How to Measure Evolution in the Fundamental Constants of Physics with Large Telescopes Chris Churchill (Penn State) …and sneak in astronomical observations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Metals at Highish Redshift And Large Scale Structures From DLAs to Underdense Regions Patrick Petitjean Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris B. Aracil R.
Advertisements

Probing the End of Reionization with High-redshift Quasars Xiaohui Fan University of Arizona Mar 18, 2005, Shanghai Collaborators: Becker, Gunn, Lupton,
First Stars, Quasars, and the Epoch of Reionization Jordi Miralda Escudé Institut de Ciències de l’Espai (IEEC-CSIC, ICREA), Barcelona. Instituto de Astrofísica.
Astronomy and the Electromagnetic Spectrum
SKA Science Measuring Variations in the Fundamental Constants with the SKA Steve Curran School of Physics School of Physics University of New South Wales.
Time dependence of SM parameters. Outline Dirac´s hypothesis SM parameters Experimental access to time dependence  laboratory measurements  Quasar absorption.
Cosmological Evolution of the Fine Structure Constant Chris Churchill (Penn State)  = e 2 /hc  = (  z -  0 )/  0 In collaboration with: J. Webb,
Galactic Diffuse Gamma-ray Emission, the EGRET Model, and GLAST Science Stanley D. Hunter NASA/GSFC Code 661
Modelling the Broad Line Region Andrea Ruff Rachel Webster University of Melbourne.
Cosmological Evolution of the Fine Structure Constant Chris Churchill (Penn State)  = e 2 /hc  = (  z -  0 )/  0 In collaboration with: J. Webb,
Galaxies What is a galaxy? How many stars are there in an average galaxy? About how many galaxies are there in the universe? What is the name of our galaxy?
C. Churchill (NMSU) D. Ceverino (NMSU) A. Klypin (NMSU) C. Steidel (Caltech) M. Murphy (Swinburne) N. Vogt (NMSU) Glenn G. Kacprzak (NMSU / Swinburne)
Missing Photons that Count: Galaxy Evolution via Absorbing Gas (and a little bit of fundamental physics to boot) Chris Churchill (Penn State)
Mg II & C IV Absorption Kinematics vs. Stellar Kinematics in Galaxies Chris Churchill (Penn State) J. Charlton J. Ding J. Masiero D. Schneider M. Dickinson.
Rand (2000) NGC 5775 Hα map. D = 24.8 Mpc It is an interacting galaxy.
Galactic Gas Kinematics and High Velocity Clouds at z~1 Chris Churchill (Penn State) Mg II 2796,2803 absorption from galaxies and ??? in quasar spectra.
Cosmic Variation of the Fine Structure Constant Does the fine-structure constant vary with cosmological epoch? John Bahcall, Charles Steinhardt, and David.
“Damped Lyman Alpha Systems” by Wolfe, Arthur M., Gawiser, E. and Prochaska, Jason X. Jean P. Walker Rutgers University Galaxy Formation Seminar.
Evolution of the IGM/Galaxy Halo Interface to z=2 Chris Churchill (New Mexico State University) Wal Sargent (Caltech) Michael Rauch (Carnegie)
Cosmological Evolution of the Fine Structure Constant Chris Churchill (Penn State)  = e 2 /hc  = (  z -  0 )/  0 In collaboration with: J. Webb,
Quasar Absorption Lines Tracing Cosmic Structure Growth & Galaxy Evolution Over Cosmic Time.
Probing dark matter clustering using the Lyman-  forest Pat McDonald (CITA) COSMO06, Sep. 28, 2006.
Galaxy Properties and the Kinematics of Gaseous Halos Chris Churchill (NMSU) Glenn Kacprzak (NMSU) Chuck Steidel (Caltech) also see: Poster (G.
IAP XVII1 Millions of Tiny, Weak Mg II Absorbers: What are They? Chris Churchill (Penn State) Jane Rigby (Steward); Jane Charlton (PSU) Churchill, Rigby,
Direct Measurement of a Magnetic Field at z=0.692 Art Wolfe Regina Jorgenson: IOA Tim Robishaw: UCB Carl Heiles:UCB Jason X. Prochaska:UCSC.
Quiz 1 Each quiz sheet has a different 5-digit symmetric number which must be filled in (as shown on the transparency, but NOT the same one!!!!!) Please.
Different physical properties contribute to the density and temperature perturbation growth. In addition to the mutual gravity of the dark matter and baryons,
Galaxy Formation and Evolution Chris Brook Modulo 15 Room 509
Cosmology: The Study of the Universe as a Whole Physics 360 Geol 360 Astronomy John Swez.
130 cMpc ~ 1 o z~ = 7.3 Lidz et al ‘Inverse’ views of evolution of large scale structure during reionization Neutral intergalactic medium via HI.
