Population synthesis with dynamics Natasha Ivanova MODEST-6 August 2005 or the problems that we face.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ringberg, July 8, 2005 COSMIC RATE OF SNIa Laura Greggio INAF, Padova Astronomical Observatory.
Advertisements

Open Clusters: At The Interface of Stellar Evolution and Stellar Dynamics Robert D. Mathieu University of Wisconsin - Madison.
The blue stragglers formed via mass transfer in old open clusters B. Tian, L. Deng, Z. Han, and X.B. Zhang astro-ph:
Formation of Globular Clusters in  CDM Cosmology Oleg Gnedin (University of Michigan)
Christian Knigge University of Southampton School of Physics & Astronoy Disk Stability vs Close Binary Evolution Rob Hynes (LSU) Christian Knigge University.
AS 3004 Stellar Dynamics Mass transfer in binary systems Mass transfer occurs when –star expands to fill Roche-lobe –due to stellar evolution –orbit, and.
HOW MANY NEUTRON STARS ARE BORN RAPIDLY ROTATING? HOW MANY NEUTRON STARS ARE BORN RAPIDLY ROTATING? NIKOLAOS STERGIOULAS DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS ARISTOTLE.
LISA will be able to detect compact objects that spiral into a MBH by GW emission from up to a distance of a Gpc. The signal is expected to be weak. To.
Vicky Kalogera Jeremy Sepinsky with Krzysztof Belczynski X-Ray Binaries and and Super-Star Clusters Super-Star Clusters.
Magnetars origin and progenitors with enhanced rotation S.B. Popov, M.E. Prokhorov (Sternberg Astronomical Institute) (astro-ph/ )
X-ray Binaries in Nearby Galaxies Vicky Kalogera Northwestern University with Chris Belczynski (NU) Andreas Zezas and Pepi Fabbiano (CfA)
1 Magnetars origin and progenitors with enhanced rotation S.B. Popov, M.E. Prokhorov (Sternberg Astronomical Institute) (astro-ph/ ) Poster N 21.
Understanding LMXBs in Elliptical Galaxies Vicky Kalogera.
Stars Collide…… …..and then what? An overview of the advancements in modelling of stellar collisions, filtered through the biases of Alison Sills MODEST-6,
Fabio Antonini Joshua Faber Alessia Gualandris and David Merritt Rochester Institute of Technology.
Galactic Evolution PHYS390 Astrophysics Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 21.
Two stories from the life of binaries: getting bigger and making magnetars Sergei Popov, Mikhail Prokhorov (SAI MSU) This week SAI celebrates its 175 anniversary.
Mike Shara Department of Astrophysics American Museum of Natural History STAR CLUSTER DYNA MIC S Or: BINARY EVOLUTION on STEROIDS.
Dynamical Evolution and the Mass Function of Globular Cluster Systems Dynamical Evolution and the Mass Function of Globular Cluster Systems Steve Zepf.
Accreting Compact Objects in Nearby Galaxies Vicky Michigan State University, Nov 8, 2006.
X-ray Binaries in Nearby Galaxies Vicky Kalogera Northwestern University Super Star Clusters Starburst galaxies Ultra-Luminous X-Ray Sources Elliptical.
Theoretical Studies of X-Ray Binaries in Clusters Vicky Kalogera MODEST-6 ExtraGalactic only…
Gravitational Wave Sources From Dense Star Clusters Cole Miller University of Maryland.
ASTR377: A six week marathon through the firmament by Orsola De Marco Office: E7A 316 Phone: Week 6, May 24-27, 2009.
X-ray binaries.
He star evolutionary channel to intermediate-mass binary pulsars with a short-orbital-period Chen Wen-Cong School of Physics, Peking University Department.
Ecology of Blue Stragglers: Closing Thoughts and Discussion.
Slide 1 CE through PN eyes June 29 th, 2005 Common Envelope Evolution through Planetary Nebula Eyes Orsola De Marco American Museum of Natural History.
Compact Binaries Cole Miller, University of Maryland.
CV and pre-CV populations in the SDSS era Ulrich Kolb with Phil Davis (OU), Bart Willems (NWU)
Detection rates for a new waveform background design adopted from The Persistence of Memory, Salvador Dali, 1931 Bence Kocsis, Merse E. Gáspár (Eötvös.
A Test for the Disruption of Magnetic Braking in Cataclysmic Variable Evolution P. Davis 1, U. Kolb 1, B. Willems 2, B. T. Gänsicke 3 1 Department of Physics.
a Ultracompact NS-NS: T merger ~ Myr ● detailed single stellar models ● wind-, metallicity-dependent evolution ● binary component tidal interactions.
Dynamical formation of LMXBs in the inner bulge of M31 by Rasmus Voss with Marat Gilfanov X-rays from nearby galaxies ESAC September 2007.
Caroline Darin Nico Salzetta Advisors: Aaron Geller, Daryl Haggard
Population of dynamically formed triples in dense stellar systems Natalia Ivanova Fred Rasio, Vicky Kalogera, John Fregeau, Laura Blecha, Ryan O'Leary.
Models of Blue Stragglers part I A talk for Hans Zinnecker (sort of). Alison Sills, McMaster University.
White Dwarf Binaries in Globular Clusters Fred Rasio (Northwestern)
From an evolutionary point of view Selma de Mink Utrecht University Lorentz Center Workshop “Stellar Mergers” Ines Brott (Utrecht), Matteo Cantiello (Utrecht),
Populations of accreting X-ray sources in galaxies
Constraining close binaries evolution with SDSS/SEGUE: a representative sample of white dwarf/main sequence binaries Matthias Schreiber ESO, May 4th, 2006.
Expected Coalescence Rate of NS/NS Binaries for Ground Based Interferometers Tania Regimbau OCA/ARTEMIS on the behalf of J.A. de Freitas Pacheco, T. Regimbau,
Orbital evolution of compact Black-hole binaries and white dwarf binaries Wencong Chen Astro-ph/ Astro-ph/
Delayed mergers: The contribution of ellipticals, globular clusters, and protoclusters to the LIGO detection rate Aug 16, 2005 Richard O’Shaughnessy (
Accreting Black Holes in the Milky Way and Beyond … Vicky Kalogera Physics & Astronomy Dept with Mike Henninger Natasha Ivanova Bart Willems.
INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma XI Advanced School of Astrophysics, Brazil, 1-6 September 2002.
Supercritical Accretion in the Evolution of Neutron Star Binaries and Its Implications Chang-Hwan 1 Nuclear Physics A 928 (2014)
Evolutionary Sequences For Low- And-Intermediate-Mass X-Ray Binaries Ph. Podsiadlowski S. Rappaport E. D. Pfahl.
Neutron star masses: dwarfs, giants and neighbors Sergei Popov (SAI MSU) Collaborators: M. Prokhorov H. Grigorian D. Blaschke.
Intermediate-mass Black Holes in Star Clusters Holger Baumgardt Astrophysical Computing Laboratory, RIKEN, Tokyo new address:
Rates from binaries: current status Tomasz Bulik Warsaw University.
Oct. 30, 2002Source Simulation & Data Analysis1 Gravitational-Wave Observations of Galactic Populations of Compact Binaries M. Benacquista Montana State.
Three Challenges to standard assumptions 9/27/13Rosanne Di Stefano, 27 September 2013.
Binary Origin of Blue Stragglers Xuefei CHEN Yunnan Observatory, CHINA.
CIfAR Stanford 2008 SN Ia Rates: Theory, Progenitors, and Implications.
The Minimum Mass Ratio for Contact Close Binary
黎卓 HB Perets, JC Lombardi Jr, SR Milcarek Jr JUNO会议,南京,2016/4/17-18
The Formation Efficiency of SNe-Ia: Single-Star Progenitors?
evolution, core collapse, binaries, collisions
Signatures of formation mechanisms in the multiple-star statistics
The primordial binary population in Sco OB2
Remnants of first stars for the gravitational wave source
Theoretical ideas for the formation and feeding of IMBHs
M. Benacquista Montana State University-Billings
Evolution of X-ray Binaries and the Formation of Binary Pulsars
Delay time distribution of type Ia supernovae
Delay time distribution of type Ia supernovae
Center for Gravitational Wave Physics Penn State University
Black Hole Binaries Dynamically Formed in Globular Clusters
Evolutionary Link between X-ray Pulsars and Millisecond Radio Pulsars
Presentation transcript:

Population synthesis with dynamics Natasha Ivanova MODEST-6 August 2005 or the problems that we face

What is population synthesis? Evolutionary Population Synthesis is the method of direct modeling of large populations of non-interacting objects (single or binaries in our case) with non-trivial (non- describable by simple analytic) evolution. Evolutionary Population Synthesis is the method of direct modeling of large populations of non-interacting objects (single or binaries in our case) with non-trivial (non- describable by simple analytic) evolution. The evolution for an object is followed from its birth till the desired moment. The goals: a) to see how the population looks like from statistical point of view b) to check if theory works OK and produces the same number of rare objects as observed c) predict new objects!

Collision time  coll : time between two successive collisions,  coll = 1/n c  S Collision time  coll : time between two successive collisions,  coll = 1/n c  S Hardness  : ratio between binary binding energy and kinetic energy of an average object Hardness  : ratio between binary binding energy and kinetic energy of an average object Soft binaries  <1 : get softer (Heggie 1975); very likely to be destroyed through ionization Soft binaries  <1 : get softer (Heggie 1975); very likely to be destroyed through ionization Hard binaries  >1 : get harder; the encounter can result in the exchange of the companion (smaller mass component is replaced by more massive intruder); very hard binary is likely to merge (Fregeau et al. 2004) Hard binaries  >1 : get harder; the encounter can result in the exchange of the companion (smaller mass component is replaced by more massive intruder); very hard binary is likely to merge (Fregeau et al. 2004) Basics of the binary dynamics

Why do we care about binaries? Interacted and destroyed binaries

Interacted and survived binaries

Non-Interacted binaries Among stars with the initial masses > 0.6 Msun only 8% only 8% are both hard and did not have interactions…

