Simulating growth impacts of Swiss needle cast in Douglas-fir: The blood, sweat and tears behind the ORGANON growth multiplier Sean M. Garber April 26,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Allometric Crown Width Equations for Northwest Trees Nicholas L. Crookston RMRS – Moscow June 2004.
Advertisements

Predicting Sapling Recruitment Following Partial Cutting in the Acadian Forest: Using Long-Term Data to Assess the Performance of FVS-NE David Ray 1, Chad.
Modeling Tree Growth Under Varying Silvicultural Prescriptions Leah Rathbun University of British Columbia Presented at Western Mensurationists 2010.
Evaluating Growth Models: A Case Study Using Prognosis BC Evaluating Growth Models: A Case Study Using Prognosis BC Peter Marshall, University of British.
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS of the FOREST VEGETATION SIMULATOR Southern Variant (FVS-Sn) Nathan D. Herring Dr. Philip J. Radtke Virginia Tech Department of Forestry.
Growth Model Users Group Growth Model Run-Off January 2002.
Modeling Effects of Genetic Improvement in Loblolly Pine Plantations Barry D. Shiver Stephen Logan.
Improving Diameter Growth Prediction of Douglas-fir in Eastern Washington State, U.S.A. by Incorporating Precipitation and Temperature Andrew D. Hill,
Examining Clumpiness in FPS David K. Walters Roseburg Forest Products.
Impact of plot size on the effect of competition in individual-tree models and their applications Jari Hynynen & Risto Ojansuu Finnish Forest Research.
LINEAR REGRESSION: Evaluating Regression Models. Overview Assumptions for Linear Regression Evaluating a Regression Model.
Modeling Branch Characteristics In Douglas-fir & Western Hemlock.
Chapter 5 Time Series Analysis
A Young Douglas-fir Plantation Growth Model for the Pacific Northwest Nick Vaughn University of Washington College of Forest Resources.
15 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy Meeting TreeLab (v1.0) Variable-density Yield Simulator for Immature, Managed Stands of Douglas-fir Sam D. Pittman Eric.
The Rural Technology Initiative –“Better technology in rural areas for managing forests for increased product and environmental values in support of local.
Summary of results from the Regional Forest Nutrition Research Project and Stand Management Cooperative Rob Harrison, Dave Briggs, Eric Turnblom, Bob Gonyea,
Estimating Response of Douglas-fir to Urea in Western Oregon & Washington By: Eric Sucre M.S. Thesis Defense.
What Do You See? Message of the Day: The management objective determines whether a site is over, under, or fully stocked.
Estimation and Application of Genetic- Gain Multipliers for Douglas-Fir Height and Diameter Growth Peter J. Gould 1, David D. Marshall 2, Randy Johnson.
Modeling the Effects of Genetic Improvement on Diameter and Height Growth Greg Johnson Weyerhaeuser Company.
Linear Regression Analysis
 Used by NRCS foresters  Simple and Quick way to determine  Average tree diameter  Range of tree diameters  Trees per acre  Stand composition 
Comparing Pre-settlement, Pre-treatment and Post-treatment Stand Structure at Lonetree Restoration Site: Incorporating GIS into Restoration By Christine.
1 A hybrid modeling framework for intensively managed Douglas-fir in the Pacific Northwest Aaron Weiskittel Department of Forest Science.
Landscape Modeling for the Resource Management Plans for Western Oregon Prepared by Carolina Hooper Vegetation Modeling Lead Oregon State Office 4/23/13.
1 Density and Stocking. 2 Potential of the land to produce wood is determined mainly by its site quality. The actual production or growth of wood fiber.
Foliage and Branch Biomass Prediction an allometric approach.
Stem form responses to differing areas of weed control around planted Douglas-fir trees Robin Rose, Douglas A. Maguire, and Scott Ketchum Department of.
Fire Prevention as a GHG Mitigation Strategy Presented by Robert Beach, RTI International Brent Sohngen, The Ohio State University Presented at Forestry.
The Potential of the Alder Resource: Challenges and Opportunities David Hibbs and Andrew Bluhm Hardwood Silviculture Cooperative Department of Forest Science.
Combining historic growth and climate data to predict growth response to climate change in balsam fir in the Acadian Forest region Elizabeth McGarrigle.
Junhui Zhao, Doug Maguire, Doug Mainwaring, Alan Kanaskie
