XML Regional Data Exchange for Best Management Practices for the Chesapeake Bay States Utilizing the National Environmental Information Exchange Network.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Environmental Information Exchange Network Electronic Submission ofWastewater Discharge Monitoring Reports.

Advertisements

Promoting Watershed-Based Stormwater Management for Linear Projects through the Green Highways Partnership Patrick Jeffers, U.S. Environmental Protection.

Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Tracking Thursday, May 31, 2012 Martin Hurd, Vladislav Royzman, Tetra Tech, Inc. Brian Burch, Megan Thynge,

FTA State Programs Meeting Accessing Resources from the National Center for Mobility Management A partnership of.

Keystone Technology Plan Presentation to Chesapeake Bay Program Information Management Subcommittee May 19, 2004 Nancie L. Imler Chief Information Officer.

Presented by the EPA AQS Team. Agenda Introductions Housekeeping/Overview of GoToWebinar Presentation Q& A session – use Question box to submit your questions.

EPA Enterprise Architecture Enterprise Architecture at the US Environmental Protection Agency John Sullivan, OEI, and Brian Burch, CBP.

1 State/EPA Environmental Information Exchange Network December 2004 Molly O’Neill State Director, Network Steering Board Environmental Council of the.

Independent Evaluator Chesapeake Bay Partner’s Response to the National Research Council’s Report Management Board, November 1, 2011 ~ 9-11 AM.

Nutrient Subcommittee Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis February 22, 2006 Nancie L. Imler PA DEP and IMS Chair Nutrient Subcommittee Regional Data.

Electronic Reporting: ICIS Data Publishing Presented by: Alison Kittle, U.S. EPA Elisa Willard, Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment Roy.

National STORET Users Conference Environmental Information Exchange Network Andrew T. Battin, Director Information Exchange & Services Division Office.

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Reusable Component Services RCS Update Presentation to Enterprise Architecture Team 09/11/2012 John Harman,

Environmental Finance Center Boise State University Working on the “How to Pay” Issues of Watershed Restoration The Environmental Finance Center.

Users' Meeting San Francisco, CA April 18 th, 2006 RCRAInfo Network Exchange.

1 Agriculture Workgroup Mid-Point Assessment Priorities Water Quality Goal Implementation Team Meeting Fairfield, Pennsylvania October 22-23, 2012.

2006 Network Users’ Meeting Chesapeake Bay Program Regional Exchange for Non Point Source Best Management Practices April 18, 2006 Nancie L. Imler PA DEP.

Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.

EPA Exchange Network SDWIS Data Flow Maine SDWIS/State system using FedRep XML output files.

Forest harvesting practices are a suite of BMPs that minimize the environmental impacts of road building, log removal, site preparation and forest management.

1 The Exchange Network: A Tool for Better Environmental Management Jonathan Jacobson US Environmental Protection Agency.

Forestry BMP Review Process Mark Sievers, Tetra Tech Forestry Workgroup (FWG) Conference Call—February 1, 2012.

Pennsylvania’s STORET Experience: Its successes and failures in system implementation and data upload. By Carrie L. Wengert Pennsylvania Department of.

TRI Pilot Data Flow via the Exchange Network Michigan’s Experience Michael Beaulac – Michigan DEQ Bill Rensmith – Windsor Solutions, Inc. Whad’ya Node?

1 Designing a Data Exchange - Best Practices Data Exchange Scenarios –Sender vs. Receiver-initiated exchanges –Node Design Best Practices: –Handling Large.

Introduction to the Exchange Network January 9 th, 2012.

The Chesapeake Bay Program’s Scenario Builder Gary Shenk CCMP workshop 5/11/2010.

1 The Exchange Network: A Tool for Better Environmental Management Doreen Sterling, Director Information Exchange & Services Division Office of Environmental.

1 Environmental Information Exchange Network - Principles and Components Molly O’Neill, State Director, Network Steering Board Pat Garvey, EPA Director,

Environmental & Health Data Integration for Homeland Security Support Exchange Network Users Meeting Hilton San Francisco Hotel, Continental Ballroom April.

State of Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality Network 101 Nodes – Not as Nasty as Polyps.

National Environmental Information Exchange Network Potential for Regional LAEs By: Dave Tetta and Andrew Battin US EPA.

Registry Services Bringing Value to US EPA, States, and Tribes Exchange Network Vendors Meeting April 24, 2007 Cynthia Dickinson EPA/OEI/OIC Data Standards.

