Policy on Misconduct in Research. Why Do We Need It? Misconduct in research has significant impact on university reputation and credibility. It should.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.

Advertisements

UNLV FACULTY SENATE TENURE & PROMOTION FORUM Oct. 2, 2012 Oct. 2, 2012 Thanks to the Past Chairs: Dr. John Filler Dr. Ceci Maldonado Dr. Nasser Daneshvary.

TITLE SLIDE GOES HERE Optional subhead would go here Promotion and Tenure Policies and Procedures Workshop Susan S. Williams Vice Provost for Academic.

Academic Misconduct Panels Student Governance December 2013 AMP DEC13.

The Tri-council Framework On Responsible Conduct In Research A Panel Member And Researchers Perspective Marc F. Joanisse, Ph.D. U. Western Ontario Karen.

What’s coming down the road? (or: “You’ll never know what hit you”)

Faculty Grievance Committee Training October 26, 2012.

Sexual Harassment University of Louisiana at Monroe.

EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCE POLICY SUMMARY FACTS Goals of the Employee Grievance Policy: Provide procedural consistency across the agencies and universities of.

AGENDA  Introduction & General Overview  Types of Audits  Types of Investigations  Audits  Investigations  Closing Remarks.

PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,

Personnel Policies Workshop Best Practices for Personnel Committees.

Administrative Procedures for Allegations of Research Misconduct Executive Summary (see WSU Policy 2101 for Details)

Michael Scian, MBA, JD Assistant Director of Compliance University of Florida.

The Adjudication Process Virginia Department of Health Professions New Board Member Training October 2008.

Anti-Discrimination & Harassment Policy

FLW EO Office 1 COMPLAINT PROCEDURES. FLW EO Office 2 Overview  Describe the Army’s EO Complaint Process  Define the types of Complaints  Describe.

Promotion and Tenure Planning Workshop Spring 2013 Susan S. Williams Vice Provost for Academic Policy and Faculty Resources.

Research Integrity & Misconduct

2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.

WU Research Integrity Policy 2010 Revision Presentation for the Committee on Research Integrity for the School of Medicine December 1, 2010 Attachment.

FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND PERFORMANCE REVIEWS CHM Chair Collaboration Meeting January 7, 2004 Presented by: Terry Curry, Professor and Director.

School of Nursing Student Grade Appeal Procedure Prepared by cgalang Revised fkhoiny 4/2011.

Review of Appendix 16 FA Purpose –Review Appendix 16 for compliance with the Collective Bargaining Agreement Changes –Compliance –Removing.

Columbia University Institutional Policy on Research Misconduct Naomi J. Schrag, J.D. Director of Research Compliance & Training Office of the Executive.

FACULTY PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT: Key Issues and Challenges Penn State “Academic Leadership Forum” February 12, 2015 Presented by: Theodore H.

Scientific Misconduct. Scientific Misconduct Definition "Misconduct in Research" means fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, or other practices that.

MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY

FHSAA Eligibility and Compliance Allegations And Investigations Florida High School Athletic Association.

Wetlands Reserve Program Case Study An Overview of the External Audit Process Helping People Help The Land.

Promotion Expectations and Preparation Dianne Delva.

Complainant seeks informal advice. Has ten (10) days to inform RMCC if going to file allegation. Research Misconduct Committee Chairperson (RMCC) Before.

Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate June 12, 2014.

Research Integrity The Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research Dr Peter Wigley Manager, Research Ethics and Integrity Flinders University.

EMPOWERING LOCAL SENATES Kevin Bontenbal, South Representative Stephanie Dumont, Area D Representative.

Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate April 10, 2014.

Post On-Scene Investigation and Report Preparation.

Research Integrity & Misconduct Research Ethics, Education, and Policy Office of Research Administration.

Jane Patton, President, ASCCC Lisa Legohn, LA Trade Tech.

UMBC POLICY ON ESH MANAGEMENT & ENFORCEMENT UMBC Policy #VI

Promotion and Tenure Planning Workshop Spring 2012 Susan S. Williams Vice Provost for Academic Policy and Faculty Resources.

POST-TENURE REVIEW: Report and Recommendations. 2 OVERVIEW Tenure Field Test Findings Recommendations This is a progress report. Implementation, assessment,

Draft Ethics Bylaws Current draft. The new code describes ethical behaviour Old A Member shall refrain from making false statements, written or oral,

Ad hoc Committee on Faculty Bylaws Todd Ellis Michelle Hendley Jimmy Johnston Michael Koch Eileen McClafferty John Relethford Renee B. Walker (Chair)

DRAFT Proposed Sexual Harassment Policy Office of General Counsel Southern Illinois University September 2008.

