R Felton 1 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 Plasma Density Control R Felton Session Leader Training November 2010 Torus radius 3.1 m Vacuum vessel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 2 Operational Amplifiers
Advertisements

Dynamic Behavior of Closed-Loop Control Systems
RWD CONTROLLERS TECHNICAL
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
Objectives Control Terminology Types of controllers –Differences Controls in the real world –Problems –Response time vs. stability.
ASIPP Characteristics of edge localized modes in the superconducting tokamak EAST M. Jiang Institute of Plasma Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences The.
George Sips ITPA, active control, 14 July Real-time Control ( and development of control systems ) at ASDEX Upgrade George Sips Max-Planck-Institut.
Data Acquisition Risanuri Hidayat.
Lecture 9: D/A and A/D Converters
Chapter 4 Waves in Plasmas 4.1 Representation of Waves 4.2 Group velocity 4.3 Plasma Oscillations 4.4 Electron Plasma Waves 4.5 Sound Waves 4.6 Ion Waves.
Physics of fusion power
Dynamic Behavior and Stability of Closed-Loop Control Systems
Stewart Shen October 27, LCLS-XTOD Gas Attenuator LCLS FAC Meeting October 27, 2005 Stewart Shen, Keith Kishiyama and Marty Roeben.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 10 : Running a discharge / diagnostics.
Control System Instrumentation
Proportional Technology Precise Control of Pressure and Flow.
“AX Control Objects” November 2006
1 Basic Control Theory and Its Application in AMB Systems Zongli Lin University of Virginia.
Proportional/Integral/Derivative Control
Fast imaging of global eigenmodes in the H-1 heliac ABSTRACT We report a study of coherent plasma instabilities in the H-1 plasma using a synchronous gated.
Stable Running Result of the Refrigerator FB41 Digital Controller in PLC S7-300 The Research of PID Control in a Large Scale Helium Refrigerator Objectives.
ITPA - IOS st Oct Kyoto E. Joffrin JET programme with the ILW in and relations with the IOS Joint experiments.
Linac Marx Modulator Update Trevor Butler 5/20/2015.
V. A. Soukhanovskii NSTX Team XP Review 31 January 2006 Princeton, NJ Supported by Office of Science Divertor heat flux reduction and detachment in lower.
Control System Instrumentation
1Physics Operators Course, PCS Navigation, D.J. Battaglia, September 15, 2015 Devon Battaglia, Keith Erickson, Dennis Mueller, Stefan Gerhardt, Roger Raman,
Grzegorz Jablonski, Technical University of Lodz, Department of Microelectronics and Computer Science XFEL-LLRF-ATCA Meeting, 3-4 December 2007 XFEL The.
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
ASIPP Long pulse and high power LHCD plasmas on HT-7 Xu Qiang.
Observer-Based Robot Arm Control System Nick Vogel, Ron Gayles, Alex Certa Advised by: Dr. Gary Dempsey.
Objectives Discuss final project deliverables Control Terminology
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
Background Long term tritium retention is one of the most critical issues for ITER during the tritium phase. It is mandatory to evaluate the long term.
Behaviour of Runaway Electrons during Injection of High Z Impurities/Gas Puffing in HT-7 S.Sajjad INSTITUTE OF PLASMA PHYSICS,HEFEI CHINA.
Control Theory Control System Objectives  Establish a final condition  Provide safe operation  Eliminate the human element  Assure economical operation.
T Loarer – TFE meeting – 20 February TORE SUPRA Association Euratom-Cea Gas Balance - fuel retention in JET T Loarer, J Bucalossi, D Brennan*, G.
Control systems KON-C2004 Mechatronics Basics Tapio Lantela, Nov 5th, 2015.
B WEYSSOW 2009 Coordinated research activities under European Fusion Development Agreement (addressing fuelling) Boris Weyssow EFDA-CSU Garching ITPA 2009.
HL-2A Heating & Current Driving by LHW and ECW study on HL-2A Bai Xingyu, HL-2A heating team.
Objectives Finish DOAS Control Terminology Types of controllers
08/07/05Plasma Operations : Introduction P.J.Lomas 1 Plasma Operations: General Introduction Peter Lomas and Plasma Operations Group:- Jerzy Brzozowski,
GOLEM operation based on some results from CASTOR
Beijing Embedded System Key Lab
1PAC-37, Plasma control algorithm development on NSTX-U using TRANSP, M.D. Boyer, 1/26/2016 Dan Boyer for the Integrated Scenarios science group Plasma.
Modern Control Systems Lab#04 PID Position and speed control of D.C Motor Dr. Imtiaz Hussain
Advanced control strategies. CONTROL SYSTEMS The process parameters which are measured using probes described in the previous sections may be controlled.
Proportional and Servo Valves
MISS. RAHIMAH BINTI OTHMAN
FUNCTION GENERATOR.
LLRF regulation of CC2 operated at 4˚K Gustavo Cancelo for the AD, TD & CD LLRF team.
TFE 3/2/2004 – Fuel retention in JET - J. Bucalossi / T. Loarer Assessment of fuel retention in JET : Contingency – 2 shifts on 6 th of february E. Tsitrone.
Mrs V.S.KharoteChavan,E&Tc,PC poly
Control System Instrumentation
Automatic control systems I. Nonlinearities in Control System
Feedback Control System
RF Matching Network Description
PID controller for improving Max power point tracking system
Dynamic Controllers for Wind Turbines
Dynamic Behavior and Stability of Closed-Loop Control Systems
Basic Design of PID Controller
Control System Instrumentation
Interactive Basic Tuning for the SERVOSTAR 600
Enhanced Single-Loop Control Strategies
Control System Instrumentation
Dynamical Systems Basics
Chapter 4 – Operational Amplifiers – Part 1
easYgen-3000XT Series Training
INTEGRATOR (or RESET) WINDUP
Lecture 22: PLLs and DLLs.
Presentation transcript:

R Felton 1 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 Plasma Density Control R Felton Session Leader Training November 2010 Torus radius 3.1 m Vacuum vessel 3.9m x 2.4m Plasma volume 80 m3 Plasma current < 5 MA Toroidal field < 4 Tesla Unique technical capabilities : Tritium Beryllium

R Felton 2 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 Plasma Density Control Objectives Inject Gas for breakdown and initial current rise Inject Gas to achieve required density for (i) Experiment (ii) Neutral Beam Injection Inject special gasses for experiment e.g. Tritium, Neon, Argon Inject special gasses to assist RF / LH coupling e.g. Hydrogen

R Felton 3 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 Ways and Means Gas Bottles, Lines and Matrices Gas Introduction Modules Plasma Density Measurements Plasma Density Controller (PDLM) Gas and Density Pulse Schedule Programme Co-ordination JET Operating Instructions

R Felton 4 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 Gas Bottles, Lines, Matrices 9 gasses in Gas Store 4 lines from Gas Store to Vessel 11 Injection Modules 2 Valve Matrices Control:- GIS on VC

R Felton 5 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 Gas Introduction Modules Mid-Plane –1,2,4 Top & LH –5,6,7,8 Divertor –9,10,11,12 Tritium –15

R Felton 6 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 GIM Control & Calibration Piezo moves valve against spring Valve opening depends on voltage across piezo (programmable psu) –Not linear –Stable enough PDLM controls –0.. 10V == % open –Needs calibration curve Calibration Pulses –In Restart

R Felton 7 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 Density Measurements Line-Integrated Density (LID), usually the Vertical Line-Of-Sight 3 –KG1 Interferometer (main) –KS3 Bremsstrahlung (back-up) Range e 18 /m 2 Occasional problems with –Fringe-jumps –Calibration of Bremsstrahlung New signal processing –KG1 real-time –KG1 fringe counting –KG4 Polarimetry KG1 KS3

R Felton 8 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 Plasma Density Validation Previously –Main density signal for Density Control selected from KG1 LIDs, blended in KVS –Backup from KS3 Bremsstrahlung, scaled to the main density Future, –Density signal from several LIDs KG1v+KVS, KG1rt, KG1c (fringe counter), KG4 polarimetry (Cotton-Mouton) KS3 Bremsstrahlung –Density signals for Density Control in PDLM NBI Enable in PEWS Real-Time Experiment control in RTCC –New PDV pulse schedule

R Felton 9 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 Feedback Theory U = Line-Integrated Density (e 18 /m 2 ) Uref = Reference waveform (e 18 /m 2 ) E = Control Error Yfb = Feedback Yff = Feedforward waveform (0..10V) Y = Control output 0..10V == % opening Reference Waveform - PID Control + Feedforward Waveform UrefEYfbYff GIM PSU and Valve Plasma Measurement & Validation YU Control Error E = Uref – U Feedback Yfb = K p E + K i ∫ Edt + K d dE/dt Kp = G G gain Ki = G / TiTi integral time constant Kd = G * TdTd differential time const. Control Output Y = Yfb + Yff Feedback as Laplace transform

