Summary of results from the Regional Forest Nutrition Research Project and Stand Management Cooperative Rob Harrison, Dave Briggs, Eric Turnblom, Bob Gonyea,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fertilization of Western Redcedar (Thuja plicata) R.W. Negrave Coast Region, MFR.
Advertisements

Nitrogen Mineralization Across an Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition Gradient in Southern California Deserts Leela E. Rao 1, David R. Parker 1, Andrzej Bytnerowicz.
INFLUENCE OF INTENSIVE MANAGEMENT ON CANOPY TRANSPIRATION IN LOBLOLLY PINE Thomas A. Stokes, Lisa Samuelson, Greg Somers, and Tom Cooksey School of Forestry,
The Effects of Site and Soil on Fertilizer Response of Coastal Douglas-fir K.M. Littke, R.B. Harrison, and D.G. Briggs University of Washington Coast Fertilization.
Northwest Advanced Renewables Alliance Douglas-fir biomass and nutrient removal under varying harvest intensities designed for co-production of timber.
Modeling Effects of Genetic Improvement in Loblolly Pine Plantations Barry D. Shiver Stephen Logan.
Impact of plot size on the effect of competition in individual-tree models and their applications Jari Hynynen & Risto Ojansuu Finnish Forest Research.
Predicting Nitrogen Fertilizer Response in Douglas-fir Plantations Kim Littke Rob Harrison.
Nutrient Content of Lettuce Plant and Soil Analysis (ESC 515) Amy Angert George Scherer.
Modeling Branch Characteristics In Douglas-fir & Western Hemlock.
How Can I Improve My Soils? Nutrient Deficiencies and Fertilization Rob Harrison, PNW Stand Management Cooperative
1 Nutrition Current Situation RFNRP completed measurements of last phase in 1998 Fertilization is part of auxiliary plots on Type I Installations –extends.
Brief History of Site Quality Estimation from a Forest Mensuration Perspective Eric C. Turnblom ESRM Forest Soils and Site Productivity - Autumn.
Analysis of Tropical Rain Forest Soil & Tropical Dry Forest Tree  Determination of Soil pH  Comparison of Available NH4-N and NO3-N  Comparison of %
1 Nutrition Current Situation RFNRP completed measurements of last phase in 1998 Fertilization is part of auxiliary plots on Type I Installations –extends.
15 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy Meeting TreeLab (v1.0) Variable-density Yield Simulator for Immature, Managed Stands of Douglas-fir Sam D. Pittman Eric.
Fall River Long-term Productivity Study : Predictions of Pre-harvest Biomass and Nutrient Pools K. Petersen, B. Strahm, C. Licata, B. Flaming, E. Sucre,
Estimating Response of Douglas-fir to Urea in Western Oregon & Washington By: Eric Sucre M.S. Thesis Defense.
EFFECT OF HARVEST REMOVAL ON PRODUCTIVITY OF A 15-YEAR-OLD DOUGLAS-FIR PLANTATION. by Dale W. Cole and Jana E. Compton University of Washington and Harvard.
The Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Nutrient Cycling and Forest Productivity By: Eric Sucre.
What Do You See? Message of the Day: The management objective determines whether a site is over, under, or fully stocked.
Materials and Methods Stand Management Cooperative (SMC) Type 1 Installations Research Plots Six 1 acre Douglas-fir plots per installation were examined.
Projected Deliverables: Estimates of N losses due to leaching, volatilization, and uptake by competing understory vegetation Determine the relative efficiency.
Changes in Environmental Variables on Site Index of Teak (Tectona grandis) in West Africa Stephen Adu-Bredu CSIR-FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF GHANA.
Soil Nutrient Availability Following Application of Biosolids to Forests in Virginia. Eduardo C. Arellano and Thomas R. Fox Department of Forestry, Blacksburg,
Measuring Forest Sustainability: How Forest Harvesting Affects Key Indicators of Soil Quality Alicia L. Kiyvyra FS 533.
The Potential of the Alder Resource: Challenges and Opportunities David Hibbs and Andrew Bluhm Hardwood Silviculture Cooperative Department of Forest Science.
21 June 2004 Western Mensurationists Meeting Developing a Whole-stand Model for Douglas-fir Plantations Eric C. Turnblom Samuel D. Pittman.
So far... We have been estimating differences caused by application of various treatments, and determining the probability that an observed difference.
Effects of Forest Management Practices on Carbon Storage Coeli M. Hoover USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station Forest PLUS, Washington DC December.
