TEMPO – Project Update Joseph Black — Rail Operations Manager February 12, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
John Barton, P.E. Assistant Executive Director for Engineering Operations Texas Department of Transportation Mid-States Highway-Rail Safety Conference.
Advertisements

Southwest Rail Conference Joseph Black – Rail Director February 25, 2013.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Beltway CTB Briefing
Northwest Rail Update Nadine Lee, Northwest Rail Project Manager Regional Transportation District March 21, 2012.
Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.
City of Schertz Presentation Joe Black – Lone Star Rail District Joe Lessard – Knudson, LP December 9, 2014.
OHIO & LAKE ERIE REGIONAL RAIL CLEVELAND HUB STUDY Ohio Rail Development Commission TMACOG Annual Transportation Summit September 29, 2003.
OCBC Infrastructure Committee April 8, 2014 LOSSAN Rail Corridor Update Jennifer Bergener – Managing Director, LOSSAN JPA.
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
City of Schertz Presentation Joe Black – Lone Star Rail District November 25, 2014.
Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner.
Passenger Rail Development Activities AASHTO Annual Meeting October 18, 2013 Serge Phillips, MnDOT Federal Relations Manager.
2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Final Approval GVMC Board May 7, 2015.
Federal Transit Administration New Starts Project Development Process
Oceanside-Escondido Rail Line Final Project Presentation John R. VelascoMay 12 th, 2003.
California Passenger Rail Summit April 29, 2015 LOSSAN Pacific Surfliner Rail Service Update.
Randy Wade TRB Intercity Passenger Rail Committee Tuesday January 25, 2011 Washington, DC.
Anaheim – Los Angeles Project EIR/EIS California High-Speed Rail Authority HIGH-SPEED TRAINS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Orange County Business Council- Infrastructure.
Public Transit in Sacramento
1 Welcome! West Valley-Taylorsville Transit Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement Public Open House/Hearing July 19, 2006.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Northern Lights Express High Speed Rail: MN APA Conference September 2011.
“High Speed Rail Implementation - An Update on Passenger Rail Planning Activities in Minnesota.” presented by: Minnesota Department of Transportation March.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INTERMODAL DIVISION - TRANSIT Presented to G.A. MPO CONFERENCE November 2012.
Trains are better for our environment than other modes of travel.
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
Staying Positive: Responding to Transit Critics Eron H. Linn Federal Relations Manager Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) 1.
Intercity Rail Background/ Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Update Met Council TAC Meeting November 5, 2008.
Passenger Rail Planning Activities in Minnesota presented by: Minnesota Department of Transportation March 15, 2011.
1 Presented to: Clean Air Trough Energy Efficiency CATEE Conference San Antonio December 18, 2013.
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3 rd Track Project Sacramento Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1 HDR Office Tuesday, May 20, :00 - 9:00.
National Multimodal Freight Trends/Issues/Forecasts/ Policy Implications.
September 19 & 20, 2007 Items 4.11a,b, & c Tabs 15, 16, & 17 Proposition 1B Intercity Rail Bond Program.
Transportation Program Status Orange County Transportation OCBC Infrastructure Committee Meeting April 14, 2009 Kia Mortazavi, OCTA, Executive Director,
1 Governance Council Meeting Fiscal Year 2004 LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY GATEWAY CITIES SERVICE SECTOR December 18, 2003.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Public-Private Partnership Program 2015 Update 2015 American Council of Engineering Companies ACEC – Los Angeles Chapter Luncheon, July 8, 2015.
NCTPA ACCOMPLISHMENTS. NCTPA Overall Work Program (OWP) Serves as a reference to be used by citizens, planners, and elected officials throughout the year.
California High-Speed Train Project California High-Speed Rail Metro Bus Operations Subcommittee January 2010.
Early Implementation of Coalition Initiatives ARK-LA-TEX Rail Summit May 9, Transportation Department North Central Texas.
NEW STRATEGY FOR TRANSPORT GOVERNANCE IN MONTREAL March EMTA Meeting, Madrid.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 22: Transit System Governance and Management.
All within 5 square miles and at the doorstep of ARTIC Study Area Approximately 73,000 employees Home for 25,000 residents Approximately 20 million visitors.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
Creating the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Today’s Presentation Now Developing the Next RTP  Very Early Stages of Development  Website: 2040Plan.org.
Implementing Quality and Efficiency in Transit Planning Mike Summerlin Former Chairperson Raleigh Transit Authority.
AT THE CROSSROADS Building for the Next Generation Council of State Governments May 30, 2008 Lexington, Kentucky.
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
Tom Norton, Executive Director Colorado Department of Transportation American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials September 9, 2003.
Oklahoma City to South Texas Passenger Rail Corridor SCORT Presentation March 2010.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 17 Transportation Planning Overview.
Impact of the California High Speed Rail System Lee Ann Eager, Chief Operating Officer Economic Development Corporation serving Fresno County.
Overview Presentation Fall 2015 Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Study.
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
Metropolitan Council 1 Twin Cities Region Transportation Policy Plan Nacho Diaz Metropolitan Council Evaluating Economic and Community Impacts of Transit.
City of Joliet - Sustainability City of Joliet Sustainability Initiatives American Planning Association National Conference April 16, 2013.
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal Adopted May 24, 2001.
Multi Agency Exchange May 16, 2017.
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
Los Angeles – San Diego – San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Update
Regional Roads Committee
Lorain County Transit Needs Assessment
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
I-85 Corridor Light Rail Transit Feasibility Study
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Presentation transcript:

TEMPO – Project Update Joseph Black — Rail Operations Manager February 12, 2011

1 Overview of intercity regional passenger rail project Project history Near Term Rail District objectives Amtrak Agenda

2 What Is the Lone Star Rail District? Independent agency established by its partnering members to solely focus on planning, building, and operating the LSTAR intercity regional passenger rail service. Members include cities, counties, and transportation agencies in the five-county corridor region. Accountable to citizens through the local jurisdictions that appoint the 20 members of the Board. 2

3 Lone Star Rail District — Members and Service Area Cities: Georgetown, Austin, San Marcos, New Braunfels, Schertz, San Antonio Counties: Williamson, Travis, Hays, Bexar Transit agencies: Capital Metro, CARTS, VIA, ART MPOs: CAMPO, SA-BCMPO Board also includes:  Austin and San Antonio business community representatives  General public members appointed by Texas Transportation Commission 3

4 City of Austin  Sheryl Cole – Elected Official  Sid Covington* – Business Representative City of San Antonio  John Clamp – Elected Official  Carroll Schubert* – Business Representative Travis County  Karen Huber – Travis County  Debbie Ingalsbe – CARTS Bexar County  Tommy Adkisson* – Bexar County  Gloria Arriaga – ART Transportation Commission  Tullos Wells* – General Public, SA  Mariano Camarillo* – General Public, Austin Hays County  Will Conley Williamson County  Dan A. Gattis City of Georgetown  Patty Eason City of New Braunfels  Mike Ybarra City of San Marcos  Kim Porterfield City of Schertz  Hal Baldwin Capital Metro (Austin)  John Langmore VIA Metropolitan Transit (SA)  Mary Briseño San Antonio-Bexar Co. MPO  Jeff Wentworth* Capital Area MPO (CAMPO)  TBD * Initial members Board of Directors – 20 Members appointed by 15 Entities

5 What is the LSTAR? 5

6 Basic Facts about the LSTAR Proposed Service 117 miles of passenger rail from Georgetown to south San Antonio. Up to 16 stations at full service, linking communities and destinations all along the corridor. 15 to 20 trains a day at full service, seven days a week, in each direction, including midday and evening service. Express service of 75 minutes or less at full service between downtown San Antonio and downtown Austin. Primarily routed in existing rail right-of- way upon relocation of Union Pacific’s through freight operations to urban bypass line. 6

7 Provide Predictable, Reliable Travel Choice Improve Mobility Throughout Corridor Improve Safety Throughout Corridor Maintain Air Quality Status Create Seamless Multi-Modal Transportation System Create Economic Development Opportunities Why Are We Doing This?

8 Forecast Through 2030: Personal income: cumulative increase of $20.4 billion State tax revenues: increase of $1.02 billion Regional and local tax revenues: increase of $1.31 billion City/County/Ad Valorem tax revenues: increase of $578 million Local and school district property tax revenues: increase of $915 million Sales tax revenues: increase of $415 million Station area property values: increase between $445 million to over $4.4 billion Billions of dollars of savings by decreasing travel times, congestion costs, fuel costs, highway maintenance costs, and accident costs. * Sources:2004 Austin-San Antonio Commuter Rail Project Feasibility Report Update (Texas Perspectives) 2006 Economic Impact Analysis (Carter Burgess & Capitol Market Research) Financial and Economic Benefits of LSTAR *

9 Raised $7.7 million in federal funding, $8.7 million state appropriation, $182 million in Texas Rail Relocation Fund*, and secured $20 million SA-BC MPO and $10 million CAMPO funds Completed feasibility, ridership, preliminary revenue/cost studies, and financial benefits/economic impact studies Evaluated and rejected FTA New Starts process Developed local funding concepts Conducted public meetings Conducted jurisdictional meetings Initiated branding program for Rail District Signed Union Pacific Memorandum of Understanding in late 2010 * Not yet certified by State Comptroller What’s Happened So Far?

10 What’s Happening Now? Working on environmental & engineering on passenger route Station location studies Updating financing plan Updating ridership studies (in cooperation with State Rail Plan for I-35 corridor) Beginning urban bypass rail studies with Union Pacific Initiating local funding discussions for annual Operations & Maintenance (O&M) costs 10

11 What Happens Next? Engineering and environmental studies are expected to take 2+ years After federal approval, move to final design and construction Freight rail relocation studies, financing plan, passenger rail environmental and engineering studies going on concurrently Solicit interest from potential private sector partners Federal funding requests (e.g. HSIPR, RRIF, appropriations, reauthorization) Establish local funding mechanisms by end of 2011 ‒ Partner to evaluate funding approaches ‒ Establish interlocal agreements with LSRD 11

12 Primary benefit comes from increased reliability, achieved though these methods:  Dispatching  Track configuration improvements  Signal system improvements  Systems maintenance focus Secondary benefit comes from coordination:  Ticketing / Fares  Schedules  Transfers What Does LSTAR Mean for Amtrak?

13 Lone Star Rail District’s Pledge to the Region LSTAR will give Central and South Texans independence from congested highways: by providing a reliable, predictable and safe regional transportation alternative that allows people to improve their lives and expand their horizons. We will also deliver benefits to those Central and South Texans who choose not to ride the LSTAR with: Improved safety, mobility, and environmental quality Positive economic impact at the local and regional level New opportunities for community vitality, prosperity, and quality of life 13

Thank you for your support!