VT. From Basic Formal Ontology to Medicine Barry Smith and Anand Kumar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DNA.
Advertisements

1 Five Steps to Interoperability (in the domain of scientific ontology) Barry Smith.
Enhancing GO for the sake of clinical bionformatics Anand Kumar IFOMIS, University of Leipzig/Saarbrücken.
Introduction and History of Anatomy/Levels of Organization.
Ontological analysis of the semantic types Anand Kumar MBBS, PhD IFOMIS, University of Saarland, Germany. BIOMEDICALONTOLOGYBIOMEDICALONTOLOGY.
Mind and Body Is Consciousness Reducible to Brain Activity/Construction?
Knowledge Representation
On the Future of the NeuroBehavior Ontology and Its Relation to the Mental Functioning Ontology Barry Smith
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Slide 4- 1.
FMA: a domain reference ontology Comments on Cornelius Rosse’s talk Anita Burgun WG6 meeting, Rome 29 Apr- 2 May 2005.
Battling Scylla and Charybdis: The Search for Redundancy and Ambiguity in the 2001 UMLS Metathesuarus James J. Cimino Department of Medical Informatics.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Chapter 8 The Enhanced Entity- Relationship (EER) Model.
Function, Role, and Disposition in Basic Formal Ontology Robert Arp and Barry Smith Ontology Research Group (ORG) National Center for.
Thomas Bittner and Barry Smith IFOMIS (Saarbrücken) Normalizing Medical Ontologies Using Basic Formal Ontology.
VT. 2 Ontology, the Semantic Web and the Unification of Medical Knowledge Barry Smith.
AN INTRODUCTION TO BIOMEDICAL ONTOLOGY Barry Smith University at Buffalo 1.
BFO/MedO: Basic Formal Ontology and Medical Ontology Draft ( )
1 VT 2 Ontology and Ontologies Barry Smith 3 IFOMIS Strategy get real ontology right first and then investigate ways in which this real ontology can.
How to Organize the World of Ontologies Barry Smith 1.
The bioinformatics of biological processes The challenge of temporal data Per J. Kraulis CMCM, Tartu University.
GOL A General Ontological Language Barry Smith Heinrich Herre Barbara Heller.
1 SNAP and SPAN Barry Smith and Pierre Grenon University at Buffalo and Institute for Formal Ontology and Medical Information Science (ifomis.de) University.
Ifomis.org 1 Biomedical Ontology in Saarbrücken Barry Smith
Ifomis.org Ontologie-basierte Qualitätssicherung medizinischer Terminologien Barry Smith with thanks to Werner Ceusters, Anand Kumar and Cornelius Rosse.
Introduction to the programme A.Hasman. Medical Informatics The study concerned with the understanding, communication and management of information in.
Foundations This chapter lays down the fundamental ideas and choices on which our approach is based. First, it identifies the needs of architects in the.
Functionalism Mind and Body Knowledge and Reality; Lecture 3.
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Slide 4- 1 EER stands for Enhanced ER or Extended ER EER Model Concepts Includes all modeling concepts.
Research Methods in Nursing. Examining History 1600’s is the age of reasoning; finding reason and experimenting what is observed. Isaac Newton is a pioneer.
The Ontology for General Medical Science Barry Smith 11/5/2012.
June 6, 2001By: Respickius Casmir1 Doctoral Thesis Title and Author A Systemic-Holistic Approach to Academic Programmes In IT Security Presented By Louise.
CONCEPT, THEORY, CASE Deciphering the Differences 1.
