Page 1 PEP-II D&D Planning & Costing Exercises John Seeman Accelerator Systems Division SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Environment, Safety and Health Steve Hoey, ESH Manager NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee Meeting March 29, 2012.
Advertisements

Prof Awad S. Hanna Concrete Structures Concrete Structures.
Instrument Space Requirements Rob Connatser Chief Instrument Project Engineer November 2014.
Global Design Effort - CFS Damping Ring Baseline Technical Review 1 DAMPING RING BASELINE TECHNICAL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING.
Richard M. Boyce FAC Review – Accelerator Installation October 29-31, Installation – Accelerator Systems Installation Planning.
PEP-II Ramp Down to a Minimum Maintenance State J. Seeman DOE PEP-II Ramp Down-D&D Review August 6-7, 2007.
MICE: Hall Infrastructure Chris Nelson CEng CM16 8 th Oct 2006.
Initial PEP II Radioactive Waste Disposal Estimate Olga Ligeti August 6, 2007.
Estimating Waste Week 3 CTC-415. What is waste Waste is material that needs to be supplied but may not be used All material items except steel beams and.
Accelerator Systems Division FACET Project Management John Seeman for the FACET Study Group PPA Directorate Stanford Linear Accelerator Center DOE FACET.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 PEP-II DND Engineering Planning S. DeBarger Accelerator Systems Division.
Richard M. Boyce FAC October 29-31, Installation Planning Integration process – IMT update Installation Planning &
D. Schultz FAC 6/17/08 1 e-Beams Systems Update People Progress the last review LTU and Dump Installation Status Undulator.
A. Bross MTA RF WS August 22, Welcome MTA RF Workshop.
PEP-II and BaBar DND Review M. Sullivan Mar 23-24, 2009Page 1 PEP-II Overview and MMS Status Michael Sullivan SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
SLAC Accelerator Department The PEP-II Accelerator John T. Seeman Assistant Director of the Technical Division Head of the Accelerator Department SLUO.
Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Undulator Physics.
Bob Law FAC Oct 24, Sector 20 Project Overview Sector 20 Site Plan Description Organizational Chart Schedule Cost.
PEP-II Overview & Ramp Down Plan J. Seeman DOE PEP-II Ramp Down-D&D Review August 6-7, 2007.
Metal Suspension and Exemption Planning Sayed Rokni, Jim Allan, James Liu, Olga Ligeti, Amanda Sabourov, Joachim Vollaire ES&H Radiation Protection Department.
Accelerator Systems Division FACET Accelerator Overview John Seeman for the FACET Study Group PPA Directorate Stanford Linear Accelerator Center DOE FACET.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Accelerator Installation Plan Gregory Fries Project Engineer, Accelerator Systems Division CFAC Review of NSLS-II.
Masonry Bracing Life Safety Considerations During Construction of Masonry Walls.
Preliminary studies for Muon shield modification to accommodate LCLS II Alev Ibrahimov December, 2010 BSY.
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
The Tevatron Decommissioning Plans AEM 10/17/11 Paul C. Czarapata.
Michael P. Andrews NuMI Shutdown & Facility Coordinator LBNE Project ESH Manager AD ESH Special Projects Coordinator.
ILCTA_NML Progress at Fermilab Jerry Leibfritz September 10, 2007.
Created site awarenessRecover personal equipment Opportunity to take abandoned equipment.
1 MICE - INFRASTRUCTURE MICO meeting 7 th February 2008 Tim Hayler.
