June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Business Assistance NSF 2009 Joint Annual Meeting June 11, 2009 Washington, DC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

THE ALLIANCE FOR GRADUATE EDUCATION AND PROFESSIORIATE PROGRAM (AGEP) CONFERENCE NSF Division of Grants & Agreements Chicago, Illinois March 18-21, 2009.
Time and Effort Reporting Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) 3/1/2014.
Documentation Transactions posted to sponsored funds Sponsored Programs Administration October 2012.
Nuts & Bolts of Award Management March 14, 2012 ISE PI Meeting Division of Grants and Agreements.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
A-133 Compliance & Audit Readiness Presented By: Tracy Jackson and Susan Cook.
Types of Cost Sharing Mandatory: When the sponsor stipulates that cost sharing or matching funds are required as a condition of receiving an award. Specifically.
Documentation, Cash & In-Kind Match. Session Objectives Gather information on proper documentation Allowable, allocable & reasonable costs Gain knowledge.
HBCU-UP Conference Financial Management Workshop Rosalind Jackson-Lewis Division of Institutional and Award Support (703)
Compliance Issues Mr. Rashawn Farrior ATE Financial Management Grant Workshop October 23, 2012 Hosted by: American Association of Community Colleges.
Subrecipient Monitoring Webcast Presenters Pat O'Rourke, Irene St. Croix, Bridget Ware Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
1 Subgrants vs. Subcontracts TAA-CCCT Grants November 16, 2011.
JULY12, 2011 SESSION 7 OF AAPLS – BUDGETING FOR PROPOSALS WITH SUBCONTRACTS: ESTABLISHING RELATIONSHIPS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES.
Subrecipient Monitoring OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION 2010.
Jamie Young, Associate Director, Chicago Office for Sponsored Research, Northwestern University.
Subcontracts 101 By Mitali Ravindrakumar USC Collaboration between Parties Perform Subcontractor Analysis Sponsor - Fund Project/Subcontr act Negotiate.
Subawards and Subrecipient Monitoring
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
KEYS TO SUCCESS NCURA Region IV Spring Meeting April 27 – 30, 2014 © 2014 National Council of University Research Administrators Effort Certification and.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Thomas Chin October 5, Presentation Topics Requirements – Internal Control Time and Effort Reporting Statistics on Single.
Alliance Meeting May 18, 2006 National Science Foundation Division of Grants and Agreements Al Wilson, Grants Management Specialist (703)
Compliance Issues NSF Regional Grants Conference October 4 & 5, 2004 St. Louis, Missouri Hosted by: Washington University.
NSF Tribal College Workshop Award Monitoring & Business Assistance November 14, 2008.
HOW TO WRITE A BUDGET…. The Importance of Your Budget Preparation of the budget is an important part of the proposal preparation process. Pre-Award and.
Presented by the Office of Research Development & Services and Sponsored Programs Administration.
NSF – HSI Workshop 1 Business Assistance NSF Workshop for Sponsored Project Administrators at Hispanic Serving Institutions April 13, Miami, FL April.
Financial Management How Can I Spend Award Dollars.
EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF GRANTS AND CONTRACTS Effort Reporting System Departmental Coordinator Training Updated 01/11/2012.
Fiscal Compliance for Title III Keisha Davis Monitoring & Compliance Section School Business Division
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Matthew Pakos School Improvement Grant Programs May 23, 2011.
2013 INBRE Project Subaward Management Barbara Bunge MSU Subaward Manager (406)
“Grants Boot Camp” Workshop Series January 9, 2014 Creighton University Sponsored Programs Administration 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE  Phone:
Effort Reporting: Back to the Basics NCURA FRA 2013 New Orleans Patrick Fitzgerald Associate Dean for Research Administration Harvard University Faculty.
Pathway to Success December 16, 2013 MSP Annual Conference Division of Grants and Agreements.
Omni Circular Key Area #7: New Responsibilities of the Pass- Through Agency By Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
BTOP OVERSIGHT WASHINGTON D.C. MAY 2012 U.S. DOC Inspector General Recovery Act Oversight Task Force 1.
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs April 4, 2011 Topic: Cost Share.
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
Cost Principles provide guidance for determining eligible costs and whether those costs are direct or indirect. Outlined in detail in OMB Circular A-21.
Cost Sharing for Sponsored Programs College of Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources March 19, 2010.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
Award Monitoring Update National Science Foundation Advisory Committee for Business and Operations October 22, 2003 Mary Santonastasso, Director, Division.
Time and Effort Reporting. Where is the Requirement? Time and effort reporting is required under the Federal Office of Management and Budget’s Circular.
Fiscal Compliance for Title III Keisha Davis Monitoring & Compliance Section School Business Division
1 QEM/BIO Workshop October 21, 2005 Award Administration.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
Daily Management of Awards Jennifer Crockett Jennifer Crockett, Director, Sponsored Projects Finance, Columbia University Tamara Hill Tamara Hill, Manager,
Title I Administrative Meeting September 30, 2010.
OnTrack Financial and Grant Compliance. Welcome The OnTrack Policies and Procedures is a draft and a living document. It may be changed based on UWGC.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Cost Analysis Guidance for Information Requested from Financial Officer.
DISTRICT AUDITING UPDATE INDIRECT COST AND TIME DISTRIBUTION Melissa A. Austin, Audits Manager SC State Department of Education Office of Finance District.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cost Classification, Administrative Costs & Program Income June 2009.
2016 NSF Large Facilities Workshop New Initiatives Business Roundtable II-III May 25-26, 2016 Jeff Lupis, Division Director, Division of Acquisition and.
What’s your friend up to? Subrecipient Monitoring Issues Tom Egan, MIT OSP Jeannette Gordon, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight OPERA, OER, NIH.
Subaward, Procurement, or Consulting? Herbert B. Chermside, CRA Prepared for Virginia Commonwealth University Grants Administration Training Series © 2003.
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
AISL PI Conference February 29, 2016 Division of Grants and Agreements.
Phase II Financial Review Guidance
Office of Sponsored Research and Programs (OSRP)
HBCU-UP PI/PD CONFERENCE Bowie State University
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Session Two – Participant Support Costs (PSCs) May 24, 2018
Participant Support Costs
Managing Federal grants
Office of Sponsored Research and Programs (OSRP)
Time Distribution Report OMB Circular A-87, Attachment B. Paragraph 8 h. Standard Operating Procedures
Results of NSF Data Analytics and Other Audits
Presentation transcript:

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Business Assistance NSF 2009 Joint Annual Meeting June 11, 2009 Washington, DC

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Ask Early, Ask Often!! Pamela Hawkins, Team Leader Rashawn Farrior, Grants Officer –Division of Grants and Agreements –Education and Human Resource (EHR) Team –(703)

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Ask Early, Ask Often!! Tamara Bowman, Team Leader Rosalind Jackson-Lewis, Project Director Charlie Zeigler, Special Assistant –Cost Analysis & Audit Resolution Branch/Division of Institution and Award Support (703)

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Oversight and Monitoring of Federal Awards Emphasis on Stewardship of Federal Funds Award Monitoring and Business Assistance Program Compliance & Common Areas of Concern

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Cost Analysis & Audit Resolution (CAAR) Award Monitoring & Business Assistance Program (AMBAP) Approximately 30 site visits per year, many at EHR organizations –Core Review Areas –Targeted Review Areas Desk Reviews

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Compliance & Common Areas of Concern Time and Effort Reporting (A-21, J.10) Participant Support (GC-1, Article 7 & Award and Administration Guide (AAG) Chapter V. Subchapter B.8 Consultants (AAG Chapter V. B.6; A-21.J.37) Subrecipient Monitoring (OMB A-133, Subchapter C._51) Cost Sharing [A-110, _.23(a)]

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Time & Effort Reporting System to document and support salary charges to Federal awards Time & attendance records vs. Time & effort reports Time & Effort Reporting is a Management Tool

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development OMB Circular A-21 Time & Effort Reporting Plan Confirmation Initially based on budget or assigned work and then adjusted to actual, if there are modifications Includes confirmation statement that the work was performed as budgeted. After the Fact Activity Reports Prepared each academic term for faculty & professional staff. Prepared for other employees at least monthly and coincides with payroll

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development OMB Circular A-21 Time & Effort Reporting Official records – by academic periods - semester, quarter Reasonably reflect activities employee is compensated for Encompass both sponsored projects and other activities

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Time & Effort Reports Should Contain : Employee name or identification code Project name / number or account code, total effort that pay period Hours or percentage charged to different projects Employee or supervisor signature (can be electronic) Not determined based on the budget, but developed after the fact, based upon actual activities performed

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Participant Support Costs Participants or Trainees (not employees – exception school districts – teacher training) Stipends, subsistence allowance, travel, registration fees, copies, tuition Funds may not be re-budgeted to other expense categories with out prior written approval of the NSF program officer

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Participant Support Costs Awardee organizations must be able to identify participant support costs. Participant Support is not a normal account classification Highly recommended that separate accounts, sub-accounts sub-task or sub-ledgers be established accumulate these costs. Should have written policies & procedures

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Participant Support Costs Typically excluded by NSF from application of the indirect cost rate Participant support eligibility- – what did participants have to do to receive the payment Documentation of attendees at conferences or workshops Reference: GC-1, Article 7; A-21, J.17 and J.48

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Consultants Members of particular profession or possess certain skill; Technical advice & support –work under awardee organization’s direction –generally not responsible for a deliverable Reasonableness of consultant rate of pay –Rates should be comparable to the normal or customary fees charged in relation to the services rendered

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Consultants Past: Appropriations Acts limited the maximum rate of compensation paid to consultants. Currently: Appropriation Act applicable to NSF contains no limitation on payments to consultants under NSF awards; therefore, eliminating this constraint began with the FY 2006 appropriated funds. However: Funds awarded prior to March 15, 2006 are still subject to the consultant pay limitation Reference: AAG Chapter V. Subchapter B.6

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Consultant - Agreement Name of Consultant - Business or organization Rate of pay Period of performance Description of service to be provided Cost information on : – indirect costs, travel (per diem rates), supplies other expenses

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Consultant - Invoice Consultant Name - Organizations Rate charged and time worked - hourly or daily rate Short description of services provided Include all hours – (example - preparation time & response time for speakers)

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Sub-awards & Sub-Recipient Monitoring Vendor –“off the shelf” technical services Subcontractor –responsible for piece of the work Consultant –provides specific, professional expertise on a project

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Sub-Awards Characteristics indicative of a Federal award received by a subrecipient : Performance is measured against objectives of the Federal award being met Responsibility for programmatic decision making Responsibility for adherence to applicable Federal program compliance requirements

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Vendors Payment for goods and services: Provided within normal business operations Many different purchasers Operates in a competitive environment Supplemental to the operation of the Federal program Not subject to compliance requirements of the Federal program.

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Prime Awardee Sub-award Monitoring Responsibilities Determine Reasonableness of Cost Performs cost or price analysis –Cost Analysis –Price Analysis

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Prime Pre-award Procedures Ensure that the subawardee: Has the ability to perform both technically and administratively Financial Capable to manage subaward Uses an appropriate indirect cost rate & base Has not been debarred or suspended by Federal Government

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Flow Through Provisions Audit & access to records Prime awardee – perform on site technical & administrative reviews Cost Principles A-87, A-122, A-21, FAR Administrative Requirements –A-110, A-102 – “The Common Rule” Statutory & Regulatory –COI, human subjects, drug-free workplace, CA-1 Article 8

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Subrecipient OMB A-133 Audits Receive OMB A-133 audit reports or access Federal Audit Clearinghouse – Resolve those findings that apply to your subcontract, if any

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development NSF Expectations System in place for monitoring subrecipients – “risk based approach” encouraged Evidence University is monitoring subawards Technical, Financial, and Compliance reviews

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Cost Sharing Line M is the amount subject to audit by OIG New awards issued under the FY07 Appropriation, are not required to meet the Statutory 1%. If cost sharing not required, don’t offer it up. Any cost sharing proposed & accepted under an award prior to the policy change is still required to be provided by the awardee

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Cost Sharing Must Meet ALL of these Criteria: Verifiable from recipient’s records Not included as contributions for any other federally assisted project or program Necessary & reasonable for proper and efficient accomplishment of project or program objectives Allowable under the applicable cost principles Not paid by Federal Government under another award Provided for in approved budget Conform to provisions of this Circular

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development NSF Cost Sharing Possible Consequences in the Event of Failure to Provide Cost Sharing noted on Line M –Disallowance of award costs –Refunding of award funds –Possible Termination of Award –Serious violations could even result in debarment or suspension

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Examples of Cost Sharing Audit Findings Accounting System not capturing cost sharing Inadequate documentation Unclear Valuation of In-Kind Donated Contributions Lack of Support for subawardee cost sharing – a subrecipient monitoring issue Failure to complete Annual and Final Certifications for Cost Sharing of $500k+

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Responsibilities at NSF in resolution of audit findings? NSF management represented by Cost Analysis and Audit Resolution Branch (CAAR) is responsible for resolution of audit findings on audit reports referred for resolution by the Office of Inspector General (OIG) CAAR is involved in the following activities during audit resolution: – experts in interpreting OMB Circulars – coordinate with NSF Program Managers – coordinate with NSF Grants Officers & Specialists – coordinate with NSF Finance Staff

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Need more information? General information Division of Institution & Award Support –Cost Analysis & Audit Resolution jsp –Policy Office jsp

June 8-11, 2009Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Keys to Success for Awardees Know requirements (read award letter, award terms and conditions, OMB Circulars) Good accounting practices – accumulation & segregation of costs Focus on the objectives of the project/program Document! Document! Document!