LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct. 24-27, 2005 BPM Signal Processing T. Straumann, M. Cecere, E. Medvedko, P. Krejcik SLAC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preliminary Design Review EVLA 1 st and 2 nd Local Oscillators.
Advertisements

Update of EXT Stripline BPM Electronics with LCLS-style Digital BPM Processors Glen White, with slides by Steve Smith 15 December 2009 ATF2.
Linac4 BPM and Phase Pickup L. Søby08/ LINAC4 Beam Position, Phase and intensity Pick-ups.
1 IF Receiver for Wideband Digitally Modulated Signals Direct Instructor: Doctor Ronen Holtzman, Microwave Division, Elisra Electronic Systems Ltd. Supervising.
Test of LLRF at SPARC Marco Bellaveglia INFN – LNF Reporting for:
FAC review, 10/27 D. Schultz 1 e-Beams System Update Injector System Installation has started. Linac System Preparing for ’06 installation. Controls System.
S. Smith LCLS Facility Advisory April 16, BPMs and Toroids Facility Advisory Committee April 16, 2007 System overview.
Bob Lill Undulator Systems – Cavity BPM October 12, 2006 Undulator Cavity BPM Status.
Ron Johnson Beam Position October 29-31, Beam Position Monitors FAC Review October 29-31, 2007 Stripline BPM.
Bob Lill FAC meeting Cavity October 30, 2007 LCLS Cavity BPM Status and Testing.
Bob Lill LCLS FAC June 16-18, 2008 RF BPM Status and Production Test Results.
RF Synchronisation Issues
Bob Lill Undulator Systems – BPM April 20, 2006 Undulator Cavity BPM Status and Plans.
Patrick Krejcik LCLS April 7-8, 2005 Breakout Session: Controls Physics Requirements and Technology Choices for LCLS Instrumentation.
Bob Lill Undulator Cavity BPM System April 16, 2007 Undulator Cavity BPM Status.
2.4-GHZ RF TRANSCEIVER FOR IEEE B WIRELESS LAN UF# UF#
HIAPER Cloud Radar Transceiver Exciter Receiver Oscillators High-Powered Amplifier Calibration Exciter Receiver Oscillators High-Powered Amplifier Calibration.
LLRF Phase Reference System The LCLS linac is broken down into 4 separate linac sections. The LCLS injector will reside in an off axis tunnel at the end.
Status of mTCA Stripline BPM Development June 4-5, 2012 Dan Van Winkle for BPM team: Sonya Hoobler, Tom Himel, Jeff Olsen, Steve Smith, Till Straumann,
Spectrum Analyzer Basics Copyright 2000 Agenda Overview: What is spectrum analysis? What measurements do we make? Theory of Operation: Spectrum analyzer.
ATF2 Q-BPM System 19 Dec Fifth ATF2 Project Meeting J. May, D. McCormick, T. Smith (SLAC) S. Boogert (RH) B. Meller (Cornell) Y. Honda (KEK)
IP-BPM NOV. BEAM TEST RESULTS Siwon Jang (KNU). 11cm Low-Q IP-BPM design  11cm Low-Q IP-BPM drawings of HFSS 100mm Sensor cavity Wave guide Antenna Designed.
High Resolution Cavity BPM for ILC final focal system (IP-BPM) ILC2007/LCWS 2007 BDS, 2007/6/1 The University of Tokyo, KEK, Tohoku Gakuin University,
SJD/TAB1 EVLA Fiber Selection Critical Design Review December 5, 2001.
Electronics for PS and LHC transformers Grzegorz Kasprowicz Supervisor: David Belohrad AB-BDI-PI Technical student report.
Status of ATF2 Cavity BPM Project Sep 29, 2005 Project Scope: Instrument both couplers ATF2 cavity BPM’s (35) Produce prototype for December cavity test.
BPMs and HOM-BPMs for the XFEL Linac N. Baboi for the BPM and the HOM teams (DESY, CEA-Saclay, SLAC, FNAL, Cockroft/Daresbury) XFEL Linac Review Meeting,
Bob Lill Undulator Systems – BPM January 31, 2006 Undulator Cavity BPM Design and Status.
1 FermiLab Recycler Ring BPM Upgrade Based on Digital Receiver Technology R. Webber, J. Crisp, P. Prieto, D. Voy, C. Breigel, C. McClure, M. Mengel, S.
Frank Ludwig, DESY Content : 1 Stability requirements on phase and amplitude 2 Available technologies and selection of the detector concept 3 Proposed.
1 C. Simon CLIC Instrumentation workshop BPM C. Simon on behalf of the Saclay’s group CLIC Instrumentation workshop 2 nd - 3 rd June.