21 June 2004 Western Mensurationists Meeting Developing a Whole-stand Model for Douglas-fir Plantations Eric C. Turnblom Samuel D. Pittman.
Name: Angelica F. White WEMBA10. Teach students how to make sound decisions and recommendations that are based on reliable quantitative information During.
Validating the Prognosis DDS model for the Inland Empire Robert E. FroeseAndrew P. Robinson School of Forest Resources Etc.Department of Forest Resources.
Generic Approaches to Model Validation Presented at Growth Model User’s Group August 10, 2005 David K. Walters.
MBA.782.ForecastingCAJ Demand Management Qualitative Methods of Forecasting Quantitative Methods of Forecasting Causal Relationship Forecasting Focus.
Effect of retained trees on growth and structure of young Scots pine stands Juha Ruuska, Sauli Valkonen and Jouni Siipilehto Finnish Forest Research Institute,
Running in Peter Gould, Pacific Northwest Research Station Growth-Model User Group Meeting, June 2, 2010.
Effects of Regeneration Abundance on Predicted Development of Interior Douglas-fir Stands By Cornel Lencar Graduate Student, Faculty of Forestry University.
Modeling Crown Characteristics of Loblolly Pine Trees Modeling Crown Characteristics of Loblolly Pine Trees Harold E. Burkhart Virginia Tech.
Do stem form differences mask responses to silvicultural treatment? Doug Maguire Department of Forest Science Oregon State University.
Incorporating stand density effects in modeling tree taper Mahadev Sharma Ontario Forest Research Institute Sault Ste Marie, Canada.
Thinning mixed-species stands of Douglas-fir and western hemlock in the presence of Swiss needle cast Junhui Zhao, Douglas A. Maguire, Douglas B. Mainwaring,
Comparisons of DFSIM, ORGANOIN and FVS David Marshall Olympia Forestry Sciences Laboratory PNW Research Station USDA Forest Service Growth Model Users.
Growth Model Users Group November 15, 2013 Greg Johnson Weyerhaeuser NR Company.
THE INFLUENCE OF STAND CONDITIONS ON TREE FORM Sean M. Garber and Aaron R. Weiskittel Oregon State University June 21, 2004.
RAP-ORGANON A Red Alder Plantation Growth Model David Hibbs, David Hann, Andrew Bluhm, Oregon State University.
Modeling regional variation in the self-thinning boundary line Aaron Weiskittel Sean Garber Hailemariam Temesgen.
The Effects of Spatial Patterns on Canopy Cover Estimated by FVS (Forest Vegetation Simulator) A Thesis Defense by Treg Christopher Committee Members:
Estimation of Genetic Multipliers for Douglas-Fir Height- and Diameter- Growth Models Peter J. Gould, David D. Marshall, Randy Johnson and Greg Johnson.
USING THE FOREST VEGETATION SIMULATOR TO MODEL STAND DYNAMICS UNDER THE ASSUMPTION OF CHANGING CLIMATE Climate-FVS Version 0.1 Developed by : Nicholas.
Bruce E. Borders Yujia Zhang OVERVIEW Consortium for Accelerated Pine Production Studies (CAPPS) makes use of existing field sites and data from Acid.
Research Update Coastal Douglas-fir Fertilization Ian R. Cameron, RPF Kamloops BC Eleanor R.G. McWilliams, RPF North Vancouver BC.
Annualized diameter and height growth equations for plantation grown Douglas- fir, western hemlock, and red alder Aaron Weiskittel 1, Sean Garber 1, Greg.
Establishing Plots to Monitor Growth and Treatment Response Some do’s and don’ts A discussion.
Incorporating Genetics into Growth Models: Results from Block-Plot Trials of Douglas-Fir Peter Gould and Brad St Clair PNW Research Station Keith Jayawickrama.
Incorporating Climate and Weather Information into Growth and Yield Models: Experiences from Modeling Loblolly Pine Plantations Ralph L. Amateis Department.
Tree and Stand Dynamics: Unravelling the Different Effects Of Site and Competition The impossible dream or an agenda for more research?
GROWTH AND YIELD How will my forest grow? Dr. Glenn Glover School of Forestry & Wildlife Sciences Auburn University.
Perspectives from a REIT Growth and Yield Modeling Architecture and Treatment Response Models – The Rayonier Approach J.P. MCTAGUE Western Mensurationists.
Leah Rathbun PhD Candidate, University of British Columbia
ln(CR) = HAB + b1BA + b2BA2 + b3ln(BA)
Cruise Summaries.
Developing Edition 3.0 of CIPSANON
How demographics and the economic downturn are affecting the way we live LSE Seminar: 1 July 2013 Neil McDonald: Visiting Fellow CCHPR.
Understanding Standards Event Higher Statistics Award
CIPS80 v. 1.0.
~adapted for Walch Education
Presentation transcript:

Simulating growth impacts of Swiss needle cast in Douglas-fir: The blood, sweat and tears behind the ORGANON growth multiplier Sean M. Garber April 26, 2007

Introduction Swiss needle cast (SNC): – Infects current year needles in Douglas-fir – Reduced gas exchange and photosynthesis – Cause premature loss of needles – Reduces tree and stand growth

Introduction Necessary to have tools to predict growth losses – Only stand-level corrections are currently available Rough approximations Limited use for individual trees Biological and economical assessments are difficult

Objectives Develop modifier equations that will adjust diameter and height growth projections for SNC in ORGANON Incorporate these equations into a DLL routine Connect SNC module to Windows version of ORGANON

Data StudyBH Age range (yrs) PlotsNumber of periods Growth interval (yrs) GIS PCT CT or 22 RCT Younger stands Older stands From Swiss Needle Cast Cooperative study plots

Data Plot measurements – Plot for all trees ≥ 5 cm DBH tagged – Smaller subplot for all trees > 1.37 m HT and < 5 cm – Measured all DBH’s – Subsampled HT and HCB

Data Needle retention (NR) – Number of needle age classes – Measure of SNC infection levels – Average of 10 trees per plot – Range was from 1 to 4.5 years

Analysis Untreated plots grown in ORGANON- SMC Used a single 4-year growth period from each plot – First 4-year growth period from each plot – Multiplied by 1.25 to match ORGANON’s 5-year time step

Analysis All trees included in ORGANON runs – Including small trees and hardwoods Site index – Fractional ages in young stands – Bruce’s (1981) site index based on earliest measurements Less affected by SNC Highly variable in younger stands Range ft

Modifier analysis Calculation of modifiers – ORGANON-SMC predictions assumed to be healthy stand – DMOD = predicted ΔDBH / (observed ΔDBH ×1.25) – HMOD = predicted ΔHT / (observed ΔHT ×1.25) Fitting modifiers – Only used trees with DBH, HT, CR

Modifier analysis Response variables were the modifiers Model as a function of needle retention Growth impact expected to follow a Weibull model form: MOD = [1 – exp(-b 1 NR b 2 )]

Model fitting Healthy tree: MOD=1.0 Infected tree: MOD<1.0

Model fitting Problems – Asymptote was > 1.0 – Residual bias with tree position

Raw residuals from DMOD fit on BAL Observed -Predicted Bias at lower crown positions

Crown Position Bias Bias only seen in DMOD residuals – Most likely an artifact of younger naturally established trees – Other small trees in small gaps – No evidence that this was related to SNC!

Final model forms Diameter growth modifier: DMOD=β 0 [exp(β 1 BAL 1.4 )] ×[1 – exp(-β 2 NR β 3 )]+ε Height growth modifier: HMOD= γ 0 [1 - exp(- γ 1 NR γ 2 )]+ ε Asymptote Accounts for BAL bias

Results High variability in modifier values DMOD and HMOD trend w/NR were significant Asymptotes significantly greater than 1.0 – Healthy trees grew faster than ORGANON- SMC predicted – DMOD = (0.0362) – HMOD = (0.0171) ΔDBH more sensitive to SNC than ΔHT

HMOD DMOD

Percent of healthy growth NR Δ DBH ΔHT 1.033%60% 1.567%82% 2.090%94% 2.598%

Application of Modifiers Adjusted ΔDBH = predicted ΔDBH × DMOD Adjusted ΔHT = predicted ΔHT × HMOD

Module Applies to unthinned and unfertilized stands Applied to SMC and NWO variants Needle retention can be changed by user during runs Dynamic link library has been written Currently being incorporated into Windows version of ORGANON

What’s next? Incorporate into ORGANON Validate with remeasurement data – 10-year remeasurement on all young plots at the end of 2007 Validate over multiple growth cycles

Questions?

Conclusions Healthy plots grow 20-30% faster in than ORGANON predicts – Short time period (influence of good years?) Confounding effects of SNC and estimation of site index in young stands Appears pattern with basal area in larger trees mostly an artifact of stand structure Appears work adequately