University of California Information Technology Guidance Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LAO PDR Summary Findings from NOSPA Mission and Possible Next Steps.
Advertisements

Building a Strategic Management System Office for Student Affairs, Twin Cities Campus Ground Level Work Metrics Initiatives Managing Change Change Management.
The Role of Environmental Monitoring in the Green Economy Strategy K Nathan Hill March 2010.
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
UC BRAID: Co-creating and evaluating performance in a regional laboratory for conducting translational science UC BRAID Executive Committee: Steven Dubinett.
Implementation Strategies for Making Diversity Count A presentation on the position paper by The University Faculty Senate Committee on Diversity and Cultural.
Listening to the Future Presented by Larry Johnson and Kristi Nelson Transforming Lives, Education, and Knowledge.
Facilities Management 2013 Manager Enrichment Program U.Va.’s Strategic Planning Initiatives Colette Sheehy Vice President for Management and Budget December.
August 2013 School of Medicine Strategic Planning Community Engagement Committee.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Academics and Research Working Group Teaching Future Generations.
1 Strategic Planning: An Update March 13, Outline What we have done so far? Where do we stand now? Next steps?
COVCA/Campus Planning & Budget Officers April 3, 2003 Meeting.
UCLA IT Vision Campus IT Planning Task Force February 4, 2009.
Human Resources Update Academic Senate Coordinating Committee February 2, 2015.
NLII Mapping the Learning Space New Orleans, LA Colleen Carmean NLII Fellow Information Technology Director, ASU West Editor, MERLOT Faculty Development.
From the IT Assessment to the IT Roadmap ( )
Scholar Services at the University Library: The Scholarly Commons Report.
ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN 1.
May 7, 2012 | 9:00 – 9:30 am | Wasserstein Hall Ivy Plus Opening Remarks.
5. How to Amass Evidence (Evaluation) of Change and its Effects? How does assessment drive transformative change in the classroom, at the department level,
Information Technology Architecture Group ITAG, Version 2.0 Or, how our role supports the evolution of interoperable systems February ITLC.
Enterprise IT Decision Making
Franklin University Dr. Lewis Chongwony, Instructional Designer
Re-organizing Information Technology University at Buffalo.
Critical Role of ICT in Parliament Fulfill legislative, oversight, and representative responsibilities Achieve the goals of transparency, openness, accessibility,
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Towards an Integrated Academy: A Teaching and Learning Framework for Carleton University
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Eastern Washington University EWU ODP Maps EWU ODP Maps
Research Cyberinfrastructure Alliance Working in partnership to enable computationally intensive, innovative, interdisciplinary research for the 21 st.
Report to Professional Council June 4, 2009 By Carla Boone Planning Council: A New Way of Doing Business at COM.
University of Louisville Faculty Discussion on Research Ho! Ho! Ho! Happy Holidays! 1 December 10,2009.
INTOSAI Public Debt Working Group Updating of the Strategic Plan Richard Domingue Office of the Auditor General of Canada June 14, 2010.
Organization, Administration, and Improvement of Graduate Education Daniel Denecke, Ph.D. Program Director, Best Practices and Publications The Council.
Doing Less with Less UW ADVANCE Workshop for Department Chairs and Deans December 6, 2010 – 11:00-1:30 PM Haggett Hall, Cascade Room.
The Report of the Provost’s Advisory Group on the SUNY Assessment Initiative September 2009 Tina Good, Ph.D. President Faculty Council of Community Colleges.
Convocation Week 2008 Strategic & Academic Action Planning Update.
Strategic Academic Visioning and Empowerment (SAVE) Final Report to UWF BOT December 2011.
Preparing for SACS: Focusing our Quality Enhancement Plan.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Funding your Dreams Cathy Manduca Director, Science Education Resource Center Iowa State University, 2005.
Information Resources and Communications University of California, Office of the President UC-Wide Activities in Support of Research and Scholarship David.
Strategic Plan 3.0 Presentation to Faculty Senate March 2014 Luiz Bermudez – Professor and Head, Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, CVM Linda Bruslind – Senior.
Office of Academic Affairs January 12, 2007 Confirming Portland State’s Leadership Position and Defining Academic Priorities Campus Symposium 2007.
HBCU LIBRARY LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE II PROJECT REPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF AN INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORY AT FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY.
Think Academics: Academic Visioning David Marker Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs.
EGovOS Panel Discussion CIO Council Architecture & Infrastructure Committee Subcommittee Co-Chairs March 15, 2004.
Technology Task Force Mission Review/Discussion March 5, 2015 Technology Task Force Mission Review/Discussion March 5, 2015.
UWA Library Strategic Directions for “ Mariette of 1915” by Charting our course and setting.
Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
NSF INCLUDES Inclusion Across the Nation of Learners of Underrepresented Discoverers in Engineering and Science AISL PI Meeting, March 1, 2016 Sylvia M.
University Town Hall May 18, 2016 Co-Chairs: Dr. Claire M. Fraser & Dr. Roger J. Ward.
AACN – Manatt Study In February 2015, the AACN Board of Directors commissioned Manatt Health to conduct a study on how to position academic nursing to.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE DIVISION OF THE PRESIDENT Approved by the President in Spring  Provide students with a quality educational.
Strategic Planning Summary of Events Open Space Technology (OST) Retreat– Oct Review of Inputs from OST by Strategic Planning Operations Committee.
Provost’s Report Global Penn State: Our Ongoing Efforts to Be a Truly Global University Dr. Nicholas P. Jones Meeting of the Board of Trustees Friday,
Forward Together: UW Madison’s Framework for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence Ad Hoc Diversity Planning Committee Shared Governance (Faculty, staff,
The Eugene T. Moore School of Education Working together to promote the growth, education, and social development of children and youth David E. Barrett.
Moving Towards Information Literacy Through Data Governance
Joint CIO Council and HR Deans & Directors Meeting
Principles of Good Governance
Local Plans and Curriculum Design
Phase One: Re-inventing the Flagship University, Fall 2006-Fall 2007
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
Higher Education’s 2016 Top 10 IT Issues: Divest, Reinvest,
SSHRC’s VISION FOR Canada sustains and enhances its position as a global leader in humanities and social sciences research and research training,
Arizona Health-e Connection Leadership from Governor Napolitano
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

University of California Information Technology Guidance Committee

UC IT Guidance Committee2 IT Guidance Committee Charge Identify strategic directions for IT investments that enable campuses to meet their distinctive needs more effectively while supporting the University’s broader mission, academic programs and strategic goals. Promote the deployment of information technology services to support innovation and the enhancement of academic quality and institutional competitiveness. Leverage IT investment and expertise to fully exploit collective and campus-specific IT capabilities.

UC IT Guidance Committee3 How Did ITGC originate? Key stakeholders in the development of the University’s information environment recognize the need for a shared services approach to planning and delivery of selected IT services –IT Leadership Council –Vice Chancellors Research –University Librarians Their view is shared widely by other stakeholders (e.g. Academic Senate committees, the Councils of Chancellors, Vice-Chancellors, Vice Chancellors Research, Vice Chancellors Administration, Planning & Budget Officers, etc.).

UC IT Guidance Committee4 Why Now? The evolving role of information technology requires a forum for UC academic, IT and business leaders to articulate future IT requirements, and strategies to address them. UC-wide IT planning has become an integral component of the University’s strategic planning processes. A future roadmap positions campuses to innovate and collaborate to deliver cost effective IT services and infrastructure.

UC IT Guidance Committee5 Benefits of Systemwide IT Planning Enables joint development of innovative solutions to common problems (e.g. effort reporting for contracts and grants, learning management systems) Promotes development and effective utilization of innovative research computing platforms and tools (e.g. visualization and simulation) Identifies common requirements for basic and advanced IT services (e.g. networking services, high-performance computing, digital asset management)

UC IT Guidance Committee6 ITGC Planning Assumptions UC will expand and enhance its global presence and partnerships. UC will foster the diversity of its ten campuses to achieve greater institutional flexibility and responsiveness to global changes and market factors. UC will invest in and facilitate academic growth in interdisciplinary areas. UC campus and lab research strengths will position the University as a leader in computationally-enabled research and the innovative uses of computation for discovery and insight.

UC IT Guidance Committee7 ITGC Planning Assumptions Research and instruction will become increasingly integrated and interdependent. Scholarly interaction will be fostered locally in highly collaborative environments where scholarly information is readily accessible and easily exchanged. UC will manage information and data as a highly strategic asset. UC will provide broad access to intellectual property developed in pursuit of the teaching and research mission.

UC IT Guidance Committee8 ITGC Planning Assumptions The classroom will be one of multiple adapted learning environments available to UC students UC will plan and coordinate investment in system wide IT infrastructure required by faculty and staff for innovation in the pursuit of knowledge creation and dissemination. Scalable models for the delivery of inter-campus or UC- wide IT services will require new, centrally managed funding sources.

UC IT Guidance Committee9 Expert working groups enable detailed assessment of key focus areas IT Guidance Committee Stewardship of Digital Assets High Performance Research Computing Advanced Networking Services Common IT Systems & Infrastructure Instructional Technology IT in Student Life Scholarly collaboration Other working groups Funding, governance & organization Environmental scans & user needs assessments Human resource issues Shared services considerations They inform and draw-upon evaluation of cross-cutting themes… Legal and policy environments … and engage campus-based deliberations on these issues.

UC IT Guidance Committee10 IT Guidance Committee Working Groups Convened to identify for and recommend to the ITGC the key strategic directions in their domain Comprised of subject-matter experts who are passionate about contributing to IT planning Chaired by leaders in the field who are invested in advancing the IT planning agenda Supported by “consultants" to enable the planning process Resourced appropriately by UCOP in recognition of system wide value

UC IT Guidance Committee11 IT Guidance Committee Working Group Charge Appropriate consultation strategy Current state assessment Identification of strategic directions for new services / capabilities / delivery models Gap analysis Priorities Challenges Funding strategies and other critical success factors

UC IT Guidance Committee12 Planning Inputs Planning Inputs Broad consultation with: – UC stakeholders –Campus and system wide governing bodies Coordination with related academic and administrative planning processes Coordination with related academic and administrative planning processes Environmental scans and competitive analysis

UC IT Guidance Committee13 IT Guidance Committee Deliverable Recommendations for University-wide IT investments that are essential to the future mission, including: oStrategies for development / coordinated deployment of key infrastructure services oBroad implementation guidelines including funding and governance considerations oReflections on policy implications and directions oProcesses that ensure continual IT planning

UC IT Guidance Committee14 IT Guidance Committee Proposed Timetable Launch the ITGC Feb, 2006 Interim Work group reports Nov, 2006 Summary report to Provost Jun, 2007 Review and comment Oct, 2007 Presentations to President, Nov, 2007 COC, Regents, Academic Council

UC IT Guidance Committee15 IT Guidance Committee Members David Ashley, EVC, Merced Jim Davis, CIO, UCLA Daniel Greenstein, AVP & University Librarian Kristine Hafner, AVP, Information Resources & Communications, UCOP Rory Hume, Acting Provost, UCOP David Kaplan, Professor, Philosophy, UCLA Larry Merkley, CIO, UCSC Gerry Munoff, University Librarian, Irvine Steve Relyea VC Business Affairs, UCSD John Oakley, Professor, UC Davis Law School, Vice Chair Academic Senate Jim Sandoval, Vice Chancellor Student Affairs, UCR AnnaLee Saxenian, Dean, SIMS, UCB Jonathan Showstack Academic Information Technology, UCSF Michael Witherell, VC Research, UCSB Peter Yellowlees, Professor of Psychiatry, Vice Provost for Information and Educational Technology, UCD