Going from Node to Flow Presented by Guy Outred. Introducing… Sponsored by Mentoring States and ECOS Based on input from States of varying geography,

Martin Hurd Tetra Tech, Inc. May 11, Why an Exchange Network? Many environmental problems cross jurisdictions and involve a web of natural systems.

Introduction to the Exchange Network May 30th, 2012.

Challenge Grant Update: Linking the Network of Natural Heritage Biodiversity Data to the Environmental Information Exchange Network.

Water Quality Exchange (WQX) Pilot and its Potential Role in NWIS/STORET Coordination October 18, 2005.

Reducing Nutrient Loads from the Opequon Creek Watershed Project Team Meeting Oct 19, 2007 Chesapeake Bay Targeted Watersheds Grant Program.

EPA’s Water Quality Exchange (WQX) National Water Quality Monitoring Conference San Jose, California Kristen Gunthardt, US EPA Curtis Cude, OR DEQ.

National Information Exchange Model (NIEM) Executive Introduction November 29, 2006 Thomas O’Reilly NIEM Program Management Office.

Bay Guidance Programs. The Bay Program partnership includes: 19 federal agencies Nearly 40 state agencies and programs in DE, MD, NY, PA, VA,

Guidance on Section 106 Grants to Indian Tribes Lena Ferris, US EPA Office of Wastewater Management November 2007.

1 The National Environmental Information Exchange Network Lessons Learned in Data Exchange Mitch West, Executive Coordinator Portland, Oregon January 22,

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Central Data Exchange Pilot Project Promoting Geospatial Data Exchange Between EPA and State Partners. April 25, 2007.

1 Exchange Network – Why Should I participate??? Whad’ya Node? Exchange Network Node Mentoring Workshop Presented by Molly O’Neill New Orleans, Louisiana.

Flowing Data from Texas to EPA: The WQX Experience Nancy Ragland Texas Commission on Environmental Quality STORET Conference November 28, 2007.

Electronic Reporting: ICIS Data Publishing Presented by: Alison Kittle, U.S. EPA Elisa Willard, Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment Roy.

Paso del Norte Watershed Council Activities August 2004 Postponement of planned demonstration of Coordinated Database/GIS for Congressionals on September.

Update on GIT Funding FY 14, FY 15 and Beyond Greg Allen EPA CBPO September 30, 2015.

NGA Center for Best Practices January 10, 2001 Charleston, South Carolina National Environmental Information Exchange Network Kim Nelson Pennsylvania Department.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Ensuring Full Access to Federal Cost Shared Conservation Practices W. Dean Hively, Ph.D. U.S. Geological.

EPA’s Water Quality Exchange (WQX) Annual Exchange Network Users’ Meeting April 18-19, 2006.

1 Future of the Exchange Network Whad’ya Node? Exchange Network Node Mentoring Workshop Presented by Molly O’Neill New Orleans, Louisiana February 28-March.

6/13/2016 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1 Starting a Facilities Flow Lee David

1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.

Business & Tourism Partnership Training Session Inari THE LOCAL FEDERATION OF EAST LAPLAND.

Introduction to the Exchange Network May 30th, 2012.

* Background Image Courtesy of Kansas State Alumni Association *

CBP Strategic Communications Plan

Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Citizens Advisory Committee

Chesapeake Bay Program

Federal Facilities and the District’s Phase III WIP

Ken Grimm National Environmental Partnership Summit May 10, 2006

Exchange Network Past, Present, and Future

Executive Order No. 23 Update Air & Waste Management Association Conference November 16, 2018 Presentation will focus on the latest policy development.

* Background Image Courtesy of Kansas State Alumni Association *

Challenge Grant Update

Citizen Advisory Committee November 30, 2018

Presentation transcript:

XML Regional Data Exchange for Best Management Practices for the Chesapeake Bay States Utilizing the National Environmental Information Exchange Network Brian Burch, EPA Data Center Manager U.S. EPA, Chesapeake Bay Program Office

Topics Introduction to the National Environmental Information Exchange Network (NEIEN) Introduction to the National Environmental Information Exchange Network (NEIEN) NEIEN Grant Program NEIEN Grant Program BMP Challenge Grant BMP Challenge Grant Existing and Planned BMP Data Flows Existing and Planned BMP Data Flows Governance Governance BMP Schema BMP Schema Benefits & Challenges Benefits & Challenges Contact Information Contact Information

November 1 st 11am-3pm CBPO Fish Shack Joint meeting of the BMP and Technical Working Groups

