Lessons from HETE-2 Ops D. Q. Lamb (U. Chicago) with invaluable input from E. Fenimore, C. Graziani, and R. Vanderspek.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VOE, CalTech, 13Apr05 GCN (GRB Coordinates Network) GRB Event Reporting Scott Barthelmy NASA-GSFC.
Advertisements

Reliable Multicast for Time-Critical Systems Mahesh Balakrishnan Ken Birman Cornell University.
Solar-B FPP 1 Ted Tarbell, TRACE Operations 3 February 2003 MODA Mtg, ISAS The TRACE Model for Operations Ted Tarbell
STEREO Science Center Status Report William Thompson NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Phase E Kickoff Meeting February 23, 2007.
1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Monthly Mission Review LAT Flight Software Status June 6, 2007 Jana Thayer Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Gamma-ray Large.
A high z (z~6.3) GRB-- GRB Reported by Bubu 2006 Mar.17.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 3.11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.
The HETE-2 Mission D. Q. Lamb (U. Chicago). Outline of This Talk  HETE-2 Mission Goals and Program  HETE-2 Spacecraft and Instruments  French Gamma.
Swift Identification of the host galaxy of Swift short GRBs by the Chandra sub-arcsecond position T. Sakamoto, N. Gehrels, E. Troja, J. Norris, S. Barthelmy,
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 2.1 Requirements 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST Large.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 4.11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 21 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.
CSCD 434 Spring 2011 Lecture 1 Course Overview. Contact Information Instructor Carol Taylor 315 CEB Phone: Office.
P. Price (U. of Hawaii) and many others Discovery and identification of the very high redshift afterglow of GRB J. B. Haislip, et al. astro-ph ,
Space Astronomy for Science Teachers - 28 June 2002 The Gamma Ray Burst Explorer What is Swift (Marg Chester, Swift Ops Lead Scientist) What are GRBs (Sally.
MAC Layer Protocols for Sensor Networks Leonardo Leiria Fernandes.
Realtime follow-up analyses with IceCube / M. Kowalski / Realtime follow-up analyses with IceCube Marek Kowalski Universität Bonn High Energy.
May 15, 2013 Space Weather Product Team (SWPT) Making Sense of the Nonsensical.
Coherent Noise Suppression Divided into two components – Near-DC Doppler component Always present We do a very good job of removing There can be artifacts.
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
SSFS Test Plan/Report Overview of the test cases What “success” means for a data format type test How the tests were conducted Key results and conclusions.
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE.
IXYZ Frank Marshall NASA/GSFC 25 April 2012 April 25, 20121Implementing Portals of the Universe.
Dividing the Pizza An Advanced Traffic Billing System An Advanced Traffic Billing System Christopher Lawrence Burke The University of Queensland.
Swift HUG 14 Feb Swift archive Lorella Angelini/HEASARC.
An Overview of the Swift Observatory Liz Puchnarewicz Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London.
Konus-Wind 10 years of operating in space 10 years of GRBs observations from the joint Russian-American KONUS-WIND experiment: results and perspectives.
Event Management & ITIL V3
Swift Annapolis GRB Conference Prompt Emission Properties of Swift GRBs T. Sakamoto (CRESST/UMBC/GSFC) On behalf of Swift/BAT team.
SharePoint document libraries I: Introduction to sharing files Sharjah Higher Colleges of Technology presents:
1 SpaceOps 2002 Autonomous Operations For The Swift Mission T3-47 John Ong/Swift Software Systems Manager NASA/GSFC Code 582/ Mike Rackley/Swift.
# - 1 E. Andrews LAT Software Schedule  Key FSW Milestone Dates –PAST: Jan ‘02 / Jul ‘02 – Preliminary Design Review / Delta PDR May ’03 – Critical Design.
Extended emission in short gamma-ray bursts registered by SPI-ACS of INTEGRAL observatory Pavel Minaev 1, 2, Alexei Pozanenko 1, Vladimir Loznikov 1 1-
SOWG # 6, 20/01/2015 ESAC Agenda  Finalization of the service 20 specifications  Test plans for the service20 at spacecraft level  Instruments.
GLAST Science Support CenterAugust 9, 2004 Users’ Committee Meeting GSSC USER SUPPORT David Band – GSSC.
GLAST Science Support CenterNovember, 2005 GSSC User Committee Meeting Tools for Mission and Observation Planning Robin Corbet, GSSC
Swift HUG April Swift data archive Lorella Angelini HEASARC.
1 John Nousek (Penn State University) Gamma-Ray Burst Explorer: Afterglow Follow-up & Swift Constraints Swift & GRBs: Unveiling the Relativistic Universe,
1 Getting Started Exercise Part 1. 2 Profiles related to the exercise When starting use archive profile: GettingStarted_Start.zip The fully completed.
HARPS Data Flow System Christophe Lovis Geneva Observatory HARPS-N PDR, 6-7 December 2007, Cambridge MA.
Data Collection Instructions for Educators Kentucky Youth Advocacy Project School Year.
Aquarius Mission Simulation A realistic simulation is essential for mission readiness preparations This requires the ability to produce realistic data,
1 HETE-II Catalogue Filip Münz and Graziella Pizzichini for HETE team Burst statistics in.
Image of M8, taken by the AEOS Burst Camera 1 Heather Swan Physics Department University of Michigan Carl Akerlof, Timothy McKay, Eli Rykoff, Donald Smith,
18 th GIST Meeting 14 th –16 th May 2003 Ground Segment (GGSPS) Report 1 GERB Ground Segment B.C.Stewart RAL.
GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Flight Software System Checkout TRR Test Suites (Backup) Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
1 John Nousek & David Burrows (Penn State University) Alberto Moretti (Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera) X-Ray Telescope (XRT): Performance after Five.
1 Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope Users Group Meeting 6 February 2009 Mission Status Update (since the phonecall) and Issues S. Ritz, J. McEnery.
Gamma-Ray Bursts with the ANTARES neutrino telescope S. Escoffier CNRS/CPPM, Marseille.
Role Of Network IDS in Network Perimeter Defense.
GLAST LAT ProjectIDT Face-to-Face Agenda S. Williams 1 Face to Face Meeting Session Topic: LAT Operating Modes Date: March 19 Time: 13:30 Convener: Scott.
Spotting the life of stars „Pi of the Sky” Project Katarzyna Kwiecińska UKSW-SNŚ on behalf of the Pi of the Sky collaboration.
Agenda for Face-to-Face IDT Meeting (1/4) Date: March 19 and 20 Place: Orange Room, SLAC March 19 (Tuesday) 9:00-9:10am T. Kamae; Charge for the Face-to-Face.
Fermi GBM Observations of Gamma-Ray Bursts Michael S. Briggs on behalf of the Fermi GBM Team Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik NASA Marshall.
GIST-19 Meeting August MSG-1 - PROGRAMME STATUS Presentation to the GIST-19 meeting.
Swift-BAT as a Triggering Facility Amy Lien Scott Barthelmy, Hans Krimm NASA Goddard Space Flight Center The 4 th AMON workshop, Penn State University,
Product Lifecycle Management with the CERN EDMS David Widegren CERN, TS/CSE 8 Nov 2005EDMS:
GLAST Science Support Center May 8, 2006 GUC Meeting AI#28. SAE Release Schedule David Band (GSSC/JCA-UMBC) Julie McEnery (GSFC)
Searching the LIGO data for coincidences with Gamma Ray Bursts Alexander Dietz Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
1 HETE-II Catalogue HETE-II Catalogue Filip Münz, Elisabetta Maiorano and Graziella Pizzichini and Graziella Pizzichini for HETE team Burst statistics.
GRB triggered Inspiral Searches in the fifth Science Run of LIGO Alexander Dietz Cardiff University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
for Lomonosov-GRB collaboration
Svom Ground-segment Meeting CNES
Drafting Requirements for Instrument Performance Monitoring Systems - Discussion from Data Management point of view Masaya Takahashi (JMA), Peter Miu (EUMETSAT),
Proposal for LAT Year 1 Data Release Plan
GLAST Large Area Telescope
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
GRB and GRB Two long high-energy GRBs detected by Fermi
Swift observations of X-Ray naked GRBs
Report 7 Brandon Silva.
Presentation transcript:

Lessons from HETE-2 Ops D. Q. Lamb (U. Chicago) with invaluable input from E. Fenimore, C. Graziani, and R. Vanderspek

Pre-Trigger Ops qCalibration on Orbit q Sources: q Crab q Sco X-1 q SGRs q Known X-ray sources q Spectral effects can be important q Pointing plan – calibration may take several weeks q Very hard question: Do we need to correctly localize several GRBs before starting to slew? q Might take a week q But if we need good image S/N or we can’t initially run triggers at Poisson threshold, mean time between GRBs will be several times longer

Pre-Trigger Ops qAstrometry q Rotation matrix between BAT and spacecraft coordinate systems might be needed q Corrections for mechanical tolerances: q Height of mask q X- and Y-offsets q Possible thermal effects qMultiple Algorithms Are Very Valuable q Chicago/RIKEN localization software q CESR/Chicago/Los Alamos/RIKEN spectral analysis software

Trigger Ops qTrigger Criteria q We will not run all of them, but we will want good coverage of timescales q Bracket criteria are effective in defending against increases in background, although they will still occasionally fire in SAA (protons) or Ecuadorian anomaly (electrons) q Bracket criteria are therefore good for detecting bursts q One-sided criteria are better for optimizing image SNR (i.e., for selecting optimal background and foreground time intervals) q Be prepared to change trigger criteria, particularly in the early going

Trigger Ops qTrigger Thresholds q Poisson floors useful for bracket triggers (i.e,, use Poisson thresholds, not “n-sigma” thresholds, esp. for triggers with short foregrounds): q Triggers w. short foregrounds will be limited by Poisson noise, not trends in the background q Essential to set thresholds at the Poisson floor; if we operate at, say, 3 x Poisson threshold, the rate of GRB detections and localizations will be reduced by this factor q Be prepared to change thresholds, particularly in the early going

Post-Trigger Ops qBurst Alerts q Very valuable to have certain info in burst alerts q HETE-2 VHF messages contain: q Goodness (~ light curve S/N) q Virtue (~ image S/N) q Trigger criterion that fired q Trigger timescale that fired q Terrestrial longitude of spacecraft q Orbit phase relative to the sun q Localization update number q Burst alert info allows a quick assessment of flight localization q This is very valuable in the case of HETE-2 q This would seem to be critical in the case of Swift, since TDRSS telemetry rate is limited and Malindi downlink might be delayed

Post-Trigger Ops qGround Processing q Essential that someone inspect flight and ground pipeline results in real time (even at 4 a.m.) q Essential that results can be inspected from home (especially at 4 a.m.) – potential firewall issues q Essential that refined analyses can be performed from home (especially at 4 a.m.) – again, potential firewall issues q Important to have Web interface to data q Essential to have version control of refinement analyses: q Several tries may be necessary to obtain the best results q Essential to keep track of the results of successive tries q Essential that “best result” be placed in results archive, even if it is not the result of the last try

Post-Trigger Ops qCommunication q Essential to have a chat tool: q does not work because of the latency involved q Contributors may be in U.S., Europe, and elsewhere q Many people will be exchanging real-time results q Many people may be offering opinions about the burst and what should be done to refine localization, etc. q All comments and results need to be logged for future reference (in 5 minutes, 5 hours, 5 days, 5 months) q Who is in Charge (at 4 a.m.)? q Flight localization retractions q Ground analysis updates q Spacecraft repointings q Whoever is in charge must be able to respond/decide/command quickly, and “break” the nominal schedule, if necessary

Post-Trigger Ops qGCN Policies: q GCN Position Notices – Who decides about retractions of flight localizations (incl. when and how)? q GCN Position Notices – Who decides about sending out refined ground analyses of flight localizations? qGCN Circulars: q Authorship protocol needs to be settled in advance q Who is in charge of getting them out? q What kind of triggers merit a GCN Circular? q GRBs q SGRs q Other? q What numbers will be included in GCN Circulars? q When will these numbers get produced?

Conclusions q“Lamb’s Law:” Dimension of Space of GRB, Instrument, and Spacecraft Operations Parameters is Very Large Every GRB Occurs Very Near an Edge in This Space qThe More Pre-Launch Planning That Can Be Done for q Pre-Trigger Ops q Trigger Ops q Post-Trigger Ops the Better (of Course) qThe Bottom Line: q The challenge of rapidly disseminating time-critical information on GRBs and GRB afterglows is large q It is like nothing else in astronomy q It is very exciting and very rewarding