CS621 : Artificial Intelligence Pushpak Bhattacharyya CSE Dept., IIT Bombay Lecture 15 OWL ontology: An example.
Lesson Overview 2.3 Carbon Compounds.
Integrated Biomedical Information for Better Health Workprogramme Call 4 IST Conference- Networking Session.
1 Enriching and Designing Metaschemas for the UMLS Semantic Network Department of Computer Science New Jersey Institute of Technology Yehoshua Perl James.
Survey of Medical Informatics CS 493 – Fall 2004 September 27, 2004.
Knowledge-Based Semantic Interpretation for Summarizing Biomedical Text Thomas C. Rindflesch, Ph.D. Marcelo Fiszman, M.D., Ph.D. Halil Kilicoglu, M.S.
Use of the UMLS in Patient Care James J. Cimino, M.D. Center for Medical Informatics Columbia University.
The ICPS: A taxonomy, a classification, an ontology or an information model? Stefan SCHULZ IMBI, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
Sharing Ontologies in the Biomedical Domain Alexa T. McCray National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health Department of Health & Human Services.
1 The Unbearable Lightness of Biomedical Informatics Barry Smith Saarbrücken/Buffalo
3. Medical Being MedO many MedOs BFO: SNAPs, SPAN(s), granularity MedO: SNAPs, SPAN(s), granularity different bodily systems total bodily system.
SOFTWARE DESIGN. INTRODUCTION There are 3 distinct types of activities in design 1.External design 2.Architectural design 3.Detailed design Architectural.
The UMLS Semantic Network Alexa T. McCray Center for Clinical Computing Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Medical School
Experience with Using the UMLS Semantic Network to Coordinate Controlled Terminologies for a Large Clinical Data Repository James J. Cimino Department.
PATO and TO Barry Smith. HP: ! tachycardia =def. Process: GO: cardiac muscle contraction Quality: PATO: increased rate HP = Human.
OGMS Proposals Alexander P. Cox 2013 ICBO Meeting Montreal, Canada.
Information Artifact Ontology Barry Smith 1.
OGMS Monthly Call 21OCT2015. Agenda 1.Implementation- Definition and placement of ‘injury’ (Sagar) 1.Propositions + Discussion – Cleanup of ‘process’
The Mind And Body Problem Mr. DeZilva.  Humans are characterised by the body (physical) and the mind (consciousness) These are the fundamental properties.
Basic Formal Ontology Barry Smith August 26, 2013.
1 Semantic Network Issues in UMLS Study Yehoshua Perl, James Geller.
VT. Realism, Concepts and Categories Or: how realism can be pragmatically useful for information systems Barry Smith.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Slide 4- 1.
1 Standards and Ontology Barry Smith
Domain of Nursing The specific domain of nursing is – People’s unique responses to and experience of health, illness, frailty, disability and health-related.
CPR Ontology: Issues Encountered Using BFO Chimezie Ogbuji.
Enhanced Entity-Relationship (EER) Model
Stefan Schulz Medical Informatics Research Group
Representing Dispositions
Lecture 9- Design Concepts and Principles
Research Methods in Nursing
Introduction to Applied and Theoretical Ontology Barry Smith
DNA Structure and Function
Lecture 9- Design Concepts and Principles
Ontological analysis of the semantic types
Stefan SCHULZ IMBI, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
Being and matter as the philosophical categories
Enhanced Entity-Relationship (EER) Modeling
Presentation transcript:

VT

From Basic Formal Ontology to Medicine Barry Smith and Anand Kumar

UMLS Semantic Network a tool to find our way around the UMLS Metathesaurus (January 2003 version consists of 132 Semantic Types + 54 links) can be arranged in the form of a graph whose vertices are the Semantic Types and whose edges are the links.

UMLS Semantic Network arranged in a double tree structure, with two superclasses: Entities and Events. Entity = “A broad type for grouping physical and conceptual entities”. Event = “A broad type for grouping activities, processes and states”.

Basic Formal-Ontological Distinctions 1. Continuant vs. Occurrent (= SNAP vs. SPAN) 2. Dependent vs. Independent 3. Universals vs. Particulars

Basic Formal-Ontological Distinctions 1. Continuant vs. Occurrent (= SNAP vs. SPAN) 2. Dependent vs. Independent 3. Universals vs. Particulars

Continuant vs. Occurrent (= SNAP vs. SPAN) continuants = entities which continue to exist through time, e.g. organisms, cells, chromosomes occurrents = entities which unfold themselves through time in successive temporal phases, e.g. an intravenous drug infusion continuant/occurrent = (roughly) UMLS distinction between Entity and Event

Basic Formal-Ontological Distinctions 1. Continuant vs. Occurrent (= SNAP vs. SPAN) 2. Dependent vs. Independent 3. Universals vs. Particulars

Dependent vs. Independent independent = has an inherent ability to exist without reference to other entities – e.g. molecules, organisms, planets dependent = require a support from other entities in order to exist – e.g. cellular motion (which requires reference to a cell which moves), or viral infection (which requires reference to some carrier)

Need to find ways to deal with time in medical informatics Guidelines Workflow  need to be clear about the distinction between continuants and occurrents

occurrents (in medicine) are always dependent entities. Thus of the four abstractly possible combinations only three are instantiated

Independent and Dependent Continuants Independent Continuants = substances, objects, things Dependent Continuants = qualities (your height, your skin-color) states or conditions (your diabetes) roles (your role as student, as doctor) functions (of a drug, of a machine)

UMLS Semantic Network Conceptual Entity, with subclasses: Organism Attribute Finding Idea or Concept Occupation or Discipline Organization Group Group Attribute Intellectual Product Language

Conceptual Entities are dependent on minds but Organism Attributes can exist without minds and Groups (e.g. a group of macac monkeys) can exist without minds

UMLS Semantic Tree with root Event Event has subclasses: Activity Phenomenon or Process Natural Phenomenon or Process Biologic Function Physiologic Function Pathologic Function runs together functions, which are continuants, with processes, which are occurrents

Functions are continuants Functions exist self-identically through time; they have no temporal phases and exist even when not being exercised The exercise of a function unfolds itself through its temporal phases The compilers of UMLS have confused what exists dispositionally in a thing, and is the product of design or evolution, with what the thing does episodically, and is the product of intentionality or immediate causal influence

UMLS Semantic Type Collections Chen, Perl et al. and Geller, Perl et al. partition the UMLS Semantic Network into more meaningful units called Semantic Type Collections. problems revealed by the BFO analysis especially in: Pathologic Function Physiologic Function Idea or Concept

Subclasses of Pathologic Function Experimental Model of Disease Cell or Molecular Dysfunction Disease or Syndrome Mental or Behavioral Dysfunction

Subclasses of Physiologic Function Organ or Tissue Function Mental Process Molecular Function Mental Process Genetic Function Cell Function

Subclasses of Idea or Concept Functional Concept Body System Temporal Concept Qualitative Concept Quantitative Concept Spatial Concept Geographic Area Body Location or Region Molecular Sequence Carbohydrate Sequence Amino Acid Sequence Body Space or Junction Nucleotide Sequence

CIRCULATORY SYSTEM bodily systems are parts of organisms (like fingers and hands)

Case Study: Regulation of Blood Pressure UMLS: hypertension is a Disease or Syndrome or a Sign or Symptom blood pressure is an Organism Function. Both are dependent SNAP entities: they endure identically for a certain period of time and they depend for their existence on their bearer.

The hydraulic equation: BP = CO*PVR arterial blood pressure is directly proportional to the product of blood flow (cardiac output, CO) and peripheral vascular resistance (PVR). UMLS: blood flow is an Organism Function cardiac output is a Laboratory or Test Result (SNAP) and a Diagnostic Procedure (SPAN)

How eliminate this nonsense? Blood pressure is_proportional_to_a laboratory or test result? Blood pressure is_proportional_to_a diagnostic procedure? An amino acid sequence is_an idea or concept St. Malo is_a spatial concept

Basic Formal-Ontological Distinctions 1. Continuant vs. Occurrent (= SNAP vs. SPAN) 2. Dependent vs. Independent 3. Universals vs. Particulars

Replace concepts in peoples’ heads (e.g. in UMLS) with universals in re teach medical terminology systems the distinction between universals and particulars distinguish clearly between ontology (the study of reality) and epistemology/psychology (the study of peoples’ concepts)

UMLS confuses epistemology with ontology it confuses the results of our attempts to gain knowledge of specific aspects of the organism (functions, qualities, processes) with those aspects themselves.

What would a better UMLS top- level look like?