Event Reweighting Tools Contents: ● Goals ● Reweighting Packages ● Usage & Reweight Friendly Packages ● Validation ● Caveats.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SADC Course in Statistics Confidence intervals using CAST (Session 07)
Advertisements

HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
1 Cross-section systematics Broad aims of this study: –Evaluate the effect of cross-section uncertainties on the all-event CC analysis (selection efficiencies,
Effect of b-tagging Scale Factors on M bb invariant mass distribution Ricardo Gonçalo.
Soudan 2 Peter Litchfield University of Minnesota For the Soudan 2 collaboration Argonne-Minnesota-Oxford-RAL-Tufts-Western Washington  Analysis of all.
A Package For Tracking Validation Chris Meyer UC Santa Cruz July 6, 2007.
1 CC analysis update Status of the cross-section reweighting package Status of the Physics Analysis Ntuple (PAN) D. A. Petyt Nov 3 rd 2004.
University of Gaziantep Department of Engineering Physics August 2006 Page 1/18 A.Beddall, A.Beddall and A. Bingül Department of Engineering Physics University.
1 First look at new MC files First look at reconstruction output from the newly- generated “mock-data” MC files. –These contain the following improvements:
1 CC Update Status of the PAN –Integration of “standard” all-event analysis with Mad Analysis update –Resolving parameter degeneracies in the ND –To do.
2015/6/23 1 How to Extrapolate a Neutrino Spectrum to a Far Detector Alfons Weber (Oxford/RAL) NF International Scoping Study, RAL 27 th April 2006.
CC/NC SEPARATION STUDY Andy Blake Cambridge University Friday February 23 rd 2007.
1 MDC post-mortem Now that we know most (if not all) of the input MDC parameters, I thought it would be useful to conduct a post- mortem of the CC MDC.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
1 MDC status Overall concept: –The FarDet Mock data challenge ‘dataset’ has been generated with unknown values of  m 2 and sin 2 2  which are to be determined.
The Calibration Process
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
1/16 MDC post-mortem redux Status as of last CC meeting: –True values of cross-section and oscillation parameters were used to reweight the ND and FD MC.
WebCT Vista PowerLinks Reporting Interfaces John Hallett Senior Product Manager WebCT, Inc.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Darren Price – Monte Carlo onia simulations at ATLAS QWG Workshop – 20/10/2007Page 1 Monte Carlo quarkonium simulations at A TLAS Darren Price, LANCASTER.
4/22/2017 5:36 PM EViews Training Creating Workfiles.
Managing Organizations Informed decision making as a prerequisite for success Action Vision Mission Organizational Context Policies, Goals, and Objectives.
The Muon Neutrino Quasi-Elastic Cross Section Measurement on Plastic Scintillator Tammy Walton December 4, 2013 Hampton University Physics Group Meeting.
News on ZEUS Leading Baryon analyses Roberto Sacchi Università di Torino and INFN DIS2004 Workshop Slovakia, April 14-18, 2004 Introduction Study of the.
Extending the Bertini Cascade Model to Kaons Dennis H. Wright (SLAC) Monte Carlo April 2005.
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
Ratio of Three over Two Jet Cross Sections: Update 36 pb -1 P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas University of Ioannina, Greece QCD High p T Meeting 17.
Sensitivity Prospects for Light Charged Higgs at 7 TeV J.L. Lane, P.S. Miyagawa, U.K. Yang (Manchester) M. Klemetti, C.T. Potter (McGill) P. Mal (Arizona)
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
Beam MC activity A.K.Ichikawa for beam group For more details,
1 CC analysis – systematic errors At the last collaboration meeting it was recognised that we needed to develop tools to enable us to properly assess the.
Sam Zeller, NuInt09, path forward session 1 Some Thoughts on MC Convergence first, would like to define what I mean two kinds of convergence … - “convergence”
David Adams ATLAS DIAL: Distributed Interactive Analysis of Large datasets David Adams BNL August 5, 2002 BNL OMEGA talk.
 0  5  Outline Event selection & analysis Background rejection Efficiencies Mass spectrum Comparison data-MC Branching ratio evaluation Systematics.
P. Vahle, Oxford Jan F/N Ratio and the Effect of Systematics on the 1e20 POT CC Analysis J. Thomas, P. Vahle University College London Feburary.
Neutrino cross sections in few hundred MeV energy region Jan T. Sobczyk Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Wrocław (in collaboration with.
Update : Ratio of Three over Two Jet Cross Sections P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas, I.Evangelou, N.Manthos University of Ioannina, Greece Senior Editor.
Beam Extrapolation Fit Peter Litchfield  An update on the method I described at the September meeting  Objective;  To fit all data, nc and cc combined,
A bin-free Extended Maximum Likelihood Fit + Feldman-Cousins error analysis Peter Litchfield  A bin free Extended Maximum Likelihood method of fitting.
Postgraduate Computing Lectures PAW 1 PAW: Physicist Analysis Workstation What is PAW? –A tool to display and manipulate data. Learning PAW –See ref. in.
1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
Proposal for the study to define what is really necessary and what is not when the data from beam, ND and SK are combined A.K.Ichikawa 2008/1/17.
K 0 S and  production at ZEUS, A. Savin, University of Wisconsin DIS 2006, April 22, K 0 S and  production at ZEUS Alexander A. Savin University.
A different cc/nc oscillation analysis Peter Litchfield  The Idea:  Translate near detector events to the far detector event-by-event, incorporating.
Neutrino DIS measurements in CHORUS DIS2004 Strbske Pleso Alfredo G. Cocco INFN – Napoli.
Marina Golubeva, Alexander Ivashkin Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow AGeV simulations with Geant4 and Shield Geant4 with Dpmjet-2.5 interface.
D. Jason Koskinen IoP Nuclear and Particle Physics Divisional Conference 4/4/ MINOS Neutrino Flux Using NuMI Muon Monitors for calculating flux for.
Measurement of fragmentation properties of charmed particle CHORUS Workshop June 2004, Rome A.Kayış Topaksu.
Status of QEL Analysis ● QEL-like Event Selection and Sample ● ND Flux Extraction ● Fitting for MINOS Collaboration Meeting FNAL, 7 th -10 th December.
Measuring Oscillation Parameters Four different Hadron Production models  Four predicted Far  CC spectrum.
September 10, 2002M. Fechner1 Energy reconstruction in quasi elastic events unfolding physics and detector effects M. Fechner, Ecole Normale Supérieure.
1 D *+ production Alexandr Kozlinskiy Thomas Bauer Vanya Belyaev
Extrapolation Techniques  Four different techniques have been used to extrapolate near detector data to the far detector to predict the neutrino energy.
Study of the Differential Luminosity Spectrum Measurement using Bhabha Events in 350GeV WANG Sicheng 王 思丞 Supervisor: André Sailer.
New HR-DDS User Services David J. S. Poulter, National Oceanography Centre, UK
Progress on Simulation Software Hai-Ping Peng(USTC) Xiao-Shuai Qin(IHEP) Xiao-Rong Zhou(USTC) Yu Hu(IHEP) 2014 STC Workshop (ITP) Hai-Ping Peng.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
Analysis Tools interface - configuration Wouter Verkerke Wouter Verkerke, NIKHEF 1.
1 A M Cooper-Sarkar University of Oxford ICHEP 2014, Valencia.
R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 1 A Search for  → e oscillations with MiniBooNE MiniBooNE does not yet have a result for the  → e oscillation search. The.
Peter Richardson IPPP, Durham University
Loops BIS1523 – Lecture 10.
Coherent Pion Production
MUMON / emulsion total flux uncertainty
K0S and L production at ZEUS
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
a middleware implementation
Overview Activities from additional UP disciplines are needed to bring a system into being Implementation Testing Deployment Configuration and change management.
Presentation transcript:

Event Reweighting Tools Contents: ● Goals ● Reweighting Packages ● Usage & Reweight Friendly Packages ● Validation ● Caveats

Goals ● Event reweighting provides a quick way to understand some of systematics present in an analysis due to uncertainties in physics models ● The goal of this work was to provide a user- friendly package allowing people to study the effects of changing a range of model parameters ● The package was developed to meet the needs of the MDC, however, it can easily be extended to incorporate new reweighting schemes

Reweighting Packages ● MCReweight (design advice: Costas) – Calculates total reweight factor given event & adjusted params ● NeugenInterface (Hugh, Costas) – Contains classes which interface to fortran code ● GnumiInterface – Correlates neutrino parent information with each event in the ntuples ● BMPT classes (fortran from Mark M.) – Calculate cross-sections according to the BMPT model using neutrino parent kinematics

Usage + Friendly Packages ● Need a range of event variables: – For Neugen: ● Neutrino 4-mom ● Target 4-mom ● Interaction type: nu-type, CC/NC, process ● Initial State, Hadronic final state – For BMPT ● Neutrino parent 4-mom ● Parent ID ● Examples of how to extract event quantities from the standard ntuples can be found in minossoft: – Mad – AnalysisNtuples

Usage + Friendly packages ● Both Neugen and BMPT models have a range of parameters that can be varied – 30 Neugen Parameters ● Details: – 39 BMPT Parameters ● Details: ● Therefore essential to only vary parameters in a meaningful way – Tools such as NuValidator can be employed for this An example of how to use MCReweight to vary the parameters can be found in the macros directory of the package

Neugen Validation ● Hugh produced two samples of events: – One with standard neugen parameters – One with a number of parameters varied ● He showed that with NeugenInterface he could reproduce standard event distributions by reweighting the non-standard event set ● This was then repeated in the MCReweight framework to validate the reweighting procedure

Neugen Validation ● Top: E , E had ; Bottom: x,y; Colours: Std, Non-Std, Rwt

BMPT Validation ● Attempted to reproduce the pion and kaon cross- sections as shown in the original paper ● Pion cross-sections reproduced well

BMPT Validation ● Kaons however are slightly off ● Kinematic variable used in code is not the same as that used in the paper – However, fortran code used to generate MDC files has the same feature....

Caveats, etc. ● General Caveat: – It is impossible to use reweighting to study previously unpopulated regions of phase space ● Sounds obvious now... – Would be useful to produce flat distributions so that reweight studies are not statistically limited (or impossible) ● If reweighting become more widely used, it will be essential to keep track of parameters used to generate event samples – e.g. MC header block to hold neugen parameters ● BMPT specific caveats: – Not currently keeping track of whether a neutrino is from a primary, secondary or tertiary interaction ● However for MDC any model that can describe ND data can still be used to predict FD at some level