Concept Design Review Micro Air Vehicle Project: P Sponsored by Impact Technologies The Boeing Company Mark Baybutt Electrical Engineering David Blonski Industrial Engineering Team Leader Andrea Wyant Electrical Engineering Geoff Amey Computer Engineering Perry Young Mechanical Engineering Daniel Segar Mechanical Engineering Patrick O’Neil Mechanical Engineering Timothy Nowicki Mechanical Engineering Benjamin Metz Mechanical Engineering Jeffrey Kozak Customer / Guide Mechanical Engineering
Team Breakdown
Customer Requirements Able to fly 1200m (linearly) Able to take two “legible” pictures Wireless remote control Stay within budget Ability to launch Able to be flown accurately Must be durable Must provide hard copy of photos Onboard power supply
Customer Needs
Engineering Specifications
QFD Analysis Part 1
QFD Analysis Part 2
Morphological Analysis Stronger Antennae New Controller New Servos Decrease # of Servos New Receivers Angle of Attack Increase Motor RPM Decrease Propeller Size Fewer Batteries Standard Body Timing System Smaller Morphable Wing PodSmaller Scalability Winglets Smaller Tail Thermoset
Pugh Analysis Part 1
Pugh Analysis Part 2
Ranking
Old MAV
New MAV Feigao Motor 3”x2” Prop Smaller Tail Tear-drop Pod 10 o Angle of Attack Berg 4L Receiver 2S 730mAh Battery Reoptimized Airfoil Twill-Weave Carbon Composites
Theoretical Motor Analysis
Empirical Motor Analysis BatteryPropeller 1A 2 A 3A 4A 5A (g) 11.5 V 480 mAh 2.5" x 1" auto off 3" x 2" auto off 3" x 3"254560auto off 7.4 V 730 mAh 2.5" x 1"3060auto off 3" x 2" " x 3" V 480 mAh 2.5" x 1"3060auto off 3" x 2"306080auto off 3" x 3" auto off
Weight Breakdown (Last Year)
Weight Breakdown (Current Team)
Power Consumption
Budget
SDII Schedule