Overview of Materials Disposition. 2 DOE Moratorium and Suspension Effective in 2000 Moratorium prohibits the unrestricted release for recycling of contaminated.
Material Disposition Planning Olga Ligeti Radiation Protection Department MARCH 24, 2009.
Machine Advisory Committee Review APS Upgrade Installation Plan and Schedule John Noonan November 15, 2006.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 UITF Progress meeting Approved Labyrinth Fresh air pulled through “chicken wire” gate.
FNAL, May 10, Introduction for Beam Diagnostics Laboratory Main Mission: R&D on charged particle beam diagnostics for e + /e - linear colliders.
David Schultz Accelerator Readiness Dec. 2, ‘08 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1 Undulator Complex Status LCLS Introduction.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
PEP-II Disassembly Technical Systems PEP-II D&D Review 6-Aug-2007 S.DeBarger S.Ecklund, A.Hill, D.Kharakh, M.Zurawel.
1 MICE Hall and Infrastructure - Progress since CM18 Chris Nelson MICE CM19 Oct 2007.
Project X RD&D Plan Beam Transfer Line and Recycler Injection David Johnson AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 1 Overview of re-use requests and related issues D. MacFarlane Deputy Director, PPA.
D&D Review 6 August PEP-II Minimal Maintenance State Upkeep Stan Ecklund (J. Seeman, S. DeBarger, D. Kharakh, M. Zurawel)
B Factory D&D Review: March 23, 2009 Page 1 B Factory D&D: Strategy Overview S. Kahn Director, PPA.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Accelerator Systems Installation F. Willeke, ASD Director 6 th ASAC October 22-23, 2009.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES CF Coordination with Technical Divisions Ove Dyling Conventional Facilities Advisory Committee Review October 5-6, 2010.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC CFS and Global Systems Meeting 1 ILC CFS AND GLOBAL SYSTEMS MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP CFS.
ALBA labs  Magnetic lab  RF lab  Vacuum lab Francis Perez.
1 Building Design Progress Dan Wilcox March 2012.
SuperB Integration SuperB Experimental hall. Related topics of Slac D&D activities.
TDR and R&D Plans J. Seeman and M. Biagini For Super-B Staff.
Synchrotron Radiation Absorption and Vacuum Issues in the IR at PEP-II and a Higgs Factory John Seeman, SLAC October 11, 2014 HF2014 Beijing.
Mini MAC II PEP-II hardware M. Sullivan Apr 23-24, 2009Page 1 PEP-II Hardware Status M. Sullivan SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Mini-MAC II Frascati,
November 12-13, 2007 Super-B Factory: Accelerator Costing, PEP-II Hardware and Schedule J. Seeman SLAC International Review Committee meeting November.
Shielding Design for LCLS Injector Operation – Phase one
CBETA Technical Review
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
Michael Sullivan and John Seeman SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Linac4-PSB 160 MeV connection readiness review ( TE/VSC )
The SPEAR3 Upgrade Project at SLAC
The SPEAR3 Upgrade Project at SLAC
Concrete Structures DR. Nabil Dmaidi.
Electron Source Configuration
SuperB RF and Other Components
J. Seeman Assistant Director for PPA/LCLS
FACET Accelerator Overview
Magnet, Support and Infrastructure
Summary of Washington DOE Review
Super-B Accelerator Overview
Polarization at the Super-B Factory
Installation Status & Operational Readiness Process
Presentation transcript:

Page 1 PEP-II D&D Planning & Costing Exercises John Seeman Accelerator Systems Division SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory

Page 2 Topics *PEP-II Components –What is to be removed and what remains. –Inventory of parts –Weights –Volumes –Waste categories *Costs –Removal –Shipping –Storage in a new building –Offsite burial *Possible “zoning” of accelerator components *Parametric costs estimates

Page 3 Parametric Cost Estimates *Make parametric estimated costs for: – Removal of all PEP-II components from the tunnel. –A) Store all suspension parts at SLAC in a new minimal building. –B) Rezoned with “release criteria”: Store “inside” zone parts and release the rest. –C) Ship requested parts to FNAL. Store remaining suspension parts at SLAC. –D) Ship requested parts to INFN. Store remaining suspension parts at SLAC. –E) Ship requested parts to INFN+FNAL. Store remaining suspension parts at SLAC.

Page 4 Contributors to PEP-II MMS-D&D Weekly Meeting *K. Burrows *S. DeBarger *G. Diaz *K. Fant *T. Galetto *A. Jacob *D. Kharakh *J. Krebs *O. Ligeti *H. Lynch *D. MacFarlane *Y. Pilastro *S. Rokni *A. Sabourov *J. Seeman *M. Sullivan *J. Vollaire *U. Wienands *W. Wisniewski *W. Wittmer

Page 5 PEP-II B Factory at SLAC Located at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

Page 6 Beam Line Lengths *HER = 2200 m *LER = 2200 m *HER injection line = 2300 m *LER injection line = 2900 m *Total length of beam line = 9600 m –(  6.0 miles)

Page 7 Magnets Vacuum chambers Lights Cable trays Sprinkler pipes Fire sensors Utility pipes Supports PEP-II Tunnel Components

Page 8 Summary: What stays & What is removed *Stays: –Tunnel walls –Fire system –Fire detection –Cable trays –Cooling-water piping –Lights –Communication equipment –Drainage system –PPS system –IR hall shielding blocks *Removed: –Magnets –Vacuum chambers –Power cables –Mechanical supports –Power supplies –Controls –Floor grout and bolts –Local radiation shielding

Page 9 Tunnel End State *

Page 10 * PEP-II HER dipoles in 1994 ready for installation (75 magnets shown) Removal sequence 

Page 11 * B-Factory RF Klystrons C. Pearson

Page 12 PEP-II Klystron Building and High Voltage Power Supply *

Page 13 PEP-II RF Cavities

Page 14 PEP-II Power Supply Buildings (nine) * RF HVPS Magnet Power Supplies

Page 15 PEP-II Injection Lines *

Page 16 Example of Components NOT Reused * LER pumping chambers “One-off” injection components IR magnet rafts

Page 17 Remove PEP-II Cable Distribution *

Page 18 ES&H discourages outdoor storage of suspension materials *

Page 19 INFN Requests for PEP-II Components *

Page 20 INFN Requests (cont) *

Page 21 INFN Requests (cont) (outside this review) *Polarized e- gun *Polarized laser *Spin rotators *Sub-harmonic bunchers *Transport magnets *Kicker magnets *Polarization monitors

Page 22 FNAL request *100 HER dipoles *Supports for 100 dipoles *Possible quadrupoles –For this exercise we will assume 50 quadrupoles and supports. *No vacuum chambers.

Page 23 Best choice: Shipping Containers * Must manage the risks! 20 foot box To FNAL To INFN

Page 24 Educated estimates for costing calculations *Shipping container holds 35,000 lbs with 1000 cubic feet of volume, with 150 square feet of floor space. –Shipping cost from SLAC to FNAL: $5000. –Shipping cost from SLAC to Civitavecchia, Italy: $6000. –Shipping cost from Civitavecchia to Tor Vergata: $1000. –Shipping cost from SLAC to Clive, Utah, burial site: $4000. *Minimal storage building costs 200 $/square foot from LCLS conventional facility staff. –Concrete slab floor –Steel sides and roof –Lights, fire sprinklers, fire alarms, and lockable doors –(Compare to 500$ for an office-laboratory building) *Release materials costs: –Assume: The income from selling released metals for reuse will exactly offset the SLAC costs for organizing that release, i.e. cost neutral. *Burial costs –590$ / cubic-yard = 22$ / cubic foot for low radioactive metallic parts –174$ / cubic foot for mixed wastes.

Page 25 Calculation of Weight, Storage Area, Containers *Group components in common blocks. *Measure width, length, and height. *Measure weight. *Determine stacking factor for storage. *Determine suspension or release materials. *Calculate total weight. *Calculate total volume. *Calculate total shipping or storage foot print area.

Page 26 *

Page 27 Cost Estimate for Removal of PEP-II Components from the Tunnel *Task: –secure the equipment –preparation for removal –rigging and rolling equipment to IR hall –Use IR hall crane to load onto a truck. *People: –Management needs about 5 people for two years Manager, 2 technicians, mechanical engineer, electrical engineer –ESH needs about 3 people for two years –Total = 16 FTE-years = 4.0 M$ *Technical removal costs were studied with specific teams and durations per task. The result was about $1/lb for technical removal costs. –Total weight = 9.7 x 10 6 lb –Cost = 9.7 M$ *Total cost = 9.7 M$ M$ = 13.7 M$.

