NCEO Indicator 3 Tool To be used for lifting assessment data from Section 618: Table 6 reports Altman, J. R., Bremer, C., Vang, M., Thurlow, M., & Rogers,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
___________________________ NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program North Carolina Alternate Assessment Academic Inventory.
Advertisements

Federal NCLB Regulations
A Guided Tour of the 1% Exception Process From Documentation to Approval.
State-wide Assessment Update for What Does TNs Alternate Assessment Program Look Like Now? Alternate Assessment General Assessment Alternate.
Flexible Scheduling Accommodations for LEP pupils and students with disabilities. Department of Education & Early Development February 2010, District Test.
STANDARDS-BASED PROMOTION Grades Elementary Schools Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G.
College and Career Ready Performance Index (CCRPI) The NEW Report Card in Georgia.
Excel: Working With Formulas Cooperative Conversations January 12, 2007.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.
Large Scale Assessment Conference June 22, 2004 Sue Rigney U.S. Department of Education Assessments Shall Provide for… Participation of all students Reasonable.
Jason Altman – NCEO Mari Quenemoen – NAAC TASH Annual Conference – Nov. 19,
NCEO Indicator 3 Teleconference DATE: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 TIME: 10:00 Pacific, 11:00 Mountain, 12:00 Central, 1:00 Eastern Presenters Facilitator:
Meeting NCLB Act: Students with Disabilities Who Are Caught in the Gap Martha Thurlow Ross Moen Jane Minnema National Center on Educational Outcomes
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Slide 1 National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) Snapshots: What We Know about State Assessment Practices Martha L. Thurlow National Center on Educational.
Carolyn M. Wood - Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems October 31,
10/29/071 Opportunity to Learn (OTL) Kansas State Department of Education October 29, 2007.
Montana’s statewide longitudinal data system Project Montana’s Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS)
Assessment Update 2008 GACIS Fall Conference. Transition of Assessments to the GPS Two major tasks: 1.Content alignment “What students must know” Make.
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
March 4,  ALL third grade students, including those classified as students with disabilities and/or ELL (ESOL) MUST take the Florida Standards.
Region VII College and Career Readiness Data AVATAR Initiatives.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
AYP Prediction By Diagnostics in the Educational Data Warehouse.
Adequate Yearly Progress Kansas State Department of Education 2007 Fall Assessment Conference Judi Miller,
Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.
IDEA and NCLB Standards-Based Accountability Sue Rigney, U.S. Department of Education OSEP 2006 Project Directors’ Conference.
Emily Day.  The state of North Carolina requires that all students be assessed at the end of the school year (middle and high school) or at the end of.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
How Do Students with Disabilities Participate in the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program? September 28, 2011.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR)
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
How Do Students with Disabilities Participate in the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program? September 29, 2010.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Laurene Christensen and Martha Thurlow National Center on Educational Outcomes April 4, 2009 ACTIVITIES THAT WORK: SELECTING ACCOMMODATIONS FOR INSTRUCTION.
How Do Students with Disabilities Participate in the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program? December 9, 2009.
Beginning in the school year, a student scoring at the lowest achievement level in reading on the 3 rd Grade Summative Assessment will not be.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Special Populations Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski.
Assessing Very Low-Achieving Children with Disabilities Using Large Scale Assessments Sue Rigney, U.S. Department of Education OSEP 2006 Project Directors’
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
703 KAR 5:225 Next-Generation Learners Accountability System Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:cw,ko.
Novice Reduction & Non-Duplicated Gap Group
Including analysis and self-help tools for coordination with Section 618: Table 6.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
“ IT IS PROOF NOT TRUTH” THE IEP IS THE PROOF Dr. Jodi Roseman Director of Special Education School District of Springfield Township.
2007 – 2008 Assessment and Accountability Report LVUSD Report to the Board September 23, 2008 Presented by Mary Schillinger, Assistant Superintendent Education.
Unit 8 – Spreadsheets Part 2 Spreadsheets Skills Lesson Part 1.
A GUIDE FOR CANTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT’S PARENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS The Mississippi Literacy-Based Promotion Act
Breakout Discussion: Every Student Succeeds Act - Scott Norton Council of Chief State School Officers.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Kansas Assessment Program
How Do Students with Disabilities Participate in the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program? September 29, 2010.
American Institutes for Research
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
IDEA Assessment Data Anne Rainey, IDEA Part B Data Manager, Montana
Springvale Primary School Key Stage 1 SATs
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Name: _______________________________
Figure 1. SAT-9 reading scores for Oceanside and Statewide for 1998 thru Blue lines represent data for all students; red lines represent data for.
What Do the Part B 618 Table 6 Data Tell Us?
Presented by Special Education Secondary Programs Fall 2008
Solving the Riddle That Is APR Indicator 3
Springvale Primary School Key Stage 1 SATs
Figure 1. SAT-9 reading scores for Oceanside and Statewide for 1998 thru Blue lines represent data for all students; red lines represent data for.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Presentation transcript:

NCEO Indicator 3 Tool To be used for lifting assessment data from Section 618: Table 6 reports Altman, J. R., Bremer, C., Vang, M., Thurlow, M., & Rogers, C. (2008) 1 Assessment Data From: 618: Table 6 To: APR Indicator 3

2 APR and Table 6 of 618 – Trail of History X APR (looks a lot like Table 6) SPP (new format) Table 6 SEPARATE APR through Table 6 attached!

Table 6 is included in the section 618 report – Table 6 must be submitted w/ APR in February It looks something like this (broken up into worksheets in excel): 3 Table 6: What is it? Section 628: Table 6 Participation Regular AssessmentAlternate AssessmentNon Participants GRADE LEVEL STUDENTS WITH IEPs (1) ALL STUDENTS (2) TOTAL (3) SUBSET (OF 3) WHO TOOK THE ASSESSMEN T WITH ACCOMMOD ATIONS (3A) LEP STUDENTS IN US < 12 MONTHS WHOSE ENGLISH PROFICIENC Y TEST REPLACED REGULAR ASSESSMEN T (3B) 1 SUBSET (OF 3) WHOSE ASSESSMEN T RESULTS WERE INVALID 2 (3C)TOTAL (4) SUBSET (OF 4) WHOSE ALTERNATE WAS SCORED AGAINST GRADE LEVEL STANDARDS (4A) SUBSET (OF 4) WHOSE ALTERNATE WAS SCORED AGAINST MODIFIED ACHIEVEME NT STANDARDS (4B) SUBSET (OF 4B) COUNTED AT THE LOWEST ACHIEVEME NT LEVEL BECAUSE OF THE NCLB 2% CAP 1 (4C) SUBSET (OF 4) WHOSE ALTERNATE WAS SCORED AGAINST ALTERNATE ACHIEVEME NT STANDARDS (4D) SUBSET (OF 4D) COUNTED AT THE LOWEST ACHIEVEME NT LEVEL BECAUSE OF THE NCLB 1% CAP 2 (4E) SUBSET (OF 4) WHOSE ASSESSMEN T RESULTS WERE INVALID 3 (4F) STUDENTS WHO TOOK AN OUT OF LEVEL TEST (5) PARENTAL EXEMPTION S (6)ABSENT (7) DID NOT TAKE FOR OTHER REASONS 1 (8 ) HIGH SCHOOL (SPECIFY GRADE: ___________)

Participation Data 4

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Participation Total Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8Grade HS#% AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade- level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Students Included in IEP count but not included in assessments above Students who took an out of level Test Parental Exemptions Absent Did not take for other reasons 5 Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3

6 Statewide Assessment – Math Assessment Participation Total Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8Grade HS#% AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade- level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Students Included in IEP count but not included in assessments above Students who took an out of level Test Parental Exemptions Absent Did not take for other reasons Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3

7 The entire APR Indicator 3 participation table can be created using 618: Table 6 Data!!!! In the example to come Table 6 location is listed in the following format: (Column) : (Grade) Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Participation Total Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8Grade HS#% AChildren with IEPs1:31:41:51:61:71:81:HS=row sum B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations 3:3 (-) 3a:33:4 (-) 3a:43:5 (-) 3a:53:6 (-) 3a:63:7 (-) 3a:73:8 (-) 3a:8 3:HS (-) 3a:HS =row sum =row sum (/) total IEP C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations 3a:33a:43a:53a:63a:73a:83a:HS=row sum =row sum (/) total IEP D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade- level standards (AA-GLAAS) 4a:34a:44a:54a:64a:74a:84a:HS=row sum =row sum (/) total IEP IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) 4b:34b:44b:54b:64b:74b:84b:HS=row sum =row sum (/) total IEP E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) 4d:34d:44d:54d:64d:74d:84d:HS=row sum =row sum (/) total IEP Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline3:3 (+) 4:33:4 (+) 4:43:5 (+) 4:53:6 (+) 4:63:7 (+) 4:73:8 (+) 4:8 3:HS (+) 4:HS =row sum =row sum (/) total IEP Overall % = box above (/) by grade 3 IEP count = box above (/) by grade 4 IEP count = box above (/) by grade 5 IEP count = box above (/) by grade 6 IEP count = box above (/) by grade 7 IEP count = box above (/) by grade 8 IEP count = box above (/) by grade HS IEP count Students Included in IEP count but not included in assessments above Students who took an out of level Test HS=row sum =row sum (/) total IEP Parental Exemptions HS=row sum =row sum (/) total IEP Absent HS=row sum =row sum (/) total IEP Did not take for other reasons HS=row sum =row sum (/) total IEP 8 618: Column 1 Grade 3 618: Column 8 Grade 4 Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3

