Suzanne E. Welcome 1, Laura K. Halderman 1, Janelle Julagay 1, Christiana Leonard 2, & Christine Chiarello 1 1 University of California, Riverside 2 University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Cluster Analysis of Individual Differences in Reading Skill and Behavioral Lateralization: Associations with Structural Asymmetries Christine Chiarello.
Advertisements

Modality-specific interaction between phonology and semantics Gail Moroschan & Chris Westbury Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton,
Examining the Relationship Between Confrontational Naming Tasks & Discourse Production in Aphasia Leila D. Luna & Gerasimos Fergadiotis Portland State.
A Computerized Measure of Regulatory Strength: Relations to Self-Discrepancies and Depressive Symptoms Erin N. Stevens, Nicole J. Holmberg, Christine R.
Understanding Metaphors: Is the RH uniquely involved? Natalie A. Kacinik 1 and Christine Chiarello 2 University of California, Davis 1, University of California,
Cortical asymmetries in the precuneus and fusiform gyri are associated with visual field asymmetries in word processing: A voxel based analysis Christiana.
Hemispheric asymmetries and joke comprehension Coulson, S., & Williams, R. F. (2005) Neuropsychologia, 43,
Experiment 2: MEG Study Materials and Methods: 11 right-handed subjects with 20:20 vision were run. 3 subjects’ data was discarded because of poor performance.
Hemispheric Asymmetries In False Recognition May Depend on Associative Strength Cathy S. Robinson & Christine Chiarello University of California, Riverside.
Putting Together the Pieces: Meaning Matters in Children’s Plural Comprehension Craig Van Pay, Areanna Lakowske & Jennifer Zapf.
Logistic Regression Part I - Introduction. Logistic Regression Regression where the response variable is dichotomous (not continuous) Examples –effect.
Individual Differences in Rapid Word Recognition and its Relation to Reading Ability Laura Halderman 1, Christine Chiarello 1, Suzanne Welcome 1, Christiana.
Behavioral and Anatomical Correlates of Corpus Callosum Size Christine Chiarello 1, Suzanne Welcome 1, Laura K. Halderman 2, Stephen Towler 4, Ronald Otto.
Newly-Learned Stimuli: The Effects on Lateralized Lexical Decision Travellia Tjokro & Christine Chiarello University of California, Riverside Introduction.
Hemispheric asymmetries in the resolution of lexical ambiguity Jeffrey Coney, Kimberly David Evans Presented by Chris Evans May 17, 2006.
Effects of Bilingualism on the A ttention N etwork T est: I ts significance and Implications Sujin Yang & Barbara Lust Cornell University (
Sex Differences in Brain Structure & Asymmetry in Healthy College Students Christiana M. Leonard 1, Stephen Towler 1, Laura K. Halderman 2, Suzanne Welcome.
Relationships between performance and hemispheric asymmetry on lexical tasks Suzanne E. Welcome 1, Christine Chiarello 1, Laura Halderman 2, & Christiana.
Evidence for Semantic Facilitation in Resilient, But Not Poor, Readers Suzanne Welcome and Christine Chiarello University of California, Riverside Introduction.
Atypical Reading/Laterality Profile Associated with Reversed Planum Temporale Asymmetry Christine Chiarello 1, Suzanne Welcome 1, & Christiana M. Leonard.
Word Retrieval in a Stem Completion Task: Influence of Number of Potential Responses Christine Chiarello 1, Laura K. Halderman 1, Cathy S. Robinson 1 &
Sex Differences in Visual Field Lateralization: Where are they? Christine Chiarello 1, Laura K. Halderman 1, Suzanne Welcome 1, Janelle Julagay 1 & Christiana.
Individual Differences in Lexical Processing and Cerebral Asymmetries Christine Chiarello*, Suzanne Welcome*, Laura K. Halderman*, Janelle Julagay*, Ronald.
Individual differences in hemisphere asymmetry for nonword reading and their relationship to reading ability Suzanne E. Welcome 1, Christine Chiarello.
Associations of Brain Size and Verbal Performance Depend on Handedness Christine Chiarello 1, Suzanne Welcome 1, Stephen Towler 2, Ronald Otto 3, & Christiana.
Influence of Word Class Proportion on Cerebral Asymmetries for High and Low Imagery Words Christine Chiarello 1, Connie Shears 2, Stella Liu 3, and Natalie.
Effects of Bilingualism on Hemispheric Interaction Suzanne E. Welcome & Christine Chiarello University of California, Riverside Maintaining and coordinating.
1 G Lect 11M Binary outcomes in psychology Can Binary Outcomes Be Studied Using OLS Multiple Regression? Transforming the binary outcome Logistic.
Word Reading Skill and Brain Anatomy in Adult Resilient Readers Suzanne Welcome 1, Christiana M. Leonard 2, Laura Halderman 1, Stephen Towler 2, & Christine.