Magnetic braking Magnetic braking Mass transfer events Mass transfer events Mergers Mergers Common envelope events Common envelope events Tidal circularization and synchronization Tidal circularization and synchronization Accretion on WDs, Ia SN and subCh Ia Accretion on WDs, Ia SN and subCh Ia SN kicks and NS-retention: e-c SN? SN kicks and NS-retention: e-c SN? Triples?! Triples?! What do we NEED to take into account for binaries and why life is uncertain

IMF IMF Mass ratio distribution? Mass ratio distribution? How to pick the secondary? How to pick the secondary? Does q depend on the primary masses? Does q depend on the primary masses? Does q depend on binary periods? Does q depend on binary periods? What is about “twins”? What is about “twins”? Periods distribution? Periods distribution? Eccentricities distribution? Eccentricities distribution? Initial binaries/triples/quadruples/quintuples and sextuples fractions? Initial binaries/triples/quadruples/quintuples and sextuples fractions? A few spices before you start to boil the soup

Moscow (Yungleson, Tutukov, Lipunov, Postnov,…) Moscow (Yungleson, Tutukov, Lipunov, Postnov,…) Seba (Portegiez Zwart, Tout, Verbunt,…) Seba (Portegiez Zwart, Tout, Verbunt,…) SSE & BSE (Hurley, Pols, Tout) SSE & BSE (Hurley, Pols, Tout) Kalogera, Belczynski Kalogera, Belczynski Willems, Kolb Willems, Kolb … Brussel code (Vanbeveren & C o ): interpolation between tracks for massive stars Brussel code (Vanbeveren & C o ): interpolation between tracks for massive stars Podsiadlowski, Rappaport, Pfahl & Han : detailed binary tracks for specific classes of systems (Ia SN, LMXBs, sdB …) Podsiadlowski, Rappaport, Pfahl & Han : detailed binary tracks for specific classes of systems (Ia SN, LMXBs, sdB …) Some currently existing Population Synthesis codes for interacting binaries

ofast and robust ocorrect and powerful (not restricted to a certain class of objects) Time-scale: < one month on a modest 32-CPUs cluster (at 50% Memory-resources: 4Gb of memory (NO swapping!) 250,000 Msun GC: ~ 1,000,000 stars: < 40 seconds per star one star should not take more than 40kb in memory. An unavoidable fact: the evolution of a single star takes much less than the evolution of a binary, if one speaks about an interacting binary. So the code is better be able to evolve a single star on a time-scale of few seconds. Any wishes?

SS encounters SS encounters Mergers in physical collisions Mergers in physical collisions Binary formations via physical collisions Binary formations via physical collisions Binary formations via tidal captures Binary formations via tidal captures Three and four body encounters Three and four body encounters MT is interrupted MT is interrupted Eccentricity is changed Eccentricity is changed Exchange occurred and companions are now misaligned and not any more on the corotation Exchange occurred and companions are now misaligned and not any more on the corotation (multiple) physical collisions, including “dynamical” CE (multiple) physical collisions, including “dynamical” CE triples formation triples formation GC: evolution is perturbed!

How to deal with all the mess? Learn binary evolution in the field Learn binary evolution in the field Build a “scenario processor” for all events Build a “scenario processor” for all events Analyze what happens - does it make any sense? Analyze what happens - does it make any sense? Treat specific circumstances with great details Treat specific circumstances with great details Re-run Re-run Run to observers Run to observers Get from observers their results and sit for a while thinking why there is no common language Get from observers their results and sit for a while thinking why there is no common language

Formation of CV binaries: CE or encounter? Field, non-eccentric binaries

CVs formation: main formation channels MS-MS CV single binary BS/BB SS Destr Collis Exch CE Merger Coll RG Exch CE 10% 40% 15% 35%

CVs: population of WDs Field “Typical” cluster

Simulaions vs observations Simulations Observations

PS and dynamics: some currently active codes Hurley - open clusters, M67. Hurley - open clusters, M67. SeBa - IMBH formation, open clusters ecology SeBa - IMBH formation, open clusters ecology Brussel - young clusters with massive stars Brussel - young clusters with massive stars Freitag - IMBH formation, Galactic center Freitag - IMBH formation, Galactic center Fregeau, Gurkan, Rasio - IMBH formation, mass segregation in globular clusters with full IMF Fregeau, Gurkan, Rasio - IMBH formation, mass segregation in globular clusters with full IMF Ivanova, Belczynski, Fregeau, Rasio - binary fractions, compact binaries formation and evolution in globular clusters Ivanova, Belczynski, Fregeau, Rasio - binary fractions, compact binaries formation and evolution in globular clusters Postnov - NS retention, MSPs Postnov - NS retention, MSPs

Future of PS codes with dynamics Bill Paxton’s “EZ” code (Eggleton-refasted): one minute per single star one minute per single star Saul Rappaport and his students at MIT: large population study of binary evolution and RLO. Saul Rappaport and his students at MIT: large population study of binary evolution and RLO. 30,000 binaries in 24 hours at 35 nodes 30,000 binaries in 24 hours at 35 nodes (~2 minutes/RLO binary!!!) (~2 minutes/RLO binary!!!)