Yikes!!! We’ll try to simplify that 9

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Participation Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Students Included in IEP count but not included in assessments above Students who took an out of level Test Parental Exemptions Absent Did not take for other reasons GRADE LEVELSTUDENTS WITH IEPs (1)ALL STUDENTS (2) HIGH SCHOOL (SPECIFY GRADE: ___________) Indicator 3 618: Table 6 Test Data 10 CHILD COUNT DATA

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Participation Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Students Included in IEP count but not included in assessments above Students who took an out of level Test Parental Exemptions Absent Did not take for other reasons GRADE LEVEL STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES WHO TOOK REGULAR ASSESSMENT ON GRADE LEVEL ACHIEVEMENT STANDARDS TOTAL (3) SUBSET (OF 3) WHO TOOK THE ASSESSMENT WITH ACCOMMODATION S (3A) LEP STUDENTS IN US < 12 MONTHS WHOSE ENGLISH PROFICIENCY TEST REPLACED REGULAR ASSESSMENT (3B) 1 SUBSET (OF 3) WHOSE ASSESSMENT RESULTS WERE INVALID 2 (3C) 3 BlueGreen HIGH SCHOOL (SPECIFY GRADE: ___________) IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations equal to BLUE minus GREEN Indicator 3 618: Table 6 11 REGULAR ASSESSMENT DATA

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Participation Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Students Included in IEP count but not included in assessments above Students who took an out of level Test Parental Exemptions Absent Did not take for other reasons GRADE LEVEL STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES WHO TOOK REGULAR ASSESSMENT ON GRADE LEVEL ACHIEVEMENT STANDARDS TOTAL (3) SUBSET (OF 3) WHO TOOK THE ASSESSMENT WITH ACCOMMODATION S (3A) LEP STUDENTS IN US < 12 MONTHS WHOSE ENGLISH PROFICIENCY TEST REPLACED REGULAR ASSESSMENT (3B) 1 SUBSET (OF 3) WHOSE ASSESSMENT RESULTS WERE INVALID 2 (3C) HIGH SCHOOL (SPECIFY GRADE: ___________) Indicator 3 618: Table 6 12 REGULAR ASSESSMENT DATA

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Participation Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Students Included in IEP count but not included in assessments above Students who took an out of level Test Parental Exemptions Absent Did not take for other reasons GRADE LEVEL STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES WHO TOOK ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT TOTAL (4) SUBSET (OF 4) WHOSE ALTERNATE WAS SCORED AGAINST GRADE LEVEL STANDARDS (4A) SUBSET (OF 4) WHOSE ALTERNATE WAS SCORED AGAINST MODIFIED ACHIEVEME NT STANDARDS (4B) SUBSET (OF 4B) COUNTED AT THE LOWEST ACHIEVEME NT LEVEL BECAUSE OF THE NCLB 2% CAP 1 (4C) SUBSET (OF 4) WHOSE ALTERNATE WAS SCORED AGAINST ALTERNATE ACHIEVEME NT STANDARDS (4D) SUBSET (OF 4D) COUNTED AT THE LOWEST ACHIEVEME NT LEVEL BECAUSE OF THE NCLB 1% CAP 2 (4E) SUBSET (OF 4) WHOSE ASSESSM ENT RESULTS WERE INVALID 3 ( 4F) HIGH SCHOOL (SPECIFY GRADE: ___________) Indicator 3 618: Table 6 13 ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT DATA

