Fire Emissions and The Cyclical Relationships of Climate Change, Forest Biomass, Fire Emissions and Atmospheric Aerosol Loadings U. Shankar 1, A. Xiu 1,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some recent studies using Models-3 Ian Rodgers Presentation to APRIL meeting London 4 th March 2003.
Advertisements

Causes and Consequences of Climate Change: Wildfire Emissions and Their Air Quality Impacts in the Southeastern U.S. U. Shankar 1, J. Prestemon 2, A. Xiu.
Forest Growth and Fire Fuel Predictions for Air Quality Modeling Limei Ran, Uma Shankar, Aijun Xiu, B.H. Baek, Zac Adelman Institute for the Environment,
Multi-scale and Ensemble Modeling of the Effects of Global Change on Air Quality in the US NW –AIRQUEST Annual Meeting Washington State University Pullman,
Fire Modeling issues: fire effects on regional air quality under a changing climate Douglas G. Fox
U. Shankar 1, D. McKenzie 2, J. Bowden 1 and L. Ran 1 Assessing the Impacts on Smoke, Fire and Air Quality Due to Changes in Climate, Fuel Loads, and Wildfire.
Incorporation of the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (MADRID) into CMAQ Yang Zhang, Betty K. Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan,
BlueSky-EM, SMOKE and Data Linkages Andy Holland Carolina Environmental Program Symposium on Climate, Forest Growth, Fire and Air Quality Interactions.
Climate, Fire and Air Quality Climate Impacts Group June 1, 2006.
Environmental Modeling Center ______________________________________________ Climate Change and Air Quality Workshop MCNC On the intercontinental transport.
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
Forest Growth Model and Data Linkage Issues Limei Ran Carolina Environmental Program UNC Steve McNulty Jennifer Moore Myers Southern Global Change Program,
Air Quality-Climate Interactions Aijun Xiu Carolina Environmental Program.
REFERENCES Maria Val Martin 1 C. L. Heald 1, J.-F. Lamarque 2, S. Tilmes 2 and L. Emmons 2 1 Colorado State University 2 NCAR.
CLARIS WP4.3 : Continental-scale air Pollution in South America.
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Workshop USEPA/OAQPS.
BlueSky Implementation in CANSAC Julide Kahyaoglu-Koracin Desert Research Institute - CEFA CANSAC Workshop Riverside, CA May 2006 Julide Kahyaoglu-Koracin.
Integration of CMAQ into the Western Macedonia environmental management system A. Sfetsos 1,2, J. Bartzis 2 1 Environmental Research Laboratory, NCSR Demokritos.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Carolina Environmental Programs Emissions and meteorological Aspects of the 2001 ICAP Simulation Adel Hanna,
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
Emission processing methodology for the new GEM-MACH model ABSTRACT SMOKE has recently been adapted to provide emissions for the new Meteorological Service.
Beta Testing of the SCICHEM-2012 Reactive Plume Model James T. Kelly and Kirk R. Baker Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards US Environmental Protection.
©2005,2006 Carolina Environmental Program Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions SMOKE Modeling System Zac Adelman and Andy Holland Carolina Environmental.
Xuexi Tie Xu Tang,Fuhai Geng, and Chunsheng Zhao Shanghai Meteorological Bureau Atmospheric Chemistry Division/NCAR Peking University Understand.
A Modeling Investigation of the Climate Effects of Air Pollutants Aijun Xiu 1, Rohit Mathur 2, Adel Hanna 1, Uma Shankar 1, Frank Binkowski 1, Carlie Coats.
Modelling the Canadian Arctic and Northern Air Quality using GEM-MACH Wanmin Gong and Stephen Beagley Science and Technology Branch Environment Canada.
Prediction of Future North American Air Quality Gabriele Pfister, Stacy Walters, Mary Barth, Jean-Francois Lamarque, John Wong Atmospheric Chemistry Division,
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
Center for Environmental Modeling for Policy Development University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Center for Community Modeling and Analysis System.
WRAP Fire Emissions Meeting 5 December 2002 Community Smoke Emissions Model WRAP Fire Emissions Forum Meeting December 2002 Douglas Fox Cooperative Institute.
A Grand Plan for FIA’s role in a FS National Carbon Accounting System Linda S. Heath USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, FIA Forest Carbon Accounting.
Investigation of the U.S. warming hole and other adventures in chemistry-climate interactions Loretta J. Mickley Pattanun Achakulwisut, Becky Alexander,
Preliminary Study: Direct and Emission-Induced Effects of Global Climate Change on Regional Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter K. Manomaiphiboon 1 *, A.
Future climate change drives increases in forest fires and summertime Organic Carbon Aerosol concentrations in the Western U.S. Dominick Spracklen, Jennifer.
Development and Preliminary Results of Image Processing Tools for Meteorology and Air Quality Modeling Limei Ran Center for Environmental Modeling for.
Integrated Modeling of the Interactions Between Climate Change, Forest Biomass, Wildfire Emissions and Air Quality U. Shankar 1, A. Xiu 1, and D. Fox 2,
Research Progress Discussions of Coordinated Emissions Research Suggestions to Guide this Initiative Focus on research emission inventories Do not interfere.
Wildland Fire Impacts on Surface Ozone Concentrations Literature Review of the Science State-of-Art Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. Rocky Mountain Center USDA FS Rocky.
Chemistry-climate working group Co-chairs: Hong Liao, Shiliang Wu The 7th International GEOS-Chem Meeting (IGC7)
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Simulation of London air quality during June 2006 and the effects of emission control scenarios Andrea Fraser NCAS funded.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
William G. Benjey* Physical Scientist NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC Fifth Annual CMAS.
Pollutant Emissions from Large Wildfires in the Western United States Shawn P. Urbanski, Matt C. Reeves, W. M. Hao US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research.
ESTIMATION OF SOLAR RADIATIVE IMPACT DUE TO BIOMASS BURNING OVER THE AFRICAN CONTINENT Y. Govaerts (1), G. Myhre (2), J. M. Haywood (3), T. K. Berntsen.
1 Aika Yano, Yongtao Hu, M. Talat Odman, Armistead Russell Georgia Institute of Technology October 15, th annual CMAS conference.
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
Extending Size-Dependent Composition to the Modal Approach: A Case Study with Sea Salt Aerosol Uma Shankar and Rohit Mathur The University of North Carolina.
Impact of the changes of prescribed fire emissions on regional air quality from 2002 to 2050 in the southeastern United States Tao Zeng 1,3, Yuhang Wang.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Carolina Environmental Programs Community Modeling and Analysis System (CMAS) Year 3 Adel Hanna Director, CMAS.
Center for Community Modeling and Analysis System (CMAS) Adel Hanna Director, CMAS October 1, th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC.
Denver 2004 TGP1 PM2.5 Emissions Inventory Workshop Denver, CO March 2004 Thompson G. Pace USEPA Emissions Estimation for Wildland Fires.
Regional Chemical Modeling in Support of ICARTT Topics:  How good were the regional forecasts?  What are we learning about the emissions?  What are.
CHARGE QUESTIONS: ENDPOINTS  anthropogenic emissions   air pollution   climate OK, but can we be more specific?  Intercontinental transport of.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
Wildfire activity as been increasing over the past decades Cites such as Salt Lake City are surrounded by regions at a high risk for increased wildfire.
Breakout Session 1 Air Quality Jack Fishman, Randy Kawa August 18.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Implementation of an Online Photolysis Module in CMAQ 4.7 Christopher G. Nolte.
Fire and Air Quality Interactions Symposium on Climate, Forest Growth, Fire and Air Quality Interactions Overview of Project and Personnel Uma Shankar.
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
Research Progress Discussions of Coordinated Emissions Research Suggestions to Guide this Initiative Focus on research emission inventories Do not interfere.
Mayurakshi Dutta Department of Atmospheric Sciences March 20, 2003
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory WRF-CMAQ 2-way Coupled System: Part II Jonathan.
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.
Impact on Recent North American Air Quality Forecasts of Replacing a Retrospective U.S. Emissions Inventory with a Projected Inventory Michael Moran1,
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.
Joanna Struzewska Warsaw University of Technology
Current Research on 3-D Air Quality Modeling: wildfire!
Presentation transcript:

Fire Emissions and The Cyclical Relationships of Climate Change, Forest Biomass, Fire Emissions and Atmospheric Aerosol Loadings U. Shankar 1, A. Xiu 1, D. Fox 2, S. McNulty 3, J. Moore Meyers 3, L. Ran 1, and A. Holland 1 3 rd International Fire Ecology & Management Congress November 14, Carolina Environmental Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2 Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Ft. Collins, CO Atmosphere, Ft. Collins, CO 3 USDA Forest Service, Southern Global Change Program Program

Research Program Goals  Project funding: EPA STAR Grant RD  Aim is to support the EPA Global Change Research Program goals by  Examining consequences of climate change for wild fire occurrence and consequently for U.S. air quality  Combining the effects of climate change with forest growth to examine impacts on fire frequency and intensity  Investigating methods to credibly project changes in biogenic emissions from due to fires

Acknowledgments  Participation and Outreach: USDA Forest Service  D. McKenzie, Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Lab, future fires  J. Prestemon and E. Mercer, Southern Research Station, human-induced fire ignition  S. McNulty and J. Moore Myers, Southern Global Change Program, forest growth modeling

Project Personnel  Uma Shankar (PI): Aerosol modeling and analysis  Aijun Xiu (co-PI): Meteorology, chemistry-climate coupling  Doug Fox (co-PI): Fire modeling  Andy Holland: Fire model data linkages, emissions processing  Limei Ran: Forest growth model and data linkages  Frank Binkowski: Radiative transfer modeling, analysis  Sarav Arunachalam: Air quality data analysis, website mgmt