IP-BPM status Siwon Jang KNU. Contents The electronics repair status –Repair work status –Electronics RF test (by using Oscilloscope) –Electronics shipment.
Marc Ross Saturday, June 5, 2004 nanometer BPM status and plans.
Dayle Kotturi System Concept Review/Preliminary Design Review November 16, 2005 LLRF Outline System Concept Review Requirements.
SPECTRUM ANALYZER 9 kHz GHz
˜ SuperHeterodyne Rx ECE 4710: Lecture #18 fc + fLO fc – fLO -fc + fLO
Future FONT BPM Processors C.Perry 25 June Types of Processor Two types of processor: a) present mixer type b) baseband type Both will be made because:
Frank Ludwig, DESY Content : 1 Stability requirements for phase and amplitude for the XFEL 2 Next LLRF system for optimized detector operation 3 Limitations.
The beam-based alignment and feedback systems, essential operations of the future colliders, use high resolution Beam Position Monitors (BPM). In the framework.
XFEL The European X-Ray Laser Project X-Ray Free-Electron Laser 1 Frank Ludwig, DESY XFEL-LLRF-ATCA Meeting, 3-4 December 2007 Downconverter Cavity Field.
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
LCLS LLRF System October 10-13, 2005 LLRF05 B. Hong, R. Akre, A. Hill, D. Kotturi, H. Schwarz SLAC, Stanford, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA Work supported.
1 ATF 2 Nanobpm (Q BPM) Electronics. Mark Slater: Cambridge Yury Kolomensky, Toyoko Orimoto: UCB Stewart Boogert, Steve Malton, Alexi Liapine: UCL Mike.
ATF DR BPM Upgrade Janice Nelson, Doug McCormick, Justin May, Andrei Seryi, Tonee Smith, Mark Woodley.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Nano beams in the ATF extraction line Marc Ross Linear collider challenges: Energy Emittance source Stability ATF.
Prototype Sensor Status and Measurements u Sensor Response Measurements u Mechanical Response u Noise Expectations u DAQ Status.
PXIE Beam Instrumentation Status Update – Preparing for MEBT 1.1 Beam Vic Scarpine Feb. 9, 2016.
RF low level control & synchronization A. Gallo, M. Bellaveglia, L. Cacciotti SPARC review committee – ENEA Frascati – 16/11/2005.
LCLS Digital BPM Processor for ATF2 Extraction Line BPMs Steve Smith 26 August 2009.
April 12 | Comparison of Sophisticated Synthesizer Concepts and Modern Step Attenuator Implementations | 2 Comparison of Sophisticated Synthesizer Concepts.
S. Smith LCLS Facility Advisory October 12, Beam Position Monitors Facility Advisory Committee October 12, 2006.
1CEA/ Saclay/ SACM CARE/SRF/WP11 Development of a new Beam Position Monitor for FLASH, XFEL and ILC Cryomodules Claire Simon, Michel Luong, Stéphane Chel,
Design of a direct conversion 200 MHz non-IQ scheme using the Dimtel LLRF4 card Bob Anderson.
Beam Secondary Shower Acquisition System: RF design techniques for 40MHz ADC Student Meeting Jose Luis Sirvent PhD. Student 30/09/2013.
Communication 40 GHz Anurag Nigam.
Re-entrant BPM R&D for ILC Main Linac
RF Synchronisation Issues
Controls CBETA controls will extend existing EPICS control system
RF Front End Radio Design- Simulations and Specifications
LLRF and Beam-based Longitudinal Feedback Readiness
Terry Cotter LO/IF Group Leader
Bunch Tiltmeter Steve Smith SLAC Snowmass July 16, 2001 Update date
A Software Defined Radio for the Masses, Part 4
Report on ATF2 Third Project Meeting ATF2 Magnet Movers ATF2 Q-BPM Electronics Is SLAC ILC Instrumentation Group a good name?
Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS) LLRF Preliminary Design Review LLRF Monitor and Control System September 26, 2005 Ron Akre.
Undulator Cavity BPM System Status
SuperB Linac VME Beam Position Monitor
Undulator Cavity BPM Status
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Beam Position & Charge Monitors LCLS Lehman Review July 11, 2007
Presentation transcript:

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 BPM Signal Processing T. Straumann, M. Cecere, E. Medvedko, P. Krejcik SLAC B. Lill ANL

