The Evil Demon Argument

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Philosophy Through the Centuries
Advertisements

the argument from sensory error
The ontological argument. I had the persuasion that there was absolutely nothing in the world, that there was no sky and no earth, neither minds nor.
The Cogito. The Story So Far! Descartes’ search for certainty has him using extreme sceptical arguments in order to finally arrive at knowledge. He has.
The Role of God in the Meditations (1) Context
The evil demon argument. I will suppose, then, not that Deity, who is sovereignly good and the fountain of truth, but that some malignant demon, who is.
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ Meditations. Four bulldozers of doubt: –I can’t trust my senses –I could be crazy –I could be dreaming –A malicious demon could be out to fool.
Meditations on First Philosophy
Bigquestions.co.uk1 meditation 3, the trademark argument perfection.
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
The Rationalists: Descartes Certainty: Self and God
Sources of knowledge: –Sense experience (empiricism) –Reasoning alone (rationalism) We truly know only that of which we are certain (a priori). Since sense.
Descartes on scepticism
Deeper.. last week what is christianity? what is christianity? doctrines doctrines apologetics apologetics.
Skepticism The Dreaming Argument. The First Meditation A ll that I have, up to this moment, accepted as possessed of the highest truth and certainty,
Results from Meditation 2
Descartes’ Epistemology
Descartes’ First Meditation
Knowledge, Skepticism, and Descartes. Knowing In normal life, we distinguish between knowing and just believing. “I think the keys are in my pocket.”
Philosophy of Mind Week 2: Descartes and Dualism
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
Rene Descartes 1596—1650. Some dates 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1633: Galileo.
Descartes. Descartes - b.1596 d.1650 ❑ Not a skeptic – “there really is a world, that men have bodies, and the like (things which no one of sound mind.
Descartes’ Meditations
The Dreaming Argument.
Descartes Meditations. Knowledge needs a foundation Descartes knows he has false beliefs, but he does not know which ones are false So, we need a method.
Meditation 1. Argument From Illusion We needn’t reject sources of knowledge one by one – we can reject by class. Authorities – parents, books, famous people,
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 12 Minds and bodies #1 (Descartes) By David Kelsey.
Descartes' Evil Demon Hypothesis:
Varieties of Scepticism. Academic Scepticism Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy A return to the Socratic.
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
“Cogito, ergo sum.” “I think, therefore I am.”.  chief architect of 17 th C intellectual revolution  laid foundations of ‘modern scientific age’
Descates Meditations II A starting point for reconstructing the world.
DESCARTES MEDITATION 1. René Descartes
Descartes' Meditations : Introduction to Philosophy June 4, 2009 Instructor: Karin Howe Carnegie Mellon University.
The Ontological Argument 1.If the GBI exists in the understanding alone, we can imagine it existing in reality. 2.Existing in reality is greater than existing.
Argument From Dreaming. 1 This is the second sceptical argument – the second wave of doubt, after the argument from illusion – senses cannot be trusted.
1 What’s wrong with the cogito? 1) Is there a questionable hidden premise?  Most criticism is of the cogito in its earlier format: “I think therefore.
COGITO ERGO SUM.
A posteriori Knowledge A priori knowledge A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A priori knowledge.
René Descartes Brandon Lee Block D.
Lauren Dobbs “Cogito ergo sum”. Bio  Descartes was a French born philosopher from the 1600’s.  He’s most famous for his “Meditations on First Philosophy”
Meditations: 3 & 4.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
WEEK 4: EPISTEMOLOGY Introduction to Rationalism.
Rene Descartes: March – February Father of Modern Philosophy Attempts to reconcile the new scientific method with traditional metaphysics.
1. I exist, because I think. 2. I am a thinking thing 3
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Skepticism.
Skepticism Introduction.
Descartes’ Meditations
Descartes’ proof of the external world
Descartes, Meditations 1 and 2
Meditations on First Philosophy
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
Descartes' Meditations
The Evil Demon Argument
On your whiteboard: What is empiricism? Arguments/evidence for it?
Descartes Scepticism.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 Berkeley
Meditation 2: The Nature of the Mind, which is Better Known than the Body Descartes Meditation I.
Rene Descartes Father of Modern Philosophy
Descartes The Cogito.
Epistemology “Episteme” = knowledge “Logos” = words / study of
Presentation transcript:

The Evil Demon Argument Skepticism The Evil Demon Argument

The Evil Demon I will suppose, then, not that Deity, who is sovereignly good and the fountain of truth, but that some malignant demon, who is at once exceedingly potent and deceitful, has employed all his artifice to deceive me; I will suppose that the sky, the air, the earth, colors, figures, sounds, and all external things, are nothing better than the illusions of dreams, by means of which this being has laid snares for my credulity…

The Evil Demon …I will consider myself as without hands, eyes, flesh, blood, or any of the senses, and as falsely believing that I am possessed of these; I will continue resolutely fixed in this belief, and if indeed by this means it be not in my power to arrive at the knowledge of truth, I shall at least... guard with settled purpose against giving my assent to what is false, and being imposed upon by this deceiver, whatever be his power and artifice. -Descartes, Meditations

The Dreaming Argument I can’t rule out the possibility that I’m dreaming. If (1), then I can’t know anything about the external world. [So] I can’t know anything about the external world.

The Evil Demon Argument I can’t rule out the possibility that I’m being deceived by an evil demon. If (1), then I can’t know anything about the external world. [So] I can’t know anything about the external world.

The Evil Demon Argument I can’t rule out the possibility that I’m being deceived by an evil demon. The Evidence Thesis: Our evidence for the external world is exactly the same as our evidence for the Evil Demon. If (1), then I can’t know anything about the external world. The Knowledge Thesis: In order to know that something is the case, you first have to rule out all the alternatives.

The Evil Demon Argument I can’t rule out the possibility that I’m being deceived by an evil demon. If (1), then I can’t know anything about the external world. [So] I can’t know anything about the external world.

Cogito ergo sum I had the persuasion that there was absolutely nothing in the world, that there was no sky and no earth, neither minds nor bodies; was I not, therefore, at the same time, persuaded that I did not exist? Far from it; I assuredly existed, since I was persuaded…

Cogito ergo sum …but there is I know not what being, who is possessed at once of the highest power and the deepest cunning, who is constantly employing all his ingenuity in deceiving me. Doubtless, then, I exist, since I am deceived; and, let him deceive me as he may, he can never bring it about that I am nothing, so long as I shall be conscious that I am something. -Descartes, Meditations