Control, Monitoring and DAQ Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE Frascati June 28, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SciFi Tracker DAQ M. Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) MICE meeting at LBNL 10.Feb.2005 DAQ system for KEK test beam Hardware Software Processes Architecture SciFi.
Advertisements

MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb February 2005 Edda Gschwendtner 1 Parameter List Edda Gschwendtner Introduction Parameter list for sub-systems of MICE.
9 March 2005Edda Gschwendtner1 DAQ Terminology ISIS Terminology MICE Terminology Parameter Definitions.
Peter Chochula, January 31, 2006  Motivation for this meeting: Get together experts from different fields See what do we know See what is missing See.
Status of MICE Tracker System H. Sakamoto, Osaka University (on behalf of the MICE Collaboration) International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE)
Daresbury Aug 2005Jean-Sébastien Graulich Detector DAQ Overview and Needs Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Univ. Genève o Introduction o Detector Systems Overview.
DAQ WS03 Sept 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Wrap Up o Control and Monitoring o DDAQ o Interface between DDAQ and MCM o Infrastructure Jean-Sebastien.
KEK Test Beam Phase II Plan Makoto Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) MICE FT Daresbury 2005/8/30.
Workshop Goals MICE Controls and Monitoring Workshop September 25, 2006 A. Bross.
Tracker DAQ Makoto Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) MICE Frascati 2005/6/27.
DAQ WS02 Feb 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 DDAQ Hardware Architecture o General Architecture o Tracker Baseline o TOF Baseline & Options o EmCal Baseline.
MICE Collaboration meeting at CERN March 28 – April 1, 2004 MICE Cooling Channel --- AFC Module work group report Wing Lau – Oxford.
1 VLPC system and Cosmic Ray test results M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.
SciFi Tracker DAQ M. Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) MICE Tracker KEK Mar. 30, 2005.
Paul drumm daq&c-ws august/september Cooling Channel.
MICE CM15 June 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 DAQ Status o Detector DAQ Test bench in Geneva o Preparing for Test Beam o FE electronics tests o Detector.
1 Online data quality and monitoring M. Ellis Daresbury DAQ Meeting 31 st August 2005.
MICE Safety System DE Baynham TW Bradshaw MJD Courthold Y Ivanyushenkov.
2005/10/22 MICE CM at RAL, Tracker Parallel, Makoto Yoshida 1 KEK test beam - introduction - M. Yoshida MICE CM tracker parallel 2005/10/ /10/22.
MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb February 2005 Edda Gschwendtner 1 Control/Monitoring and DAQ for PIDs Edda Gschwendtner.
MOM Report Paul Soler MICE Operations Manager University of Glasgow MICO April 12, 2010.
Controls Review  Want to record a full configuration of the experiment at every possible “event”, including controls data.  Event trigger = accelerator.
VC Sept 2005Jean-Sébastien Graulich Report on DAQ Workshop Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Univ. Genève o Introduction o Monitoring and Control o Detector DAQ.
DAQ WS03 Sept 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 DDAQ Trigger o Reminder: DAQ Trigger vs Particle Trigger o DAQ Trigger o Particle Trigger 1) Possible.
Jianchun (JC) Wang, 08/21/99 RICH Electronics and DAQ Chip Carrier Short Cable Transition Board Long Cable Data Board Crate J.C.Wang Syracuse University.
Status of the preparation for KEK test beam M. Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) MICE VC 2005/9/14.
MICE Hydrogen System Design Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Elwyn Baynham Columbia Meeting June 2003.
CFT Calibration Calibration Workshop Calibration Requirements Calibration Scheme Online Calibration databases.
MICE Tracker Readout and Data Acquisition; Solenoid Magnetic Field Measurement Terry Hart for the MICE Collaboration, Illinois Institute of Technology,
MICE Hydrogen Control System MICE H2 Review Meeting RAL 15 th Jan 2015 PJ Warburton – STFC Daresbury Lab.
17 March 2005Edda Gschwendtner1 MICE Cooling Channel: Can we predict cooling to ? Edda Gschwendtner Challenge Systematics Cooling Channel Beam Line.