Cosmology and Dark Matter II: The inflationary Universe Jerry Sellwood.
The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.
Cosmology and Dark Matter I: Einstein & the Big Bang by Jerry Sellwood.
Sources of Reionization Jordi Miralda Escudé Institut de Ciències de l’Espai (IEEC-CSIC, ICREA), Barcelona. Beijing,
Missing Photons that Count: Galaxy Evolution via Absorbing Gas (and a little bit of fundamental physics to boot) Chris Churchill (Penn State)
Cosmological Evolution of the Fine Structure Constant Chris Churchill (Penn State)  = e 2 /hc  = (  z -  0 )/  0 In collaboration with: J. Webb,
CHAPTER 4: Visible Light and Other Electromagnetic Radiation.
Study Mg II quasar absorption line systems in order to understand the kinematics of halos probing distances out to 70 kpcs from the galaxies. Therefore.
Starlight and Atoms Chapter 6. The Amazing Power of Starlight Just by analyzing the light received from a star, astronomers can retrieve information about.
In this toy scenario, metal enriched clouds entrained in galactic winds gives rise to absorption lines in quasar spectra, as illustrated in the above panels.
Mário Santos1 EoR / 21cm simulations 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008 Epoch of Reionization / 21cm simulations Mário Santos CENTRA - IST.
Collaborators Blair Savage, Bart Wakker (UW-Madison) Blair Savage, Bart Wakker (UW-Madison) Ken Sembach (STScI) Ken Sembach (STScI) Todd Tripp (UMass)
The Distributions of Baryons in the Universe and the Warm Hot Intergalactic Medium Baryonic budget at z=0 Overall thermal timeline of baryons from z=1000.
Correlations of Mass Distributions between Dark Matter and Visible Matter Yuriy Mishchenko and Chueng-Ryong Ji NC State University Raleigh, NC KIAS-APCTP-DMRC.
UNM 29-Oct04 Galaxy-Halo Gas Kinematic Connection at 0.3 < z < 1 Collaborators: Chris Churchill (NMSU) Chuck Steidel (Caltech) Alice Shapley (Princeton)
Elizabeth Stanway - Obergurgl, December 2009 Lyman Break Galaxies as Markers for Large Scale Structure at z=5 Elizabeth Stanway University of Bristol With.
The Beginning of Time: Evidence for the Big Bang & the Theory of Inflation.
Lyman- Emission from The Intergalactic Medium
Galaxies with Active Nuclei Chapter 14:. Active Galaxies Galaxies with extremely violent energy release in their nuclei (pl. of nucleus).  “active galactic.
Vatican 2003 Lecture 20 HWR Observing the Clustering of Matter and Galaxies History: : galaxies in and around the local group are not distributed.
Active Galaxies and Supermassive Black Holes Chapter 17.
Note that the following lectures include animations and PowerPoint effects such as fly-ins and transitions that require you to be in PowerPoint's Slide.
UNIT 1 The Milky Way Galaxy.
Lecture 8 Optical depth.
Missing Photons that Count: Galaxy Evolution via Absorbing Gas (and a little bit of fundamental physics to boot) Chris Churchill (Penn State)
BBN abundance observations Karl Young and Taryn Heilman Astronomy 5022 December 4, 2014.
David R. Law Hubble Fellow, UCLA The Physical Structure of Galaxies at z ~ John McDonald, CFHT Galaxies in the Distant Universe: Ringberg Castle.
Astronomy 1143 – Spring 2014 Lecture 21: The Evidence for Dark Matter.
Big Bang f(HI) ~ 0 f(HI) ~ 1 f(HI) ~ History of Baryons (mostly hydrogen) Redshift Recombination Reionization z = 1000 (0.4Myr) z = 0 (13.6Gyr) z.
Cosmic Dust Enrichment and Dust Properties Investigated by ALMA Hiroyuki Hirashita ( 平下 博之 ) (ASIAA, Taiwan)
Evidence For Cosmological Evolution of the Fine Structure Constant? Chris Churchill (Penn State)  = (  z -  0 )/  0  = e 2 /hc.
Lyα Forest Simulation and BAO Detection Lin Qiufan Apr.2 nd, 2015.
The cross-correlation between CMB and 21-cm fluctuations during the epoch of reionization Hiroyuki Tashiro N. Aghanim (IAS, Paris-sud Univ.) M. Langer.
ASTR112 The Galaxy Lecture 5 Prof. John Hearnshaw 8. Galactic rotation 8.3 Rotation from HI and CO clouds 8.4 Best rotation curve from combined data 9.
Reionization of the Universe MinGyu Kim
The Big Bang The Big Bang
Stars and Galaxies Lesson2 Q & A
The Big Bang The Big Bang
Presentation transcript:

How to Measure Evolution in the Fundamental Constants of Physics with Large Telescopes Chris Churchill (Penn State) …and sneak in astronomical observations on the evolution of galaxies and the intergalactic medium

Executive Summary 1.Motivations 2.CMB/BBN 3.And the Winner is…QALs 4.Fine Structure Constant 5.Electron-Proton Mass 6.Bread and Butter Astronomy 7.Concluding Remarks

Classes of Theories Attempts to solve some cosmological problems… Multi-dimensional and String Theories Scalar Theories (varying electron charge) Varying Speed of Light Theories Unification of quantum gravity with other forces… Couples E+M to cosmological mass density… Modified Bekenstein theories…

Fundamental “Constants” that are ripe for investigation…  = e 2 /hc 2.x =  2 g p /  3.y =  2 g p  = m p /m e  z  o   x  x  z opt – z 21 )/(1+z   y  y  z mol – z 21 )/(1+z  z i = z o + bK i b = (1 + z o ) 

Last scattering vs. zCMB spectrum vs. l CMB Behavior and Constraints Smaller  delays epoch of last scattering and results in first peak at larger scales (smaller l) and suppressed second peak due to larger baryon to photon density ratio. Solid (  =0); Dashed (  =-0.05); dotted (  =+0.05) (Battye etal 2000)

BBN Behavior and Constraints D, 3 He, 4 He, 7 Li abundances depend upon baryon fraction,  b. Changing  changes  b by changing p-n mass difference and Coulomb barrier. Avelino etal claim no statistical significance for a changed  from neither the CMB nor BBN data. They refute the “cosmic concordance” results of Battye etal, who claim that  =-0.05 is favored by CMB data. (Avelino etal 2001)

QSO absorption line methods can sample huge time span QSO Absorption Lines (history) Savedoff (1965) used doublet separations of emission lines from galaxies to search for  evolution (first cosmological setting) Bahcall, Sargent & Schmidt (1967) used alkali-doublet (AD) separations seen in absorption in QSO spectra.

 z =  0 + q 1 x + q 2 y  z = redshifted wave number x = (  z /  0 ) 2 - 1y = (  z /  0 )  0 = rest-frame wave number q 1, q 2 = relativistic correction coefficients for Z and e - configuration Mg II 2803 Mg II 2796 Fe II 2600 Fe II 2586 Fe II 2382 Fe II 2374 Fe II 2344 The Many-Multiplet Method

SIMULATIONS…. HIRES/Keck resolution and pixel sampling rate, infinite signal to noise Black lines are unshifted data. Red lines are shifted for  Fe II shifts to blue by ~10(1+   times that of Mg II, though each Fe II has a unique shift magnitude. Cr II shifts to red compared to Si II and Zn II shifts blue as compared to Si II, also with different shift magnitudes Relative Shifts of Large Shifters for  =+10 -4

Webb et al Results 1.49 absorption cloud systems over redshifts 0.5–3.5 toward 28 QSOs compared to lab wavelengths for many transitions 2.2 different data sets; low-z (Mg II, Mg I, Fe II ) high-z (Si II, Cr II, Zn II, Ni II, Al II, Al III ) 3.Find  = (–0.72±0.18) × (4.1  ) (statistical) 4.Most important systematic errors are atmospheric dispersion (differential stretching of spectra) and isotopic abundance evolution (Mg & Si; slight shifting in transition wavelengths) 5.Correction for systematic errors yields stronger  evolution

 = (–0.72±0.18) × (4.1  ) (statistical) (Webb etal 2001)

Soon to the Press Preliminary Findings… Now have a grand total of 138 systems due to adding the HIRES data of Sargent et al. Find  = (–0.65±0.11) × (6  ) (statistical)

The Future Same and new systems observed with different instruments and reduced/analyzed by different software and people. Build UVES/VLT and HRS/HET data base in order to reproduce the HIRES/Keck results Raid STIS/HST archive (already done) to perform the study at z=0 (in Galactic HVCs).

(Murphy etal 2001) Measuring y=g p  2  and y=g p  2 Evolution is Problematic The line of sight probed by 21-cm may not be the same probed by the QSO! Carilli etal (2001) attempt to minimize this using VLBI for 21 cm.