Page 28 Cost Estimate for moving PEP-II Components to SLAC Storage Building *Task: –Forklift components from IR hall into storage building *People: –Management needs about 2 person for two years Manager, technician (driver) –ESH needs about 1 person for two years –Total = 6 FTE-years = 1.5 M$ *Technical moving costs about $0.25/lb –Total weight = 9.7 x 10 6 lb –Cost = 2.4 M$ *Total cost = 2.4 M$ M$ = 3.9 M$.

Page 29 Cost of storage building at SLAC *Assume 200 $/square foot *From table storage area of 33k square feet to store all suspension PEP-II components *Add 10 % for aisle ways *SLAC management oversite = 0.8 M$ *  Cost of primitive storage building=8.1 M$

Page 30 Storage Building Example * Possible location: Linac Sector 10

Page 31 Cost of shipping to FNAL and INFN *FNAL (full request): –For 100 dipoles –200 supports –50 quadrupoles and supports –66 containers x 5k$ per container = 0.33 M$. –Add 2 k$ ea for packing and packing materials = 0.13 M$ –Add 0.75 M$ for processing, documentation, permits –Total = 1.3 M$ *INFN (full request): –346 containers x (6+1) k$ ea = 2.42 M$ –Add 2 k$ ea for packing and packing materials = 0.69 M$ –Add 1.0 M$ for processing, documentation, permits –Total = 4.1 M$ *INFN (request with FNAL request removed): –306 containers x (6+1) k$ ea = 2.14 M$ –Add 2 k$ ea for packing and packing materials = 0.61 M$ –Add 1.0 M$ for processing, documentation, permits –Total = 3.7 M$

Page 32 Measured residual radioactivity in PEP-II (J. Allan) *

Page 33 Bury all PEP-II radioactive components in Utah (None of these parts are wanted by INFN or FNAL.) *Total PEP-II component volume = 104 k cf *Assume 5% radioactive waste: –Cost = 0.05 x 0.10 x 10 6 cf x 22$/cf = 0.11 M$ *Assume 1% mixed waste: –Cost = 1040 cf x 174$/cf = 0.19 M$ *Shipping –Cost= 30 containers x (4+2)k$ = 0.18 M$ *SLAC EDI (12 FTE-yr) –Manager, two technicians, four ESH professionals, engineer –Cost = 12 x 0.25 = 3.0 M$ *Total = 3.5 M$

Page 34 A): Store all suspension parts in a new minimal building at SLAC *Do minor release calculations. *Remove components. *Bury radioactive components (6%). *Build large storage building. *Move components to storage building. *Project management.

Page 35 B: “Inside zone” suspension parts for storage and release remainder *Determine “release criteria” in the tunnel by using FLUKA and other calculations requiring significant effort to determine release zone. *Example here: Release everything radially outside of the vacuum chambers except for dumps and collimators. *Remove components. *Bury radioactive components (6%) *Build small storage building. *Move remaining suspension components to storage building (mostly vacuum chambers). *Project management.

Page 36 C) Ship requested parts to FNAL and store remaining suspension parts. *Ship to FNAL requested components. *Do modest release calculations. *Remove components from the tunnel. *Bury radioactive components (6%). *Build small storage building. *Move components to storage building. *Project management.

Page 37 D) Ship all requested parts to INFN and Store the remaining suspension parts *Ship to INFN requested components. *Do modest release calculations. *Remove components from the tunnel. *Bury radioactive components (6%). *Build small storage building. *Move components to storage building. *Project management.

Page 38 E) Ship all requested parts to INFN and FNAL Store the remaining suspension parts *Ship to FNAL requested components. *Ship to INFN most of requested components. *Do modest release calculations. *Remove components from the tunnel. *Bury radioactive components (6%). *Build small storage building. *Move components to storage building. *Project management.

Page 39 Summary Cost Table *

Page 40 B Factory MMS/D&D budget

Page 41 Conclusions *A list of PEP-II components and their properties have been made. Components are released by an authorization process. *The base goal has been established: –Remove components –Recycle release materials (~20%) –Bury radioactive materials (~6%) –Keep suspension material (~74%) –Build a new (primitive) storage building for inventory control *Ship components to “Inside” or “Outside” requesters as appropriate. *Cost estimates have been made for the various scenarios. –Base goal costs are ~45 M$.