Contemporary Theory Merton and Conflict Theory

Robert Merton: Parson’s Student— friendly critique Liberal response to "functionalism is conservative" Not all that exists is functional 1. universalism, unity, indispensability 2. manifest/latent 3. dysfunctional/nonfunctional 4. functional for whom? 5. Net-balance functional Social structure and anomie

TYPOLOGY OF MODES OF INDIVIDUAL ADAPTATION Modes of AdaptationCultural GoalsInstitutionalized means I. Conformity++ II. Innovation+- III. Ritualism-+ IV. Retreatism-- V. Rebellion+/- Source: Robert Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure (Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1957), p. 140

Coser's Functional Theory of Conflict - Influence: Weber and Simmel - Conflict can be functional - functional analysis of ability of system to accommodate conflict

Dahrendorf's Conflict Theory Critique of Parsons: "Out of Utopia" (1958) – ignores conflict – cannot explain social change Weberian theory of political domination – authorities and subordinates: quasi-groups – potential for collective action stability of collective identity resources leadership and organization – society's ability to accommodate conflict

C. Wright Mills: Power Elite - Authorities in each institution share interest - work together to maintain status quo - need for liberal reform

Conflict Theory Models of Interest Group Politics Darhendorf's Non-elites Authorities Subordinates conflictchange other factors other factors

Dahrendorf's Social System Social and Political System Ability to Accommodate "class" conflict external threat - - +

Mills' Elites cultural elites economic elites social and political elites

Mills'Social System Social and Political System Ability to serve elite interests external threat - - +