Tracker Summary Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE Frascati June 28 th, 2005.
MICE CM February 08Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Hardware Status o Introduction o Preliminary list o Plan for action o Summary Jean-Sebastien.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices iteratively to determine trace.
MICE CM18 June 07Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Status o Since CM17 o Detector DAQ software o Front End Electronics o Schedule Milestones.
1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.
1 MICE Tracker Update M. Ellis UKNFIC Meeting 25 th August 2005.
1 The MICE Online Systems Linda R. Coney CHEP – May 2012.
VC Feb 2010Slide 1 EMR Construction Status o General Design o Electronics o Cosmics test Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva.
CM26 March 2010Slide 1 EMR Status o Intro o Construction o Magnetic shielding o Electronics o Prototype Cosmics test o Schedule Jean-Sebastien Graulich,
MICE CM25 Nov 2009Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Issues o Achievements Since CM24 o Trigger o Event Building o Online Software o Front End.
MICE CM16 Oct 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Status o Since CM15 o Detector DAQ software o Interface DDAQ / Mice Control & Monitoring.
DC12 Commissioning Status GOALS: establish operating conditions, determine initial calibration parameters and measure operating characteristics for the.
Review of Daresbury Workshop MICE DAQ Workshop Fermilab February 10, 2006 A. Bross.
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
Clara Gaspar, March 2005 LHCb Online & the Conditions DB.
DAQ WS03 Sept 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Control and Monitoring Summary of DAQ WS III o General Architecture o RF System C&M o D0 EPICS extensions.
Mice CM Oct 2005Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 MICE Collaboration Meeting Oct05 Review of DAQ Workshop and DAQ Issues Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Univ. Genève.
MICE Status & Plans MICE-UK paul drumm 15 th September 2004.
January 31, MICE DAQ MICE and ISIS Introduction MICE Detector Front End Electronics Software and MICE DAQ Architecture MICE Triggers Status and Schedule.
MICE Phase 1 Koji Yoshimura KEK June
Controls for Particle ID/tracking in MICE 1.Physics and systematics 2.Controls types 3.Controls list 4.Needed for particle ID/tracking M. A. Cummings May.
KEK beam test in May 2005 Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE Frascati June 27 th, 2005.
1Malcolm Ellis - Tracker Meeting - 28th November 2006 Electronics - Station Acceptance  Hardware: u 1 MICE cryostat with 1 VLPC cassette. u VME crate,
1 CKOV1 at the MICE Experiment CKOV1 to perform mu/pi id w TOF0/TOF1. Progress since CM16 CKOV1 Fabrication and Installation TOF0 CKOV1 TOF1 EMCAL TOF2.
Controls & Monitoring Overview J. Leaver 03/06/2009.
KEK Test Beam Phase I (May 2005) Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE-FT Daresbury Aug 30th, 2005.
Database David Forrest. What database? DBMS: PostgreSQL. Run on dedicated Database server at RAL Need to store information on conditions of detector as.
1 MICE Tracker Readout Update Introduction/Overview TriP-t hardware tests AFE IIt firmware development VLSB firmware development Hardware progress Summary.
Tracker Cosmic Ray Test 2011 Linda R. Coney UC Riverside CM 29 - February 16, 2011.
Controls and monitoring in MICE 1.Physics and systematics 2.Controls types 3.Controls list 4.Data record M. A. Cummings April 2004 CERN.
ch/~bdl/lepc/lepc.ppt 1 MICE Status and Plans Rikard Sandström Université de Geneve International Scoping Study CERN,
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
Tracker Summary M. Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) MICE 2005.Feb.12 th.
VC98 March 07Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 DDAQ Status o DAQ Software o Front-End and Trigger o What will happen soon o Schedule Milestones Jean-Sebastien.
L. Coney UC Riverside MICE CM32 – Glasgow – June 2012
RF acceleration and transverse damper systems
Luminosity Monitor Status
Preparation for Station Acceptance Test
Particle ID Diagnostics in the MICE Beamline
Presentation transcript:

Control, Monitoring and DAQ Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE Frascati June 28, 2005

Brief history Initiate work on control/monitoring and DAQ in the previous collaboration meeting in Berkeley Initiate work on control/monitoring and DAQ in the previous collaboration meeting in Berkeley Edda surveyed on controls, instrumentation and DAQ Edda surveyed on controls, instrumentation and DAQ Jean-Sebastien distribute a draft of a new version of Edda ’ s note Jean-Sebastien distribute a draft of a new version of Edda ’ s note DAQ-Terminology.doc DAQ-Terminology.doc “ Kick-off ” DAQ meeting in lunch time on June 23 “ Kick-off ” DAQ meeting in lunch time on June 23 Jean-Sebastien, Emilio, Paul, Alan, Koji and Makoto Jean-Sebastien, Emilio, Paul, Alan, Koji and Makoto Emilio prepared a skeleton for DAQ specification Emilio prepared a skeleton for DAQ specification DAQrequirements.doc DAQrequirements.doc Will need a meeting with accelerator experts for further integration Will need a meeting with accelerator experts for further integration

Prepared by Emilio Radicioni

Categories DAQ (O(mili-sec), every spill) DAQ (O(mili-sec), every spill) Detector-DAQ (O(micro-sec), every trigger with spill#-stamp) Detector-DAQ (O(micro-sec), every trigger with spill#-stamp) detector data detector data ADC / TDC ADC / TDC Beamline-DAQ Beamline-DAQ cooling channel cooling channel RF voltage / phase RF voltage / phase oscilloscope or flash ADC oscilloscope or flash ADC others? others? protons on target protons on target 2ndary particle intensity monitor 2ndary particle intensity monitor Slow control/monitor (O(sec), continuously even when DAQ is not running) Slow control/monitor (O(sec), continuously even when DAQ is not running) beamline beamline magnet currents / temperature magnet currents / temperature cooling channel cooling channel RF temperature RF temperature LH2 absorber temperature LH2 absorber temperature solenoid currents / temperature solenoid currents / temperature detectors detectors Temperature Temperature HV HV

DAQ Each sub-group is developing stand-alone systems Each sub-group is developing stand-alone systems Gather the data stream to the event-builder Gather the data stream to the event-builder For every particle or for every spill For every particle or for every spill Synchronization between the systems Synchronization between the systems Spill number stamp Spill number stamp Event numbering in each detector Event numbering in each detector Time stamp by common clocks? Time stamp by common clocks? Need to develop a communication between the stand- alone systems Need to develop a communication between the stand- alone systems Determine interface/protocol Determine interface/protocol Data structure Data structure

Slow control Each sub-group develop stand-alone systems Each sub-group develop stand-alone systems Strongly related to safety issue Strongly related to safety issue Gather the consoles in a control room Gather the consoles in a control room Develop a communication between the stand-alone systems, if they need Develop a communication between the stand-alone systems, if they need Need to determine interface/protocol Need to determine interface/protocol

An idea of the DAQ architecture Bit3 SASeq#1 SASeq#2 SASeq#3 SASeq#4 SERDES#1 SERDES#2 SERDES#3 SERDES#4 SERDES#5 SERDES#6 SERDES#7 SERDES#8 VLPC #1 L VLPC #1 R VLPC #2 L VLPC #2 R VLPC #3 L VLPC #3 R VLPC #4 L VLPC #4 R Tracker Collector Upstream Tracker Collector Downstream Tracker Builder PID Builder Beam Builder MICE Builder MICE Storage MICE Control Bit3 SASeq#1 SASeq#2 SASeq#3 SASeq#4 SERDES#1 SERDES#2 SERDES#3 SERDES#4 SERDES#5 SERDES#6 SERDES#7 SERDES#8 Tracker Control Bit Tracker Slow Ctrl VLPC #1 L VLPC #1 R VLPC #2 L VLPC #2 R VLPC #3 L VLPC #3 R VLPC #4 L VLPC #4 R Upstream TrackerDownstream Tracker 4096ch 4kBytes/event 8MBytes/spill 4kBytes/event 4MBytes/spill Cryosat Ctrl/Monitor

Key issues Instruments for each sub-group Instruments for each sub-group Voltage controller/monitor Voltage controller/monitor HV controller/monitor HV controller/monitor CAENET CAENET VME ADC/TDC VME ADC/TDC … Communication between stand-alone systems Communication between stand-alone systems Socket on TCP/IP Socket on TCP/IP Log files on common directory Log files on common directory … Integration Integration Event-builders Event-builders Event numbering Event numbering Unified interface or distributed controls to stand-alone systems Unified interface or distributed controls to stand-alone systems … Offline database Offline database

Summary DAQ group start to discuss on the integration DAQ group start to discuss on the integration Need to fill the documents on DAQ specification Need to fill the documents on DAQ specification Description on the systems of each sub-group Description on the systems of each sub-group Integration, Synchronization Integration, Synchronization To build up MICE control/monitor and DAQ system, communication with accelerator experts is mandatory To build up MICE control/monitor and DAQ system, communication with accelerator experts is mandatory Workshop in RAL? Workshop in RAL?

MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb. 05 Survey on Controls, Instrumentation and DAQ 1.PHYSICS PARAMETERS: Which parameters might it be important to include in the data analysis of the experiment? 2.CONTROL/MONITORING: Which additional parameters are needed for control or monitoring? 3.How do you see these parameters being recorded and controlled? 4.What need do you have for stand-alone operation as opposed to integrated operation in MICE at RAL?

MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb. 05 Beam & Target (Drumm) CM Parameters  For all magnets Qs(9), Ds(2), decay solenoid: Current Volts Temperature, Cryogenics, Vacuum  Target: ISIS Machine start ISIS clock Insertion depth (read every 0.1ms to adapt drive currents and timing) Insertion time  Operational monitors: 8 temperature measurements/cycle Extra RAL  Beam line independent from MICE  Target testing away from RAL Local integrated System for beam Line and target. PC/VME/PLC EPICS/LabView To TDC ? Useful for trigger

MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb. 05 Cooling Channel - Absorber CM parameters  Temperature (Cryocooler, Absorber, temperature systems)  Liquid level  Buffer vacuum pressure  Pressure at key points in H2 system  Valve status in H2 system  Heater currents  Window location (?) CM parameters (from TRD)  H2 gas system and He gas system Pressure gauge (capacitance-type); 1 each Pirani gauge; 1 each  LH2 reservoir at 1 st stage of Cryocooler 2 Thermometers 1 Level sensor (capacitance-type) 2 Heater (1 for spare)  Hydrogen absorber 8 Thermometer 1 Level sensor  Absorber windows 1 Thermometer Heater; 1 each (to warm up)  Safety windows Thermometer; 1 each  Absorber vacuum and Safety vacuum Pressure gauge (capacitance type); 1 each Pirani & cold cathode gauge; 1 each Mass spectrometer; 1 each

MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb. 05 Cooling Channel - RF Cavities (Virostek) CM parameters  Cavity position and alignment with respect to solenoid  Cavity temperature  Sensing loop signal from each of the 8 cavities  Vacuum roughing pump control (2each)  Vacuum roughing valve control and status (2each)  Cryo pump ion gages (4 total)  Vacuum manifold thermocouple and ion gages (4 each total)  Vacuum vessel ion gages (2 per vessel, 4 total)  Cavity ion gages (8total)  Cryo pump compressor control (2 each)  Gate valve control and status (4 each)  Cavity body temperature thermocouple (2 per cavity, 16 total)  Cavity cooling fluid temperature in (8 total)  Cavity cooling fluid temperature out (8 total)  Cavity cooling fluid pressure in (1 per cavity pair, 4 total)  Cavity cooling fluid pressure out (1 per cavity pair, 4 total)  Cavity cooling flow rate (8 total)  Tuner hydraulic reservoir pressure (8 each)  Tuner hydraulic reservoir pressure control (8 each) [feedback & control from cavity frequency] ~1 Hz recording rate Goes to primary control system

MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb. 05 Cooling Channel - Magnets CM parameters:  Current in each individual supply  Magnetic field at external probes (4 probes/coil)  Temperatures (cryocooler and coil)  Quench protection (?)

MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb. 05 CKOV1 (Cremaldi) Physics parameters  Noise levels-pedestal  Random pedestal trigger  Photoelectron count- 4 channel + 1 spare  Single electron photo-peak  Muon bunch structure  Device efficiency vs. muon position  Laser pulse system trigger (shared with CKOV2) CM parameters  PM Tube HV – 4 channels + 1 spare  CAEN/Lecroy HV Alarm System  Box temperature  PLC (slow control)  Purge gas flow  visual  Freon level  ?? Extra RAL  Oscilloscope  ADC card + PC  External trigger line  Radioactive source trigger + logic  Trigger paddles + logic for muon response survey DAQ

MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb. 05 CKOV2 (Gregoire) Physics parameters  8 responses of PMs to light pulses Pedestal, gain  1 digital output for triggering light pulser  8 TDC outputs CM parameters  8 HV  Temperature probe  He pressure  Humidity

MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb. 05 TOF (Bonesini) Physics parameters  Pedestal CM Parameters  HV  Temperature  Magnetic field

MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb. 05 EmCAL (Tortora) Physics parameters  Pedestals CM parameters  HV of PMs (  CAEN SY 527, CAENNET VME Controller V288 for remote control)  Residual B field  Global Time Offset ( Trigger formation time with respect to ISIS bunch warning) Extra RAL  Stand-alone readout system  Cosmic rays run for E, t, calibration

MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb. 05 SciFi (Bross) Physics parameters  Pedestal  Gain  Discriminator threshold CM Parameters  72 Temperature  64 Bias Extra RAL  Separate calibration runs Via FE electronics board, stored via MICE slow control system. 8 temperatures for cryostat, interfaced differently. DAQ