Relationships Among Variables
Multivariate Methods EPSY 5245 Michael C. Rodriguez.
Factor Analysis Psy 524 Ainsworth.
Hemispheric Specialization I
Pilot: Customizing a Commercially Available Digital Game to Assess Cognitive Function William C. M. Grenhart, John F. Sprufera, Jason C. Allaire, & Anne.
An Electrophysiological study of translation priming in French/English bilinguals Katherine J. Midgley 1,2, Jonathan Grainger 2 & Phillip J. Holcomb 1.
1 ROLE OF WORKING MEMORY IN TYPICALLY DEVELOPING CHILDREN’S COMPLEX SENTENCE COMPREHENSION AUTHORS; Shwetha M.P.,Deepthi M. Trupthi T, Nikhil Mathur &
Measuring Independent Attention Networks in the Two Hemispheres Deanna J. Greene 1, Anat Barnea 2,, Amir Raz 3, & Eran Zaidel 1 1 Department of Psychology,
Discriminant Analysis
Chapter 10: Analyzing Experimental Data Inferential statistics are used to determine whether the independent variable had an effect on the dependent variance.
Discriminant Analysis Discriminant analysis is a technique for analyzing data when the criterion or dependent variable is categorical and the predictor.
Access Into Memory: Does Associative Memory Come First? Erin Buchanan, Ph.D., University of Mississippi Abstract Two experiments measuring the reaction.
Task Design EX: Participants were required to fixate on a plus sign in the middle of a screen. Sentences missing the last word were presented auditorily.
Last Lecture History of disconnection syndromes History of disconnection syndromes The structure of the corpus callosum The structure of the corpus callosum.
Braun Y. R. 1, Edelman, S. 2, Ebstein R. P. 3, 4, Gluck, M.A. 5 and Tomer R. 1 1 Psychology Department, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel, 2 Neurobiology.
A comparison of cortical anatomy between college students with different reading skills Suzanne E. Welcome 1, Christine Chiarello 1, Paul Thompson 2, &
# Attentional Volleying Across Visual Quadrants Andrew S. Clement 1,2 & Nestor Matthews 1 1 Department of Psychology, Denison University, 2 Department.
Commonly Used Statistics in the Social Sciences Chi-square Correlation Multiple Regression T-tests ANOVAs.
Chapter 6: Analyzing and Interpreting Quantitative Data
Adam Houston 1, Chris Westbury 1 & Morton Gernsbacher 2 1 Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Canada, 2 Department of Psychology, University.
CHAPTER OVERVIEW Say Hello to Inferential Statistics The Idea of Statistical Significance Significance Versus Meaningfulness Meta-analysis.
Introduction  Conway 1 proposes there are two types of autobiographical event memories (AMs):  Unique, specific events  Repeated, general events  These.
Orienting Attention to Semantic Categories T Cristescu, JT Devlin, AC Nobre Dept. Experimental Psychology and FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford,
PET Count  Word Frequency effects (coefficients) were reliably related to activation in both the striate and ITG for older adults only.  For older adults,
Chapter 6 Indexes, Scales, And Typologies. Chapter Outline Indexes versus Scales Index Construction Scale Construction.
Theory of Mind and Executive Functioning: Dual Task Studies Claire Conway, Rebecca Bull & Louise Phillips School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen,
Remembering Can Cause Inhibition Retrieval-Induced Inhibition As Cue Independent Process Veling & Knippenberg, 2004.
Early Time Course Hemisphere Differences in Phonological & Orthographic Processes Laura K. Halderman 1, Christine Chiarello 1 & Natalie Kacinik 2 1 University.
Models of Production and Comprehension [1] Ling4-437.
Psychology research methods– Analysis Portfolio Taylor Rodgers B
Simultaneous interpreting is a particularly demanding cognitive process in which language comprehension and production take place at the same time in two.
Results Introduction The present study focuses on adult attitudes toward children. Many examples of discrimination against children in Western societies.
Chapter 8 Introducing Inferential Statistics.
