Individual Particle Reconstruction Norman Graf SLAC April 28, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Individual Particle Reconstruction CHEP07, Victoria, September 6, 2007 Norman Graf (SLAC) Steve Magill (ANL)
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements Sufficient data for Energy Flow algorithm development Provide data for calorimeter tracking algorithms  Help setting.
Particle Flow Template Modular Particle Flow for the ILC Purity/Efficiency-based PFA PFA Module Reconstruction Jet Reconstruction Stephen Magill Argonne.
Ties Behnke, Vasiliy Morgunov 1SLAC simulation workshop, May 2003 Pflow in SNARK: the next steps Ties Behnke, SLAC and DESY; Vassilly Morgunov, DESY and.
PFA on SiDaug05_np Lei Xia ANL-HEP. PFA outline Calibration of calorimeter –Done –Not tuned for clustering algorithm Clustering algorithm –Done: hit density.
 Track-First E-flow Algorithm  Analog vs. Digital Energy Resolution for Neutral Hadrons  Towards Track/Cal hit matching  Photon Finding  Plans E-flow.
 Performance Goals -> Motivation  Analog/Digital Comparisons  E-flow Algorithm Development  Readout R&D  Summary Optimization of the Hadron Calorimeter.
1 Forward Tracking Simulation Norman A. Graf ALCPG Cornell July 15, 2003.
LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera1 Jet/Calorimeter Cluster Energy Corrections – Status Goal: To improve the individual jet energy determination based.
PFA Development – Definitions and Preparation 0) Generate some events w/G4 in proper format 1)Check Sampling Fractions ECAL, HCAL separately How? Photons,
Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.
Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, Brian Musgrave, Norman Graf, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.
Scintillator (semi)DHCAL? Vishnu Zutshi for. Introduction Can a scintillator (semi)digital calorimeter work? Cell sizes are necessarily 6-12 cm 2 Can.
Track Extrapolation/Shower Reconstruction in a Digital HCAL – ANL Approach Steve Magill ANL 1 st step - Track extrapolation thru Cal – substitute for Cal.
Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.
Study of a Compensating Calorimeter for a e + e - Linear Collider at Very High Energy 30 Aprile 2007 Vito Di Benedetto.
Simulating the Silicon Detector August 16, 2005 Norman Graf SLAC.
Individual Particle Reconstruction: PFA Development in the US Norman Graf (for M. Charles, L. Xia, S. Magill) LCWS07 June 2, 2007.
Progress with the Development of Energy Flow Algorithms at Argonne José Repond for Steve Kuhlmann and Steve Magill Argonne National Laboratory Linear Collider.
ALCPG Simulation Status and Plans ECFA LC Workshop, Durham Sep. 2, 2004 Norman Graf (SLAC)
ALCPG Simulation Status and Plans ACFA LC Workshop, Taipei Nov. 10, 2004 Norman Graf (SLAC)
Studies of PFA Fundamentals Ron Cassell – SLAC SiD Workshop Jan. 28, 2008.
Simulation and Reconstruction: ALCPG Framework & Toolkit Norman Graf (for the ALCPG Simulation & Reconstruction Team) ILC-ECFA Meeting November 8, 2006.
Cluster Finding Comparisons Ron Cassell SLAC. Clustering Studies This report studies clustering in the EM calorimeter, using SLIC simulated ttbar events.
0 Status of Shower Parameterisation code in Athena Andrea Dell’Acqua CERN PH-SFT.
Non-prompt Track Reconstruction with Calorimeter Assisted Tracking Dmitry Onoprienko, Eckhard von Toerne Kansas State University, Bonn University Linear.
Summary of Simulation and Reconstruction Shaomin CHEN (Tsinghua University)  Framework and toolkit  Application in ILC detector design Jupiter/Satellites,
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
SiD performance for the DBD Jan Strube CERN. Overview Software Preparation (CERN, SLAC) Machine Environment (CERN, SLAC) Tracking Performance (C. Grefe)
PFA Template Concept Performance Mip Track and Interaction Point ID Cluster Pointing Algorithm Single Particle Tests of PFA Algorithms S. Magill ANL.
Development of a Particle Flow Algorithms (PFA) at Argonne Presented by Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
Two Density-based Clustering Algorithms L. Xia (ANL) V. Zutshi (NIU)
1 Calorimetry Simulations Norman A. Graf for the SLAC Group January 10, 2003.
PFA Jet Energy Measurements Lei Xia ANL-HEP. June 19, 2007 Lei Xia 2 ILC requires precise measurement for jet energy/di-jet mass At LEP, ALEPH got a jet.
T RACKING E FFICIENCY FOR & CALORIMETER S EED TRACKING FOR THE CLIC S I D Pooja Saxena, Ph.D. Student Center of Detector & Related Software Technology.
PFAs – A Critical Look Where Does (my) SiD PFA go Wrong? S. R. Magill ANL ALCPG 10/04/07.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
13 July 2005 ACFA8 Gamma Finding procedure for Realistic PFA T.Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.), M-C. Chang(Tohoku Univ.), K.Fujii(KEK), A.Miyamoto(KEK), S.Yamashita(ICEPP),
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
1 D.Chakraborty – VLCW'06 – 2006/07/21 PFA reconstruction with directed tree clustering Dhiman Chakraborty for the NICADD/NIU software group Vancouver.
Particle-flow Algorithms in America Dhiman Chakraborty N. I. Center for Accelerator & Detector Development for the International Conference.
Particle Flow Review Particle Flow for the ILC (Jet) Energy Resolution Goal PFA Confusion Contribution Detector Optimization with PFAs Future Developments.
Ties Behnke: Event Reconstruction 1Arlington LC workshop, Jan 9-11, 2003 Event Reconstruction Event Reconstruction in the BRAHMS simulation framework:
Individual Particle Reconstruction The PFA Approach to Detector Development for the ILC Steve Magill (ANL) Norman Graf, Ron Cassell (SLAC)
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
7/13/2005The 8th ACFA Daegu, Korea 1 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP), M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK), T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
12/20/2006ILC-Sousei Annual KEK1 Particle Flow Algorithm for Full Simulation Study ILC-Sousei Annual KEK Dec. 20 th -22 nd, 2006 Tamaki.
Status of SiD/Iowa PFA by Usha Mallik The University of Iowa for Ron Cassell, Mat Charles, TJ Kim, Christoph Pahl 1 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas,
VXDBasedReco TRACK RECONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE STUDIES Bruce Schumm University of California at Santa Cruz ALCPG Workshop, Snowmass Colorado August 14-28,
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
2005/07/12 (Tue)8th ACFA Full simulator study of muon detector and calorimeter 8th ACFA Workshop at Daegu, Korea 2005/07/12 (Tue) Hiroaki.
DESY1 Particle Flow Calorimetry At ILC Experiment DESY May 29 th -June 4 rd, 2007 Tamaki Yoshioka ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo Contents.
Optimizing SiD for the LOI: Simulation and Reconstruction Norman Graf (for the ALCPG Simulation & Reconstruction Team) October 9, 2007.
ECAL Interaction layer PFA Template Track/CalCluster Association Track extrapolation Mip finding Shower interaction point Shower cluster pointing Shower.
Intelligent Norman Graf, Steve Magill, Steve Kuhlmann, Ron Cassell, Tony Johnson, Jeremy McCormick SLAC & ANL CALOR ‘06 June 9, 2006 DesignDetector.
SiD Calorimeter R&D Collaboration
slicPandora: slic + pandoraPFANew
Simulation Framework Norman Graf SLAC June 10, 2005.
Individual Particle Reconstruction
EFA/DHCal development at NIU
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Simulating the Silicon Detector
Sampling Calorimeter Reconstruction Issues and Approaches: An Overview
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Argonne National Laboratory
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements
Presentation transcript:

Individual Particle Reconstruction Norman Graf SLAC April 28, 2005

2 Individual Particle Reconstruction The aim is to reconstruct individual particles in the detector with high efficiency and purity. Recognizing individual showers in the calorimeter is the key to achieving high di-jet mass resolution. High segmentation is favored over compensation. Loss of intrinsic calorimeter energy resolution is more than offset by the gain in measuring charged particle momenta.

3 Occupancy Event Display Seems not to be a problem, even in busy events. ttbar  six jets Display only cells with energy depositions from more than one MC Particle.

4 Clustering Two clustering algorithms available in current code release –“Nearest”-Neighbor, with user-defined domains available in longitudinal and two transverse dimensions.“Nearest”-Neighbor (1,0,0) is simplest MIP-cluster finder. –Fixed-Cone algorithm ( ,  )Fixed-Cone fast, seed-based, but iterative centering cluster splitting for overlapping cones. Cluster interface defined, so additional clustering algorithms are easily accommodated.Cluster

5 SimpleClusterBuilder A simple (1,1,1) Nearest-Neighbor clustering algorithm performs quite well in the silicon- tungsten detector.

6 Track Finding and Fitting Nick Sinev has released standalone pattern recognition code for the 2D Barrel VXD hits. –High efficiency, even in presence of backgrounds. –Efficient at low momentum. –Propagates tracks into Central Tracker to pick up  hits Conformal-mapping pattern recognition also available. Fast, but not yet tuned (97% vs 99+%). Work also ongoing to find MIP stubs in Cal and propagate inwards (Kansas State, Iowa).

7 Strategy I Begin by finding and fitting tracks. (Optionally) Cluster the calorimeter cells in EM, HAD & MUON independently using SimpleClusterBuilder. –EM  photons & electrons + muon MIPs + others –HAD  hadrons + muon MIPS –MUON  muon MIPS (+ punchthrough)

8 Strategy II Propagate tracks through the calorimeters and associate cells/clusters to the track if trajectory intersects calorimeter cell (or cell in cluster). –Tracks associated to EM cells/clusters and good match between cluster energy & track momentum become electron candidates. –Tracks associated with cells/clusters in EM, HAD and MUON become muon candidates. –Remainder become pion candidates. Remove cells/clusters from the event list.

9 Neutral Clusters EM Clusters unassociated with a track are photon candidates. –Calculate chi-squared for longitudinal shower shape. –Calculate shower width. –Clusters passing cuts become photon candidates. –Remove photon candidate clusters. Unassociated EM neutral clusters failing photon cut + HAD clusters are clustered using fixed cone algorithm. These become neutron (K 0 L ) candidates.

10 ReconstructedParticles These ReconstructedParticles (electron, photon, pion, muon, neutron) are added back to the event. Tracks and Clusters form ReconstructedParticles. Goal is 1:1 ReconstructedParticle  MCParticle

11 Z Pole Analysis Generate Z  qqbar events at 91GeV. Simple events, easy to analyze. Can easily sum up event energy in ZPole events. –Width of resulting distribution is direct measure of resolution, since events generated at 91GeV. Run jet-finder on RP four vectors, calculate dijet invariant mass. Can compare analysis results with SLC/LEP.

12 Z Pole Event

13 Reconstruction Example final public class ExampleReconstruction extends Driver { add( new SmearDriver() ); add( new VXDBasedReco() ); add( new SimpleClusterBuilder(1,1,1) ); add( new IndividualParticleReconstruction() ); add( new EMClusterAnalyzer(task, eMin, chisqMax) ); add( new NeutralHadronFinder(radius, seedNhitMin, nHitMin) ); add( new ReconstructedParticleEventAnalyzer() ); } fetch and return information from the event via the process( EventHeader event ) method.

14 IPR Analysis Status Simple example of individual particle reconstruction is available within hep.lcd framework, expect org.lcsim version soon. Few (if any) hardcoded values for either geometries, algorithms, or cuts. These are all determined from the event detector (geometry) or arguments to object constructors (algorithm and cut values). Many places along the analysis chain for improvement.

15 Data Samples Have generated canonical data samples and are processing them through full detector simulation. Variants include HCal sampling material &readout, field strength, adding tracker layers, changing EMCal radius,… single particles of various species Z Pole events WW, ZZ, ttbar, qqbar, tau pairs, mu pairs, Z , Zh

16 Detector Variants XML format allows variations in detector geometries to be easily set up and studied: –Stainless Steel vs. Tungsten HCal sampling material –RPC vs. Scintillator readout –Layering (radii, number, composition) –Readout segmentation –Tracking detector topologies “Wedding Cake” Nested Tracker vs. Barrel + Cap –Field strength

17 Hadronic Calorimeter W(SS)+RPC (Scint.) Sampling Barrel+Endcap Disks