Land Use and Land Cover Chapter 20.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Road-Sign Detection and Recognition Based on Support Vector Machines Saturnino, Sergio et al. Yunjia Man ECG 782 Dr. Brendan.
Advertisements

Change Detection. Digital Change Detection Biophysical materials and human-made features are dynamic, changing rapidly. It is believed that land-use/land-cover.
Major Operations of Digital Image Processing (DIP) Image Quality Assessment Radiometric Correction Geometric Correction Image Classification Introduction.
ASTER image – one of the fastest changing places in the U.S. Where??
GIS: The Grand Unifying Technology. Introduction to GIS  What is GIS?  Why GIS?  Contributing Disciplines  Applications of GIS  GIS functions  Information.
Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.
Geographic Information Systems GIS Output. 1. Color Theory Additive primaries blue, green, and red Subtractive primaries yellow, cyan, and magenta.
Lecture 22: Remote Sensing Image Processing and Interpretation
An Overview of RS Image Clustering and Classification by Miles Logsdon with thanks to Robin Weeks Frank Westerlund.
Data Merging and GIS Integration
Thematic Information Extraction: Pattern Recognition/ Classification
January 20, 2006 Geog 258: Maps and GIS
Image Classification To automatically categorize all pixels in an image into land cover classes or themes.
Classification of Remotely Sensed Data General Classification Concepts Unsupervised Classifications.
Remote Sensing Image Processing and Interpretation
DROUGHT MONITORING THROUGH THE USE OF MODIS SATELLITE Amy Anderson, Curt Johnson, Dave Prevedel, & Russ Reading.
Image Classification
Accuracy Assessment. 2 Because it is not practical to test every pixel in the classification image, a representative sample of reference points in the.
THE IMPACTS OF URBANIZATION ON SURFACE ALBEDO IN THE YANGTZE RIVER DELTA INTRODUCTION Mélanie Bourré 06/02/2011.
Remote Sensing Image Processing and Interpretation
Remote Sensing Applications Supporting Regional Transportation Database Development CLEM 2001 August 6, 2001 Santa Barbara, CA Chris Chiesa,
Data fusion and separation meeting - Carnuntum, Austria, June Conception and multi-sources enrichment of significant features for a multi-purpose.
NAPP Photo Five Pockets near Dubois.
Land Cover Classification Defining the pieces that make up the puzzle.
Seto, K.C., Woodcock, C.E., Song, C. Huang, X., Lu, J. and Kaufmann, R.K. (2002). Monitoring Land-Use change in the Pearl River Delta using Landsat TM.
Land Cover Interpretation and Mapping Supplemental Material Lecture 1 prepared by R. Lathrop 8/03.
Price Ch. 2 Mapping GIS Data ‣ GIS Concepts GIS Concepts Ways to map data Displaying rasters Classifying numeric data.
GIS Data Structure: an Introduction
ASPRS Annual Conference 2005, Baltimore, March Utilizing Multi-Resolution Image data vs. Pansharpened Image data for Change Detection V. Vijayaraj,
Image Classification Digital Image Processing Techniques Image Restoration Image Enhancement Image Classification Image Classification.
Remote Sensing and Internet Data Sources Unit 3: Module 12, Lecture 3 – Remote Autonomous Vehicles/On-line data resources.
How do we represent the world in a GIS database?
Senegal Change Assessment Ugo Leonardi GLCN Land Cover/Remote Rensing Expert
Remote Sensing Classification Systems
Support the spread of “good practice” in generating, managing, analysing and communicating spatial information Introduction to Remote Sensing Images By:
Change Detection Techniques D. LU, P. MAUSEL, E. BRONDIZIO and E. MORAN Presented by Dahl Winters Geog 577, March 6, 2007.
A Forest Cover Change Study Gone Bad Lessons Learned(?) Measuring Changes in Forest Cover in Madagascar Ned Horning Center for Biodiversity and Conservation.
7 elements of remote sensing process 1.Energy Source (A) 2.Radiation & Atmosphere (B) 3.Interaction with Targets (C) 4.Recording of Energy by Sensor (D)
ANDERSON (1976) Land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data Level I Level II 1 Urban or Built-up Land 11 Residential.
Land Cover Change Monitoring change over time Ned Horning Director of Applied Biodiversity Informatics
Land Cover Change Monitoring change over time Ned Horning Director of Applied Biodiversity Informatics
Visual Interpretation Skills
Map of the Great Divide Basin, Wyoming, created using a neural network and used to find likely fossil beds See:
Digital Image Processing
Change Detection The process of identifying differences in the state of an object or phenomenon by observing it at different times. Change detection applications:
14 ARM Science Team Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, March 21-26, 2004 Canada Centre for Remote Sensing - Centre canadien de télédétection Geomatics Canada Natural.
BOT / GEOG / GEOL 4111 / Field data collection Visiting and characterizing representative sites Used for classification (training data), information.
Remote Sensing Unsupervised Image Classification.
Using Population Data to Address the Human Dimensions of Population Change D.M. Mageean and J.G. Bartlett Jessica Daniel 10/27/2009.
Citation: Moskal., L. M. and D. M. Styers, Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution near infrared aerial imagery: costs and applications.
Image Photos vs. Classified Image Which one is better?
Land Cover Classification and Monitoring Case Studies: Twin Cities Metropolitan Area –Multi-temporal Landsat Image Classification and Change Analysis –Impervious.
Remote Sensing Theory & Background III GEOG370 Instructor: Yang Shao.
LAND USE/LAND COVER CHANGE IN BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS Maryia Bakhtsiyarava FNRM 5262.
Integrating LiDAR Intensity and Elevation Data for Terrain Characterization in a Forested Area Cheng Wang and Nancy F. Glenn IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE.
Image Elements Used in Photo Interpretation
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
Using vegetation indices (NDVI) to study vegetation
Factsheet # 12 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution.
HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DIFFERENT CROPS USING
Classification of Remotely Sensed Data
ASTER image – one of the fastest changing places in the U.S. Where??
Remote Sensing, GPS, GIS.
Map of the Great Divide Basin, Wyoming, created using a neural network and used to find likely fossil beds See:
Incorporating Ancillary Data for Classification
Evaluating Land-Use Classification Methodology Using Landsat Imagery
REMOTE SENSING Multispectral Image Classification
Land cover data: a short theoretical introduction
Unsupervised Classification
Presentation transcript:

Land Use and Land Cover Chapter 20

Introduction Land use – defined by economic terms Land cover – visible features Both are important and are really inseparable We depend on accurate LU/LC data for scientific and administrative purposes

Intro What are some examples of why knowledge of LU/LC is important?

Predictive Land Use Modeling A Basin-Scale Econometric Model for Projecting Future Amazonian Landscapes was developed to predict forest loss associated with development scenarios in the Amazon basin. Given the scenarios, projections follow from results of econometric modeling based on economic theory and detailed local observation (led by Alexander Pfaff of Columbia University).

As an example, this image shows a situation in which deforestation precedes road-building. It depicts in red several settlement roads in 1988; deforested areas, as of 1988, are shown by the yellow polygons extending beyond the roads. Since the roads now pass through these old deforested areas, the figure suggests reverse causality, in which deforestation actually leads to road-building. This situation is probably common in areas of smallholder colonization.

Air Photos Most LU/LC data are derived from air photos Used as early as 1930 by the TVA USGS later developed a classification system

USGS Classification System A Land Use And Land Cover Classification System For Use With Remote Sensor Data By JAMES R. ANDERSON, ERNEST E. HARDY, JOHN T. ROACH, and RICHARD E. WITMER Geological Survey Professional Paper 964 A revision of the land use classification system as presented in U.S. Geological Survey Circular 671