Deep Soil: Modeling and Significance of Subsurface Carbon & Nitrogen Jason James 1, Robert Harrison 1, Warren Devine 2, & Tom Terry 3 (1) University of.
Introduction: Globally, atmospheric concentrations of CO 2 are rising, and are expected to increase forest productivity and carbon storage. However, forest.
A New Effort to Study Intensively Managed Pine Plantations CAPPS - Consortium for Accelerated Pine Production Studies.
Lecture 10 FORE 3218 Forest Mensuration II Lectures 10 Site Productivity Avery and Burkhart, Chapter 15.
Do stem form differences mask responses to silvicultural treatment? Doug Maguire Department of Forest Science Oregon State University.
Sustainable Production Forestry THE JOINT FORCES OF CSIRO & SCION Development of a productivity Index for Douglas-fir Leith Knowles.
Projected Deliverables: Estimates of N losses due to leaching, volatilization, and uptake by competing understory vegetation Determine the relative efficiency.
Metadata – Date (at beginning and end of data collection) (year, month, date) – Growing season? (yes or no) – GPS location (in decimal degrees) – In situ.
Growth and Yield Lecture 6 (04/17/2015). Overview   Review of stand characteristics that affect growth   Basic Stand Growth Terminology Yield curve;
Interspecific differences in rates of base cation immobilization in the stem of some hardwoods of eastern Canada Patricia Boucher and Benoît Côté Macdonald.
Thinning mixed-species stands of Douglas-fir and western hemlock in the presence of Swiss needle cast Junhui Zhao, Douglas A. Maguire, Douglas B. Mainwaring,
Fertilization. Objectives What factors affect fertilization decisions How to find information needed How to calculate application costs.
Effects of Intensive Fertilization on the Growth of Interior Spruce Presentation to: Interior Fertilization Working Group February 5/13 (revised March.
Comparisons of DFSIM, ORGANOIN and FVS David Marshall Olympia Forestry Sciences Laboratory PNW Research Station USDA Forest Service Growth Model Users.
Growth Model Users Group November 15, 2013 Greg Johnson Weyerhaeuser NR Company.
After successful completion of this Lesson, you have learned to: List the 3 indicators of soil health. List the physical indicators that help to know a.
Pre-workshop exercise on SOC stock simulation / calibration of DNDC Steven Sleutel Dept. Soil Management & Soil Care Ghent University.
Looking for the Plateau in Douglas-fir Annual Volume Increment
RAP-ORGANON A Red Alder Plantation Growth Model David Hibbs, David Hann, Andrew Bluhm, Oregon State University.
Modeling regional variation in the self-thinning boundary line Aaron Weiskittel Sean Garber Hailemariam Temesgen.
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution What is it? How do we describe it? What does it imply for precision management?
SMC Silviculture Project Report Eric C. Turnblom Silviculture Project Leader, SMC SMC Spring Policy Meeting, 25 – 26 Apr 2007 Vancouver, WA.
Sustainable Production Forestry THE JOINT FORCES OF CSIRO & SCION Application of the New Zealand Douglas-fir stand-level growth model to data from the.
Understanding Site-Specific Factors Affecting the Nutrient Demands and Response to Fertilizer by Douglas-fir Center for Advanced Forestry Systems 2010.
Risk to Long-term Site Productivity Due to Whole-tree Harvesting in the Coastal Pacific Northwest Austin Himes 1,2, Rob Harrison 1, Darlene Zabowski 1,
Research Update Coastal Douglas-fir Fertilization Ian R. Cameron, RPF Kamloops BC Eleanor R.G. McWilliams, RPF North Vancouver BC.
Annualized diameter and height growth equations for plantation grown Douglas- fir, western hemlock, and red alder Aaron Weiskittel 1, Sean Garber 1, Greg.
Feedstock and Soil Sustainability 2013 meeting, Corvallis, OR Rob Harrison Stephani Michelsen-Correa (PhD) Marcella Menegale (PhD) Jason James (MS) Erika.
Airborne LiDAR requires purchase, but offers a number of advantages; Airborne LiDAR requires purchase, but offers a number of advantages; Spatial resolution.
GROWTH AND YIELD How will my forest grow? Dr. Glenn Glover School of Forestry & Wildlife Sciences Auburn University.
Rapeepan Kantavichai, PhD student
Regression Analysis.
N Fertilization of PNW Forests: Things we know and some things we ought to Jeff DeRoss 4/26/07.
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Topsoil Depth at the Centralia Site
Chemical Properties of Forest Soils in the Catskills Region
Then… ….and Now.
Scarification and Fertilization of Western Redcedar
In-Field Soil Sampling
Presentation transcript:

Summary of results from the Regional Forest Nutrition Research Project and Stand Management Cooperative Rob Harrison, Dave Briggs, Eric Turnblom, Bob Gonyea, Bert Hasselberg. University of Washington.

SOIL SUPPLY POTENTIAL USE ACTUAL USE REMOBILIZED UPTAKE FROM SOIL NUTSUPDM Nutrient Supply and Use

Results: Pre-RFNRP 1950’s through 1960’s

Percent volume response N rate (lb N/acre) N200 N300 N200-P88-S154 N200-P88-S168+ N100 N52-P12-K220

Percent volume response N rate (lb N/acre) N100 N52-P12-K220 N300 N100 N200-P88-S154 N200-P88-S168+ N200 N52-P12-K220 N+P

Percent volume response N rate (lb N/acre) N100 N52-P12-K220 N300 N100 N200-P88-S154 N200-P88-S168+ N200 N52-P12-K220

Results of other studies 1)Hodge-podge of nutrients other than nitrogen makes conclusions difficult. Several studies indicate results similar to the 2nd above, and many indicate the central role of N. 2)Clearly, both response to N and other nutrients is site controlled. Indicates need for larger scale studies on a wide variety of sites to pin response to site variables.

Conclusions of early studies 1)“Nitrogen application evoked a growth response throughout a range of growing conditions. Magnitude of response is related to amount of nitrogen applied and response is still evident in 1975 from a 1962 application”. 2)“Apparent response to the application of other elements is quite variable and no consistent picture emerges. There is no evidence of an economic response to the other elements”.

RFNRP 1969-pres.

Installations of the PNW Stand Management Cooperative

RFNRP Installations

Forest floor C/N ratio

Overall results of SMC studies Response vs. N rate. Sidell thesis. (1)

Table 2. Pilchuck Tree Farm study established 1994, measured through 2002 (8 y growth). Each treatment is replicated 6 times (two each installation).

Table 1. Oregon Dept. Forestry study established 1995, measured through 1999 (4 y growth). Each treatment is replicated 6 times (two each installation).

Results of RFNRP studies 1)N response averaging 20% (unthinned) -30% (thinned) with 400 kg N, highly site dependent. 2)Clearly, both response to N and other nutrients is site controlled. Indicates need for larger scale studies on a wide variety of sites to pin response to site variables. 3)Effects of N fertilization appear to be very long- lived.

SMC (1991+) No multi-element additions. SMC Type II, III and IV no fertilizer work at all

SMC Type I Installations -plantations with initial stocking spa -Respace (PCT) before onset of competition -7 core treatments (basic 7) ISPHa, ISPHa/2, ISPHa/4, ISPHa and ISPHa/2 min thin ISPHa repeated thin ISPHa heavy thin 2-8 plots for other work, including fertilization Eric Sucre did his M.S. on 7 fertilized sites

Location of SMC Type 1 Fertilized Research Installations

Site Descriptives

Soil & Site Properties Examined Climatic data Elevation % Slope Relative Density (RD) Quadratic Mean Diameter (QMD) Site Index (SI) bulk density (Db) pH C:N ratio cation exchange capacity (CEC)* Inorganic nitrogen (NO 3 - and NH 4 + )* *Mineral Soil only

Total volume and 4-year PAI relative response for each treatment regime at the respected treatment intervals (224 kg ha -1 of N as urea every 4 years). Standard errors are shown.

Multiple regression equations for the relationships between the unstandardized residuals of total volume (m 3 ha -1 ) and 4-year PAI (m 3 ha -1 yr -1 ) response to 224 kg N ha -1 as urea (dependent variables) and various soil, site and stand variables (independent variables).

Results of SMC studies too few sites (7) for broad generalizations 1)Response to N is site and stand controlled. Indicates need to couple fertilization with other silvicultural treatments, particularly stocking, and use RD or other stand properties to drive time of fertilization.