Wilson-’t Hooft operators and the theta angle Måns Henningson Chalmers University of Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Topology of Graph Configuration Spaces David G.C. Handron Carnegie Mellon University
Advertisements

1 Lect. 12: Number Theory. Contents Prime and Relative Prime Numbers Modular Arithmetic Fermat’s and Euler’s Theorem Extended Euclid’s Algorithm.
 Symmetries and vanishing couplings in string-derived low-energy effective field theory              Tatsuo Kobayashi 1.Introduction.
On d=3 Yang-Mills-Chern- Simons theories with “fractional branes” and their gravity duals Ofer Aharony Weizmann Institute of Science 14 th Itzykson Meeting.
Brane-World Inflation
Magnetic Monopoles E.A. Olszewski Outline I. Duality (Bosonization) II. The Maxwell Equations III. The Dirac Monopole (Wu-Yang) IV. Mathematics Primer.
Vector integrals Line integrals Surface integrals Volume integrals Integral theorems The divergence theorem Green’s theorem in the plane Stoke’s theorem.
A journey inside planar pure QED CP3 lunch meeting By Bruno Bertrand November 19 th 2004.
Geometric Transitions 25 Giugno 2007 Michele Rossi.
Štefan Olejník Institute of Physics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia Coulomb energy, remnant symmetry in Coulomb gauge, and phases of.
Quantum One: Lecture 3. Implications of Schrödinger's Wave Mechanics for Conservative Systems.
An Uncertainty Principle for Topological Sectors Zurich, July 2, 2007 TexPoint fonts used in EMF: AA A AAA A A AA A A A Based on: hep-th/ , hep-th/
ASYMPTOTIC STRUCTURE IN HIGHER DIMENSIONS AND ITS CLASSIFICATION KENTARO TANABE (UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA) based on KT, Kinoshita and Shiromizu PRD
DARPA Oasis PI Meeting Hilton Head, SC March 2002.
M. Farber and D. Schütz | Homology of Planar Polygon Spaces | Presented by Yair Carmon Based on the paper by M. Farber and D. Schütz Presented by Yair.
Fun with Computational Physics: Non-commutative Geometry on the Lattice Alberto de Campo 1, Wolfgang Frisch 2, Harald Grosse 3, Natascha Hörmann 2, Harald.
6. One-Dimensional Continuous Groups 6.1 The Rotation Group SO(2) 6.2 The Generator of SO(2) 6.3 Irreducible Representations of SO(2) 6.4 Invariant Integration.
Supersymmetry and Gauge Symmetry Breaking from Intersecting Branes A. Giveon, D.K. hep-th/
Gerard ’t Hooft Spinoza Institute Yukawa – Tomonaga Workshop, Kyoto, December 11, 2006 Utrecht University.
FSM Decomposition using Partitions on States 290N: The Unknown Component Problem Lecture 24.
Introduction to Gröbner Bases for Geometric Modeling Geometric & Solid Modeling 1989 Christoph M. Hoffmann.
Electric-Magnetic Duality On A Half-Space Edward Witten Rutgers University May 12, 2008.
Antennas Hertzian Dipole –Current Density –Vector Magnetic Potential –Electric and Magnetic Fields –Antenna Characteristics.
Contributed Talk at the International Workshop on VISUALIZATION and MATHEMATICS 2002 Thomas Lewiner, Hélio Lopes, Geovan Tavares Math&Media Laboratory,
Symmetries and conservation laws
Topological Insulators and Beyond
Masses For Gauge Bosons. A few basics on Lagrangians Euler-Lagrange equation then give you the equations of motion:
Hermann Kolanoski, "Magnetic Monopoles" Magnetic Monopoles How large is a monopole? Is a monopole a particle? How do monopoles interact? What.
Some new formulae for magnetic and current helicities Jean-Jacques Aly DSM/IRFU/SAp, CE Saclay, France.
MATH 224 – Discrete Mathematics
1 Lattice Formulation of Two Dimensional Topological Field Theory Tomohisa Takimi ( 基研、理研 ) K. Ohta, T.T Prog.Theor. Phys. 117 (2007) No2 hep-lat