Carmel Proctor, Roger Tweed, Daniel Morris
Implications and Future Studies
Alison Burros, Nathan Herdener, & Mei-Ching Lien
Figure 1. (A) One training trial in the probabilistic selection task
The Effects of Musical Mood and Musical Arousal on Visual Attention
Measuring latent variables
Measuring latent variables
EPSY 5245 EPSY 5245 Michael C. Rodriguez
Presentation transcript:

Suzanne E. Welcome 1, Laura K. Halderman 1, Janelle Julagay 1, Christiana Leonard 2, & Christine Chiarello 1 1 University of California, Riverside 2 University of Florida A Factor Analytical Approach to Hemisphere Differences in Lexical Processing Suzanne E. Welcome 1, Laura K. Halderman 1, Janelle Julagay 1, Christiana Leonard 2, & Christine Chiarello 1 1 University of California, Riverside 2 University of Florida Participants 200 university students – 100 female, 100 male – 14% non-right handed – 18 to 34 years of age Divided Visual Field Tasks Word Naming (2 separate occasions) Nonword Naming Masked Word Recognition Lexical Decision Semantic Decision Category Member Generation Verb Generation Analysis Techniques Reaction time and accuracy scores for each VF and each task were submitted to factor analysis using an oblique rotation Asymmetry indices for each dependent variable and each task were submitted to factor analysis using an oblique rotation Methods Results Conclusions Most studies of asymmetries in word recognition have used relatively small samples and a small number of tasks to investigate quantitative hemispheric differences in specific processes Biological Substrates for Language Project takes a multivariate approach to determine whether task structure differs between hemispheres Previous studies investigating correlations between asymmetry measures have used single, relatively simple measures of visual word recognition (Boles, 1998; Hellige, et al., 1994) Biological Substrates for Language Project investigated whether tasks tapping into differing aspects of visual word recognition load on different factors Previous factor analytic approaches investigating hemisphere differences have examined the factor structure of asymmetry scores (Boles, 1998; Boles, 2002) This study investigated whether scores from each VF load on the same factor If hemispheres differ in how information is processed, factor structure should differ between hemispheres If hemispheres differ primarily in efficiency of the same process, the factor structure should not differ between hemispheres Introduction References This research was supported by NIH grant DC Factor 1 Variables Std Reg Coeffs Factor 5 Variables Std Reg Coeffs Factor 6 Variables Std Reg Coeffs Word Naming 1 LVF Word Naming 1 RVF Word Naming 2 LVF Word Naming 2 RVF Masked Word Rec. LVF Masked Word Rec. RVF Lexical Decision LVF Lexical Decision RVF Semantic Decision LVF Semantic Decision RVF Nonword Naming LVF Nonword Naming RVF Verb Generation LVF Cat. Generation LVF Cat. Generation RVF Asymmetry for making single correct response Accuracy of generating one of many alternatives Accuracy of category generation Separate VF Scores Factor structure differs between dependent variables -For reaction time, factors appear to discriminate between tasks that rely on phonological decoding, tasks that require semantic generation and tasks that require binary decisions -For accuracy, factors appear to discriminate between tasks that allow only a single correct response and tasks that allow multiple correct responses Factor structure appears to be largely similar in the LVF and RVF -Suggests that hemispheres differ primarily in efficiency of processing, not type of processing done Asymmetry Indices Factor structure differentiates between tasks that allow multiple responses (Verb and Category Generation and Nonword Naming) and tasks that do not (Word Naming, Lexical and Semantic Decision) Factor structure from asymmetry scores is not mirrored in factor structure from separate VF scores A number of task asymmetries did not load significantly on either factor Perhaps reflects the fact that asymmetry scores are less reliable than individual visual field scores Suggests that individual visual field scores may convey information that asymmetry scores do not For reaction time and accuracy scores for both visual fields on each task, a six- factor solution was obtained which accounted for 86.9 percent of the total variance. Separate factors were obtained for accuracy measures and reaction time measures. Interpretations of each factor are given beneath the factor loadings. Boles, D.B. (1998) Relationships among multiple task asymmetries: II. A large-sample factor analysis. Brain and Cognition, 36, Boles, D.B. (2002) Lateralized spatial processes and their lexical implications. Neuropsychologia, 40, Hellige, J.B, Bloch, M.I., Cowin, E.K. Eng, T.L., Eviatar, Z., & Sergent, V (1994) Individual variation in hemispheric asymmetry: multitask study of effects related to handedness and sex. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, For asymmetry indices, a two-factor solution was obtained which accounted for 88.5 percent of the total variance Factor 1 Variables Std Reg Coeffs Factor 2 Variables Std Reg Coeffs Word Naming 1 Acc. Word Naming 1 RT Word Naming 2 Acc. Word Naming 2 RT Lexical Decision Acc. Lexical Decision RT Semantic Decision Acc Verb Generation Acc. Cat. Generation Acc. Nonword Naming Acc Asymmetry for making single correct response Asymmetry for making one of several correct responses Factor 2 Variables Std Reg Coeffs Factor 3 Variables Std Reg Coeffs Factor 4 Variables Std Reg Coeffs Word Naming 1 LVF Word Naming 1 RVF Word Naming 2 LVF Word Naming 2 RVF Nonword Naming LVF Nonword Naming RVF Verb Generation LVF Verb Generation RVF Cat. Generation LVF Cat. Generation RVF Masked Word Rec. LVF Masked Word Rec. RVF Lexical Decision LVF Lexical Decision RVF Semantic Decision LVF Semantic Decision RVF Latency of phonological decoding Latency of semantic generation Latency to make binary decision REACTION TIME FACTORS ACCURACY FACTORS