CS301 Discussion Topic

Asmt. 1: Hacking to improve security A Dutch hacker, who said he worked in computer security, sent to Microsoft warning that some of its Web sites were vulnerable to break-ins. Microsoft did not reply until after he broke in to one of the Web sites about a week later and left a taunting message as proof. Was his action ethical? Did he do Microsoft and the public a favor? What might be some reasons why Microsoft did not respond to his ?

Postitions Group 1: Argue in support of the hacker. Group 2: Argue against the hacker

(Hacker Advocate) for the pro hacker position revealed a security hole in MS's websites proved the security hole's existence without "damage" compelled Microsoft to "act" potentially saved MS and others from suffering from more severe attacks

(MS Representative) for the anti-hacker position encourages others to hack there is damage caused by showing that it can be done, it encourages others to do the same forces MS and others to redivert resources to prevent further potential damage this may cause delays with services, release dates, increased costs, etc.