About NEIEN Nat’l Environmental Info. Exchange Network Nat’l Environmental Info. Exchange Network Partnership among EPA and States Partnership among EPA and States Efficient, secure exchanges over the Internet Efficient, secure exchanges over the Internet Nodes: Nodes: 1 node per state (MDE, PADEP, VADEQ) 1 node per state (MDE, PADEP, VADEQ) EPA’s node – CDX EPA’s node – CDX Chesapeake Node, EPA, Annapolis, MD Chesapeake Node, EPA, Annapolis, MD

NEIEN Grants NEIEN Grant Program NEIEN Grant Program 2002 Readiness: MD, PA, VA $338, Readiness: MD, PA, VA $338, Readiness: MD $297,700; PA, VA $178, Readiness: MD $297,700; PA, VA $178, Implementation: MD $300,000; VA $275, Implementation: MD $300,000; VA $275, Challenge: PA $395, Challenge: PA $395, Challenge: MD $750, Challenge: MD $750,000

About the Challenge Grant 2004 award to Pennsylvania DEP 2004 award to Pennsylvania DEP Exchange of non-point source BMP data Exchange of non-point source BMP data Funded agencies: Funded agencies: Pennsylvania DEP (lead) Pennsylvania DEP (lead) Maryland: MDE, MDDNR, MDA Maryland: MDE, MDDNR, MDA Virginia: VADEQ, VADCR Virginia: VADEQ, VADCR Cooperators: CBP, NRCS Cooperators: CBP, NRCS Total EPA funding: $395,424 Total EPA funding: $395,424

Why BMP’s? As-is Data Flow Data Call Disparate sources (as many as 14) PA Data Call MD VA Regular Update CBP Disparate Formats To WSM Annual Delivery

Activities  Governance structure  Document “As-Is” BPA & data flow  Establish the “Chesapeake Node” at CBPO, Annapolis, MD  Develop Taxonomy  Develop Schema  Map to Schema  Exchange

Governance Structure Project Management Team Nancie Imler, Chair Chairs of BMP & Technical Groups CBPO Staff BMP Workgroup Nancie Imler, Chair State & Federal BMP Experts CBPO Staff Technical Workgroup Jen Gumert, Chair State & CBP Node Experts CBPO Staff

Planned Exchange MD Node Chesapeake Node CBPO, Annapolis CDX No planned exchange with CDX No EPA enterprise system for BMP PA Node VA Node Inbound Schema & Services Outbound Schema & Services Retrieve BMPs By Geographies

About the Exchange/Schema Exchange Exchange Quarterly, machine-to-machine Quarterly, machine-to-machine Transactional Transactional Trusted through authentication Trusted through authentication Raw BMP data Raw BMP data Schema: Schema: Generic & flexible, handle any BMP codes/types Generic & flexible, handle any BMP codes/types Applicable nationally Applicable nationally Leverage existing NEIEN components Leverage existing NEIEN components

Schema Components

Mapping to the Schema Status Status Virginia Virginia Final mapping by October 2006 Final mapping by October 2006 Exchanges anticipated in October 2006 Exchanges anticipated in October 2006 Maryland Maryland In process of mapping In process of mapping Exchanges anticipated early 2007 Exchanges anticipated early 2007 Pennsylvania Pennsylvania In process of developing enterprise system In process of developing enterprise system Exchanges anticipated 2007 Exchanges anticipated 2007

“To-be” Data Flow PA MD VA Regular Update CBP To WSM Sources feed Enterprise database Inbound Schema & Services Regular Update Outbound Schema & Services To EN Delivery On-Demand From State EN Nodes PA Node MD Node VA Node Chesapeake Node ODS

Benefits Timeliness – Data on-demand Timeliness – Data on-demand Quality Quality Synchronization Synchronization Automation processes, remove manual data handling Automation processes, remove manual data handling Spatially explicit Spatially explicit Cost savings Cost savings State staff savings State staff savings CBP staff savings – automated delivery CBP staff savings – automated delivery

Challenges Complex flow Complex flow Dozens of partners Dozens of partners Disparate data Disparate data Sensitive data Sensitive data Data standards – NRCS/State Data standards – NRCS/State State agency coordination State agency coordination Node Agency vs. Data Agency Node Agency vs. Data Agency Reengineering of source systems Reengineering of source systems

Contact Information Nancie Imler Chief Information Officer Pennsylvania DEP

November 1 st 11am-3pm CBPO Fish Shack Joint meeting of the BMP and Technical Working Groups

Questions?