PSYC512: Research Methods PSYC512: Research Methods Lecture 11 Brian P. Dyre University of Idaho.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 9 Choosing the Right Research Design Chapter 9.
Advertisements

7/20/03Copyright Ed Lipinski and Mesa Community College, All rights reserved. 1 Research Methods Summer 2009 Using Between Subjects and Within.
Experimental Design True Experimental Designs n Random assignment n Two comparison groups n Controls threats to internal validity n Strongest evidence.
PSYC512: Research Methods PSYC512: Research Methods Lecture 13 Brian P. Dyre University of Idaho.
Control Any means used to rule out threats to validity Example –Hypothesis: Rats learned to press a bar when a light was turned on. –Data for 10 rats bar.
Research Variables.
Between- vs. Within-Subjects Designs
1 Chapter 7: The Experimental Research Strategy Manipulating the IV Controlling Extraneous Variance Holding Extraneous Vars Constant Between Subjects Designs.
Questions  Is Exam 2 going to be cumulative or will it just cover the second part of the information?  Are cause-and-effect relationships the same as.
Chapter 9: Within Designs
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS Criteria for Experiments
PSYC512: Research Methods PSYC512: Research Methods Lecture 10 Brian P. Dyre University of Idaho.
Experimental Research Independent variable Dependent variable Causation.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS What Is Required for a True Experiment? What Are the Independent and Dependent Variables? What Is a Confounding Variable? What Are.
Using Between-Subjects and Within-Subjects Experimental Designs
PSYC512: Research Methods PSYC512: Research Methods Lecture 19 Brian P. Dyre University of Idaho.
Questions What is the best way to avoid order effects while doing within subjects design? We talked about people becoming more depressed during a treatment.
Sampling and Experimental Control Goals of clinical research is to make generalizations beyond the individual studied to others with similar conditions.
Lecture 12 Psyc 300A. Review: Inferential Statistics We test our sample recognizing that differences we observe may be simply due to chance. Significance.
PSYC512: Research Methods PSYC512: Research Methods Lecture 15 Brian P. Dyre University of Idaho.
Experimental Psychology PSY 433 Chapter 3 Experiments -- Designs.
PSYC512: Research Methods PSYC512: Research Methods Lecture 9 Brian P. Dyre University of Idaho.
PSYC512: Research Methods PSYC512: Research Methods Lecture 12 Brian P. Dyre University of Idaho.
Factorial Experiments Factorial Design = experiment in which more than one IV (factor) at a time is manipulated Uses all possible combinations of the levels.
PSYC512: Research Methods PSYC512: Research Methods Lecture 14 Brian P. Dyre University of Idaho.
Experimental Group Designs
Chapter 9 Experimental Research Gay, Mills, and Airasian
Choosing Statistical Procedures
BHS Methods in Behavioral Sciences I May 19, 2003 Chapter 9 (Ray) Within-Subjects Designs (Cont.), Matched-Subjects Procedures.
PSYC2030 Exam Review #2 March 13th 2014.
Chapter 4 Hypothesis Testing, Power, and Control: A Review of the Basics.
+ Controlled User studies HCI /6610 Winter 2013.
Consumer Preference Test Level 1- “h” potato chip vs Level 2 - “g” potato chip 1. How would you rate chip “h” from 1 - 7? Don’t Delicious like.
Design Experimental Control. Experimental control allows causal inference (IV caused observed change in DV) Experiment has internal validity when it fulfills.
Single-Factor Experimental Designs
ITEC6310 Research Methods in Information Technology Instructor: Prof. Z. Yang Course Website: ec6310.htm Office:
Control in Experimentation & Achieving Constancy Chapters 7 & 8.
Chapter 18 Some Other (Important) Statistical Procedures You Should Know About Part IV Significantly Different: Using Inferential Statistics.
INTRO TO EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, continued Lawrence R. Gordon Psychology Research Methods I.
Psychology 301 Chapters & Differences Between Two Means Introduction to Analysis of Variance Multiple Comparisons.
URBDP 491 A Lecture 7: Research Approaches Objectives How to compare alternative approaches Experimental vs. non-experimental approaches Cross-sectional.
Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 3: The Foundations of Research 1.
@ 2012 Wadsworth, Cengage Learning Chapter 10 Extending the Logic of Experimentation: Within-Subjects and Matched-Subjects 2012 Wadsworth,
Introduction section of article
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Using Between-Subjects and Within- Subjects Experimental Designs.
The Psychologist as Detective, 4e by Smith/Davis © 2007 Pearson Education Chapter Six: The Basics of Experimentation I: Variables and Control Chapter Six:
 Descriptive Methods ◦ Observation ◦ Survey Research  Experimental Methods ◦ Independent Groups Designs ◦ Repeated Measures Designs ◦ Complex Designs.
Chapter 6 Research Validity. Research Validity: Truthfulness of inferences made from a research study.
Chapter Six: The Basics of Experimentation I: Variables and Control.
Research Methods and Data Analysis in Psychology Spring 2015 Kyle Stephenson.
Aim: What factors must we consider to make an experimental design?
ITEC6310 Research Methods in Information Technology Instructor: Prof. Z. Yang Course Website: /itec6310.htm Office:
Today: Assignment 2 back on Friday
Experiment Basics: Designs Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
ANCOVA.
Choosing and using your statistic. Steps of hypothesis testing 1. Establish the null hypothesis, H 0. 2.Establish the alternate hypothesis: H 1. 3.Decide.
Experimental Design. Talking While Driving: Are Cell Phone Conversations Different from Passenger Conversations? Research Problems Talking on a cellphone.
Some Terminology experiment vs. correlational study IV vs. DV descriptive vs. inferential statistics sample vs. population statistic vs. parameter H 0.
7 Control Techniques in Experimental Research.
Experimental Research Designs
Between-Subjects, within-subjects, and factorial Experimental Designs
Within- Subjects Design
Within- Subjects Design
2 independent Groups Graziano & Raulin (1997).
Chapter 6 Research Validity.
Experimental Design.
Experimental Design.
Scientific Method Steps
Chapter 11 EDPR 7521 Dr. Kakali Bhattacharya
CHAPTER 8 EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

PSYC512: Research Methods PSYC512: Research Methods Lecture 11 Brian P. Dyre University of Idaho

PSYC512: Research Methods Lecture 11 Outline Causation and Experimentation Causation and Experimentation Experimental research designs Experimental research designs Reactivity Reactivity Within vs. between subjects designs Within vs. between subjects designs Condition ordering Condition ordering Subject assignment Subject assignment More on research design More on research design Using 2 or more groups Using 2 or more groups Multifactor research – using two or more independent variables Multifactor research – using two or more independent variables Experimentation vs. Quasi-experimentation Experimentation vs. Quasi-experimentation

PSYC512: Research Methods Experimental Designs Manipulate one or more independent variables and observe effect on dependent variable Manipulate one or more independent variables and observe effect on dependent variable Possible to achieve strong internal validity if extraneous variables are carefully controlled  causation can be inferred! Possible to achieve strong internal validity if extraneous variables are carefully controlled  causation can be inferred! Extraneous variables (subject and environmental you aren’t interested in) add error variance Extraneous variables (subject and environmental you aren’t interested in) add error variance Differences in treatments might be due to error variance rather than your manipulations! Differences in treatments might be due to error variance rather than your manipulations!

PSYC512: Research Methods Experimental Research: Reactivity Reactivity and the Hawthorne effect Reactivity and the Hawthorne effect Demand characteristics: cues in experiment that allow a subject to determine the experimenter’s purpose, hypotheses, or expectations Demand characteristics: cues in experiment that allow a subject to determine the experimenter’s purpose, hypotheses, or expectations Good subject role: S produces expected effect Good subject role: S produces expected effect Faithful-subject role (neutral) Faithful-subject role (neutral) Negativistic-subject role: S sabotages expected effect Negativistic-subject role: S sabotages expected effect Countering demand characteristics Countering demand characteristics unobtrusive measures or observations done in the “field” unobtrusive measures or observations done in the “field” Deception Deception Withholding information Withholding information

PSYC512: Research Methods Experimental Designs Goal: minimize the amount of error variance and ensure that it doesn’t correlate with your independent variables Goal: minimize the amount of error variance and ensure that it doesn’t correlate with your independent variables How? How? Reduce error variance Reduce error variance Increase effectiveness (variance) of your IV by choosing more extreme treatments Increase effectiveness (variance) of your IV by choosing more extreme treatments Randomize error variance across groups through random assignment of subjects Randomize error variance across groups through random assignment of subjects Use inferential statistics to estimate the effects of error variance Use inferential statistics to estimate the effects of error variance

PSYC512: Research Methods Features of Experimental Designs Subject Assignment: Within-Subjects (repeated measures) vs. Between Subjects Subject Assignment: Within-Subjects (repeated measures) vs. Between Subjects Number of Independent Variables: Single factor (IV) vs. multiple factors (IVs) Number of Independent Variables: Single factor (IV) vs. multiple factors (IVs) Number of Dependent Variables: Single DV vs. multiple DVs (multivariate) Number of Dependent Variables: Single DV vs. multiple DVs (multivariate)

