INTERSTATE 75 / OVERPASS ROAD INTERCHANGE JUSTIFICATION PROCESS Presentation to Pasco County Board of County Commissioners December 6, 2011 Presentation to Pasco County Board of County Commissioners December 6, 2011

PRESENTATION AGENDA Project BackgroundProject Background Project Purpose & NeedProject Purpose & Need Interchange Justification Report (IJR) StatusInterchange Justification Report (IJR) Status Upcoming PD&E ProcessUpcoming PD&E Process ScheduleSchedule QuestionsQuestions Project BackgroundProject Background Project Purpose & NeedProject Purpose & Need Interchange Justification Report (IJR) StatusInterchange Justification Report (IJR) Status Upcoming PD&E ProcessUpcoming PD&E Process ScheduleSchedule QuestionsQuestions 2

LOCATION MAP 3 Proposed Interchange

PROJECT BACKGROUND 4 Overpass Road Route Study (2005) Overpass Road Route Study (2005) I-75/Overpass Road Interchange Feasibility Study ( ) I-75/Overpass Road Interchange Feasibility Study ( ) LRTP 1 (adoption December 2009) Comp Plan Amendments (2010) LRTP 1 (adoption December 2009) Comp Plan Amendments (2010) ETDM Programming Screen (2008) ETDM Programming Screen (2008) FHWA Feasibility Study Review/ Concept Acceptance Letter (2007) FHWA Feasibility Study Review/ Concept Acceptance Letter (2007) Future PD&E Study ( ) 2 Future PD&E Study ( ) 2 1 Overpass Road Interchange included in Cost Feasible 2035 LRTP 2 Tentative. It may take a longer period of time based on review periods and coordination between the IJR and the PD&E Studies.

FDOT PROJECTS I-75 Mainline WideningI-75 Mainline Widening –North of CR 54 to North of SR 52 –Add Lanes (4 to 6) –Right-of-Way: FY 13/14* –Construction: FY 19/20** *Source: Adopted FDOT Five-Year Work Program FY 11/12-FY 15/16 *Source: Adopted FDOT Five-Year Work Program FY 11/12-FY 15/16 **Source: SIS Second Five Year Plan FY 16/17-FY 20/21 I-75 Mainline WideningI-75 Mainline Widening –North of CR 54 to North of SR 52 –Add Lanes (4 to 6) –Right-of-Way: FY 13/14* –Construction: FY 19/20** *Source: Adopted FDOT Five-Year Work Program FY 11/12-FY 15/16 *Source: Adopted FDOT Five-Year Work Program FY 11/12-FY 15/16 **Source: SIS Second Five Year Plan FY 16/17-FY 20/21 5

PROJECT PURPOSE Study the potential benefits & impacts of a new interchange in accordance with Federal requirementsStudy the potential benefits & impacts of a new interchange in accordance with Federal requirements Evaluate traffic operations for existing & future conditionsEvaluate traffic operations for existing & future conditions Propose & evaluate alternative interchange configurationsPropose & evaluate alternative interchange configurations Study the potential benefits & impacts of a new interchange in accordance with Federal requirementsStudy the potential benefits & impacts of a new interchange in accordance with Federal requirements Evaluate traffic operations for existing & future conditionsEvaluate traffic operations for existing & future conditions Propose & evaluate alternative interchange configurationsPropose & evaluate alternative interchange configurations 6

PROJECT NEED Projected population and employment growthProjected population and employment growth Traffic growth / increased congestionTraffic growth / increased congestion Inability of existing interchanges at I-75/CR 54 and I-75/SR 52 to handle future demandInability of existing interchanges at I-75/CR 54 and I-75/SR 52 to handle future demand Projected population and employment growthProjected population and employment growth Traffic growth / increased congestionTraffic growth / increased congestion Inability of existing interchanges at I-75/CR 54 and I-75/SR 52 to handle future demandInability of existing interchanges at I-75/CR 54 and I-75/SR 52 to handle future demand 7

IJR STATUS Methodology PhaseCompletedMethodology PhaseCompleted Traffic AnalysisCompletedTraffic AnalysisCompleted Alternatives DevelopmentCompletedAlternatives DevelopmentCompleted Preliminary IJR ReportNovember 2011Preliminary IJR ReportNovember 2011 Final IJR Report SubmittalAugust 2012Final IJR Report SubmittalAugust 2012 FHWA AcceptanceDecember 2012FHWA AcceptanceDecember 2012 FHWA Approval*December 2013FHWA Approval*December 2013 *Tentative. It may take a longer period of time based on review periods and coordination between the IJR and the PD&E Studies. Methodology PhaseCompletedMethodology PhaseCompleted Traffic AnalysisCompletedTraffic AnalysisCompleted Alternatives DevelopmentCompletedAlternatives DevelopmentCompleted Preliminary IJR ReportNovember 2011Preliminary IJR ReportNovember 2011 Final IJR Report SubmittalAugust 2012Final IJR Report SubmittalAugust 2012 FHWA AcceptanceDecember 2012FHWA AcceptanceDecember 2012 FHWA Approval*December 2013FHWA Approval*December 2013 *Tentative. It may take a longer period of time based on review periods and coordination between the IJR and the PD&E Studies. 8

INTERCHANGE CONCEPTS EVALUATED Diamond InterchangeDiamond Interchange Single Point Urban InterchangeSingle Point Urban Interchange Diverging Diamond InterchangeDiverging Diamond Interchange Flyover Ramp InterchangeFlyover Ramp Interchange Loop Ramp InterchangeLoop Ramp Interchange Diamond InterchangeDiamond Interchange Single Point Urban InterchangeSingle Point Urban Interchange Diverging Diamond InterchangeDiverging Diamond Interchange Flyover Ramp InterchangeFlyover Ramp Interchange Loop Ramp InterchangeLoop Ramp Interchange

PRELIMINARY DIAMOND INTERCHANGE CONCEPT 10

PRELIMINARY SINGLE POINT URBAN INTERCHANGE CONCEPT 11

PRELIMINARY DIVERGING DIAMOND INTERCHANGE CONCEPT 12

PRELIMINARY FLYOVER RAMP INTERCHANGE CONCEPT 13

PRELIMINARY LOOP RAMP INTERCHANGE CONCEPT 14

PRELIMINARY INTERCHANGE CONCEPTS COST ESTIMATES Costs are preliminary, subject to review and represent present day values.

FUNDING PLAN Potential revenue sources:Potential revenue sources: –Special Non Ad Valorem Assessments –Transportation Mobility Fee Funds –Multimodal Tax Increment Funds –Mobility Fee Surcharges (Villages of Pasadena Hills) –Sales Taxes –Issuance of Revenue Bonds –Right of Way Donations Potential revenue sources:Potential revenue sources: –Special Non Ad Valorem Assessments –Transportation Mobility Fee Funds –Multimodal Tax Increment Funds –Mobility Fee Surcharges (Villages of Pasadena Hills) –Sales Taxes –Issuance of Revenue Bonds –Right of Way Donations

*FDOT and/or FHWA Review and Comment periods are built into these tasks. **FHWA Determination of Engineering & Operational Acceptability ***Tentative. It may take a longer period of time based on review periods and coordination between the IJR and the PD&E Studies. PROJECT SCHEDULE (80% Complete)

QUESTIONS ?