September 15, 2006 Mending the Fractured Value Chain Through Functional Use of Demand Response.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Advertisements

EMIG Electricity Market Investment Group Presentation to the Ontario Energy Board February 17, 2004.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Distributed Generation (DG)
LRIS Settlement Example April 20 th, © CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, INC. THE OFFERING DESCRIBED IN THIS PRESENTATION IS SOLD AND CONTRACTED.
24 May 2007 PROGRESS & PROMISE ON DR/AMI Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
24 May 2007 DEMAND RESPONSE BENEFITS Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.
Vendor Briefing May 26, 2006 AMI Overview & Communications TCM.
1 Wal-Mart’s View on Demand Response Program Design Anoush Farhangi Angela Beehler.
Solar Energy in Washington State and Executive Order All Stakeholder Workgroup Jake Fey Director, WSU Energy Program December 8, 2014.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
1 JULY 2010 PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE REPORT – WORK IN PROGRESS Session 4 Discussion of Alternatives and Implementation Activities for Real- Time.
Loads Acting as a Resource Relationships with QSEs and LSEs
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
November 2001 CHRISTENSENASSOCIATES RTP as a Demand Response Program – How Much Load Response Can You Expect? Peak Load Management Alliance Fall Conference.
1 State Allocation Board Hearing Solar Energy and Energy Efficiency Project Options for California Schools Mark Johnson, Energy Solutions Manager - Schools.
New Zealand & Australian Wholesale Electricity Markets A Comparative Review Dr Ralph Craven Transpower NZ Ltd.
“Specializing in Operational Excellence” Outsourcing Is it right for you? Texas Technology Showcase Houston, Texas March 18, 2003 Integrated Process Solutions.
REGULATORY MECHANISMS TO ENCOURAGE DR/AMI Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.
1 Transmission Development at Ameren and in the Midwest ISO Mid-America Regulatory Conference Maureen A. Borkowski June 8, 2010.
Battling Load Growth in NYC Chris Smith NYSERDA NARUC 2007 Summer Meeting.
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Viticulture– Electricity procurement Site / company name and logo here This is an AgriFood Skills Australia Ltd project developed in partnership with Energetics.
Electric Restructuring In Pennsylvania Sonny Popowsky Pennsylvania Consumer Advocate May 10, 2007 Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Transforming.
1 ENCO Utility Services How Could a Boulder Municipal Utility Run Its Electric Distribution System? June 1, 2011 Boulder, Colorado
Smart Grid - Developments and Implementations Prof. Gady Golan – HIT, Israel Dr. Yuval Beck – HIT, Israel , Electricity 2012, Eilat.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
The Regulatory Assistance Project 50 State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, VT Phone: web: Demand Response in Wholesale.
Retail Competition: Managing a Difficult Transition David L. O’Connor Commissioner Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources (DOER) Presentation to National.
The Texas Renewable Energy Program National Governors Association Scottsdale, Arizona April 29, 2004.
Overview What's is micro grid Over view of electric grid
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Energy Analysis Department Cost-Effectiveness Valuation Framework for Demand Response Resources: Guidelines and Suggestions Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
ERCOT ELTF – Overview and Brief Proposal Dr. Eric Woychik – Strategy Integration LLC representing Comverge, Inc. 8 November 2006.
AER Consumers Forum Brisbane 18 December 2014 Thoughts on DM in the QLD network businesses’ regulatory proposals.
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
Demand Response: Next Steps OPSI Annual Meeting October 1, 2012 Howard J. Haas.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Distributed Solar Generation: Value and Pricing Austin Electricity Conference April 9, 2015 Ashley Brown Executive Director, Harvard Electricity Policy.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
THE 2005 CERT ENERGY ROUNDTABLE Ontario’s Electricity Sector: The Hybrid Model Takes Shape By: Ron Clark May 31, 2005.
Promoting Distributed Generation Resources Through State Initiatives Ed Ethridge Public Utility Commission of Texas Distributed Resources in Restructured.
This slide deck contains animations. Please open this deck in slide show mode (“View” menu, then click on “Slide Show”). To move through the animations,
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Legal Disclaimers and Admonitions PROTOCOL DISCLAIMER This presentation provides a general overview of the Texas Nodal.
A Framework for Organizing Current and Future Electric Utility Regulatory and Business Models Andrew Satchwell and Peter Cappers Lawrence Berkeley National.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, Session 6 Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary? Reluctantly…yes But States should also be.
Demand Response
To Buy or To Build Is it really one or the other? APPA New Generation Workshop Portland, Oregon August 1, 2007.
Business Case NPRR 351 Floyd Trefny Amtec Consulting Brenda Crockett Champion Energy Services.
Extra electricity slides
ERCOT Public 1 Project Panel 1 Dan Woodfin Director, System Operations August 15, 2014.
Oncor Transmission Service Provider Kenneth A. Donohoo Director – System Planning, Distribution and Transmission Oncor Electric Delivery Co LLC
Mario S. DePillis Jr. USAEE Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA October 25-28, 2015.
1 Economic Dispatch Sub-Committee Meeting Ross Baldick Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at Austin September 24,
CEC Public Workshop Order Instituting Informational and Rulemaking Proceeding (08-DR-01) March 3, 2008.
Metering Americas April 24, 2006 Advanced Metering.
1 ECONOMIC TRANSMISSION PLANNING Wholesale Market Subcommittee March 22, 2006 CMWG Proposal #1.
BGE Smart Grid Initiative Stakeholder Meeting September 17, 2009 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing and Regulatory Services.
Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
NWA Suitability Criteria
The Need for Compensatory Standby Rates
State Allocation Board Hearing Solar Energy and Energy Efficiency Project Options for California Schools Mark Johnson, Energy Solutions Manager - Schools.
Addressing HPWH Market Barriers: Expanded Perspective
Presentation transcript:

September 15, 2006 Mending the Fractured Value Chain Through Functional Use of Demand Response

Demand Response in a Fractured Value Chain

Risk Elements With DR DR risk elements include the following:  Marketing, customer acquisition, and customer churn  Hardware and equipment (warranty)  Software upgrades and customer call center  Operations and maintenance  Measurement & verification  Performance – dispatchable MWs when called upon  Stranded investment (if not used)

Demand Side Benefits Across the Value Chain Demand response can reduce costs and investment:  Long- and short-term generation costs – reduce dispatchable, low-capacity-factor, peaking resources  Transmission investment and congestion (redispatch)  Distribution investment, maintenance, and reconductoring  Environmental emissions (SOx, NOx, CO2) Demand response over the longer term has the potential to capture all of these benefits Unbundled market structure, however, strands many of these benefits – leaves benefits untapped

Retail Choice Creates Churn, While Demand Response Equipment Does Not Migrate For customers that seek retail choice some churn -- change of retail provider -- is expected Given churn, demand response equipment cannot be easily “changed-out” or reinstalled in a different local Customer choice means demand response equipment will be stranded investment Retail choice and unbundled functions fracture the value chain How to capture the full set of retail and wholesale benefits?

Proposal for Demand Response to Mend the Fractured Value Chain

How DR May be Best Used During declared emergency conditions, ERCOT may have first priority to dispatch DR for reliability (if DR is not already dispatched by the REP) The REP may dispatch for economics to lower peak power costs (absent emergency conditions), if customer chooses DR If DR is not used by ERCOT or the REP, the distribution wires company may dispatch the DR if needed Place limits on the number of hours of dispatchable DR that are available? Alternative schemes for DR priority?

Optional Uses of Demand Response Option 1: the retail customer does not choose to have DR, so ERCOT uses DR during limited grid emergencies Option 2: the retail customer has the REP using DR, and REP pays customer an incentive – more customer choice Option 3: the distribution wires company uses the DR if needed and it is not used by ERCOT or the REP Option 4: a priority scheme allows REP to use DR if the customer chooses, ERCOT to use it under emergencies (if not previously used by REP), and distribution wires company uses DR (if not used by REP or ERCOT)

Use Neutral Demand Response Provider Use a demand response (DR) provider that is neutral to all parties involved, e.g., retail energy providers Roles of the DR provider may be  1) marketing under the prevailing REPs logo and terms  2) installation of equipment for customers that choose DR  3) Operations, measurement & verification of DR program  4) Migration of DR capabilities to the current customer REP DR provider does not migrate, but changes marketing to match the prevailing REP’s approach and logo

Who Benefits from DR: Matching Functions and Costs All customers benefit from DR dispatched by ERCOT during emergencies – less outage and lower costs REPs and their customers benefit from DR when it is dispatched for economics/congestion to lower costs Distribution wires companies benefit from reliable operations and greater kWH sales from customers Instead of “cost-of-service” DR cost allocation, use functional allocation of DR responsibilities/costs

Functional Proposal to Allocate DR Costs & Responsibilities #1: Share costs across value-chain elements-- use logical functions consistent with DR benefits #2: Provide consistent incentives that reduce conflicts  Rate-base DR equipment costs – allocate to the distribution wires company who is neutral and does not change  Allocate DR operations (dispatching), maintenance, and communications costs to REPs – they net peaking benefits  Allocate DR measurement, verification, and settlement responsibilities to ERCOT, paid for by all customers  Use a fully-outsourced third party DR provider for all functions, under a long-term contract (e.g., 10 to 12 years)

Outsourcing Achieves Multiple Goals (e.g., neutrality) and Mends Fractured Value Chain Distribution wires company has DR equipment installed so it is available – neutral agent REPs dispatch DR if the customer chooses to lower overall costs – operations agent ERCOT uses DR if emergency reliability is needed – reliability and settlement agent Fully-outsourced third party DR provider facilitates all functions across multiple entities – services agent

Q&A & Answers