Web-Based Program of Research on Risky Decision Making Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Paradoxes in Decision Making With a Solution. Lottery 1 $3000 S1 $4000 $0 80% 20% R1 80%20%
Advertisements

New Paradoxes of Risky Decision Making that Refute Prospect Theories Michael H. Birnbaum Fullerton, California, USA.
Among those who cycle most have no regrets Michael H. Birnbaum Decision Research Center, Fullerton.
Science of JDM as an Efficient Game of Mastermind Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton Bonn, July 26, 2013.
This Pump Sucks: Testing Transitivity with Individual Data Michael H. Birnbaum and Jeffrey P. Bahra California State University, Fullerton.
1 Upper Cumulative Independence Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
Components of Source Credibility Michael H. Birnbaum Fullerton, California, USA.
1 Lower Distribution Independence Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
True and Error Models of Response Variation in Judgment and Decision Tasks Michael H. Birnbaum.
Evaluating Non-EU Models Michael H. Birnbaum Fullerton, California, USA.
Tversky and Kahnemann: Framing of Decisions
Who are these People Who Violate Stochastic Dominance, Anyway? What, if anything, are they thinking? Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
1 st lecture Probabilities and Prospect Theory. Probabilities In a text over 10 standard novel-pages, how many 7-letter words are of the form: 1._ _ _.
Decision making and economics. Economic theories Economic theories provide normative standards Expected value Expected utility Specialized branches like.
© red ©
Testing Lexicographic Semi- Order Models: Generalizing the Priority Heuristic Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
Testing Heuristic Models of Risky Decision Making Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
1 A Brief History of Descriptive Theories of Decision Making Kiel, June 9, 2005 Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
Some New Approaches to Old Problems: Behavioral Models of Preference Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
1 Distribution Independence Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
1 Upper Tail Independence Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
Testing Models of Stochastic Dominance Violations Michael H. Birnbaum Decision Research Center California State University, Fullerton.
1 Upper Distribution Independence Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
Ten “New Paradoxes” Refute Cumulative Prospect Theory of Risky Decision Making Michael H. Birnbaum Decision Research Center California State University,
Violations of Stochastic Dominance Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
Testing Critical Properties of Models of Risky Decision Making Michael H. Birnbaum Fullerton, California, USA Sept. 13, 2007 Luxembourg.
Ten “New Paradoxes” Refute Cumulative Prospect Theory of Risky Decision Making Michael H. Birnbaum Decision Research Center California State University,
New Paradoxes of Risky Decision Making that Refute Prospect Theories Michael H. Birnbaum Fullerton, California, USA.
1 The Case Against Prospect Theories of Risky Decision Making Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
Testing Transitivity (and other Properties) Using a True and Error Model Michael H. Birnbaum.
Web-Based Program of Research on Risky Decision Making Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
1 A Brief History of Descriptive Theories of Decision Making: Lecture 2: SWU and PT Kiel, June 10, 2005 Michael H. Birnbaum California State University,
1 Gain-Loss Separability and Reflection In memory of Ward Edwards Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
I’m not overweight It just needs redistribution Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
1 Ten “New Paradoxes” of Risky Decision Making Michael H. Birnbaum Decision Research Center California State University, Fullerton.
1 Gain-Loss Separability Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
Is there Some Format in Which CPT Violations are Attenuated? Michael H. Birnbaum Decision Research Center California State University, Fullerton.
1 Lower Cumulative Independence Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
Stochastic Dominance Michael H. Birnbaum Decision Research Center California State University, Fullerton.
Web-Based Program of Research on Risky Decision Making Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
Testing Transitivity with Individual Data Michael H. Birnbaum and Jeffrey P. Bahra California State University, Fullerton.
1 Restricted Branch Independence Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
Problems With Expected Utility or if the axioms fit, use them but...
Notes Over 12.5 Probability of Independent Events 1. You are playing a game with 2 numbered cubes. Find the probability of rolling a sum of 8 on the first.
Presidential Address: A Program of Web-Based Research on Decision Making Michael H. Birnbaum SCiP, St. Louis, MO November 18, 2010.
Behavior in the loss domain : an experiment using the probability trade-off consistency condition Olivier L’Haridon GRID, ESTP-ENSAM.
Risk Attitudes of Children and Adults: Choices Over Small and Large Probability Gains and Losses WILLIAM T. HARBAUGH University of Oregon KATE KRAUSE University.
Decision making Making decisions Optimal decisions Violations of rationality.
Agata Michalaszek Warsaw School of Social Psychology Information search patterns in risk judgment and in risky choices.
Economic evaluation of health programmes Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health Class no. 9: Cost-utility analysis – Part 2.
Markets, Firms and Consumers Lecture 4- Capital and the Firm.
Decision Theory: Outcomes and Consequences Not Considered Decision Outcomes Consequences Decision: choose between betting on green or red chip. Objective:
Prospect Theory. 23A i 23B, reference point 23A) Your country is plagued with an outbreak of an exotic Asian disease, which may kill 600 people. You.
A Stochastic Expected Utility Theory Pavlo R. Blavatskyy June 2007.
Ellsberg’s paradoxes: Problems for rank- dependent utility explanations Cherng-Horng Lan & Nigel Harvey Department of Psychology University College London.
Homework Assignment You are going to research any artist of your choosing from any time period or genre. You are going to complete a one page double- spaced.
Click to begin. Click here for Final Jeopardy Set Theory Exponents Linear Equations Systems of Equations Probability 10 Points 20 Points 30 Points 40.
Testing Transitivity with a True and Error Model Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton.
Axiomatic Theory of Probabilistic Decision Making under Risk Pavlo R. Blavatskyy University of Zurich April 21st, 2007.
Allais Paradox, Ellsberg Paradox, and the Common Consequence Principle Then: Introduction to Prospect Theory Psychology 466: Judgment & Decision Making.
Can a Dominatrix Make My Pump Work? Michael H. Birnbaum CSUF Decision Research Center.
Experiments and “Rational” Behavior, 5/1/07. Beauty Contest Game Each person choose a number from 0 to 100. We will average these numbers. The person.
Risk Efficiency Criteria Lecture XV. Expected Utility Versus Risk Efficiency In this course, we started with the precept that individual’s choose between.
Decisions under risk Sri Hermawati.
Mohan Pandey 56th Edwards Bayesian Research Conference March 1-3, 2018
Election #1 Popular Vote Electoral Vote State Red Yellow
Colours.
What Color is it?.
Inactivation of Medial Frontal Cortex Changes Risk Preference
New Paradoxes of Risky Decision Making that Refute Prospect Theories
Presentation transcript:

Web-Based Program of Research on Risky Decision Making Michael H. Birnbaum California State University, Fullerton

Case Against Prospect Theory Violations of Stochastic Dominance Violations of Coalescing (Event-Splitting) Violations of Upper Tail Independence Violations of Lower Cumulative Independence Violations of Upper Cumulative Independence

Recipe: Violations of Stochastic Dominance

Which gamble would you prefer to play? Gamble AGamble B 90 reds to win $96 05 blues to win $14 05 whites to win $12 85 reds to win $96 05 blues to win $90 10 whites to win $12 70% of undergrads choose B

Which of these gambles would you prefer to play? Gamble CGamble D 85 reds to win $96 05 greens to win $96 05 blues to win $14 05 whites to win $12 85 reds to win $96 05 greens to win $90 05 blues to win $12 05 whites to win $12 90% choose C over D

Case Against Prospect Theory-2 Violations of Restricted Branch Independence are opposite predictions of inverse-S weighting function needed to explain the Allais Paradoxes Violations of 3- and 4-Distribution Independence are opposite the patterns predicted by the inverse-S weighting function.

Decision Theories and Allais Paradox Branch Independence CoalescingSatisfiedViolated SatisfiedEU, CPT* OPT* RDU, CPT* ViolatedOPT*RAM, TAX