Air Quality and Climate Impacts of Fires  Impacts of wild fires felt at the regional and global scale  > 8M acres burned last year  Black carbon => positive forcing on climate; SO 2 emissions => negative forcing on climate from secondarily produced SO 4  Dioxins and GHGs also associated with fire plumes (Gullett and Tuotti, AE 37, 2003; Simmonds et al., AE 39, 2005)  Effect of radiatively important pollutants on short-term climate variability affects forest growth, and thus the biogenic emissions as well as fuel available for potential fires COO3O3 Carbonaceous Aerosol Model predictions of the effects of Canadian boreal fires on aerosols and ozone, July 1995

Modeling Issues  Feedback of short-term climate variability to forest growth is not represented in most models  Most regional air quality models do not include feedback of scattering and absorbing aerosols or ozone to atmospheric dynamics  Understanding these feedbacks and effect on short-term climate variability is essential to fully assess impacts of managed vs. uncontrolled fires on forest land and the net benefits of fire management plans

Objectives  To examine impacts of climate change and variability on:  forest growth -> fuel loads -> fire frequency, fire emissions  feedbacks to forest biomass and biogenic emissions  To investigate the changes in air quality due to evolution of emissions in response to fires in successive years under various fire scenarios  To study the feedbacks of these air quality changes to climate variability  In the process, to build a modeling system that can be further refined for similar assessments

Modeling System PnET CCSM METCHEM (MM5-MCPL / MAQSIP) BlueSky-EM- SMOKE- BEIS3 Monthly met. Base & future year fuel data Fire Simulator Hourly met Fire activity data Modified biogenic land use data Anthropogenic inventoried emissions Gridded & Speciated Emissions Initial & boundary met.

Forest Growth Model  Used by the US Forest Service’s Southern Global Change Program to model 11 states in the Southeast  Modeling period for this application:  University of NH model coupled to forestry economics model (SRTS) to create PEcon  Ecological process model of forest productivity, species composition, and hydrology (PnET II); predictions of forest biomass scaled up from the FIA plot to the county level  Removal due to disturbances including climate change impacts, ozone levels, fire, pests, etc.  Being adapted to track dead wood biomass for future year fuel loads  Developing linkages to fire simulator and biogenic land cover

ClimateSpatial FIA FIA Plot PnET-CN  Volume 1  Volume 2  Volume 3 Inventory and Harvest SRTS Update Acres Calculate Acres Harvested Allocate Harvest Calculate Growth Update Inventory Update Equilibrium Flow Chart of PEcon

Fire/Smoke Emissions Modeling  BlueSky-EM, a smoke emissions model linked to the Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions Model (SMOKE) for processing and merging with emissions from other sources (industry, transport, biogenic, sea salt, etc.)  Directly linked to the FCCS fuel database  ConUS fire emissions data at 36-km resolution, nesting down to 12-km res domain over the Southeast  Future-year fire modeling expertise from USDA FS consultants  Adapt Fire Scenario Builder developed by Pacific Wildland Fire Lab  Modify fire ignition mechanism to use a probabilistic model developed by Southern Research Station, USFS for arson

Ignition Avail Fire Scenario Builder – model Flammability Fire frequency & fuel maps Management RxFire/suppression MM5 (mesoscale model) Atmospheric Instability - CAPE Map Types -500mb -700mb Fire Generator Fire Starts Fire Sizes Equations predict fuel moisture in fuel size classes that carry fire. NFDRS Human ignitions (East)

McKenzie et al. (2006) Ecol. Modell. FSB output for the Pacific Northwest 12-km MM5 domain

Air Quality and Climate Feedback Modeling  Coupled meteorology-chemistry model developed by CEP under a previous EPA grant  Prior application results (1995, eastern U.S.) at  Ongoing applications, eval (U.S. and South Asia)  Recently added sea salt emissions algorithm, chemical reactions with anthropogenic aerosols  Fast optics code to improve performance and prediction of aerosol optical depths  Nested simulations at 36-km and 12-km resolutions to evaluate the whole system against forest, fire and AQ observations over the Southeast for 2002  Future forest and fire simulations to 2050; AQ modeling for selected periods in 2015, 2030 and 2050

Coupled Meteorology-Chemistry Model (METCHEM) H & V Transport, Cloud Physics & Chemistry, Gas/Particulate Chemistry, PM Microphysics (Modal), D ry & Wet Removal (MAQSIP CTM) Met. Couple (MCPL) Meteorology (MM5) Emissions Processing (SMOKE) Aerosol Direct Radiative Feedback

MM5 Modeling Domains  Purpose of ConUS simulation is mainly to provide adequate chemical boundary conditions for the inner domain  MM5 grid is a few grid cells larger on all sides than respective AQ grid

Next Steps  Complete ConUS BlueSky-EM runs (36-km)  ConUS METCHEM simulations for 2002  Extract boundary condition inputs for SE  12-km simulations with PEcon linked in  Examine model performance in base year  Proceed to “snap shot” simulations with full system in 2015, 2030 and 2050 to analyze effects of key climate parameters  Archive results on project website: