Wilson-’t Hooft operators and the theta angle Måns Henningson Chalmers University of Technology
S-duality of N=4 Yang-Mills theory An N=4 Yang-Mills theory is characterized by its gauge group G. the complex parameter = /2 + i/g 2. S-duality states that this description is redundant: We get an equivalent theory if we take G L G and -1/ or G G and +1, i.e. +2
Evidence for S-duality A more recent development is to instead consider non-local operators. (Kapustin 2005) the topologically twisted partition function. (Vafa-Witten 1994) the spectrum of states. (Olive-Montonen 1977, Osborn 1979, Witten 1979, Sen 1994) A quantum theory is specified by an algebra of observable operators acting on a space of states. Evidence for S-duality has mostly come from
The Wilson operator W( ) In SU(N) gauge theory, we define W( ) = Tr N (P exp A). If all fields are invariant under the Z N center, the gauge group may be taken as G= SU(N)/Z N. W( ) then transforms with a factor e 2 in/N, where n Z N 1 (G) is determined by the restriction to of the gauge parameter. Let be a closed spatial curve.
Duality of Wilson-’t Hooft operators S-duality predicts that W( ) = M 0,1 ( ) may be generalized to operators M p,q ( ) for p, q Z N. M p,q ( ) M q,p ( ) as -1/ . M p,q ( ) M p,p+q ( ) as +1. A ’t Hooft operator T( ) = M 1,q ( should thus undergo a monodromy as +2 T( ) = M 1,q ( M 1,q+1 ( ) ≈ M 1,q ( ) M 0,1 ( ) =T( ) W( ) The aim of this talk is to elucidate this property.
The ’t Hooft operator T( ) T( ) is given by a singular G=SU(N)/Z N gauge transformation, whose restriction to a curve ’ which links represents the element 1 Z N 1 (G). ’’ Two such singular transformations differ by a regular gauge transformation. So T( ) has a well-defined action on physical states. T( ) may be regularized to a smooth non- gauge transformation in a neighbourhood of . So T( ) acts non-trivially on physical states.
An analogy: The Witten effect One finds by a canonical analysis that a state | > is characterized by its magnetic charge g Z, and electric charge e g /2 mod Z. Under a smooth increase +2 these must undergo the monodromy g g e e + g. Consider SU(2) Yang-Mills theory on R 3 spontaneously broken to U(1).
The spatial geometry Our proof of the monodromy property T( ) T( ) W( ) as +2 needs a topologically non-trivial curve We add these points to space to get X = S 1 x S 2. A minimally complicated situation is to take three-space as S 1 x R 2, and let wind arount the compact direction. A physical state | > of finite energy must look like vacuum at infinity in R 2.
Topological interpretation of T( ) P is classified by its second Stiefel-Whitney class (discrete abelian magnetic flux) w 2 H 2 (X,Z N ) Z N. A state | > is associated with a principal G bundle P over X S 1 x S 2. The state | ’ > = T( )| > is then associated with another G bundle P’ with second Stiefel- Whitney class w 2 ’ = w
Large gauge transformations A physical state | > must be invariant under the connected component G 0 of the group G = Aut(P) of gauge transformations. But | > may transform in an arbitary character of the discrete coset group = G/G 0 of homotopy classes of gauge transformations. What is the structure of the abelian group ?
The topology of G = Aut(P) A G=SU(N)/Z N gauge transformation may be twisted in two different ways: Over three-space X. Let be a gauge transformation such that [ ] = 1 Z 3 (G). By the definition of the theta angle, | > = e i | >. Along the curve . Let be a transformation such that [ | ] = 1 (G) Let | > be an eigenstate of with some eigenvalue e i , i.e. | > = e i | >.
A presentation of G/G 0 Let 1 (G) Z N be the group of homotopy classes of gauge transformations restricted to Let 0 3 (G) Z be the group of homotopy classes of transformations that are trivial on . We thus have a short exact sequence Exactness implies that [ ], [ ] fulfill the relation [ N = [ k for some k. What is the integer k?
Computing k Let Y S 1 X T 2 S 2. Construct two bundles P and P over Y by extending the bundle P over the cylinder I X and gluing together the ends with gluing data or . I X N = [ k implies that the second Chern classes of P and P fulfill N c 2 (P ) = k c 2 (P ).
Characteristic classes of P and P We have c 2 (P ) = 1 Z H 4 (Y,Z). Modulo H 4 (Y,Z) we have c 2 (P ) = 1/2 (1/N-1) w 2 (P ) w 2 (P ). The class w 2 (P ) is determined by its restrictions w 2 (P )| T 2 = [ | = Z N 1 (G) H 2 (T 2, Z N ). w 2 (P )| S 2 = w 2 (P) H 2 (S 2, Z N ) Z N. Putting everything together, we find that k = w 2 (P) mod Z N.
The monodromy So as +2 we have the monodromies e i e i e 2 i w 2 /N and e i ’ e i ’ e 2 i (w 2 +1 ) /N. The states | > and | ’> = T( )| > transform as | > = e i | >, | > = e i | > | ’> = e i | ’>, | ’> = e i ’| ’>. Here e i N = e i (w 2 mod N) and e i ’ N = e i (w 2 +1 mod N). It follows that T( ) T( ) W( ), where W( ) transforms in the same way as the Wilson operator, i.e. W( ) -1 = e 2 i/N W( ). Q.E.D.