

Portsmouth 2008 MG at the linear level  scalar-tensor models  standard gravity  DGP  f(R) Lue et al. 2004; Koyama et al Bean et al Hu et al Tsujikawa 2007  coupled Gauss-Bonnet see L. A., C. Charmousis, S. Davis 2006 Boisseau et al Acquaviva et al Schimd et al L.A., Kunz &Sapone 2007

Portsmouth 2008 Parametrized MG: Growth of fluctuations as a measure of modified gravity we parametrize Instead of LCDM DE DGP ST is an indication of modified gravity/matter good fit Peebles 1980 Lahav et al Wang et al Bernardeau 2002 L.A Linder 2006 Di Porto & L.A. 2007

Portsmouth 2008 Present constraints on gamma Viel et al. 2004,2006; McDonald et al. 2004; Tegmark et al. 2004

Portsmouth 2008 Present constraints on gamma C. Di Porto & L.A DGP LCDM

Portsmouth 2008 Two MG observables Correlation of galaxy positions: galaxy clustering Correlation of galaxy ellipticities: galaxy weak lensing

Portsmouth 2008 Observer Dark matter halos Background sources Radial distances depend on geometry of Universe Probing gravity with weak lensing Statistical measure of shear pattern, ~1% distortion Foreground mass distribution depends on growth/distribution of structure

Portsmouth 2008 Probing gravity with weak lensing In General Relativity, lensing is caused by the “lensing potential” and this is related to the matter perturbations via Poisson’s equation. Therefore the lensing signal depends on two modified gravity functions and in the growth function in the WL power spectrum {

Portsmouth 2008 Forecasts for Weak Lensing L.A., M. Kunz, D. Sapone JCAP 2007 Marginalization over the modified gravity parameters does not spoil errors on standard parameters

Portsmouth 2008 Weak lensing measures Dark Gravity DGPPhenomenological DE Weak lensing tomography over half sky LCDM DGP L.A., M. Kunz, D. Sapone arXiv:

Portsmouth 2008 Weak lensing measures Dark Gravity scalar-tensor model Weak lensing tomography over half sky V. Acquaviva, L.A., C. Baccigalupi, in prep.

Portsmouth 2008 Non-linearity in WL Weak lensing tomography over half sky =1000,3000,10000

Portsmouth 2008 Non-linearity in BAO Matarrese & Pietroni 2007

Portsmouth 2008 Conclusions: the teachings of DE  Two solutions to the DE mismatch: either add “dark energy” or “dark gravity”  The high precision data of present and near-future observations allow to test for dark energy/gravity  New MG parameters: γ,Σ  A general reconstruction of the first order metric requires galaxy correlation and galaxy shear  Let EUCLID fly...

Portsmouth 2008 Current Observational Status: CFHTLS First results From CFHT Legacy Survey with Megacam (w=constant and other priors assumed) Weak Lensing Type Ia Super- novae Hoekstra et al Semboloni et al Astier et al. 2005