SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/021 Numerical Modeling Using Finite Difference Techniques.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Earthquakes.
Advertisements

1992 M=7.3 Landers shock increases stress at Big Bear Los Angeles Big Bear Landers First 3 hr of Landers aftershocks plotted from Stein (2003)
Financial Losses from Quakes Are also quite disruptive in the modern world.
16/9/2011UCERF3 / EQ Simulators Workshop RSQSim Jim Dieterich Keith Richards-Dinger UC Riverside Funding: USGS NEHRP SCEC.
10/09/2007CIG/SPICE/IRIS/USAF1 Broadband Ground Motion Simulations for a Mw 7.8 Southern San Andreas Earthquake: ShakeOut Robert W. Graves (URS Corporation)
Ground motion simulations and site effect estimation for Istanbul, Turkey Mathilde Bøttger Sørensen 1, Nelson Pulido 2, Sylvette Bonnefoy-Claudet 3, Kuvvet.
1 High Performance Computing at SCEC Scott Callaghan Southern California Earthquake Center University of Southern California.
Stress, Strain, Elasticity and Faulting Lecture 11/23/2009 GE694 Earth Systems Seminar.
Geol 600 Notable Historical Earthquakes Finite fault rupture propagation rohan.sdsu.edu/~kbolsen/geol600_nhe_source_inversion.ppt.
Earthquake interaction The domino effect Stress transfer and the Coulomb Failure Function Aftershocks Dynamic triggering Volcano-seismic coupling.
March 7, 2008NGA-East 2nd Workshop1 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN STRONG MOTION SIMULATIONS FOR CEUS Paul Somerville and Robert Graves URS Pasadena MOTIVATION:
SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/ Izmit Earthquake August 17, 3:02am, 1999 Mw 7.4 Mw earthquake: >18,000 fatalities >300,000 homeless.
California Earthquakes. Sylmar Earthquake About: When: 6:00 A.M. February 9, 1971 Where: San Fernando Valley What: Ruptured segment of the San Fernando.
Static stress changes-- Coulomb. Key concepts: Source faults Receiver faults Optimally oriented faults Assume receiver faults are close to failure Triggering.
Stress III The domino effect Stress transfer and the Coulomb Failure Function Aftershocks Dynamic triggering Volcano-seismic coupling.
11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop1 NUMERICAL GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS: ASSUMPTIONS, VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION Earthquake Source Velocity Structure.
Tsunami Great Sumatra Earthquake Tsunami Death Toll ~ 250,000 Tsunami Death Toll ~ 250,000.
Aftershocks tend to fall preferentially in area of static Coulomb stress increase but there are also earthquakes in area of decrease Coulomb stress Aftershocks.
Earthquake potential of the San Andreas and North Anatolian Fault Zones: A comparative look M. B. Sørensen Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen,
NA-Pa Plate Boundary Wilson [1960] USGS Prof. Paper 1515.
San Andreas Big Bend A geometric feature Restraining the relative plate motion Nature’s solution Impacts include:  patterns of faults, seismicity  Rupture.
Turkey Earthquake Risk Model Financing the Risks of Natural Disasters World Bank Washington, DC, June 2-3, 2003 Dennis E. Kuzak Senior Vice President,
S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER Southern California: A Natural Laboratory for Earthquake Science SCEC annual meeting, 2000.
Paleoseismic and Geologic Data for Earthquake Simulations Lisa B. Grant and Miryha M. Gould.
The Evolution of Regional Seismicity Between Large Earthquakes David D. Bowman California State University, Fullerton Geoffrey C. P. King Institut de Physique.
LECTURE 4: EARTHQUAKE FOCAL MECHANISMS
Lisa Wald USGS Pasadena U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquakes 101 (EQ101)
Exploring Planet Earth Blind Thrust Fault Earthquake Rupture Animation (Northridge, 1994) Brad Aagaard, USGS
IMPLEMENTATION OF SCEC RESEARCH IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING ONGOING PROJECTS SCEC PROPOSAL TO NSF SCEC 2004 RFP.
Izmet, Turkey Earthquake By Molly Sumpter. Outline ► tectonic setting of Turkey, North Anatolian Fault ► August 17, 1999 event ► outcomes, what was learned.
California Earthquakes Through an historical perspective.
Earthquake Science (Seismology). Seismometers and seismic networks Seismometers and seismic networks Earthquake aftershocks Earthquake aftershocks Earthquake.
The kinematic representation of seismic source. The double-couple solution double-couple solution in an infinite, homogeneous isotropic medium. Radiation.
A functional form for the spatial distribution of aftershocks Karen Felzer USGS Pasadena.
Response of the San Jacinto fault zone to static stress changes from the 1992 Landers earthquake M. Nic Bhloscaidh and J. McCloskey School of Environmental.
Zadonina E.O. (1), Caldeira B. (1,2), Bezzeghoud M. (1,2), Borges J.F. (1,2) (1) Centro de Geofísica de Évora (2) Departamento de Física, Universidade.
Mantle plumes and hotspots Not all volcanic activity can be related to present day active plate margins. The Pacific Ocean shows a number.
On Parallel Time Domain Finite Difference Computation of the Elastic Wave Equation and Perfectly Matched Layers (PML) Absorbing Boundary Conditions (With.
Mid-Term Review Meeting, February 13-14, Tutzing Seismic wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex media: a European network Local scale.
Schuyler Ozbick. wake-up-call /
Earthquake Dynamics and Inversion for source characteristics Raul Madariaga Sergio Ruiz and Maria Lancieri Laboratoire de Géologie CNRS ENS Paris, France.
Karen Felzer & Emily Brodsky Testing Stress Shadows.
Coulomb Stress Changes and the Triggering of Earthquakes
Important topics related to earthquake hazard Calling for Bi-lateral collaboration.
California Geologic Regions and Hazards Presentation DAY 2.
Location and map of region Tectonic activities Mechanism of earthquake Damage Risks.
Bolu A zone with seismic risk. Geological risk in Bolu ● There are about inhabitants in Bolu. ● On August 17 th 1999 an earthquake in Turkey killed.
Correlating aftershock sequences properties to earthquake physics J. Woessner S.Wiemer, S.Toda.
06/22/041 Data-Gathering Systems IRIS Stanford/ USGS UNAVCO JPL/UCSD Data Management Organizations PI’s, Groups, Centers, etc. Publications, Presentations,
Section 6.1 Objectives 1. Discuss the elastic rebound theory.
Can we forecast an Earthquake??? In the next minute there will be an earthquake somewhere in the world! This sentence is correct (we have seen that there.
Earthquakes 101 (EQ101) Lisa Wald USGS Earthquake Hazards Program
LESSONS FROM PAST NOTABLE EARTHQUAKES PART V Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Geology 5640/6640 Introduction to Seismology 09 Jan 2015 © A.R. Lowry 2015 Read for Mon 12 Jan: S&W 1-28 Last time: Course overview Discussed: syllabus,
EARTH’S INTERIOR.
II. Earthquakes Small magnitude earthquakes are much more common than larger magnitude earthquakes.
Future Directions and Capabilities of Simulators Jim Dieterich
Introduction to Seismology
Kinematic Modeling of the Denali Earthquake
學生:林承恩(Cheng-en Lin) 指導老師:陳卉瑄(Kate Huihsuan Chen)
Southern California Earthquake Center
LA Basin Story Tectonics Geology Faults Velocity Structure Seismicity
From Parsons et al (2001).
Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra
Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra
V. Fault Mechanisms and Earthquake Generation
EARTH’S INTERIOR.
Frequency, regularity and predictability of earthquake hazard events
EARTH’S INTERIOR.
Presentation transcript:

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/021 Numerical Modeling Using Finite Difference Techniques

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/022 Modeling of Wave Propagation and Ground Motion

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/023 M Landers M Northridge

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/024 When: 28 June 1992 Where: Mojave Desert Damage: $56 million Deaths: 1 Injured: > Landers

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/ Northridge When: 17 Jan 1994 Where: San Fernando Valley Damage: $20 billion Deaths: 57 Injured: >9000

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/026 Objective: Mitigate loss of life and property in future large events

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/027 Subsurface Model

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/028 M7.5 San Andreas from south-east Fault-parallel

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/029 M7.5 San Andreas from north-west Fault-parallel

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0210 3D/1D peak velocity ratios

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0211 Validation: 1994 Northridge

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0212

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0213

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0214

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0215

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0216 Wavefield Separation

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0218

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0219

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0220

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0221

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0222

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0223

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0224

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0225

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0226

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0227

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0228

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0229

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0230

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0231

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0232

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0233

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0234

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0235

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0236

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0237

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0238

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0239

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0240

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0241

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0242

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0243

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0244

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0245

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0246

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0247

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0248

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0249

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0250

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0251

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0252

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0253

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0254

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0255

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0256

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0257

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0258

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0259

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0260

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0261

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0262

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0263

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0264

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0265

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0266

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0267 Modeling of Earthquake Rupture Dynamics

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0268 Dynamic Rupture From Trial-and-Error Finite-Difference Modeling

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0269 Inverted (Trial-and- Error) Dynamic Radiation Versus Data

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0270 Modeling of Stress Transfer/Triggering

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0271 Static Coulomb Failure Stresses  f among others, Das & Scholz, 1981 Harris et al., 1991 Stein, 1999

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0272 However:  f does not explain all observations e.g., 1943 North Anatolian Fault event More aftershocks in direction of rupture propagation (for example, 1992 Landers) Sometimes aftershocks in the stress shadow

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0273 Dynamic Coulomb Failure Stresses  f (t) Kilb et al., 2002 Kilb, 2003

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0277 Illustration of  f (t) North Anatolian Fault 1944 Event

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0278 Components of  f (t)  s (t)  n (t)  f (t) peak[  f (t)]

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0279 Effect of Rupture Direction Toward the West Bi-lateral Toward the East peak[  f (t)]  f (t)

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0280 Effect of Rupture Velocity Sub-shear Super-shear  f (t)peak  f (t)]

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0281 North-Anatolian Fault, Turkey

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0282 West-ward propagating series of events on the North Anatolian Fault

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0283 North Anatolian Fault Sequence km N

SCEC Annual Meeting - ITR 09/17/0284 Seismic Exploration