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Participation Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Students Included in IEP count but not included in assessments above Students who took an out of level Test Parental Exemptions Absent Did not take for other reasons GRADE LEVEL STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES WHO TOOK ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT TOTAL (4) SUBSET (OF 4) WHOSE ALTERNATE WAS SCORED AGAINST GRADE LEVEL STANDARDS (4A) SUBSET (OF 4) WHOSE ALTERNATE WAS SCORED AGAINST MODIFIED ACHIEVEME NT STANDARDS (4B) SUBSET (OF 4B) COUNTED AT THE LOWEST ACHIEVEME NT LEVEL BECAUSE OF THE NCLB 2% CAP 1 (4C) SUBSET (OF 4) WHOSE ALTERNATE WAS SCORED AGAINST ALTERNATE ACHIEVEME NT STANDARDS (4D) SUBSET (OF 4D) COUNTED AT THE LOWEST ACHIEVEME NT LEVEL BECAUSE OF THE NCLB 1% CAP 2 (4E) SUBSET (OF 4) WHOSE ASSESSM ENT RESULTS WERE INVALID 3 ( 4F) HIGH SCHOOL (SPECIFY GRADE: ___________) GRADE LEVEL STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES WHO TOOK ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT TOTAL (4) AA-GLAAS (4A)AA-MAAS(4B) HIGH SCHOOL (SPECIFY GRADE: ___________) Indicator 3618: Table 6 14

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Participation Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Students Included in IEP count but not included in assessments above Students who took an out of level Test Parental Exemptions Absent Did not take for other reasons GRADE LEVEL STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES WHO TOOK ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT TOTAL (4) AA-GLAAS (4A)AA-MAAS(4B) HIGH SCHOOL (SPECIFY GRADE: ___________) Indicator 3 618: Table 6 15 ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT DATA

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Participation Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Students Included in IEP count but not included in assessments above Students who took an out of level Test Parental Exemptions Absent Did not take for other reasons GRADE LEVEL STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES WHO TOOK ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT TOTAL (4) AA-GLAAS (4A)AA-MAAS(4B) HIGH SCHOOL (SPECIFY GRADE: ___________) Indicator 3 618: Table 6 16 ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT DATA

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Participation Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Students Included in IEP count but not included in assessments above Students who took an out of level Test Parental Exemptions Absent Did not take for other reasons GRADE LEVEL STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES WHO TOOK ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT TOTAL (4) SUBSET (OF 4) WHOSE ALTERNATE WAS SCORED AGAINST GRADE LEVEL STANDARDS (4A) SUBSET (OF 4) WHOSE ALTERNATE WAS SCORED AGAINST MODIFIED ACHIEVEME NT STANDARDS (4B) SUBSET (OF 4B) COUNTED AT THE LOWEST ACHIEVEME NT LEVEL BECAUSE OF THE NCLB 2% CAP 1 (4C) SUBSET (OF 4) WHOSE ALTERNATE WAS SCORED AGAINST ALTERNATE ACHIEVEME NT STANDARDS (4D) SUBSET (OF 4D) COUNTED AT THE LOWEST ACHIEVEM ENT LEVEL BECAUSE OF THE NCLB 1% CAP 2 (4E) SUBSET (OF 4) WHOSE ASSESSM ENT RESULTS WERE INVALID 3 ( 4F) HIGH SCHOOL (SPECIFY GRADE: ___________) GRADE LEVEL SUBSET (OF 4B) COUNTED AT THE LOWEST ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL BECAUSE OF THE NCLB 2% CAP 1 (4C) SUBSET (OF 4) WHOSE ALTERNATE WAS SCORED AGAINST ALTERNATE ACHIEVEMENT STANDARDS (4D) SUBSET (OF 4D) COUNTED AT THE LOWEST ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL BECAUSE OF THE NCLB 1% CAP 2 (4E) SUBSET (OF 4) WHOSE ASSESSMENT RESULTS WERE INVALID 3 (4F) HS Indicator 3618: Table 6 17

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Participation Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e+f) Baseline Overall % Students Included in IEP count but not included in assessments above Students who took an out of level Test Parental Exemptions Absent Did not take for other reasons GRADE LEVEL SUBSET (OF 4B) COUNTED AT THE LOWEST ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL BECAUSE OF THE NCLB 2% CAP 1 (4C) SUBSET (OF 4) WHOSE ALTERNATE WAS SCORED AGAINST ALTERNATE ACHIEVEMENT STANDARDS (4D) SUBSET (OF 4D) COUNTED AT THE LOWEST ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL BECAUSE OF THE NCLB 1% CAP 2 (4E) SUBSET (OF 4) WHOSE ASSESSMENT RESULTS WERE INVALID 3 (4F) HS Indicator 3 618: Table 6 18 ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT DATA

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Participation Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations Blue C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations Green D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) Red IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) Yellow E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Violet Overall (b+c+d+e+f) Baseline Overall % Students Included in IEP count but not included in assessments above Students who took an out of level Test Parental Exemptions Absent Did not take for other reasons Overall equal to Blue + Green + Red + Yellow + Violet Indicator 3 19 OVERALL CALCULATIONS

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Participation Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs Green B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e+f) Baseline Blue Overall % Students Included in IEP count but not included in assessments above Students who took an out of level Test Parental Exemptions Absent Did not take for other reasons Overall % equal to Blue divided by Green and then multiplied by 100 Indicator 3 20 OVERALL CALCULATIONS

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Participation Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Students Included in IEP count but not included in assessments above Students who took an out of level Test Parental Exemptions Absent Did not take for other reasons GRADE LEVEL STUDENTS WHO DID NOT TAKE AN ASSESSMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCLB STUDENTS WHO TOOK AN OUT OF LEVEL TEST (5) STUDENTS WHO DID NOT TAKE ANY ASSESSMENT PARENTAL EXEMPTIONS (6)ABSENT (7) DID NOT TAKE FOR OTHER REASONS 1 (8) HIGH SCHOOL Indicator 3 618: Table 6 21 NON-PARTICIPANT DATA

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Participation Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Students Included in IEP count but not included in assessments above Students who took an out of level Test Parental Exemptions Absent Did not take for other reasons GRADE LEVEL STUDENTS WHO DID NOT TAKE AN ASSESSMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCLB STUDENTS WHO TOOK AN OUT OF LEVEL TEST (5) STUDENTS WHO DID NOT TAKE ANY ASSESSMENT PARENTAL EXEMPTIONS (6)ABSENT (7) DID NOT TAKE FOR OTHER REASONS 1 (8) HIGH SCHOOL Indicator 3 618: Table 6 22 NON-PARTICIPANT DATA

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Participation Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Students Included in IEP count but not included in assessments above Students who took an out of level Test Parental Exemptions Absent Did not take for other reasons GRADE LEVEL STUDENTS WHO DID NOT TAKE AN ASSESSMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCLB STUDENTS WHO TOOK AN OUT OF LEVEL TEST (5) STUDENTS WHO DID NOT TAKE ANY ASSESSMENT PARENTAL EXEMPTIONS (6)ABSENT (7) DID NOT TAKE FOR OTHER REASONS 1 (8) HIGH SCHOOL Indicator 3 618: Table : Table 6 NON-PARTICIPANT DATA

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Participation Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Students Included in IEP count but not included in assessments above Students who took an out of level Test Parental Exemptions Absent Did not take for other reasons GRADE LEVEL STUDENTS WHO DID NOT TAKE AN ASSESSMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCLB STUDENTS WHO TOOK AN OUT OF LEVEL TEST (5) STUDENTS WHO DID NOT TAKE ANY ASSESSMENT PARENTAL EXEMPTIONS (6)ABSENT (7) DID NOT TAKE FOR OTHER REASONS 1 (8) HIGH SCHOOL Indicator 3 618: Table 6 24 NON-PARTICIPANT DATA

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Participation Total Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8Grade HS#% AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations BlueGreenRedYellowVioletOrangePink C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Students Included in IEP count but not included in assessments above Students who took an out of level Test Parental Exemptions Absent Did not take for other reasons Overall Row Total equal to Blue + Green + Red + Yellow + Violet + Orange + Pink (same is true for all cells in this COLUMN) 25 Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3

Reading Assessment Participation Statewide Assessment – Total #% AChildren with IEPs Green B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations Blue C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Students Included in IEP count but not included in assessments above Students who took an out of level Test Parental Exemptions Absent Did not take for other reasons Overall % equal to Blue divided by Green and then multiplied by 100 (same is true for all cells in this COLUMN) 26 Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3

Performance Data 27

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Performance Total Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8Grade HS#% AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade- level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % 28 Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3

29 Statewide Assessment – Math Assessment Performance Total Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8Grade HS#% AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade- level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3

