Energy Reconstruction Algorithms for the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope J.D. Zornoza 1, A. Romeyer 2, R. Bruijn 3 on Behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trigger issues for KM3NeT the large scale underwater neutrino telescope the project objectives design aspects from the KM3NeT TDR trigger issues outlook.
Advertisements

14.5m 100 m ~480 m Junction Box ~70 m String-based detector; Downward-looking (45°) PMTs; 2475 m deep; 12 detection lines 25 storeys / line 3 PMTs / storey.
Sean Grullon For the IceCube Collaboration Searching for High Energy Diffuse Astrophysical Neutrinos with IceCube TeV Particle Astrophysics 2009 Stanford.
ANTARES aims, status and prospects Susan Cartwright University of Sheffield.
M. Kowalski Search for Neutrino-Induced Cascades in AMANDA II Marek Kowalski DESY-Zeuthen Workshop on Ultra High Energy Neutrino Telescopes Chiba,
WATER PROPERTIES ON TRACKS RECONSTRUCTION AND DETECTOR PERFORMANCE H Yepes -Ramirez IFIC (CSIC – Universitat de València) ANTARES Collaboration Meeting.
MACRO Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish 5 May 00 1.Neutrino oscillations 2.WIMPs 3.Astrophysical point sources.
The ANTARES Neutrino Telescope Mieke Bouwhuis 27/03/2006.
A feasibility study for the detection of SuperNova explosions with an Undersea Neutrino Telescope A. Leisos, A. G. Tsirigotis, S. E. Tzamarias Physics.
The ANTARES experiment is currently the largest underwater neutrino telescope and is taking high quality data since Sea water is used as the detection.
Search for point sources of cosmic neutrinos with ANTARES J. P. Gómez-González IFIC (CSIC-Universitat de València) The ANTARES.
Ersilio Castorina - Exotic Phys. with nu Telescopes, Uppsala Sept Exotic Physics searches in ANTARES Ersilio Castorina Pisa University and INFN.
Hanoi, Aug. 6-12, 2006 Pascal Vernin 1 Antares Status report P.Vernin CEA Saclay, Dapnia On behalf of the Antares collaboration P.Vernin
Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.
EHE Search for EHE neutrinos with the IceCube detector Aya Ishihara for the IceCube collaboration Chiba University.
Simona Toscano IFIC (Instituto de Física Corpuscular) CSIC-Universitat de València, Spain on behalf of the ANTARES collaboration on behalf of the ANTARES.
Petten 29/10/99 ANTARES an underwater neutrino observatory Contents: – Introduction – Neutrino Astronomy and Physics the cosmic ray spectrum sources of.
Antoine Kouchner Université Paris 7 Laboratoire APC - CEA/Saclay for the ANTARES collaboration Neutrino Astronomy: a new look at the Galaxy Astronomy Neutrino.
CEA DSM Irfu The ANTARES Neutrino Telescope A status report Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration 44 th Rencontres de Moriond February.
Piera Sapienza – VLVNT Workshop, 5-8 october 2003, Amsterdam Introduction and framework Simulation of atmospheric  (HEMAS and MUSIC) Response of a km.
V.Bertin CPPM / ANTARES Coll. - Moriond ANTARES : A deep-sea 0.1 km² neutrino telescope Vincent Bertin - CPPM-Marseille on behalf of the Antares.
Susan Cartwright IDM2000 ANTARES : vStatus u site evaluation u demonstrator u detector design vProspects u physics aims u neutralino detection status and.
4. Einstein Angle and Magnification The angular deflection for a relativistic neutrino with mass m ʋ that passes by a compact lens of mass M with impact.
Astrophysics working group - CERN March, 2004 Point source searches, Aart Heijboer 1 Point Source Searches with ANTARES Outline: reconstruction news event.
Antares Neutrino Telescope Jean-Pierre Ernenwein Université de Haute Alsace (On behalf of the ANTARES collaboration) Rencontres de Moriond, 13/03/2005.
Agustín Sánchez-Losa IFIC (CSIC-Universitat de València) Transient sources, like AGNs or Gamma Ray Bursters, are among.
Neutrino Diffuse Fluxes in KM3NeT Rezo Shanidze, Thomas Seitz ECAP, University of Erlangen (for the KM3NeT consortium) 15 October 2009 Athens, Greece.
SEARCHING FOR A DIFFUSE FLUX OF ULTRA HIGH-ENERGY EXTRATERRESTRIAL NEUTRINOS WITH ICECUBE Henrik Johansson, for the IceCube collaboration LLWI H.
Ronald Bruijn – 10 th APP Symposium Antares results and status Ronald Bruijn.
Point Source Search with 2007 & 2008 data Claudio Bogazzi AWG videconference 03 / 09 / 2010.
The ANTARES neutrino telescope is located on the bottom of the Mediterranean Sea, 40 km off the French coast. The detector is installed at a depth of 2.5.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
Data collected during the year 2006 by the first 9 strings of IceCube can be used to measure the energy spectrum of the atmospheric muon neutrino flux.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
CEA DSM Irfu Reconstruction and analysis of ANTARES 5 line data Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration XX th Rencontres de Blois 21 / 05.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
The ANTARES detector: background sources and effects on detector performance S. Escoffier CNRS Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille on behalf.
KM3NeT – ORCA Measuring Neutrino Oscillations and the Neutrino Mass Hierarchy in the Mediterranean Sea J. Brunner CPPM.
R. Coniglione, VLVnT08, Toulon April ‘08 KM3NeT: optimization studies for a cubic kilometer neutrino detector R. Coniglione P. Sapienza Istituto.
June 6, 2006 CALOR 2006 E. Hays University of Chicago / Argonne National Lab VERITAS Imaging Calorimetry at Very High Energies.
High-energy gammas from the giant flare of SGR of December 2004 in AMANDA Juande D. Zornoza on behalf of the IceCube.
Astroparticle physics with large neutrino detectors  Existing detectors  Physics motivation  Antares project  KM3NeT proposal M. de Jong.
Indirect detection of Dark Matter with the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope Miguel Ardid on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration Rome – September 2015.
Longitude Latitude A recent analysis of the Fermi-LAT data by M. Su et al. [1] revealed two large spherical structures centered by our Galactic Center.
Status report on the Antares project Luciano Moscoso (DSM/DAPNIA, CEA/Saclay F Gif-sur-Yvette) (On behalf of the ANTARES collaboration)
Sebastian Kuch, Rezo Shanidze Preliminary Studies of the KM3NeT Physics Sensitivity KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting Pylos, Greece, April 2007.
Comparison of different km3 designs using Antares tools Three kinds of detector geometry Incoming muons within TeV energy range Detector efficiency.
Search for diffuse cosmic neutrino fluxes with the ANTARES detector Vladimir Kulikovskiy The ANTARES Collaboration 3-9 August 2014ANTARES diffuse flux.
Measuring Oscillation Parameters Four different Hadron Production models  Four predicted Far  CC spectrum.
A. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Reconstruction, Background Rejection Tools.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
Point-like source searches with ANTARES RICAP Conference Rome, June 2007 Juan de Dios Zornoza (IFIC - Valencia)
Roma International Conference on Astroparticle Physics Rome, May 2013 Juan de Dios Zornoza (IFIC – Valencia) in collaboration with G. Lambard (IFIC) on.
Italy Pizza, Mozzarella di Buffala Switzerland Roesti, Cheese Fondue
Imaging the Neutrino Universe with AMANDA and IceCube
DM searches with the ANTARES neutrino telescope
Sebastian Kuch University Erlangen-Nürnberg
The Antares Neutrino Telescope
Performance of the AMANDA-II Detector
M.Bou-Cabo, J.A. Martínez.-Mora on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration
Optimization studies of a tower based km3 detector
FLUCTUATIONS OF MUON ENERGY LOSSES
Topological Study of Downgoing Muon Events for the
Search for point-like source in ANTARES
Karen Andeena, Katherine Rawlinsb, Chihwa Song*a
on behalf of the NEMO Collaboration
MC studies of the KM3NeT physics performance Rezo Shanidze
Claudio Bogazzi * - NIKHEF Amsterdam ICRC 2011 – Beijing 13/08/2011
Unfolding performance Data - Monte Carlo comparison
ICRC2011, 32ND INTERNATIONAL COSMIC RAY CONFERENCE, BEIJING 2011
Presentation transcript:

Energy Reconstruction Algorithms for the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope J.D. Zornoza 1, A. Romeyer 2, R. Bruijn 3 on Behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration 1 IFIC (CSIC-Universitat de València), Spain 2 CEA/SPP Saclay, France 3 NIKHEF, The Netherlands International Workshop on UHE Neutrino Telescopes Chiba July 28-29, 2003

Juan-de-Dios Zornoza - IFIC Introduction Neutrinos could be a powerful tool to study very far or dense regions of the Universe, since they are stable and neutral. The aim of the ANTARES experiment is to detect high energy neutrinos coming from astrophysical sources (supernova remnants, active galactic nuclei, gamma ray bursts or micro-quasars). At lower energies, searches for dark matter (WIMPs) and studies on the oscillation parameters can be also carried out. The background due to atmospheric neutrinos is irreducible. However, at high energies, this background is low, so energy reconstruction can be used to discriminate it.

Juan-de-Dios Zornoza - IFIC ANTARES Layout 12 lines 25 storeys / line 3 PMT / storey ~60-75 m 350 m 100 m 14.5 m Junction box Readout cables 40 km to shore

Juan-de-Dios Zornoza - IFIC Energy loss The muon energy reconstruction is based on the fact that the higher its energy, the higher the energy loss along its track. The muon energy reconstruction is based on the fact that the higher its energy, the higher the energy loss along its track. There are two kinds of processes: There are two kinds of processes: –Continuous: ionization –Stochastic: Pair production, bremstrahlung, photonuclear interactions Above the critical energy (600 GeV in water) stochastic losses dominate. Above the critical energy (600 GeV in water) stochastic losses dominate. Energy loss vs. muon energy:

Juan-de-Dios Zornoza - IFIC Time distribution There is also an effect of the energy on the arrival time distribution of the photons. There is also an effect of the energy on the arrival time distribution of the photons. The higher the energy, the more important the contribution to the time distribution tail. The higher the energy, the more important the contribution to the time distribution tail. The ratio of the tail hits over the peak hits gives information about the muon energy. The ratio of the tail hits over the peak hits gives information about the muon energy. Photon arrival time distributions

Juan-de-Dios Zornoza - IFIC Reconstruction algorithms Three algorithms have been developed to reconstruct the muon energy: Three algorithms have been developed to reconstruct the muon energy: –MIM comparison method –Estimation based on dE/dx –Neural networks

Juan-de-Dios Zornoza - IFIC MIM Comparison method 1. An estimator is defined, based on a comparison between the light produced by the muon and the light it would have produced if it was a Minimum Ionizing Muon: 1. An estimator is defined, based on a comparison between the light produced by the muon and the light it would have produced if it was a Minimum Ionizing Muon: 2. A large MC sample is generated to calculate the dependence between the muon energy and the estimator. 2. A large MC sample is generated to calculate the dependence between the muon energy and the estimator. log x = p 0 + p 1 logE  + p 2 (logE  ) 2 4. This parameterization is used to estimate the energy of a new MC sample. 4. This parameterization is used to estimate the energy of a new MC sample. 3. This dependence is parameterized by the fit to a parabola: 3. This dependence is parameterized by the fit to a parabola:

Juan-de-Dios Zornoza - IFIC Reconstructed energy Two energy regimes have been defined, in order to optimize the dynamic range of the method. In the calculation of the estimator, we only take the hits which fulfill: Two energy regimes have been defined, in order to optimize the dynamic range of the method. In the calculation of the estimator, we only take the hits which fulfill: –Low energy estimator: 0.1 < A hit /A MIP < 100 –High energy estimator: 10 < A hit /A MIP < 1000 There is a good correlation between the reconstructed and the generated energy. There is a good correlation between the reconstructed and the generated energy. The resolution is constrained by the stochastic nature of the energy loss process. The resolution is constrained by the stochastic nature of the energy loss process. E rec vs E gen Estimator distributions

Juan-de-Dios Zornoza - IFIC MIM Results vs. muon generated energy: vs. muon reconstructed energy: Each x-slice of the log 10 (E rec /E gen ) distribution is fitted to a Gaussian. Each x-slice of the log 10 (E rec /E gen ) distribution is fitted to a Gaussian. The mean of the distribution is close to zero. The mean of the distribution is close to zero. The resolution at high energies is a factor 2-3. The resolution at high energies is a factor 2-3.

Juan-de-Dios Zornoza - IFIC Estimation based on dE/dx An new estimator is defined as follows: An new estimator is defined as follows: L μ = muon path length in the sensitive volume  A = ∑A=total hit amplitude R = detector response R(r, θ, φ) is the ratio of light seen by the overall detector, i.e. a kind of detector efficiency to a given track. It is independent of the reconstruction, but a function of: R(r, θ, φ) is the ratio of light seen by the overall detector, i.e. a kind of detector efficiency to a given track. It is independent of the reconstruction, but a function of: track parameters (x, y, z, θ, φ) track parameters (x, y, z, θ, φ) light attenuation and diffusion ( att ~ 55 m) light attenuation and diffusion ( att ~ 55 m) PMT angular response PMT angular response This method also uses the dE/dx dependence on the muon energy. This method also uses the dE/dx dependence on the muon energy.