R Felton 10 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 Feedback Practice Sensor: KG1/LID3 PID: G=1, Ti=1000s, Td=0.7s (  =1) Actuators: GIM8: FB + 20% FF P only Density exceeds reference Sensor: KG1/LID3 PID: G=1, Ti=2s, Td=0.7s (  =1) Actuators: GIM8: FB + 20% FF PI Density on target Error Density GIM Electron Flow

R Felton 11 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 Feedback Practice Sensor: KG1/LID3 PID: G=1, T i =3s, T d =0.7s (  =1) Actuators: GIM8: FB + 20% FF X-point formation increases pumping e(t) ≠ k v(t) Gas flow e(t) and v(t) n(t) and n ref (t) t=61s t=62s

R Felton 12 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 Gas Pulse Schedule Gas species Reservoir pressure Control mode –Puff –Dose –Feedback –RTC Control Times Density Reference for Feedback

R Felton 13 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 GIM Set-up Puff: 100% opening of GIM for a time FBack: Feed-back in time window with feed-forward (Dosing) waveform Dosing: time window in waveform V2 valve open increases volume

R Felton 14 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 PDLM (aka PDF) Schedule Requested Density waveform Control Mode = PID Gain G Integral Time Constant Ti Differential Time Constant Td and strength α

R Felton 15 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 Plasma Density Feedback Input reference : target density waveform units = “Fringes” (10 18 m -2 ) starts at GAS=39.5, allow for pump-out at X-point formation allow for heating phase Input signal : DENS1 (usually) Output signal : Vopen ( V) to any GIM Vopen = VopenFF + VopenFB Proportional Gain:  Vopen/  LID A simple flat unit gain works well, add extra GIMs to increase effective gain at appropriate time (e.g. Xpoint). Select GIMs for appropriate speed and location.

R Felton 16 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 Plasma Termination Normal –PDLM follows requested density, usually a ramp down from experiment level to zero Soft Stop –When Plasma Termination Network (PTN) triggers a Soft Stop, PDLM ramps down from the last-good density to zero, proportional to plasma current. GIM Stop –When Plasma Termination Network (PTN) triggers a GIM Stop, PDLM switches off the GIMs designated to be switched off by the GIM Stop.

R Felton 17 (22) Session Leader Training November nd Feedback Loop Experimental Control a Signal e.g. Frad using Gas –Better to use RTCC Target waveform –Normalised range -1 to +1 –Starts at GAS = 39.5s Signal –Normalised range -1 to +1 –Selected and scaled in RTSS pages PID Feedback –P I D tuning needs several pulses –P I D can be estimated from a step response Step Gas, observe change in Density and Signal G ~∆Signal / ∆Density, Ti ~ rise-time

R Felton 18 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 Real-Time Control RTCC output PDF1 –Sets the reference waveform for the Main Loop (Density) –Modify target density dynamically, according to events RTCC output PDF2 –Sets the reference waveform for the Auxiliary Loop (Norm. Sig.) –Modify target signal dynamically, according to events RTCC output GIM groups A,B,C –Sets the GIM opening directly (0..100%) –Trigger puffs/doses on events, e.g. NTM, Pellet Centrifuge –Experimental Feedback Control, e.g. 3 He, Frad

R Felton 19 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 Real-Time Experiments 3 He Control for Mode Conversion Y = 100Φ He / (100Φ He + 18Φ Da ) U = 3 He gim Detached Plasma Y = Φ Da / Φ Br U = D 2 gim Guards for Tritium puff Detached Plasma serendipitidous gain

R Felton 20 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 Gas Inventory Gas injected per pulse Gas loaded on cryo pumps

R Felton 21 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 Programme Coordination The Gas Form –Programme Intranet SL requests –Gas species –Reservoir pressure Approved at Weekly C/O Coord Printed for –Shift Techs –Vac Group –EiC D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D 2 +10% H 2 H2H2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 CD 4 D 2 +10% H 2 H2H2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 CD 4 D 2 +10% H 2 H2H2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 CD 4 D 2 +10% H 2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D2 D2D

R Felton 22 (22) Session Leader Training November 2010 JET Operating Instructions JOI 4.2 –Pews Density Limits for Neutral Beam Injection Valid in any Plasma Configuration JOI 4.7 –Alternative Pews Density Limits for Neutral Beam Injection, Valid in Fat or Superfat Plasma Configuration Only JOI 7.2 –Vacuum Conditions for Tokamak Operation JOI 7.4 –Operation of Gas Introduction Matrix JOI 7.5 –Avoiding Potentially Explosive Mixtures