(Potekhin etal 1998) Measuring  =m p /m e is a simple matter of finding damped Ly-alpha systems with hydrogen molecules! Not so easy, only five known to date. Combining 2 QSOs, Ivanchik etal (2002) find  = (5.7 +/- 3.8) x At z=3. Searching with Sara Ellison (ESO) and Max Pettini (IoA) using CORALS

(Potekhin etal 1998) Vibrational and Rotational states of H 2 have different  dependence! This is parameterized using sensitivity coefficients, K. K i = dln( i )/dln(  Simple linear regression z i = z o + bK i b = (1 + z o )  Though Potekhin etal (1998) and Ivanchik etal (2002) have placed excellent limits on , a zero redshift calibration would be useful to check that the sensitivity coefficients are not systematically influencing the results.

(Martini etal 2000) The photodissociation regions of Galactic reflection nebulae show strong H 2 emissions lines. These emission lines can be used to place z=0 constraints on . This has never been tried, but is in principle straight forward and favorable in that reflection nebulae are abundant (good stats). The phoenix on Gemini-S is ideally suited for this… R=50,000 and a signal to noise of 30/pixel on a K=12 object in 1 hour (in the continuum)!!

Cooling Flow Galaxies exhibit strong H 2 emission lines! Seven CF galaxies known to date with H 2 emission. Redshifts are in the range 0.05 to Kinematics of gas (~500 km/s) may be a problem, but experience with all gas is that the lower the ionization level, the smaller the physical size and the narrower the profiles. Thus, it is expected that these features will break up into multiple narrow velocity components. Exploring this with Alexander Delgarno (CfA) (Falcke etal 1998)

And now for something completely different…

A uniform and high quality library of QSO Spectra can be fully exploited to learn many fundamental properties of the high redshift universe. Kinematic, chemical, and ionization conditions of galactic gas and of the Lyman alpha forest. Evolution in number per unit redshift (number density X cross section) Detailed photo-ionization modeling yields chemical evolution and size constraints Directly probe inter-galactic and galactic conditions to highest redshifts Mg II absorbers are ideal - associated with galaxies and with Lyman alpha forest clouds… charts first generation of stars in all environments…

We require high resolution spectra… (Churchill 1997)

(Churchill etal 2001)

(Churchill et al 1999; Rigby etal 2002) Predicted for a decade to not exist… these spectra were peppered with “weak” systems….

Summary of Weak Mg II Systems

(Churchill & Vogt 2001) The kinematics of the “Strong” Systems

Establishing Direct Connection with Galaxies Note weak systems are not identified with galaxies Strong systems typically within 40 kpc of QSO line of sight A pilot project in which the stellar rotation curves of five z=1 edge- on spiral galaxies were measured with LRIS/Keck revealed that the absorption traces the disk kinematics far out into the halo (Steidel etal 2002). We are currently extending this project to 30 galaxies with HST imaging, high resolution absorption line data, and stellar rotation curves (spirals) or velocity dispersions (ellipticals).

(Churchill 2001)

Interpreting Complex Absorption Line Profiles Each absorption line arises from an individual cloud with some line-of-sight velocity. Complex profiles are blends of many clouds that are distributed in some geometric/kinematic arrangement(s) in and/or near normal bright galaxies. Simple models of galactic disk geometry and kinematics and of “halo” geometry and kinematics are statistically consistent with the observed complex profiles. (Charlton & Churchill 1996, 1998; Churchill & Vogt 2001)

State of the Mg II Union (Churchill & Charlton 2002)

HRS (z = ) and JCAM (z = ) on HET (Churchill & Charlton 2002)

Simulated JCAM/HET Spectrum

JCAM/HET Commissioning Data R=11,000 ~ 28 km/s J=12  =2500 sec ~1.15  m

The Future 1.Continue  work in collaboration with UVES/VLT and bring in HRS/HET. Long term (10 years)- independent work at R=120,000 with HRS! 2.Independently measure  in Galactic HVCs using STIS/HST archival data 3.Measure  in Galactic reflection nebulae (need pilot) and eventually in cooling flow galaxies to z=0.2. This is H 2 emission line work. Search for high-z DLAs with H 2 molecules and measure  in absorption to z= Extend studies of Mg II kinematics, chemical, and ionization conditions to z~4 with UVES/HRS/JCAM 5.Continue establishing kinematic connections with Mg II absorption and stellar kinematics; establish nature of “weak” systems.

Varying Electron Charge Theories   Variation occurs over matter dominated epoch of the universe. (Barrow etal 2001)

Varying Speed of Light Theories Motivation is to solve the “flatness” and “horizon” problems of cosmology generated by inflation theory (Barrow 1999; Moffat 2001). Theory allows variation in  to be ~10 -5 H 0 at redshift z=1. Evolution is proportional to ratio of radiation to matter density.