Instanton representation of Plebanski gravity Eyo Eyo Ita III Physics Department, US Naval Academy Spanish Relativity Meeting September 10, 2010.
Monday, Apr. 2, 2007PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #12, 13, 14 Monday, Apr. 2, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Local Gauge Invariance 2.U(1) Gauge.
ADE Matrix Models in Four Dimensional QFT DK, J. Lin arXiv: , ``Strings, Matrices, Integrability’’ Paris, August 19, 2014.
Chap 3. Formalism Hilbert Space Observables
Exact Results for perturbative partition functions of theories with SU(2|4) symmetry Shinji Shimasaki (Kyoto University) JHEP1302, 148 (2013) (arXiv: [hep-th])
The relationship between a topological Yang-Mills field and a magnetic monopole RCNP, Osaka, 7 Dec Nobuyuki Fukui (Chiba University, Japan) Kei-Ichi.
Confinement mechanism and topological defects Review+ papers by A.V.Kovalenko, MIP, S.V. Syritsyn, V.I. Zakharov hep-lat/ , hep-lat/ , hep-lat/
1 Topological Quantum Phenomena and Gauge Theories Kyoto University, YITP, Masatoshi SATO.
Uniform discretizations: the continuum limit of consistent discretizations Jorge Pullin Horace Hearne Institute for Theoretical Physics Louisiana State.
Algebroids, heterotic moduli spaces and the Strominger system James Gray, Virginia Tech Based on work with: Alexander Haupt and Andre Lukas ????
The embedding-tensor formalism with fields and antifields. Antoine Van Proeyen K.U. Leuven Moscow, 4th Sakharov conf., May 21, 2009.
Reinterpretation of Skyrme Theory Y. M. Cho Seoul National Univ.
The Geometry of Moduli Space and Trace Anomalies. A.Schwimmer (with J.Gomis,P-S.Nazgoul,Z.Komargodski, N.Seiberg,S.Theisen)
Chiral Dynamics Workshop, JLAB, Aug. 6-10, 2012
A. Aizenbud and D. Gourevitch Gelfand Pairs Regular pairs We call the property (2)
Algorithms 1.Notion of an algorithm 2.Properties of an algorithm 3.The GCD algorithm 4.Correctness of the GCD algorithm 5.Termination of the GCD algorithm.
Instanton representation of Plebanski gravity Hilbert space structure and proposed resolution of the Kodama state Eyo Eyo Ita III GR19 Conference, Mexico.
Wilson PRD10, 2445 (1974); Ginsparg Wilson PRD25, 2649 (1982); Neuberger PLB417, 141 (1998), Hasenfratz laliena Niedermayer PLB427, 125 (1998) Criterion.
Topology induced emergent dynamic gauge theory in an extended Kane-Mele-Hubbard model Xi Luo January 5, 2015 arXiv:
Heterotic—F Theory Duality Revisited
Maximal super Yang-Mills theories on curved background with off-shell supercharges 総合研究大学院大学 藤塚 理史 共同研究者: 吉田 豊 氏 (KEK), 本多 正純 氏 ( 総研大 /KEK) based on M.
9/10/2007Isaac Newton Institute1 Relations among Supersymmetric Lattice Gauge Theories So Niels Bohr Institute based on the works arXiv:
Our understanding of M-theory is still very incomplete. But possibly, an important clue might be found in a celebrated piece of work that appeared in.
Torsional heterotic geometries Katrin Becker ``14th Itzykson Meeting'' IPHT, Saclay, June 19, 2009.
Extension of the Poincare` Group and Non-Abelian Tensor Gauge Fields George Savvidy Demokritos National Research Center Athens Extension of the Poincare’
Goro Ishiki (University of Tsukuba) arXiv: [hep-th]
Electic-Magnetic Duality On A Half-Space Edward Witten March 9, 2008.
Hertzian Dipole Current Density Vector Magnetic Potential
Function Spaces and examples of functionals
Lagrange Formalism & Gauge Theories
Automatically trivial fibrations
Hyun Seok Yang Center for Quantum Spacetime Sogang University
Quantized K
A new large N reduction for Chern-Simons theory on S3
Unitary Spherical Super-Landau Models Andrey Beylin
Gelfand Pairs A. Aizenbud and D. Gourevitch the non compact case
in collaboration with G. Ishiki, S. Shimasaki
Quantum One.
Presentation transcript:

Wilson-’t Hooft operators and the theta angle Måns Henningson Chalmers University of Technology

S-duality of N=4 Yang-Mills theory An N=4 Yang-Mills theory is characterized by its gauge group G. the complex parameter  =  /2  + i/g 2. S-duality states that this description is redundant: We get an equivalent theory if we take G  L G and   -1/  or G  G and    +1, i.e.    +2 

Evidence for S-duality A more recent development is to instead consider non-local operators. (Kapustin 2005) the topologically twisted partition function. (Vafa-Witten 1994) the spectrum of states. (Olive-Montonen 1977, Osborn 1979, Witten 1979, Sen 1994) A quantum theory is specified by an algebra of observable operators acting on a space of states. Evidence for S-duality has mostly come from

The Wilson operator W(  ) In SU(N) gauge theory, we define W(  ) = Tr N (P exp   A). If all fields are invariant under the Z N center, the gauge group may be taken as G= SU(N)/Z N. W(  ) then transforms with a factor e 2  in/N, where n  Z N  1 (G) is determined by the restriction to  of the gauge parameter. Let  be a closed spatial curve.

Duality of Wilson-’t Hooft operators S-duality predicts that W(  ) = M 0,1 (  ) may be generalized to operators M p,q (  ) for p, q  Z N. M p,q (  )  M q,p (  ) as   -1/ . M p,q (  )  M p,p+q (  ) as    +1. A ’t Hooft operator T(  ) = M 1,q (  should thus undergo a monodromy as    +2  T(  ) = M 1,q (  M 1,q+1 (  ) ≈ M 1,q (  ) M 0,1 (  ) =T(  ) W(  ) The aim of this talk is to elucidate this property.

The ’t Hooft operator T(  ) T(  ) is given by a singular G=SU(N)/Z N gauge transformation, whose restriction to a curve  ’ which links  represents the element 1  Z N   1 (G).  ’’ Two such singular transformations differ by a regular gauge transformation. So T(  ) has a well-defined action on physical states. T(  ) may be regularized to a smooth non- gauge transformation in a neighbourhood of . So T(  ) acts non-trivially on physical states.

An analogy: The Witten effect One finds by a canonical analysis that a state |  > is characterized by its magnetic charge g  Z, and electric charge e  g  /2  mod Z. Under a smooth increase  +2  these must undergo the monodromy g  g e  e + g. Consider SU(2) Yang-Mills theory on R 3 spontaneously broken to U(1).

The spatial geometry Our proof of the monodromy property T(  )  T(  ) W(  ) as    +2  needs a topologically non-trivial curve  We add these points to space to get X = S 1 x S 2. A minimally complicated situation is to take three-space as S 1 x R 2, and let  wind arount the compact direction. A physical state |  > of finite energy must look like vacuum at infinity in R 2.

Topological interpretation of T(  ) P is classified by its second Stiefel-Whitney class (discrete abelian magnetic flux) w 2  H 2 (X,Z N )  Z N. A state |  > is associated with a principal G bundle P over X  S 1 x S 2. The state |  ’ > = T(  )|  > is then associated with another G bundle P’ with second Stiefel- Whitney class w 2 ’ = w

Large gauge transformations A physical state |  > must be invariant under the connected component G 0 of the group G = Aut(P) of gauge transformations. But |  > may transform in an arbitary character of the discrete coset group  = G/G 0 of homotopy classes of gauge transformations. What is the structure of the abelian group  ?

The topology of G = Aut(P) A G=SU(N)/Z N gauge transformation may be twisted in two different ways: Over three-space X. Let  be a gauge transformation such that [  ] = 1  Z  3 (G). By the definition of the theta angle,  |  > = e i  |  >. Along the curve . Let be a transformation such that [ |  ] = 1       (G)  Let |  > be an eigenstate of  with some eigenvalue e i , i.e. |  > = e i  |  >.

A presentation of  G/G 0  Let     1 (G)  Z N be the group of homotopy classes of gauge transformations restricted to  Let  0   3 (G)  Z be the group of homotopy classes of transformations that are trivial on . We thus have a short exact sequence Exactness implies that [ ], [  ]   fulfill the relation [  N = [  k for some k. What is the integer k?

Computing k Let Y  S 1  X  T 2  S 2. Construct two bundles P and P  over Y by extending the bundle P over the cylinder I  X and gluing together the ends with gluing data or . I X  N = [  k implies that the second Chern classes of P and P  fulfill N c 2 (P ) = k c 2 (P  ).

Characteristic classes of P  and P We have c 2 (P  ) = 1  Z  H 4 (Y,Z). Modulo H 4 (Y,Z) we have c 2 (P ) = 1/2 (1/N-1) w 2 (P )  w 2 (P ). The class w 2 (P ) is determined by its restrictions w 2 (P )| T 2 = [ |    =   Z N   1 (G)  H 2 (T 2, Z N ). w 2 (P )| S 2 = w 2 (P)  H 2 (S 2, Z N )  Z N. Putting everything together, we find that k = w 2 (P) mod Z N.

The monodromy So as    +2  we have the monodromies e i   e i  e 2  i w 2 /N and e i  ’  e i  ’ e 2  i (w 2 +1 ) /N. The states |  > and |  ’> = T(  )|  > transform as  |  > = e i  |  >, |  > = e i  |  >  |  ’> = e i  |  ’>, |  ’> = e i  ’|  ’>. Here e i  N = e i  (w 2 mod N) and e i  ’ N = e i  (w 2 +1 mod N). It follows that T(  )  T(  ) W(  ), where W(  ) transforms in the same way as the Wilson operator, i.e. W(  ) -1 = e 2  i/N W(  ). Q.E.D.