Classification Level Typical data characteristics I LANDSAT (formerly ERTS) type of data II High-altitude data at 40,000 ft (12,400 m) or above (less than l:8O,OOO scale) III Medium-altitude data taken between 10,000 and 40,000 ft (3,100 and 12,400 m) (1:20,000 to 1:80,000 scale) IV Low-altitude data taken below 10,000 ft (3,100 m) (more than 1:20,000 scale)

Level I Level II 1 Urban or Built-up Land 11 Residential 12 Commercial and Services 13 Industrial 14 Transportation, Communications, and Utilities 15 Industrial and Commercial Complexes 16 Mixed Urban or Built-up Land 17 Other Urban or Built-up Land

2 Agricultural Land 21 Cropland and Pasture 22 Orchards, Groves, Vineyards, Nurseries, and Ornamental Horticultural Areas 23 Confined Feeding Operations 24 Other Agricultural Land

3 Rangeland 31 Herbaceous Rangeland 32 Shrub and Brush Rangeland 33 Mixed Rangeland 4 Forest Land 41 Deciduous Forest Land 42 Evergreen Forest Land 43 Mixed Forest Land

Visual Interpretation Interpreters look at imagery and draw boundaries to mark categories Use the numeric symbols of the classification system Remember chapter 5 about visual interpretation cues

Visual Interpretation Cropped agricultural land is recognized by systematic division of fields into rectangles or circles, with smooth even textures. Tone varies with growth stage Pasture is usually more irregular in shape, a mottled texture, medium tone with possibly some isolated patches of trees

Visual Interpretation Transportation is often seen as linear patterns that cut across the landscape, and by distinctive loops of interchanges

Visual Interpretation Some parcels are delineated as multiple purpose Airports – include runways, hangars, terminals, roads, etc.

Land Use Change by Visual Interpretation Two maps representing the same region are prepared for different dates, to depict land use/land cover Must use the same classification system One can’t be “forest” if the other splits into “pine” and “deciduous” Must be compatible with respect to scale, geometry, and level of detail Should be able to identify points on both maps

Historical and Environmental Analysis Aerial photos are helpful where hazardous materials may have been used/abandoned Disposal sites include ponds, lagoons, landfills, etc. These may now be in populated areas due to urban sprawl

Other LU/LC classification systems The Anderson system described earlier is a general-purpose classification system Land Utilization Survey of Britain TVA land use New York Land Use and Natural Resources Survey

Other LU/LC classification systems Special Purpose Classification Systems Wetlands Classification (Cowardin, 1979)

Land-Cover Mapping by Image Classification Appears straightforward, but many factors are hidden Selection of images – what season, what dates are of most significance Processing – accurate registration and atmospheric corrections Subsetting needs to be done carefully Classification algorithm – needs to be chosen based on region “grow” homogenous training fields

Land-Cover Mapping by Image Classification Assignment of spectral classes to informational classes – “deciduous forest” may require spectral classes that reflect slope aspect. Display and symbolization – consistency of color choices

Digital Compilation of Land-Use Probably no one set of techniques works in all situations. Digital change (Jensen 1996) Image algebra – image subtraction where values near zero are no change, usually applied to single band Must select threshold for change/no change Image ratios can also be applied

Digital Compilation of Land-Use Postclassification comparisons – independent classification of scenes which are then compared Accurate classification is required Multidate composites – assemble all bands from multiple dates into a single composite. The entire set is then analyzed by principle components or other techniques Pretty unwieldy

Digital Compilation of Land-Use Spectral change vector analysis – examines a pixel’s position in multispectral data space. If the pixel occupies roughly the same position in the two data sets, it has not changed. Binary change mask – classify first date, do image algebra on original images from both dates, create a binary mask representing only changed/unchanged pixels. Classify the second date, but use only the pixels identified as changed in the mask.

Digital Compilation of Land-Use On-screen digitization – software is used to view both images side-by-side and visually interpret them. Change detection by image display – corresponding bands from different dates are used as separate overlays in RGB display

Broad-scale Land-Cover studies AVHRR and other data has been used to look at continental or hemispheric changes over time LULC Multiresolution Land Characteristics Gap Analysis