Lesson 4 - 3 Establishing Causation. Knowledge Objectives Identify the three ways in which the association between two variables can be explained. Define.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Advertisements

Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Aim: How do we establish causation?
AP Statistics Chapters 3 & 4 Measuring Relationships Between 2 Variables.
2.6 The Question of Causation. The goal in many studies is to establish a causal link between a change in the explanatory variable and a change in the.
Characteristics of Scatterplots
 Pg : 3b, 6b (form and strength)  Page : 10b, 12a, 16c, 16e.
1 10. Causality and Correlation ECON 251 Research Methods.
 Correlation and regression are closely connected; however correlation does not require you to choose an explanatory variable and regression does. 
C HAPTER 4: M ORE ON T WO V ARIABLE D ATA Sec. 4.2 – Cautions about Correlation and Regression.
2.4: Cautions about Regression and Correlation. Cautions: Regression & Correlation Correlation measures only linear association. Extrapolation often produces.
Looking at data: relationships - Caution about correlation and regression - The question of causation IPS chapters 2.4 and 2.5 © 2006 W. H. Freeman and.
Lecture PowerPoint Slides Basic Practice of Statistics 7 th Edition.
4.3: Establishing Causation Both correlation and regression are very useful in describing the relationship between two variables; however, they are first.
Does Association Imply Causation? Sometimes, but not always! What about: –x=mother's BMI, y=daughter's BMI –x=amt. of saccharin in a rat's diet, y=# of.
+ Chapter 4 Designing Studies 4.1Samples and Surveys 4.2Experiments 4.3Using Studies Wisely.
Simple Comparative Experiments Section 2.3. More on Experiments An experiment is a planned intervention undertaken to observe the effects of one or more.
+ The Practice of Statistics, 4 th edition – For AP* STARNES, YATES, MOORE Chapter 4: Designing Studies Section 4.3 Using Studies Wisely.
AP STATISTICS LESSON 4 – 2 ( DAY 1 ) Cautions About Correlation and Regression.
3.3 Correlation: The Strength of a Linear Trend Estimating the Correlation Measure strength of a linear trend using: r (between -1 to 1) Positive, Negative.
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
+ The Practice of Statistics, 4 th edition – For AP* STARNES, YATES, MOORE Chapter 4: Designing Studies Section 4.3 Using Studies Wisely.
Lesson Correlation and Regression Wisdom. Knowledge Objectives Recall the three limitations on the use of correlation and regression. Explain what.
Describing Relationships
Activity! Get your heart beating! Are standing pulse rates generally higher than sitting pulse rates? We will preform two experiments to try to answer.
Cautions About Correlation and Regression Section 4.2.
The Question of Causation
Section 4.3 Using Studies Wisely By: Michelle Rondilla & Alexander Hasson Period 4.
+ Chapter 4: Designing Studies Section 4.3b Using Studies Wisely.
The Practice of Statistics, 5th Edition Starnes, Tabor, Yates, Moore Bedford Freeman Worth Publishers CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies 4.3 Using Studies Wisely.
4.1 Statistics Notes Should We Experiment or Should We Merely Observe?
Lurking Variables. Consider this situation: Students who take AP math courses have a relatively high performance in the first year at university. Some.
Prediction and Causation How do we predict a response? Explanatory Variables can be used to predict a response: 1. Prediction is based on fitting a line.
Producing Data 1.
2.7 The Question of Causation
Cautions About Correlation and Regression Section 4.2
Cautions About Correlation and Regression
Proving Causation Why do you think it was me?!.
Establishing Causation
4.3: Using Studies Wisely.
Section 4.3 Types of Association
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Cautions about Correlation and Regression
Looking at data: relationships - Caution about correlation and regression - The question of causation IPS chapters 2.4 and 2.5 © 2006 W. H. Freeman and.
Lesson Using Studies Wisely.
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Does Association Imply Causation?
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
4.2 Cautions about Correlation and Regression
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Section 6.2 Establishing Causation
Introduction to Producing Data
Experiments Observational Study – observes individuals and measures variables of interest but does not attempt to influence the responses. Experiment.
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Chapter 4: Designing Studies
Experiments Observational Study – observes individuals and measures variables of interest but does not attempt to influence the responses. Experiment.
Chapter 4: More on Two-Variable Data
CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies
Presentation transcript:

Lesson Establishing Causation

Knowledge Objectives Identify the three ways in which the association between two variables can be explained. Define what is meant by a common response. List five criteria for establishing causation when you cannot conduct a controlled experiment.

Construction Objectives Explain what process provides the best evidence for causation. Define what it means to say that two variables are confounded. Discuss why establishing a cause-and-effect relationship through experimentation is not always possible. Explain what it means to say that a lack of evidence for a cause-and-effect relationship does not necessarily mean that there is no cause-and-effect relationship.

Vocabulary Causation – a direct cause-and-effect link between variables Common Response – variables change in response to changes to a third variable (and not really to changes in each other)

Common Response Changes in x cause changes in y Changes in both x and y are caused by another variable z The effect of x on y is confounded by the other variable z # of ticks and cases of spotted fever # of ticks, boating accidents, and summer weather

Confounding When two variables influences on a response variable is hard to distinguish from one another, we refer to that a confounding. Confounding variables can be other explanatory variables or a variable not included in the analysis (extraneous) Remember we don’t want to use the term “lurking variable” because of the nuances it carries. Use extraneous variable instead

Why not Experiment Always? The best evidence for causation comes from experiments in which the researcher controls the explanatory variable(s) So why do we do observational studies? –Ethics –Not physically possible

Causation in Absence of Experiment 1.The association is strong studies show very strong correlations 2.The association is consistent studies across wide ranges of different populations or areas show same strong correlations 3.Larger values of the response variable are associated with stronger responses more explanatory variables correspond to more (or less) of the response variable 4.The alleged cause precedes the effect in time the cause has time to effect the response 5.The alleged cause is plausible experiments (where do-able) back the larger effect

Summary and Homework Summary Homework –pg