30 Most of the APR Indicator 3 performance table can be created using 618: Table 6 Data!!!! In the example to come Table 6 location is listed in the following format: (Column) : (Grade) Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Performance Total Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8Grade HS#% AChildren with IEPs1:31:41:51:61:71:81:HS1:3 B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations N/A C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations 9a:3 (-) box above 9a:4 (-) box above 9a:5 (-) box above 9a:6 (-) box above 9a:7 (-) box above 9a:8 (-) box above 9a:HS (-) box above =row sum 9a:3 (-) box above D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade- level standards (AA-GLAAS) 9b:39b:49b:59b:69b:79b:89b:HS=row sum9b:3 IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) 9c:39c:49c:59c:69c:79c:89c:HS=row sum9c:3 E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) 9d:39d:49d:59d:69d:79d:89d:HS=row sum9d:3 Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline =sum of assessmen ts above =row sum =sum of assessmen ts above Overall % = box above (/) by grade 3 IEP count = box above (/) by grade 4 IEP count = box above (/) by grade 5 IEP count = box above (/) by grade 6 IEP count = box above (/) by grade 7 IEP count = box above (/) by grade 8 IEP count = box above (/) by grade HS IEP count : Column 1 Grade 3 618: Proficient Levels Table 9d Grade 6 Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Performance Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % GRADE LEVELSTUDENTS WITH IEPs (1)ALL STUDENTS (2) HIGH SCHOOL (SPECIFY GRADE: ___________) Indicator 3 618: Table 6 32 CHILD COUNT DATA

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Performance Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) F IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) G Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Indicator 3 618: Table 6 33 Not Available on 618: Table 6 REGULAR ASSESSMENT DATA

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Performance Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations Blue C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations Green D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % For IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations sum columns shaded below then take that result and subtract Green Indicator 3 618: Table 6 34 REGULAR ASSESSMENT ON GRADE LEVEL (9A) GRADE LEVELTEST NAME 9A ROW TOTAL 1 Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 6Level 7Level 8Level HS Example of state with minimum proficient level of 3 REGULAR ASSESSMENT DATA

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Performance Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Indicator 3 618: Table 6 35 ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT ON GRADE LEVEL STANDARDS (9B) GRADE LEVELTEST NAME 9A ROW TOTAL 1 Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 6Level 7Level 8Level HS Example of state with minimum proficient level of 3 For IEPs in AA-GLAAS sum columns shaded above starting with minimum proficient level and moving right ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT DATA

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Performance Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Indicator 3 618: Table 6 36 Example of state with minimum proficient level of 2 For IEPs in AA-MAAS sum columns shaded above starting with minimum proficient level and moving right ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT ON MODIFIED STANDARDS (9C) GRADE LEVELTEST NAME 9A ROW TOTAL 1 Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 6Level 7Level 8Level HS ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT DATA

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Performance Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Indicator 3 618: Table 6 37 Example of state with minimum proficient level of 4 For IEPs in AA-AAAS sum columns shaded above starting with minimum proficient level and moving right ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT ON ALTERNATE ACHIEVEMENT STANDARDS (9D) GRADE LEVELTEST NAME 9A ROW TOTAL 1 Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 6Level 7Level 8Level HS ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT DATA

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Performance Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations Blue C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations Green D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) Red IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) Yellow E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Violet Overall (b+c+d+e+f) Baseline Overall % Overall equal to Blue + Green + Red + Yellow + Violet Indicator 3 38 OVERALL CALCULATIONS

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Performance Grade 3 AChildren with IEPs Green B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e+f) Baseline Blue Overall % Overall % equal to Blue divided by Green and then multiplied by 100 Indicator 3 39 OVERALL CALCULATIONS

Statewide Assessment – Reading Assessment Performance Total Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8Grade HS#% AChildren with IEPs B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations BlueGreenRedYellowVioletOrangePink C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Overall Row Total equal to Blue + Green + Red + Yellow + Violet + Orange + Pink (same is true for all cells in this COLUMN) 40 Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3

Reading Assessment Performance Statewide Assessment – Total #% AChildren with IEPs Green B IEPs in regular assessment with no accommodations Blue C IEPs in regular assessment with accommodations D IEPs in alternate assessment against grade-level standards (AA-GLAAS) IEPs in alternate assessment against modified standards (AA-MAAS) E IEPs in alternate assessment against alternate standards (AA-AAAS) Overall (b+c+d+e) Baseline Overall % Overall % equal to Blue divided by Green and then multiplied by 100 (same is true for all cells in this COLUMN) 41 Annual Performance Report: Indicator 3

42 CONTACTS Questions related to AYP, Participation, & Performance Data: Jason R. Altman, Research Coordinator, Questions related to Improvement Activities: Chris Bremer, Research Associate, Chris Rogers, Research Fellow, General Indicator 3 Questions: Martha Thurlow, Director, For additional information on Indicator 3 please see:

43