Presented by: Theresa Elliot-Cheslek AVP & CHRO Terry Ryan Asst. Attorney General, AGO Dealing with Faculty Personnel Issues Revised October 2015.

Academic Program Review Committee Report Faculty Senate meeting November 11, 2008.

Program Evaluation Workshop Overview of the Site Visit Process Rita Marie Cain Professor of Business Law, Bloch School.

Ethical Conduct of Research for New Faculty, Post-Docs and Graduate Students Brief Overview.

EO COMPLAINT PROCEDURES. OVERVIEW  DEFINE TYPES OF COMPLAINTS  ALTERNATIVE AGENCIES  CDR/ALTERNATE AGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES  ELEMENTS OF INQUIRY/INVESTIGATION.

Non-compliance with Human Subjects Research Regulations J. Bruce Smith, MD, CIP November 2014 Continuing Education for IRB Members.

Evaluation of the Ability to Work Faculty Senate Meeting October 23, 2014 President's Report1.

Attendance Advisory Panels 1. Outcomes Understanding of the purpose of Attendance Advisory Panels (AAPs) as part of a plan for restoring attendance Familiarity.

REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE AUGUST 26, 2016 SUE OTT ROWLANDS, PROVOST.

FACULTY GRANTS AND LEAVES

Allegations & Investigations

PAc-17 Sabbatical Leave of Absence

Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty

Research Misconduct Michael Scian, MBA, JD Assistant Director of Compliance University of Florida.

Faculty Performance Reviews at MSU

ALLEGATIONS OF ABUSE Internal Occurrence Reporting and Investigation.

EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCE POLICY SUMMARY FACTS

Review of Interim Policy Regarding Appointment of Principal Investigators FA

Research Misconduct Procedures

The Not-So-Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Evaluation of the Ability to Work Faculty Senate Meeting

DFG Ombudsman Germany Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice Recommendation of the Germany Research Foundation Prof. Ulrike Beisiegel Chair of the DFG Ombudsman.

PAc-28 Educational Leave of Absence

Bullying by Pilar Janis, Lead & Higher Education Counselor

FA Review and Clarification of Appendix 15A

Presentation transcript:

Policy on Misconduct in Research

Why Do We Need It? Misconduct in research has significant impact on university reputation and credibility. It should not be tolerated. Needed for grants and sponsored research Mandated by EO 890

Definition Fabrication, Falsification, Plagiarism, in proposing, or reviewing research, or in reporting results.

General Policy Provisions Thorough, competent, objective, and fair evaluation Privacy and confidentiality to the extent permitted by the law Burden of proof in finding of misconduct, as well as defenses raised, and mitigating factors forwarded Restoring reputation and preventing retaliation Consultation with experts Individuals participating must be selected based on expertise.

Process AllegationInquiryInvestigation

Allegation Allegations may be communicated in any form to the AVP(R&GS) AVP (R&GS) shall determine if the allegations are: –Specific and credible –Meets the external agency’s applicability requirements –An inquiry is warranted –Prepare written description and inform person(s) against whom allegation are made

Inquiry Purpose: –Review of evidence to determine if investigation is required Inquiry Panel –Three members jointly selected by AVP(R&GS) and Academic Senate Chair. Two must be full time tenured faculty –Appointment must be made within 15 days following notification

Inquiry Process Must start immediately by AVP(R&GS) Process must be completed within 60 calendar days. Comprehensive final report including review and comment by the individual(s) against whom allegations are made. Shall determine if an investigation is warranted

Investigation Purpose –Formal development of a factual record leading to a decision regarding finding/no finding of misconduct. Investigation Panel –Five members jointly selected by the AVP(R&GS) and Academic Senate Chair –Members of inquiry are not eligible to serve –Members must be selected within 15 days of determination that investigation is warranted

Investigation Process Investigation must start within 30 calendar days of the completion of inquiry. All aspects must be completed in 120 calendar days Draft Final report must be provided to AVP(R&GS) within 90 calendar days Individual(s) against whom allegation is made must be given a minimum of 10 working day to comment. Comments shall be included in the report. Copies of the final report must be provided to AVP(R&GS) and the Chair of the Academic Senate and individual(s) against whom allegations were raised AVP(R&GS) makes recommendation for corrective measures and disciplinary actions and report it to AVP(FA), Provost, and Deans/unit directors