(c) Allen C. Goodman, 2006 Density Functions Chapters 8, 10.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Monocentric City. Assumptions Central export node All employment concentrated in core Steeper bid-rent for businesses than residences Single transportation.
Advertisements

Land Use and Modern Cities O’Sullivan Chapter 9. For Wednesday (Response Paper in Class) Read: –Mieszkowski, Peter and Edwin S. Mills, (1993). “The Causes.
Review of The Economics of Zoning Laws by William Fischel, Chapters Note by Austin Troy For NR 277 University of Vermont.
Chapter 5 Urban Growth. Purpose This chapter explores the determinants of growth in urban income and employment.
Urban and Regional Economics Weeks 8 and 9 Evaluating Predictions of Standard Urban Location Model and Empirical Evidence.
Urban population density
Growth, and Limiting Growth © Allen C. Goodman, 2006.
Land-Use Patterns Chapter 7 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Urban Land Rent Chapter 6 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Unit Seven: Cities and Urban Land Use Advanced Placement Human Geography Session 1.
Chapter 6 Urban Land Rent.
URBAN GEOGRAPHY CHAPTER 4 SECTION 4.
Suburban Sub-centers and employment density in metropolitan Chicago Daniel P. McMillen (Tulane U) John F. McDonald (U of Illinois) Journal of Urban Eco,
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 7 Land-Use Patterns.
Chapter 7 Land Use Patterns.
Outline Central Cities vs Suburbs Why Did Suburbs Grow? Decentralization of Employment and the Monocentric City Is Suburbanization Efficient?
Brief Lecture on Urban Decentralization and Income Segregation NR 377 Land Use Policy and Economics Austin Troy University of Vermont.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Appendix Chapter 7.
Land Use in Monocentric City
U.S. suburbanization and gentrification Soc 331 Population and Society
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 6 Urban Land Rent.
1 Understanding Urban Growth Patterns Real Estate 690 Market Analysis for Real Estate Dr. Longhofer.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 1 Introduction and Axioms of Urban Economics.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 5 Urban Growth.
Urban population density distribution Factors affecting population density.
Alain Bertaud Urbanist Module 2: Spatial Analysis and Urban Land Planning The Spatial Structure of Cities: International Examples of the Interaction of.
Virpi PastinenSCATTER WORKSHOP SCATTER SPRAWLING CITIES AND TRANSPORT: FROM EVALUATION TO RECOMMENDATIONS SCATTER WORKSHOP MILAN OCTOBER 24.
Internal Structure of City
1 Land Rents and Land-use Patterns Chapter Definitions of Rent Land rent—payment for using land as an input –Site rent (ground rent)—earnings associated.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Introduction to Geography Arthur Getis, Judith Getis, & Jerome D. Fellmann.
“Real Estate Principles for the New Economy”: Norman G
13-3,4 Issues of Inner Cities and Suburbs Compare/Contrast.
UNIT VII: Urban Geo.
Overview of Urban Economics
Land Use and the Monocentric City
Urban Sprawl. Urban Sprawl, outward spread of built-up areas caused by their expansion. It is the result of urbanization.
Class 12a: Suburban geography Transportation and land use History of suburban growth.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 6 Urban Land Rent.
Urban Growth Chapter 5 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Why do inner suburbs have distinctive problems?
Where have Urban Areas Grown? URBANIZATION Increasing Percentage of People in Cities History LDCs MDCs Increasing Number of People in Cities MDCs vs.
KI 13-3 Why Do Inner Cities Face Distinctive Challenges?  Inner-city physical issues? Most significant = deteriorating housing (built prior to 1940) ○
UNIT 7 LESSON 5. LEARNING OBJECTIVE  Student will be able to discuss urban sprawl, gentrification, and movement from CBD.
Mills on Suburbanization © Allen C. Goodman, 2000.
Chapter 13: Urban Patterns
Matching!—Pick up the sheet on your way in 1.Industrial Revolution 2.Islamic City 3.Feudal City 4.Gateway City 5.Great Migration 6.Medieval City 7.European.
 MDCs  Industrial Revolution (Rural to Urban) began in 1800s  Are MDCs fully urbanized?  LDCs  8 of 10 most populous cities in LDC 8 of 10 most.
Chapter 13: Urban Patterns
Urban Land Values and Urban Form
Real Estate Principles, 11th Edition
What do you think these dots represent?
Marron Institute of Urban Management,
Chapter 13: Urban Patterns
Chapter 13: Urban Patterns
Chapter 13: Urban Patterns
Urban Patterns.
Urban Models How and why does land use organize a city?
Chapter 13: Urban Patterns
IV. Why Services Cluster Downtown Ch. 13 – Urban Patterns
Chapter 13: Urban Patterns
Chapter 13 Urbanization.
Chapter 13 Spatial Distribution of Employment and residence
Class 3: Housing Concepts, Household Bids
CHAPTER 1 Introduction.
Trading and Factory Towns
Chapter 13: Urban Patterns
Class 3: Housing Concepts, Household Bids
Chapter 13: Urban Patterns
Chapter 13: Urban Patterns
Presentation transcript:

(c) Allen C. Goodman, 2006 Density Functions Chapters 8, 10

Rent Functions We saw that the competitive bidding for land yielded rent curves that looked like this: Distance Rent

Impacts of Decreasing Rent We substitute capital for land, where land rent is high  vertical city. We substitute land for capital, where land rent is low  horizontal city. What happens over time?

Over Time A> Remember  p = -t/h. Over time, out-of- pocket t , making the numerator small. Why? However, as income , valuation of time may rise, so technically, travel costs could go either way. See time_costs.xlstime_costs.xls

Over Time Remember  p = -t/h Over time, income  making housing , making the denominator large. Why? What happens to rent function?

Over Time Consumers’ bids (per mile) tend to get shallower. Locating near the center isn’t important. Lots of urban analysts call this the “traditional” model of decentralization. How do we measure it?

Density Density = Density at the center, multiplied by a “decaying” factor. D (u) = D o exp (-  u), or D (u) = D o e -  u The larger the value of , the steeper the density function, the more centralized. Distance DoDo Density

Over time, we would expect that urban areas become less dense, so the function becomes flatter. There’s a whole host of empirical work that bears this out for population, housing, employment. Distance Early Later Density

Decentralization Clearly, the population has decentralized. Percentages of populations in central cities have fallen continuously for as long as we can measure. This has happened for both employment and for residences.

McMillen Finds: McMillen, Daniel P., “Polycentric urban structure: The case of Milwaukee,” Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Economic Perspectives, 15-27

Transportation Changes Key changes -- Ability to move goods on roads. Intracity and intercity trucks. You can move goods out from central shipping point. You can ship directly without going to center Distance Land rent Bid function w/ horse-drawn wagon Bid function w/ truck Residential

So, Why Suburbanization? Increase in real income Decrease in commuting cost Central-city problems: race, crime, taxes, education Following firms to the suburbs Public policy

Public Policy? Subsidies for home-ownership Commuting externalities Fragmented system of local government – has suburbs competing with central cities. Highway construction

Gentrification? Coming back to the city? Who does it? –Wealthy, young, highly educated –Relatively high commuting costs –Relatively low demands for housing and land –Few children Most move in from elsewhere within city Many move out when children get older

Subcenters – Los Angeles Come from agglomeration economies. Important for employment and commuting. CBD is still largest.

Density with Subcenters City and metropolitan area may have “bumps.” Distance Density

Figure 1: Three dimensional views of population distributions in 7 cities represented at the same scale International Perspective From Alain Bertaud, 2003

Built-up Densities around the world (figure 2) 640 acres/sq.mile 259 hectares/ sm Bombay Approx 101,000/sq.mile