PSYC512: Research Methods Features of Experimental Designs Factors that determine optimal subject assignment Factors that determine optimal subject assignment If at all possible use a within-subjects design If at all possible use a within-subjects design Most efficient-requires fewest subjects Most efficient-requires fewest subjects Statistically powerful: each subject acts as their own control – eliminates error variance due to subject variables Statistically powerful: each subject acts as their own control – eliminates error variance due to subject variables PROBLEM: Carry-over and ordering effects PROBLEM: Carry-over and ordering effects If significant carry-over and ordering effects are expected then use a between-subjects design If significant carry-over and ordering effects are expected then use a between-subjects design Randomized Groups: if subject variables are not expected to covary with the measure Randomized Groups: if subject variables are not expected to covary with the measure Matched Groups: if subject variables are expected to covary with the measure (some argue randomization is still better) Matched Groups: if subject variables are expected to covary with the measure (some argue randomization is still better)

PSYC512: Research Methods Controlling for Carry-over and Order Effects Balance carry-over and order effects across treatments Balance carry-over and order effects across treatments Randomization and Blocked Randomization Randomization and Blocked Randomization Counterbalancing of N treatments Counterbalancing of N treatments Complete: present each subject with a unique order and use every possible order: requires N! orders/Ss Complete: present each subject with a unique order and use every possible order: requires N! orders/Ss Partial (Latin Square): present each subject a unique order carefully chosen from a subset of all possible orders Partial (Latin Square): present each subject a unique order carefully chosen from a subset of all possible orders

PSYC512: Research Methods Constructing a Latin Square for N treatments Randomly assign each treatment a number Randomly assign each treatment a number Five treatments (A, B, C, D, E) are assigned (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) Five treatments (A, B, C, D, E) are assigned (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) Determine First Order using: Determine First Order using: 1, 2, N, 3, N-1, 4, N -2… A, B, E, C, D

PSYC512: Research Methods Constructing a Latin Square for N treatments Fill in N-1 more orders by incrementing down and “wrapping”. For odd N, also use reverse orders Fill in N-1 more orders by incrementing down and “wrapping”. For odd N, also use reverse orders N = 4 (4 Ss)N = 5 (10 Ss) A B D CA B E C D D C E B A B C A DB C A D EE D A C B C D B AC D B E AA E B D C D A C BD E C A BB A C E D E A D B CC B D A E

PSYC512: Research Methods Controlling for Carry-over and Order Effects Minimize carry-over and order effects across treatments Minimize carry-over and order effects across treatments Practice Sessions Practice Sessions Breaks Breaks Make the treatment order a between-subjects independent variable Make the treatment order a between-subjects independent variable Creates a mixed design Creates a mixed design

PSYC512: Research Methods Controlling for Subject Variance in Between-subjects Designs Random Assignment Random Assignment Ensures subject characteristics don’t correlate with treatments, if you have enough subjects Ensures subject characteristics don’t correlate with treatments, if you have enough subjects Matched Groups Matched Groups Assess participants on one or more characteristics that might correlate with the DV Assess participants on one or more characteristics that might correlate with the DV Distribute like-participants to groups Distribute like-participants to groups Subject attrition could be a problem Subject attrition could be a problem Both methods attempt to equate the groups and treat subject variance as error variance Both methods attempt to equate the groups and treat subject variance as error variance

PSYC512: Research Methods Choosing the Number and Type of Independent Variables Single factor (IV) vs. multiple factors (IVs) Single factor (IV) vs. multiple factors (IVs) Single factor designs are simpler but more limited in scope Single factor designs are simpler but more limited in scope Multiple factors allow for examining the synergistic effects of variables (interactions) Multiple factors allow for examining the synergistic effects of variables (interactions) Parametric vs. Non-parametric Designs Parametric vs. Non-parametric Designs Parametric: IV is quantitative (ratio or interval scale) Parametric: IV is quantitative (ratio or interval scale) Non-parametric: IV is qualitative (nominal or ordinal scale) Non-parametric: IV is qualitative (nominal or ordinal scale)

PSYC512: Research Methods Experimental vs. Quasi- Experimental Research Designs Experimental Research: random assignment of subjects to conditions Experimental Research: random assignment of subjects to conditions Quasi-experimental: assignment of subjects to groups based on a “subject variable” or measured attribute Quasi-experimental: assignment of subjects to groups based on a “subject variable” or measured attribute Treats a DV as an IV in the hope of establishing causality Treats a DV as an IV in the hope of establishing causality May be necessary in the context of field studies May be necessary in the context of field studies Examples: age, income, test-performance Examples: age, income, test-performance Problems Problems Confounding variables may covary with subject variable Confounding variables may covary with subject variable Regression to the mean Regression to the mean

PSYC512: Research Methods Next Time… Multi-factor experimentation Multi-factor experimentation