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Overview for Stripline BPMs Requirements/Engineering Constraints Status Current Frontend Design Timeline for next 12 months

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Objective High precision/resolution BPM Electronics 5um resolution (R ~ 12mm) drift < 5um/h low bunch charge: nC Stripline sensitivity: V = (a-b)/(a+b) = 2 r / R dynamic range > 60dB + 20dB

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Engineering Constraints SNR expressed as position noise (LINAC Stripline; 150MHz) dB[ r/1um ] = NF – dB[ q/1nC ] - ½ dB[ BW/1MHz ] 8dB > NF + 14dB(.2nC) – 10dB (10MHz) noise figure including cable losses stripline signal level based on estimation

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Baseband vs. Mixer Baseband Simpler Cheaper Use existing cables (?) Only marginally meets resolution requirements Mixer More signal at higher freq. Proven solution ADC performs better at IF LO generation + distribution New cables in LINAC needed

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 System Overview Calibration scheme does not require extra cables Direct digitization

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Status VME Digitizers + basic driver software available Echotek Joerger SIS New card ordered (13ENOB, 130MSPS, 700MHz input BW) First frontend design + prototype (E. Medvedko) Engineer hired (M. Cecere)

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Frontend f 0 =150MHz (enough signal, ADC still well performing) Low noise, 10MHz BW Low distortion Alias suppression Build Prototype Test (noise, stability, out-of band performance, linearity) Final Design Interface (form factor, control signals, status monitors) Calibration

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 BPM Analog Front End Baseband Design BPF # 1 Signal from BPM or Hybrid BPF # 2 LNA ADC Final Amplifier Undersampling ADC Frequency Selection Filter Low Noise Amplifier Band Pass Filter

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Baseband Design Component Selection Criteria BPF # 1 BPF # 2 LNA ADC Freq./BW determine SNR Low Insertion Loss Good OOB rejection Low NF Low Distortion Moderate Gain Sharp Rolloff (Anti- alias) Flat Passband High Gain*BW Low High Output Level >= 119MSPS High Dynamic Range BW>= 200MHz

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Timeline (Injector only)

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Calibration Bench Test Measurement setup (not worse than required stability!!) Test stability of calibration (splitters, BPM striplines) Cross-talk issues? Repeatability Multiplexing (t/f) Final design, integration

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 LCLS Cavity BPM Overview RF BPM system current status Planning for prototype testing Planning for 8 LTU BPMs electrically identical to those in the undulator. Planning for 33 undulator BPMs

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Miteq X-Band Low Noise Receiver Existing product line WR 75 Waveguide Interface Low Noise Figure (2.7 dB) Prototype delivery date 12/10/05 Budgetary price for prototype $ (for 3 channels)

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Prototype Receiver Specification ParameterSpecification LimitCondition RF Frequency GHz 20.0 Celsius Dx, Dy, Intensity Input Peak Power50 watts peakNo damage (limiter protection) LO Frequency GHz (2856 MHz*4) /- 0.2 Celsius 1nC, 1mm offset, 200fs BL LO Power Range+10 dBm Max.Provide LO for 3 down converters IF Frequency60 MHz Min /- 0.2 Celsius Noise Figure Dx and DY2.7 dB Max /- 0.2 Celsius Noise Figure Intensity (reference)4.0 dB Max /- 0.2 Celsius LO to RF Isolation40 dB Min.20.0 Celsius LO to IF Isolation45 dB Min.20.0 Celsius Output Power+14 dBm1 dB compression Conversion Gain25 dB typical20.0 Celsius

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Long Lead Item Status Receiver Prototype del. 12/10/05 Local oscillator del. 11/24/05 Waveguide del. 12/1/05 Waveguide calibration kit del. 12/9/05 CPI Vacuum windows 11/30/05

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 BPM System Test Approach Phase I Injector Test Stand ITS Install single X-Band Cavity and modified off- the-shelf down converter receiver Mount BPM on Piezo two-axis translation stage Phase II Bypass line test with PC gun Install three X-Band Cavities BPMs Bypass line test with PC gun to start June 06

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Charge- 1 nC single- bunch Bunch length- ~ ps FWHM for ps laser Spot size on final screen at 5.5 MeV ~ 0.75 mm rms, ps laser Injector Test Stand ITS Beam Parameters

