MICE Beam Line Design Oct 24 th 2005 Dean Adams, Kevin Tilley Based on TURTLE element definitions by K Walaron, T Roberts and K Tilley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
Advertisements

1 Simulation Status/Plans Malcolm Ellis Sci Fi Tracker Meeting Imperial College, 10 th September 2004.
FIGURE OF MERIT FOR MUON IONIZATION COOLING Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 28 July 2004.
FODO-based Quadrupole Cooling Channel M. Berz, D. Errede, C. Johnstone, K. Makino, Dave Neuffer, Andy Van Ginneken.
Paul drumm, mutac jan MICE Beamline Optics Design Kevin Tilley, RAL, 12th June MICE Needs Generic Solution Pion Injection & Decay Section (a) Inputs.
Emittance–momentum matrix1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, MICE Video Conference, 21 January Initial 4D.
SLIDE Beam measurements using the MICE TOF counters Analysis meeting, 23 September 2008 Mark Rayner.
Slide 1 MICE Beamline Design and Commissioning Review 16 th Nov 2007 Simulation comparison / tools / issues Henry Nebrensky Brunel University There are.
TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. September 22, 2004.
Analysis Meeting – – Slide 1 Beam momentum measurement using TOFs: progress report Analysis Meeting, February 2008 Mark Rayner.
1 Downstream scraping and detector sizes Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting CERN.
1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.
1 G4MICE studies of PID transverse acceptance MICE video conference Rikard Sandström.
M.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)1 Single Particle Amplitude M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
Beam line summary paul drumm for beam line group.
K.Walaron Fermilab, Batavia, Chicago 12/6/ Simulation and performance of beamline K.Walaron T.J. Roberts.
Beam line characterization with the TOFs1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, CM26 California, 24 March Initial.
Diffuser in G4MICE Victoria Blackmore 09/03/10 Analysis Meeting 1/8.
1 OPTICS OF STAGE III Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 6 October 2004.
1 Losses in the Cooling Channel Malcolm Ellis PID Meeting 1 st March 2005.
Simulated real beam into simulated MICE1 Mark Rayner CM26.
Beamline-to-MICE Matching Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 2 August 2004 MICE performance with ideal Gaussian beam JUNE04 beam from ISIS beamline (Kevin.
Beam line review group aims for review paul drumm.
Solenoid Magnetic Field Measurement. MICE solenoid includes 5 coils First solenoid expected at FNAL for magnetic field measurements in April Measurements.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
1 MICE Beamline Design: General principles & expected capabilities Kevin Tilley, 16 th November Charge to beamline & desirable beam General principles.
M.apollonio/j.cobbMICE UK meeting- RAL - (9/1/2007) 1 Single Particle Amplitude M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
1 Simulations of MICE March 2005 BENE Week Rikard Sandström Geneva University.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.
(+) session, PAC09 Vancouver – TH6PFP056 Introduction The Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment (MICE, fig. 1c) at RAL[1]
1 Beamline DayTimePresenterTopic Thurs9:00C.BoothMICE Target Wed16:00K.TilleyRecent Beamline Design Work Wed16:30T.RobertsMICE Beamline Performance + Emittance.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
Beam line commissioning Preparations for Phase1 Kevin Tilley For Paul Drumm & the beam line group.
PSI July 2002MuEGamma Review Meeting1 Beam Line Status update 1.  E5 Test Beam Overview : Aims + RequirementsAims + Requirements Zone Layout + Measurement.
MICE PID size &scraping MICE CM16, RAL, Oct V. Palladino, Univ & INFN Napoli for R. Sandrstrom and others contributing to this effort Yagmur, Holger,
Paul drumm, mutac jan Precursor: - Resources since cm16. Beamline Review Response. Optics related work: the major threads: -Current (ε,p) status.
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
Marco apollonio/J.CobbMICE coll. meeting 16- RAL - (10/10/2006) 1 Transmittance, scraping and maximum radii for MICE STEPVI M. Apollonio – University of.
M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Thursday 28th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Timing measurements at the MICE experiment – 1 The analysis of timing measurements at the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Mark Rayner The University.
26 Oct 2010PC Physics Requirements of Software from Chris R ~19 Oct. My.
ILC EXTRACTION LINE TRACKING Y. Nosochkov, E. Marin September 10, 2013.
14/01/2008MICE CM23 - Beam Line Parallel Session1 Simulations: tools and status Marco Apollonio, Imperial College - London.
1June 2 nd 2009MICE CM24 - RAL1 m. apollonio Beamline+( ,P) matrix.
1 Updated Run Plans. K.Tilley, MICO, 07/02/08 - pre-commissioning - Target, - beamline functionality - detectors, particle production - decay solenoid.
Mark Rayner – Analysis SessionCM25, 4 November Beam characterization by the TOFs Mark Rayner The University of Oxford MICE CM25.
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Wednesday 27th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.
A.Saini, K.Ranjan, N.Solyak, S.Mishra, V.Yakovlev on the behalf of our team Feb. 8, 2011 Study of failure effects of elements in beam transport line &
1 Error study of non-scaling FFAG 10 to 20 GeV muon ring Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 26 July, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Monte Carlo simulation of the particle identification (PID) system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Mice is mainly an accelerator physics.
Paul drumm, mutac jan Status of Muon Beamline design work Kevin Tilley, RAL, 9th Feb Including Beamline Materials in new revision Reference ('True')
1June 1 st 2009MICE CM24 - RAL1 Beamline Optics m. apollonio.
MEASUREMENT OF EMITTANCE AND OTHER OPTICS QUANTITIES V. Blackmore 01/19.
Muons, Inc. Feb Yonehara-AAC AAC Meeting Design of the MANX experiment Katsuya Yonehara Fermilab APC February 4, 2009.
1 1 Optics related work: the major threads: -Current (ε,p) status - G4BL/TTL Simulation comparisons - Beam steering/correction -Collimation d/stream &
Marco apollonioAnalysis Meeting (9/12/2006)1 transmission vs amplitude with a finite size diffuser M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
MICE Step IV Lattice Design Based on Genetic Algorithm Optimizations
C. Rogers, ASTeC Intense Beams Group Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
MICE Beamline Status m. apollonio 17 December 2009 MICE VC
Parametric Resonance Ionization Cooling of Muons
TOF Software and Analysis Tools
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
Design of the MANX experiment
How to turn on MICE Step IV
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Details of K1.8BR Beam line
The Detector System of the MICE Experiment
Presentation transcript:

MICE Beam Line Design Oct 24 th 2005 Dean Adams, Kevin Tilley Based on TURTLE element definitions by K Walaron, T Roberts and K Tilley

Beam Requirements into Mice Spectrometer P (MeV/c)  ε RMS  mmrad ● To match into spectrometer α=0,  =2p/qB ( α,  are optical twiss parameters) ● Hence for case in study. Line delivers : x RMS = y RMS = 3.25 cm x’ RMS = y’ RMS = 97.6 mmrad ● RMS Acceptance of Mice Experiment  ε = 10  mm rad. dp/p=10%. Hence x,y < 4.2 cm x’,y’ < 125 mmrad. Case under Study

Mice Beam line Piece of Beam line under Review

Muon Beam Line Optic. TOF separation 6.11 m Sigma envelopes Final Distributions Collimator Quad app cm. Collimator Happ 8 cm All Muon Beam p Dp/p=10% Beam collimation for TOFs TOF,CK1 Rates < 3.2 MHz

TOF0 distributions Un-collimated, Rate ~2.6 MHz 8 cm collimation Rate ~2.1MHz

TOF0 distributions Un-collimated, Rate ~2.6 MHz 8 cm collimation Rate ~ 2.1MHz x rms = 3.5 cm y rms =5.6 cm

CK1 Distributions, Rate ~ 2.1 MHz (All Beam) x rms = 3.9 cm y rms = 5.3 cm

TOF1 Distributions, Rate ~ 1.21 MHz (All Beam) x rms = 3.75 cm y rms = 3.43 cm

Upstream of lead scatterer, Rate ~ 1.21 MHz (All Beam) Achieved :x rms = 4.47 cm y rms = 3.25 cm x’ rms =30 mrad y’ rms = 48 mrad  ε x rms ~ 2.5  mm rad,  ε y rms ~ 2.8  mm rad Need 6.0  mmrad, increase angular divergence using lead scatterer.

Downsteam of 7.6 mm lead scatterer, (dp/p=10%+Acceptance Cut, Rate drop 1.21 to 0.67 MHz) Wanted :x RMS = 3.25 cm y RMS = 3.25 cm x’ RMS =97.6 mmrad y’ RMS = 97.6 mmrad Achieved :x RMS = 3.48 cm y RMS = 2.85 cm x’ RMS =90.7 mmrad y’ RMS = 101 mmrad  ε xrms ~ 5.97  mm rad,  ε yrms ~ 5.45  mm rad

SEPT04 version, Downsteam of 7.6 mm lead scatterer. No Detector Scatter (dp/p=10%, Rate = 0.61 MHz) Wanted :x RMS = 3.25 cm y RMS = 3.25 cm x’ RMS =97.6 mmrad y’ RMS = 97.6 mmrad Achieved :x RMS = 4.31 cm y RMS = 4.82 cm x’ RMS =90.4 mmrad y’ RMS = 84.5 mmrad

Whats next ? Run this lattice through G4beamline to check lattice design tools. –Done. Reasonable Match into Mice Spectrometer, Turtle Beam smaller emittance (TJR,CR) –Differences due to G4beamline modelling of quad apps, fringe field effects and multi particle scattering. –Turtle/G4 Rates at TOF0 2.1, 2.5 MHz and at TOF1 1.2, 1.2 MHz, x2 good muons wrt Sept04 (TJR/CR) –Hence TURTLE good for prototyping designs. Have G4Beamline extrapolate to p=140,240 MeV/c cases and determine effects of detector scattering. – Done in Turtle (KT) Small effect Check the beam sizes at detectors are acceptable. Re-tune lattice to meet x,y rms half widths of 3.25 cm. If above OK, study the remaining parameter space (p,ε) with this lattice.