Juan-de-Dios Zornoza - IFIC Detector response and sensitive volume The detector response is defined as: The detector response is defined as: N PMT =number of PMTs in the detector  θj =PMT angular response r=distance to the PMT The sensitive volume is the volume where the muon Cherenkov light can be detected. The sensitive volume is the volume where the muon Cherenkov light can be detected. It is defined as the detection volume att in each direction It is defined as the detection volume att in each direction Detector volume N N N N µ

Juan-de-Dios Zornoza - IFIC Results of the dE/dx method log 10 Egen (GeV) RMS with mean at zero Above 10 TeV, the energy resolution is a factor 2-3.

Juan-de-Dios Zornoza - IFIC Neural networks There are 11 inputs in this method: There are 11 inputs in this method: –Hit amplitude and time –Hit time residue distribution –Reconstructed track parameters Only events with energy above 1 TeV have been used to train the NN. Only events with energy above 1 TeV have been used to train the NN. After studying several topologies, the best performances were obtained by a two layer network with 20 units in each layer. After studying several topologies, the best performances were obtained by a two layer network with 20 units in each layer.

Juan-de-Dios Zornoza - IFIC Results of neural network method The energy resolution is a factor ~2 above 1 TeV. The energy resolution is a factor ~2 above 1 TeV. From 100 GeV to 1 TeV, the energy resolution is ~3. From 100 GeV to 1 TeV, the energy resolution is ~3. After fitting each x-slice of the log 10 E rec /E gen distribution to a Gaussian, we can plot the mean and the sigma: After fitting each x-slice of the log 10 E rec /E gen distribution to a Gaussian, we can plot the mean and the sigma:

Juan-de-Dios Zornoza - IFIC Spectrum reconstruction (I) Atmospheric neutrinosDiffuse flux in E -2 (Waxman & Bahcall) dE/dx energy reconstruction method Using the methods previously presented, muon spectra can be reconstructed. The aim is to compare the atmospheric and the signal spectra. Atmospheric muon background has been rejected in the selection process (quality cuts).

Juan-de-Dios Zornoza - IFIC Spectrum reconstruction (II) Another approach to reconstruct the spectra is to use a deconvolution algorithm. Another approach to reconstruct the spectra is to use a deconvolution algorithm. An iterative method 1 based on the Bayes’ theorem has been used. An iterative method 1 based on the Bayes’ theorem has been used. preliminary Reconstructed Spectrum P(X j |E i ) P o (E) P(E i |X j ) n(X j ) n(E i )P(E i ) Initial Hypothesis n o (E) Experimental Data Smearing Matrix (MC) Cause: E  log10 E μ Effect: X Effect: X  log 10 x low (MIM method) 1 G. D'Agostini NIM A362(1995)

Juan-de-Dios Zornoza - IFIC ANTARES Sensitivity The reconstructed energy can be used as a threshold to calculate the sensitivity of the experiment. The optimum value is the one for which we need the lowest number of signal events to exclude the background hypothesis at a given confidence level (i.e. 90%) The expected sensitivity is: - 7.7·10 -8 E -2 GeV -1 cm -2 s -1 sr -1 with Eµ > 50 TeV, after 1 year - 3.9·10 -8 E-2 GeV-1 cm -2 s -1 sr -1 with Eµ > 125 TeV, after 3 years These values are comparable with AMANDA II

Juan-de-Dios Zornoza - IFIC Conclusions Three methods have been developed to reconstruct the muon energy, based on the stochastic muon energy loss. Three methods have been developed to reconstruct the muon energy, based on the stochastic muon energy loss. The energy resolution is a factor 2-3 above 1 TeV. The energy resolution is a factor 2-3 above 1 TeV. The expected sensitivity after 1 year is ~8x10 -8 E -2 GeV -1 cm -2 s -1 sr -1 with E µ > 50 TeV. The expected sensitivity after 1 year is ~8x10 -8 E -2 GeV -1 cm -2 s -1 sr -1 with E µ > 50 TeV. This value will be similar to AMANDA II. This value will be similar to AMANDA II.