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Phase I Data Acquisition Design Approach Instrument three channel down converters with Struck SIS ADCs 14-bit Single VME board will provide the data acquisition for 8 channels Epics driver complete Digitize horizontal, vertical position and Intensity 0 to 1 volt range Fit Data to decaying exponential at 60 MHz

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Phase I Testing Objectives Test prototype Cavity BPM, down converter, and data acquisition Generate preliminary compliance table to specification Gain operational experience to determine if translation stage is useful, what are optimum operating parameters

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Phase I Schedule Milestones Design and develop prototype Cavity BPM Prototype non vacuum Nov 05 Build single Cavity BPM Dec 05 Cold Test Dec 05 Install cavity BPM into ITS and Test Jan 06

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Phase II Schedule Milestones Refine design and develop First Article Cavity BPM and support hardware Jan 06 Build 3 Cavity BPMs Mar 06 Cold Test May 06 Install cavity BPM into APS PAR/Booster bypass line and Test June 06

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Phase II Testing Objectives First Article Prototypes evaluated Test three BPM separated by fixed TBD distance to determine single-shot Complete test matrix

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 LTU and Undulator Planning Receiver and LO housed in shielded enclosure below girder 20 watt power dissipation maximum Presently BPM output on wall side BPM output flexible waveguide section allows movement for alignment

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 BPM Mounting BPM connects directly to the girder. Mechanical translation stage used for alignment BPM and Quad can be pre-aligned independently with respect to each other

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Undulator Planning

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Backup slides

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 f o = 150MHz BW = 10MHz Lark Engineering MS CC Insert. Loss = 5.8dB TTE filters KB3T-150M-10M-50-3A Insert. loss = 4.1dB Microwave Filter Co. 3MB10-150/10-SF/SF-1 Insertion loss = 3dB Sirenza SGA-6589 G = 26dB NF = 3.0dB OIP3 = 33dBm Sirenza SGA-4363 G = 18dB NF = 3.1dB OIP3 = 29dBm Sawtek fo= 150MHz BW = 10MHz Insert. loss = 11dB TI OPA847 GBW = 3.9GHz Distortion -105dBc LTC MSPSmax 16-bit 700MHz BW f samp =119MHz Req. jitter < 350fs AD MSPSmax 14-bit 200MHz BW f samp =102? Req. jitter < 600fs Alias 30MHz Baseband Design Components BPF # 1 BPF # 2 LNA ADC NF = 2-4dB NF = 3dB Cable NF = 2-4dB

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Input signal Cable losses BPF1 LNA BPF2 Final output Frequency MHz dBm BPM signal Baseband Design Frequency Response

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 BPM or Hybrid LNA ADC RF LO IF MHz 43MHz xN 119MHz Minicircuits ZFM-2 1 – 1000 MHz Conv Loss = 5.8dB Mixer Based BPM Block Diagram

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Frequency MHz dBm BPM signal After coax BPF1 LNA BPF2 mixer Mixer Based Design Frequency Response

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Software Tasks Evaluation / test software BPM Processor Processing algorithm Real-time tasks: data acquisition and processing timing history buffers Calibration Integration (SLC-aware IOC, timing, feedback) Slow controls (gain, calib, status monitors, alarms)

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Integration; Hardware Clock generation and distribution Timing; triggers/gates Calibration signal generation and distribution Controls: gain, calib. mux Power Status monitors

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Integration; Software Timing SLC-aware layer Shot-to-shot feedback High-level applications (EPICS database) Naming Real-time Sysadmin; infrastructure; network

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 PDRO local oscillator GHz (119 MHz x 96) Phase lock to 119 MHz ref 0 dBm +/- 3 dB +13 dBm output power In-Band Spurs <70 dBc Phase noise depends on 119 MHz reference

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Noise Estimates Sensitivity: -58 dBm/0.2nC/1  m Minimum bit size: nC Assumes 2 gain ranges for 75 dB Noise floor <200 nm rms ParameterValue Thermal noise-174 dBm/Hz IF Bandwidth20 MHz Noise in-band-101 dBm Receiver 1 dB compression +14 dBm Receiver gain25 dB Receiver noise figure2.7 dB

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 APS Test Objectives Develop a cavity BPM that meets system requirements and can be manufactured economically Develop simulation model that correlates to prototype data Transition from prototyping to production

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 ITS Installation

LCLS Control Group LCLS-Week Oct , 2005 Cost Savings Reduce the dipole cavity outputs from 4 ports to 2 ports Terminate the unused ports in vacuum Eliminate 2 transitions, 2 windows, waveguide, 2 magic tees Prove resolution and offset performance